1. T5F a warrant be Uirertcn to tljCBafficis of a jfrancrjife to txt- c» &4tn
1 CUte a WXit, tfie Kettim or one of the Baylies in the Name of PM/; *■£
Both 10 Utftt'CKtlt* €*♦ 39- €U 15. £L Uetineeit Palmer and Marjh. ter s c buC
]9erCurtanu , <. s p - does
' 2. j;fai©ntljeejccutetibpaS!jertff, antJ before Return t^cteof, not appear.
a New' Sheriff is elected, he ought to return the Writ, ailt> ttOt tl)C OlD
€>ijerffi ; OSecaure tijcBeto ©tjertff 10 nolo t&eOTcet of tlje Court*
%x, 39- Cl'B-E* Per Curiam* ^ ,^ ,„
3 Annuity by the Biff op of D. againft J. N. the Sheriff return djguod Cle-
ric us eft beneficiatas in dimes, de D. non habens Laicum Feodum ; and Ve-
nire facias Clericum iffuedto the Metropolitan inafmuch as the Biff op was
Party i For where it appears by the Return that the Bifhop or Sheriff is
Parry, there they fhall not ferve their own Procefs,quod nota. Br. Re-
torn de Briefs, pi. n 8. cites 34 H. 6. 29. .,-'., T , „ .*
4. Original return'd by one Not Sheriff' is irregular, but fuch Irregu- 1 he y^'ff
laritv mult be complain'd of the fame Term, and if Defendant appears â„¢%^â„¢
and does not challenge the Original, it is an admitting it. 1 Salic. 295. ma d e by a-
Andrews v. Lynton. notherPer-
fon in his
Name, the fame linn. Per Holt 12 Mod. 302. in the Cafe of the King v. the Borough of Abingdon.
(D. z) By whom to be made. Where there are
Joint Officers.
I. TXT HEN Venire facias iff lies to the Coroners where there area,, there Br. Rerani
V V the Return lha11 not be b y 2 onl >'> but b y a11 the 4- Br - office 11 *"§*
& Off. pi. 22. cites 31 A if 20. S.C. — If
Writ be directed generally Coronatoribus, and nor Nominatim to fuch and fuch, if one dies, and the
Z z Stir-
178 Return.
Survivors return the Wrir, ir is i;ood ; For the Survivors are Coroners. Per Yclverton J. Bulf.
219. Pafch. 9 Jac. in the Call- ofOrd v. Morton.
Where 2. And when fuch ^'ric ifTues to London or Fork, wfrich has 2 Sheriffs^
Writ tflues t h e Return lhall be in the Name of Both, and yet it is uiual for one oftk&A
" !cri $ foferv* the Wrk, and this is the Serving oi both ; but when it lhall be-
wterelhey return'd, it lhall be in the Name of both. Br. Office & Off. pi. 22. cites
have z She- 31 Ail! 2 0.
litis, and the
f „ e ,<•,• J W* on/y, this is not good, tho' the other be dead , For there are not Snenffs. Br. Retorn
dc Briefs, pi. 42. cites 14 H. 4. 54.
Br. office 3. In EjetJment of Ward they were at IJpte upon a Deed of Darefs of
« Off pi. 11. l m prifonment, and becaufethe Plaintiff was Sheriff, Venire facias ifued to
B^Repka. the Coroners, and 4 return' d the Writ, and at the Habeas Corpora 3 ret urn 'rf
dcr, pi'. 13. the Writ, and Exception taken ; and upon Argument, becauie it appeared
cites S. C. the Jury was ready Hank, held this is a good Return, becaufe the \th
was dead at the Time&c. and alfo the Plural Number Coronatoribus is
obferv'd. Br. Retorn de Briefs, pi. 42. cites 14 H. 4. 34.
And one 4. And alio by Hank one Coroner may adjudge the Outlawry upon E.\>-
onlymay „ enL jg r Retorn de Briefs, pi. 42. cites 14 H. 4. 34.
fit upon 1 tew ,
oj the Body of a Man killed. Ibid. — And one only may refunwions an Appeal. Ibid. But thofe Acts
they do )Udicially, and as Judges, bur the Return they make as Minifters, and therefore there lc.nis
to be a Diverlity; quxre. Ibid.
Br. Office et 5. Writ ifued to the Coroners of theCounty ofS. to arrefi W. N. and J. N.
CW s' c— °" e °f the Com,ers of che Count v aforefaid ret urn 'd tie Writ in his own
Br^Refcous Name only viz. That he had made Precept to M. his Servant to take him,
pi. 15. cites' and he took him, and Refcous was made by f. C. and K. upon which At-
S. C. but tachment ilfued againlt them, and they were taken, and the Attachment
not S. P. return'^ . an d a t ter it was awarded, that the Refcuers lhall go to the
Fleet. But by the Reporter this is as upon a Suggertion made to the
Court, and not as upon the Return ; For it is agreed that the Return is
not good, quod nota. Br. Retorn de Briefs, pi. 66. cites 39 H. 6.40.
z Show. 168. 6. A Record was before 2 Jufiices of the Grand Sejjions in Wales, and it
pi. 162. S.C. was return d by one only, without ficwing that the other was dead, and this
but S. P. j^^g exceptec i t0j j t M as anfwer'd, That they are Jufiices by Patent, and
a Ja ito" 5, that the Record was as much before the one as the other, and therefore
S.'c'but not well enough. Skin. n. Mich. 33 Car. 2. Morgan v. Vaughan.
S. P.
Raym.456. S. C. but notS. P.
(E) How it may be. Not agahifi the Return before.
The Return I. Tjf t!)C 8>i)Criff returns upon the Venire filCl'ag 12 Jurors, he cannot
of the Nihil A upon the Diltrin^as return that one has nothing, bCCtltlft It 10 3-
â„¢ s b y.? caitiff tlje firft Return ; for if tc Dan at m firft Return W Dc W
S'and aticnen, pet it ti cljarijcablc witO tijc Iffues 19 £>♦ *• 38.
riamhe was'amere'd ; For he muftenfue the firft Return. For if any W has *tf ^jf"*' "jjf
the juror has Eftate conditional, and the Condition is perform'*, and the W^hfi*** ^ :/ â„¢
Cafeithe Sheriff oueht to return the Special Matter, and conclude, and lo Nihil habet, and it he was
icverfufficient, be-all have ABion IfDefeei, again* hjs Prcdeceffor. Br. Retorn de W, pi. 4*
cites 19 H. 6. A But Fort and Markham agreed, That ,f the Defendant be return d j.^.t and
S 1m this is weltj For the Party, may have Capias and Exigent, again} bin, ; ««»«**â–
juror. Br. Retorn de Briefs, pi. 49- cites .9 H. 6. 38 — Br. Action fur le Cafe, pi. ft. cites £>. U
2. S»
•5-
Return. 179
2* So \)t cannot return upon tlje Diffringas, quod mandavk BaiUvo The sheriff
as to one Juror, qui nullum Reiponfum dedit, (Jt feCUlgS l3£CaUfC It 10 w as l? c t C£li
againtt tlje otijer Return.) 19^6. 48* fiR*
returned ufoii
a Difivinvas Juratores, All dif.rained except one, and as to him, Quod mandavit BaiUvo &c qui nullum
dedit Refponfttm; For if he may be permitted to return ib, then he may make fuch another Return
another Time, and infinite Delay, ana therefore Brooke fays, It fee'ms that in this Cafe he ought to have
entered the Franchtfe and ferved the (frit himfclf for the Default of the Bailiff in not anfivering. Br. Re-
torn de Briefs, pi. 50. cites 19 H. 6. 4S 6c 67.
3, But if tljC Land I)£ recovered by Elder Tide in the mefne Time [)£ Br. Retorn
mag return it untlj concluding, And fo Nihil habec. 19 1> + 6, 3 8 + &. p d , e Jj^
4» So if tij£ JUrOr ijaO tljC Land Pur auter Vie, and Ceity que Vie is & C & P '
dead in the mean Time between the Returns. 19 ft), 6. 39.
5. So tf IjC ijaO LanD in Right of the Feme, ailO UJC l<3 OCaO tit tljC Tho* fte be
mean Juliet 19^6.39. dead «*&,**
Jjjue. at.
Retorn de Brief, pi. 49. cites S. C.
6. At the Grand Diftrefs Sicut alias, 0t Pluries, tljC %\)ttiW Cannot He ™ ft «-
return without Caufe, That the Party had nothing by which Ije UUijljt MtaM -
fee OU'ttaineO, where he had returned before itl attOtljet ltDrit, That he wher e r tn c
was diitntined by fo much $t* 2.2 3fl"» 80. "But gCUlaetC* Party was
return'd
fummoncd before. Qujere. Br. Retorn de Brief, pi. no. cites S. C.
7. But with Caufe fufficient \)t ma? tettint It 22 M> 80.
8. As tlje Sljentf map return Quod Nihil jjabet in OSaHtoa fua J 1 ' B F - et f ort f
prater exitus iuos prius lorisfacfos. 22 3Uâ„¢* 80. uocitcsSC;
9. In Precipe quod reddat the 'tenant vouch' d, and the Sheriff' returned
the Vouchee fummoned, and alter at the Grand Cape he returned that he had
nothing by which he might be fummoned, neither Lands orTenements which
might be taken into the Hands of the King j and it was adjudged a good
Return. Br. Retorn de Briers, pi. 7. cites 9 H. 6. 41.
10. Where the Bailiff makes in fufficient Return, the Sheriff may return,
Quod nullum dedtt Refpondit ; For inefficient Anfwer is as no Anfwer. Per
Cur. Br. Retorn de Briefs 3 pi. 89. cites 5 H. 7. 27.
(F) In what Cafes the Succeffor Sheriff fhall be bound by
the Predecejjor.
I
r jF tlje PredecelTor returns upon a Venire 12 Jurors, tlje Succefibr
jL upon the Diitringas cannot return, That One Juror nihil habet ;
for if Ijeljao at tlje Ecturn of tlje centre facias, tlje fame nana is
pet cljanjcabie uutlj tlje gffues tijo' Ijc ijas altenco it, ano tte <8>uc=
ccffirc fljall be uouno op t(je Eeturn of tlje Jpreoecefibr tljat Ije Ijao at * Br Retom
tlje ©Clint faCiaS ; SlltO tf tljtS be falfe he may have * Writ ol Difceit de Brief, pi.
againlt the Sherirf. 19 $}♦ 6. 38. Curia* 49-cuesS.C.
2. Sotljc Succeffor cannot return tlje tDuTrmojas as to one Juror, see ce) p u
Quod mandavi Ballivo talis Libertatis qui nullum Reiponfum dedit. 19
I), 6. 38. fc
(G) lf r hen
— —»BI**~I~ â– - ■— -' — â–
1 80 Return.
(G) JJ r hat ihall be a good Return aga'infl the Admittance
of the Party.
I.11PON ait Habere facias Seifinam MIOU a ItttigmCUt asainft
Ui J. h. it tu no booh Return tor tOc Sljeriff to return, "That
J. S. had nothing in the Land, nor was Tenant. 17 ({j. 3. 66. tU
2- lit flit 3Ctldn Of Debt againft an Heir, if theDclendant pleads,That
nothing descended to him but an Houfe in B. UpOU tUijll!) judgment is'
given tor the Plaintiff, aUU CUtM tgUOratUr Of Ulijat X)MiVZti)C fpOU'C
UttSS, Writ ifTttCg tO tlje @>ijenff to make Enquiry of the Value, and
to make Execution accordingly ; aUO tl)C <§)!jeri{f returns, That the
Houfe was fold Uj> ti)e DefeitOatlt before the Writ came to him ; ti}!3
is not a gooo Return* p. 7 3ia» 15* between Goifon ana Bennett
per Curiam*
Godb. 17S. 3. Jf in an ^CtiOn Of Debt againft an Executor tfjC Defendant con-
P'fjo-Mich. f e fle S t h e Action, bV lUljtCl) a Fieri facias ilfues, the ©IjClirT 1113? rCtUin
|£ c - b „„ ot Nulla Bona $c. Jf or tljiis ffaifoies tuitlj rue Jutujment iitafmuctj as ije
si p conteiTes tlje action, but not tljat ije W 00000* DuWtatur* 33. 8.
3 a* 15* bCttiJCCn Newman ailO Babmgton.
And in T«/- 4. D<^>/ againft Executors, who pleaded Plene Adminiftravit ; And it
?•'/■' j" ^- l f was found that they had Affets ; by which the Fieri facias ijfued to levy the
l
that there is Libertatis de K. qui mihi refpondit, Jguod Exec, non habent aliqu.i bona
fucbaVUl, Teftatoris, which was contrary to the Verditl. Keble faid, Yet the Return
yet at the is good ; For Verdicl between Party and Party mail not conclude the She-
£5J£jr riff: And if the Party will conlefs, yet the Sheriff lhall not be by this
may return, concluded. Br. Retorn de Briefs, pi. 87. cites 3 H. 7. 12.
That there is
no fttch till in the fame County. Ibid. But Curia econtra, and that he cannot return that which is
contrary to the Verdift or Confeffion ; and in iiich Cafe the Sheriff may return Devaftavemnt. Ibid. — â–
S. P. Per Cur. That the Return is not good Br. Retorn de Briefs, pi. S9. cites 5 H. 7. 27.- . For
Per Wood, In Replevin it is no Return, That be has no fttch Beafts ; but may return, Quod averia font
elon/rata, or Quod nitlhts venit ex Parte tfuerentis ad demonftranda averia. Ibid. And in IVrit ad De-
liberand. in Detinue, it is no Plea, That there are nofucb Goods. Ibid. And in Hal eve facias fef
it is no Return, That Ko Jttch Land; For upon fuch Return the Plaintiff cannot have due Execution.
Jbid. And in the Principal Cafe he might have returned. Quod Exec, devaftaverunt Bona, or ea elet
verunt ; And all the firft Procefs was lerved by the Sheriff, without returning Mandavi ballivo, and
the Sheriff might have returned Execution againft the Executors u^on another Record of later Time ;
And Per Cur. The Return is not good. Ibid.
(G. 2) Return of f\/kil. hi what Cafes it is Peremptory.
It is the 1. TN Scire Facias by Executors, upon Recovery of Damages by their c tefta-
Courfe in J^ tor, the Defendant was return'd Nihil, and the Plaintiffs had
C..B. tha F ln Execution by Award. And fo note, upon a Judgment the Plaintiff
Scire facias ^,, j iay£ E xecut { on upon t he fan ]\ j n il return'd. Br. Scire facias, pi.
tipon Recovery _ r , r
of Debt, 96. cites 21 E. 3. 13.
tfrefpafs, Of
Annuity at the firft Nihil return'd, the Plaintiff lhall have Execution, PefBrian. Br. Scire facias,pl.[
cites 2 HL 7. 5' — " ln Scire facias upon a Recovery of Debt or Damages, the tirlt Return of Nihil againft
the Defendant isPercmptory, if he makes Default. Br. Peremptory, p!. 63. cites 24 H. S.
Br Scire 2. In Account, the Defendant was Outlaid, and got Pardon, and hai
Facias, pi. Scire facias againft the Plaintiff, who was return'd Nihil ^ and the Par-
don
Return. i $ i
don was allozvd upon a Nihil return'd, and he went quit. Br. Retorn 9 8 - cites 21
de Briefs, pi. 109. cites 21 E. 3. E. j. 20.
3. * But by 40 E. 3. Sicut alias fhall ijftie, and the like 19 E. 3. Ibid, scire ft~ —
upon Charter
â– of Pardon by the Defendant, who is Out!. zta'd againft the Plaintiff, if the Sheriff" returns Nihil, and upon
the Mas fiwititer, this is peremptory, and the Charter fiiall be allowed, if the Plaintiff does not come.
Br. Peremptory, pi. 65. cites 4S E J.I.J. Br. Averment contra &c. pi. (J. cites S. C. S P
Br Scire facias, pi. 192. cites 22 H. 6. 7 'Two Nibili returned upon Scire facias upon Charter of Par don 1,
countervails Scire feci. Br. Retorn de Briefs, pi. lot. cites 1 1 H. 6. 3.- '-* Orig.is(Tantum')
4. Where it is return'd, That a Veior Nihil habet &c. fcil. where
Procefs is made againft the Veior to tefiify the View in the firft Recovery < or
if Procefs lhall be made againft a Witnefs to tcftify the making of the
Deed in which he is Witnefs, if it (hall be return'd Nihil habet dec. and
teftatum eft that they have in a Foreign County, the AfTife mall not Hay, nor
Procefs ihyll not be made in the Foreign County, but the Trial lhall pro-
ceed by the Jury ; quod nota. Br. Procefs, pi. 99. cites 29 Alf. 70.
5 Three Nihi Is return'd in Ven.fac. upon an Audita Querela is peremp-
tory, and the Defendant who brought the Audita Querela fhall go quit.
Br. Peremptory, pi. 65. cites 48 E. 3. 1. 3.
6. In Appeal of Death the Defendant remov'd it oat of the County by Writ
to the Sheriff and Coroners, to fend it into B. R. who fent the Record ; and
becaufe the Plaintiff was line Die before the Sheriff and Coroners, Scire
facias ifftud againft the Plaintiff, to maintain the Appeal if he would, re-
turnable Quind. Hill, and the Sheriff return'd Nihil, by which Stent
alias fined, and the Sheriff return'd Nihil, and Planes ijfued. And fo
fee the firft Nihil there is not Peremptory. Br. Peremptory, pi. 63. cites
48 Alf. 3.
7. In Covenant to levy a Fine, the Sheriff ret urn'' 'd Nihil; and it was
faid that it was ill, becaufe he may fummons him in the Land in the Writ
of which the Fine fhall be levied ; Quod quaere, becaufe it may be thai he
is not_ thereof Tenant, & iicut Alias fhall ifiue without Amercement of the
Sheriff. Br. Retorn de Briefs, pi. 122. cites 10H. 6. 12.
8. In .&>uare hnpedit the Sheriff return d Nihil upon the Summons, and
iipon the Attachment, and upon thcDiftrefs: And per Danby, Pafton, New-
ton, Cott. and Gcdred, the Plaintiff lhall recover by the Intendment
oi the Statute i but contra Marten and Strange of Nihil return'd in Quare
Impedit. Br. Retorn de Briefs, pi. 101 cites 11 H. 6. 3.
9. And upon Nihil return'd in Aftife, the Alhfe fhall be taken. Br.
Retorn de Briefs, pi. 101. cites uH. 6. 3.
10. And Executor who firft comes at the id Capias, fhall anfwer. Br.
Retorn de Briefs, pi. 101. cites n H. 6. 3.
n. And per Marten, If the Sheriff returns Nihil in Writ of Mefne, yet
Procefs of Forejudger lhall be. Br. Retorn de Briefs, pi. 101. cites 11
H. 6. 3.
12. And per Danby, If Nihil be return'd in Writ of Ward, Writ of
Wafte, or in Writ of Admeafurcment of Dower, or of Pafture, the Plaintiff
fhall have fuch Judgment as if the Writs had been return'd ferv'd. Br.
Retorn de Briefs, pi. 10 1. cites 11 H. 6. 3.
13. In Detinue, the Defendant pray 'd Garnifloment, becaufe the Writings
were delivered to him upon Condition &c. the Sheriff returned Nihil upon
the Scire facias. And per Heufier Prothonotary, He ought to have Tefta-
tum in fuch County where the Garnilhee has been warn'd ; for the Plain*
tiff pall not have Livery of Writings upon the Return of one Nihil, as he
lhall have upon the Scire facias upon Charter of Pardon after Outlawry ; for
there the Plaintiff may have a new Original, but the Garnilhee lhall not
have A£tion, and 10 fimiliter here if Judgment pals againft him of the
fame Thing • Quaere ; for non Adjudicatur. Br. Scire facias, pi. 234.
cites 11 H. 6. 51.
14. If a Man comes by Capias Utlagatum, and pleads in Reverfal of the
Outlawry, and Scire facias ijfues againd the Plaint iff to maintain the Out T
A a a la wry,
i $ 2 Return.
Wry and be is return d Nihil, and the like at the Alias Scire facias', the
Outlawry ihall be revers'd, if none ior the King maintain it, and if the!
King's Attorney will contefs the Exception, the Outlawry ihall be re-*
vers'd immediately. Br. Scire facias, pi. 192. cites 22 H. 6. 7-
15. In Error, if the Plaintiff be Nouftited after the 7 ear, the Plaintiff
in the (irfl Aft ion pall have Scire jacias, and the Defendant ought to be
warn'd, or two Nihils return'd before Execution ihall be awarded. Br.
Scire facias, pi. 174. cites 5 E. 4. 6.
(H) JPbat fliall be good Exc/tfe of the \j/oi\ doing of
the Command. Default of the Party.
Roll Pep. 1. "I "1 PON atl Habere facias feifinam (t & a p05 ECttttn tO Z&
si. pi. 11. II cufc tfje S&iKtUT that he was alva?a ready tO tieUllCr @)Ctfm,
tr 1 * and appointed divers Times in certain fct tlje parttf tO COttlC tO tf)C
SC but' lanH, aitH rCCCfoe Seifilt, at which Time he himfelt was ready tO DC>
rotS P.- ItUCf S>CiUtt, but none came fot tlje Partp tO tCCClUC it* 1?. 15 3*
ibid. 200 ^ j^ f/oy^ *u jB«a&i/7. pec Curiam*
1! T^Tr. S.C but not S. P.— Ibid. 5" p' i» Hill.i, Jac. B. R S C. but not S. P. — Ibid.
^0 pi. 8. Mich. 14 Jac. B. R. S. C. but not S. P. Bndgm. 56. S.C. but notS.P.
Goods « re 2 v nn Execution, ftil. a Fieri facias, if t!jC SIjCtUT tetUTtld
Keriff's that he took certain Bealts Of tl)C part}) to fell for tljCDCbt, and J. S.
Bailiff by refcued them ftOUt tint, tty$ IS ItUt a SOOD CrCUfC Of tljC €>&Cnff tt
warrant b0mK up0lt execution, in tlje fceuine; of toijtclj lie Das Poiie Co-
? a ^{f:mitaIos ©♦ 15. Ja.os.K. *r^'£Cafe. per Curiam atnuogefl
shcrift« tljat tijcEetttrn tss inrnffictcnt*
turned that
refcueeffrom the Bailiff by A. contra Voluntatem of the Bailiff. Richardfon, Hutton, and Henden held
that no Refcouscan be on a Fi. fac. for that lies only on a Capias againft the PeiTon himfelf ; but that
the Party injured may have an JSioA on the Cafe ; But Yelverton contra. Het. 145 Trm. 5 Car. C. B.
The Sheriff of Surry v. Alderton. So where the Defendants were profecuted in the Crown-Office for a
Refcue of a Coach and Harnefs returned upon a Fieri facias, and upon Appearance of the Parties the
Return was quaftVd, and they difcharged, becaufe not "ood on a Fieri facias. Show. 1 So. Mich. 2 W.
&M t'eKingv Bill Seal. It was moved to quafh the Return of a Refcous upon a Fati facias a»
a bad V eturn, and a Rule was made to fhew Cuife. Barns's Notes 304 The King v Baldwin & aft
On Rule to fhew Caufe, why an Information fhould not be granted againft the Defendants for a
Refcue Probyn J. Paid, That the Refcue ought to be returned, before this Court will do any Thing m
if but the Counfel informed them, that this was a Refcue of Gods upon a IVrit of Execution, for which
Reafbn the Sheriff ought to have maintained his Poileffion, and cannot return a Rdcu.:. Accordingly
the Court made the Rule abfolute as to Panfton, and difcharged it as to the others. (Ch. Juft. abfent)
2Barn.Rep. inB.R. 5S. Mich. 5 Geo. 2. 1:31. Deemes v , Pafton 8c al.
(I) Not good, for not Excnfing all the Time of the
Command.
See(H) P l.i. 1. TJT upon ail Habere facias feifinam t!jCSIjCrifFretnnt!8, That he
S.C \ was ready at the Place IrjljClt (JC* inch a Day tO btiit tJCiibetCD
infill, and gave Notice to the Party, tljat IjC fljOUlD LlC tljCrC at tlje
DaP tO aCCCpt tt, and none came for fotlll at tljC Dap ; '(STijlg IS ItOt a
(tCOO HCtUtlt without excuiing himlelf for the Time alter the i>«yj
jot ijc mtoljt tjaue Done tt after tlje Dap before tlje Return,
p. 15. 3ia* T&* E. Wyd and Bethiii. per curiam.
2. So
■«i i . -Ti'-irF-
Return. 1 8 2
2. So in tl)CCatC afOreflltQ he ought to excufe himfelf of the Time See (H) pl.t,
betore the Day aforefiid, OtljertUife tljC JRetttrit IS ItOt gOOH; JFOt $tt'
Ijspsilje M& rcqtteffea before, nnD tooulo not perform it. p. 15 Ja»
15> E. tieyd and BetbUi, per Crofee ano ipomxnton atxamff S9otmta=
mieanoDonertoKCi ifor tljep fatotljat tlje "j&fjcriff cannot t\\mn
atteno* Duo*
(I. 2) JVrlt notfervd, Excufe. What.
'N Native Habendo, the Sheriff of London rerurn'd, TTtat ff 4 &â– Cfttefcsj
_^ JP///W* «We/>/ ZWo» ^y * /l^r and a Day, he jhall not be drawn f: 2 >- chcs
out â– and the belt Opinion was that it is a good Return. Br. Retorn de %t'~\, nrt
de Briefs, pi. 46. cues 7 H. 6. 32. and 8 H. 6. 3. fflliiS
ilj£ J-)pj €72—
font is frank and of a frank Eft ate ; For this is for the Party himfelf to return. Br. Retorn de Briefs,
PI 46 utes 7 H. 6. 52 and S H 6. 3 — ■/^ a Man/;.,// only return „« Impediment which interrupts him*
but he cannot return that which is the Matterof the Defendant. Ibid.
2. And Return, That Attaint does ma lie in London is good. Br. Re- Rr - Cuftoms t
torn de Brieis, pi. 46. cites 7 H. 6. 32 and 8 H. 6. 3. P 1 - 2 v cites
3. And that if Wth iffue to the Sheriff of Chcjler that it is a good Re- S ' C *
ftw« afea* they have County Palatine and Writ of the King within themf elves,
and that Time out of Mind Writ of the Ring was not ferv'd there, by
which they cannot ferve the Writ. Br. Retorn de Brieis, pi. 46. cites
•7 H. 6. 32. and 8 H. 6. 3.
4. And in Replevin it is a good Return that the Defendant claims Pro-
perty. Br. Retorn de Briefs, pi. 46. cites 7 H. 6 32 and 8 H. 6. 3.
5. And it is a good Return in feveral Writs, Quod Mandavi Ballivo;
and yet in thofe Cafes the Writ is notfervcrd, but it is an Excufe for why
the Sheriff ihall not ferve it. Br. Retorn de Briefs, pi. 46. cites 7 H. 6.
32 and 8 H. 6. 3.
6. And in Writ of Habere facias fei/fnam it is a good Return that at
the Day of the Writ purchafed, and the Day of the Judgment, and always
after he himfelf was Tenant, fo that he could ferve the Writ if he did not do a
Ton to himfelf; by diverie. Br. Retorn de Briefs, pi. 46. cites 7 H. 6
32. and 8 H. 8. 3. '
7. And it is a good Return upon a Capias that the Party committed
Felony and took to the Church, which Privilege he cannot break, and yet the
Writ is Capias ii inventus fueritinBallivatua. Br. Retorn de Briefs, pi.
46. cites 7 H. 6. 32 and 8 H. 6. 3.
8. It is no good Return for the Sheriff, That the Party would not give So where U
bis Cofis or Fee, and therefore he did not execute the Writ. Br. Retorn is written to
de Briefs, pi. 10. cites 34 H. 6. the B 'M *«
' r °^ certify Ala-
Baftardy, Contra upon Inquiry Dejure Patnnatus ; For there he is Judge and not Minifter ; noteThe'nJ'
verfity. Br. Ibid.— Br. Fees, pi. 1. cites 34 H. 6. 38 S. C.
9. Where an Attachment for Contempt if ties Againfl the Mayor of W. be-
taufe be did not return a Certiorari, nor the Alias, nor the Pluries, and he
is taken, and comes in Ward, he may traverfe that no Writ was delivered
to him Prout &c. Quod iuit conceffum. Br. Traverfe per &c. pi. 206,
cites 2 E. 4. r.
(K) What
184.
Return.
^^p 1 '; (K.) What fhali be a Good Return. XInrefpcttof
vin(0. l) v > l jr J
the /Fords.]
This wis in i. T jf il U2>rit bC Scire facias per Probos & Legales Homines, aitO fjC
the Return returns Quod Scire lecit by fuch an one and fuch an one, JlflO
Cf nt a and' h " HOCjS not fay Probos & Legales Homines, J>Ct tt IS £000. 8 fi) t 6.
Exception 27 t3*
but non allocatur. And it is not material where the Defendant appears. Br. Retorn de Brief, pi. 48.
cites 8 H. 6. z-. _ , _ _
ȣ;< Sec and the
material when
that they tvere Ontlaiv'd, fa
Breve exigit &c. it (hall not
be*ii)tendedtobc Probi Homines. Br. Retorn de Briefs, pi. 12. cites 53 H 6. 31.
Cites o n. o. - . •
In St ire facias the Sheriff return d the Writ fen 'd,
Defendant tookExcepthnbecaiife it did not fay Probos &> Legates Homines. PerPrifot, It is not ire