Electronic library


read the book
eBooksRead.com books search new books russian e-books
Gary L Ingman.

Lower Clark Fork River water quality monitoring, 1984-1985 : data report (Volume 1)

. (page 46 of 49)

predominately pool-riffle character. The results seem fairly
reasonable. The reach with the most c han ne I -con t r o I character
should probably be the Forest Grove to LaVista; the fact that A
exceeds 1.0 and B is negative for this reach indicates that the
river may flow abnormally fast through this stretch. The reach
With the most pool-riffle character would certainly be Petty Or
to Forest Grove, which includes Alberton Gorge.

The values for A and B were rounded off to the common fractions
which are shown in the "Used" columns. The determination of
travel-times at other flows was done by the following procedure

1. divide the river from below Milltown to above Thompson
Falls into reaches;

2. determine the flow at USGS gauge below Missoula;

3. estimate the flow for the other reaches;

4. calculate V and V for each reach followed by

estimates of V using Tne equations given above;
m

5. using the estimates of V calculate the travel time for
each reach and keep a cumulative total.



543



Appendix A. Continued



The table below gives
measured atyy^USGS stat



the final results for three flows as
on be I ow Missoula.



Station (upper






Slope




1 500 c


f s


3000 c


f s


4000 c<


1

s


end of reach)


Mile


Ft /Mi


MPH


Hou r


MPH


Hour


MPH


Hou r


Bel M i 1 1 t own







9.2


1


. 6







2







2 . 1








Abv Missoula


4




II




II


2


5


•■


2





II


1


9


Missoula STP


7


5


II




II


4


7


II


3


8


II


3


t


Shuf f i e 1 ds


9




II




II


5


6


II


4


5


11


4


3


B i t t e r r oo t R


1 1 .


5


5.6




. 8


7


2


2 .2


5


8


2 . 3


5


5


Harper Bridge


20




5 . 7




.8


1 1


9


2.2


9


5


2 . 3


9


1


Champ i on


23 .


6


5.6




.8


13


9


2 .2


1 1


1


2 . 3


10 .


6


Hu son


32




2.5




. 4


18


6


1 . 7


15





1 . 9


1 4 .


3


N i nem i 1 e


38




4 .




. 7


22


9


2.0


18


5


2 . 2


1 7 .


b


Abv Alberton


43




10.3




. 5


25


8


1 . 9


2 1





2 . 1


19 .


7


Ta r k i


62




3.9




. 3


38


5


2 .2


31





2 . 3


28


8


Lozeau


71




3.0




. 8


45


1


2 .0


35


1


2 . 2


32


7


Super i r


81




5. 3




. 9


51





2.2


40


1


2 . 4


37


2


St Reg i s


97




5 . 4




. 8


59


4


2 . 1


47


3


2 .3


43


9


Abv F 1 at head


120




3. 5


2


. 4


72


2


2 . 7


58


3


2 . 9


53


9


Plains


130




2.3


2


. 1


76


4


2 . 4


62





2 . 6


57


4


Abv T Falls


145










83


5




68


5




63


1



For the synoptic sampling runs the "Hour" column in the above
table was used to determine when to sample at each station,
"window" of + or - 5% of the cumulative hour was allowed,
example, at 3000 cfs the sampling schedule allowed for the
station at Superior to be sampled anytime from 38.1 to 42.1
hours after the start of the sampling run below Milltown.
Although an attempt was being made to track a slug of water,
actuality the slug disperses greatly as it moves downstream
This was noted in the dye-study and justifies the + or - 5%
w i n dow .



A
For



I n



544



Appendix A. Continued



REFERENCES :

Boning, Charles W., Generalization of Stream Travel Rates and
Dispersion Characteristics from T i me-o f -T r a ve I Measurements:
Jour. Research U.S. Geol. Survey, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 495-9 CJuly
- Aug . , 1974).

Hubbard, E. P., F. A. Kilpatrick, L. A. Martens, and J. F.
Wilson, Jr., Measurement of Time of Travel and Dispersion in
Streams by Dye Tracing: U.S. Geol. Survey Techniques of
Wa t e r -Re sou r c e 5 Investigations, Book 3, Chap. A9 , 44 p.



545



APPENDIX B



Montana Department of Health
and Environmental Sciences



QUALITY ASSURANCE LIMITS



Chemistry
Laboratory





PRE


:CISI0N






RANGE




LIMIT


PARAMETER


(mg/1)


(^


â–  or -)


ACIDITY








EPA 305.1


10 - 1000




10


ALKALINITY


10 - 70




2.0


EPA 310.2


70 - 200




3.0




200 - 300




5.0




300 - 500




10.


ALUMINUM










.1 - .6




.27


EPA 202.1


.6 - 1.2




.39



ACCURACY PET. LIMIT

WARNING ACCEPTANCE
LIMITS LIMITS
(% Recovery) (% Recovery) (mg/l J



NOT AVAILABLE



NOT AVAILABLE



80 - 123



6j - 134



10.0



10.0



0.1



EPA 200.7



INSUFFICIENT DATA BASE



90 - 110



85 - 115



0.3



ANTIMONY



EPA 204.1


.2 - 15.0 .2


90 -


110


85 -


115


0.2


EPA 200.7


INSUFFICIENT DATA BASE


90 -


no


85 -


115


.04


ARSENIC


.001 - .005 .002










0.0


Automated


.005 - .020 .003


93 -


125


85 -


133




Gaseous Hydride


.020 - .100 .005












EPA 200.7


INSUFFICIENT DATA BASE


90 -


110


85


115


.05


BARIUM


0.1 - 0.5 .10










0.1


EPA 208.1


.5 - 1.5 .20
1.5-5.0 .50


84 -


107


79 -


112




EPA 200.7


.Op5 - 0.50 .003


93 -

cut


107


89 -


111

Sect. 2.2
Page 1 of 9
MDHES
Rev. 7/85


.0



Appendix B. Continued



PARAMETER



PRECISION



RANGE
(mg/l)



LIMIT
(+ or -)



ACCURACY PET. LIMIT

WARNING ACCEPTANCE
LIMITS LIMITS
(% Recovery) {% Recovery) (mg/1)



BERYLLIUM

EPA 210.1
EPA 200.7



.005 - .050 .002
.050 - .250 .004
INSUFFICIENT DATA BASE



90 - 110



90 - 110



85 - 115



85 - 115



.005
.001



BIOCHEMICAL
OXYGEN DEMAND

EPA 405.1



2-10
10 - 45
45 - 100
100 - 200



2

7

15

30



NOT AVAILABLE



2.0



BORON
EPA 212.3

EPA 200.7

CADMIUM
EPA 213.1

EPA 200.7

CALCIUM
EPA 215.1

EPA 200.7



CHEMICAL
OXYGEN DEMAND

EPA 410.



I



0.10 - .50
.50 - .75
.75 - 1.0



,10

,29
,35



90 - 110



85 - 115



10



INSUFFICIENT DATA BASE



.005
.010
.020
.010



2.8

5.1

18.5

0.7

1.4



4.2
17.8



.001


- .02


.020


- .100


.100


- .50


.005


- .020


1.00


- 50.0


50.0


- 100.0


100 -


300


0.1 -


• 50.0


50.0


- 100.


5 - 50


50 -


500



90 - 110



90 - 109



92 - 113



87 - 110



89 - 108



90 - 110



85 - 115



86 - 113



87 - 118



81 - 115



84 - 113



85 - 115



547



Sect. 2.2
Page 2 of 9
MDHES
Rev. 7/85



.005



,005



.005



,01



0.10



5.0



Appendix B. Continued

PRECISION
RANGE LIMIT

PARAMETER (mg/1 ) (+ or -)



ACCURACY PET. LIMIT

WARNING ACCEPTANCE
LIMITS LIMITS
{% Recovery) (% Recovery) (mg/1)



CHLORIDE


1 - 5


.2


96 - 112


92 - 116


1.0


EPA 325.2


5 - 25
25 - 50
50 - 100


.4

1.4
2.6








CHROMIUM














.05 - .100


.03


79 - 141


64 - 156


.05


EPA 218.1


.100 - .500


.13








EPA 200.7


.02 - .10


.02


90 - 112


85 - 117


.02


CHROMIUM,












HEXAVALENT


.01 - .100


.05


90 - 110


85 - 115


.01



EPA 218.5



COBALT





.05 - 1.00 .05


90


- 110 85 -


115


EPA 219.1 ,


1.00 - 5.00 .10








EPA 200.7


INSUFFICIENT DATA BASE


90


-110 85 -


115


COLOR










EPA 110.1


INSUFFICIENT DATA BASE




NOT AVAILABLE




COPPER












.01 - .05 .01


94


- 115 88 -


121


EPA 220.1


.05 - .30 .02
.30 - 1.00 .03








EPA 200.7


.01 - .300 .010


85


- 112 78 -


119


CYANIDE











EPA 335.2



.001 - .100
.100 - .200
.200 - .500



.005
.017
.070



90 - 110



115 - 85



.05
.01

1.0

.01

.01

.001



548



Sect. 2.2
Page 3 of 9
MDHES
Rev. 7/85



Appendix B. Oontinued

PRECISION
RANGE LIMIT

PARAMETER (mg/1 ) (+ or -)



ACCURACY PET. LIMIT

WARNING ACCEPTANCE
LIMITS LIMITS
{% Recovery) (% Recovery) (mg/l )



FLUORIDE
















.05 -


.10


.02


92 - 106


89 - 110


.05


EPA 340.3


.10 -

1.00

1.50


1.00

- 1.50

- 2.00


.05
.07
.10








HARDNESS
















.05 -


15


1.1


87 - 110


82 - 114


.05


EPA 130.2


25 -
200 -
500 -


200
500
750


3.1
4.0
4.4








IRON
















.01 -


.20


.02


85 - 117


76 - 125


.01


EPA 236.1


.20 -
.50 -


.50
1.00


.03
.05








EPA 200.7


.01 -
.20 -
.50 -


.20
.50
1.0


.010
.020
.050


90 - 111


85 - 116


.01


LEAD
















.05 -


.10


.05


87 - 113


80 - 120


.05


EPA 239.1


.10 -


.50


.10








EPA 200.7


.05 -


.10


.05


82 - 116


74 - 124


.05


LITHIUM














ICP


INSUFFICIENT DATA


BASE


90 - 110


85 - 115


.005


MAGNESIUM
















1.0 -


20.0


2.1


87 - 111


81 - 117


.01


EPA 242.1


20. -
50: -


50.0
100


4.6
9.6









549



Sect. 2.2
Page 4 of 9
MDHES
Rev. 7/85



Appendix B. Continued

PRECISION
RANGE LIMIT

PARAMETER (mg/1) (+ or -)



ACCURACY DET. LIMIT

WARNING ACCEPTANCE
LIMITS LIMITS
(% Recovery) (% Recovery) (mg/l )



EPA 200.7


.50 - 20.0
20. - 100


.40

1.8


91 -


107


88 -


110


MANGANESE
















.01 - .04


.01


91 -


109


87 -


113


EPA 243.1


.04 - .70
.7 - 2.0


.05
.12










EPA 200.7


.005 - .700


.010


93 -


110


88 -


115


MERCURY
















.0002 - .0005


.0002


87 -


119


78 -


128


EPA 245.1


.0005 - .0100
.0100 - .0500


.0003
.0007










ICP


INSUFFICIENT DATA


BASE


90 -


110


85 -


115


MOLYBDENUM â– 
















.1 - 1.50


.10


90 -


110


85 -


115


EPA 246.1


1.50 - 7.50


.20










EPA 200.7


INSUFFICIENT DATA


BASE


90 -


110


85 -


115


NICKEL
















.05 - .20


.05


88 -


114


81 -


120


EPA 249.1


.20 - 1.0
1.0 - 5.0


.06
.12










EPA 200.7


INSUFFICIENT DATA


BASE


90 -


110


85 -


115


NITROGENS.














AMMONIA
















.01 - .10


.01


78 -


122


67 -


133


EPA 350.1


.10 - 1.0


.03











.01



.01
.005

.0002

.05

0,10
.01

.05

.02



,01



550



Sect. 2.2
Page 5 of 9
MDHES
Rev. 7/85



Appendix B. Continued

PRECISION
RANGE LIMIT

PARAMETER (nig/1 ) (+ or -)



ACCURACY PET. LIMIT

WARNING ACCEPTANCE
LIMITS LIMITS
(% Recovery) (% Recovery) (mg/1)



KJELDAHL








.10 -


1.0


EPA 351.2


1.0 -


10.


NITRATE +






NITRITE


.01 -


.10




.10 -


.50


EPA 353.2


.50 -


2.0




2.0 -


4.0



,22
,79



.01
.03
.05
.08



77 - 137



87 - 119



62 - 152



79 - 127



,10



.01



OIL & GREASE INSUFFICIENT DATA BASE
EPA 413.1



92 - 99



90 - 101



1.0



£H

EPA 150.1



1 - 14



.10



NOT AVAILABLE



x.xx



PHENOLICS



EPA 420.1



PHOSPHORUS :
ORTHU PHOSPHATE



EPA 365.1



.001 - .010


.003


90 - 110


85 - 115


.010 - .100


.010






.001 - .010


.003


88 - 110


83 - 115


.010 - .020


.006






.020 - .100


.007






.100 - 1.00


.01







,001



,001



TOTAL PHOSPHORUS



EPA 365.1



.001 - .020


.004


86 -


â–  119


77 â– 


â–  128


.020 - .10


.020










.10 - 1.00


.06











551



Sect. 2.2
Page 6 of 9
MDHES
Rev. 7/85



.001



Appendix B. Continued

PRECISION
RANGE LIMIT

PARAMETER (mg/1) (+ or -)



ACCURACY PET. LIMIT

WARNING ACCEPTANCE
LIMITS LIMITS
(% Recovery) (% Recovery) (mg/l )



POTASSIUM


















.2 - .5




.48


93 •


- 113


88 â– 


- 118


EPA 258.1


.5 - 2.5
2.5 - 6.0
6.0 - 15.0




.73
2.2
4.9










EPA 200.7


INSUFFICIENT


DATA


BASE


90 â– 


- 110


85 -


â–  115


NON FILTERAP'.E
















RESIDUE
(TSS)


7 - 20

20.0 - 50.0




3.5
7.0




NOT AVAILABLE




EPA 160.2


50.0 - 150.0
200 - 1000




13.0
34.0










SELENIUM


















.002 - .010




.002


79 -


• 115


70 -


124


Automated


.010 - .020




.004










Gaseous Hydride


.020 - .050
.050 - .100




.012
.015










EPA 200.7


INSUFFICIENT DATA BASE


90 -


110


85 -


115


SILICA
















(Si02)


2.0 - 5.0




.6


90 -


110


85 -


115


EPA 370.1


5.0 - 15.0
15. - 30.0




1.5
2.0










EPA 200.7


INSUFFICIENT


DATA


BASE


90 -


110


85 -


115


SILVER


















.01 - .05




.01


90 -


104


86 -


108


EPA 272.1


.05 - .50




INSUFFICIENT


DATA


BASE






EPA 200.7


.01 - .05




.03


82 -


105


76 -


111



.10



.2



,002



.08

2.0

.07

.01
.01



552



Sect. 2.2
Page 7 of 9
MDHES
Rev. 7/85



Appendix B. Continued

PRECISION
RANGE LIMIT

PARAMETER (mg/l ) (+ or -)



ACCURACY PET. LIMIT

WARNING ACCEPTANCE
LIMITS LIMITS
(% Recovery) (% Recovery) (mg/l)



SODIUM





1.0 - 15.0




1.0


88


- 108 83 -


113


Flame Emission


15.0 - 100




3.








S.M. 15th


100 - 300




10.








325B














EPA 200.7


INSUFFICIENT


DATA


BASE


90


- 110 85 -


115


SPECIFIC

CONDUCTANCE


.10-75
75 - 560




11.7
13.8




NOT AVAILABLE




EPA 120.1


560 - 870
870 - 1500




35.7
64.2








STRONTIUM















.10



.05



10



ICP



INSUFFICIENT DATA BASE



90 - 110



85 - 115



.001



SULFATE



EPA 375.2


1.0 •


- 15.0




1.0


87 â– 


- 110


82 -


115


(low level )


15.0


- 50.0




2.2










(high level)


20 -
80 -
130 â– 


80
130
- 300




4.1
5.9
15.3










SULFIDE


















EPA 376.1


INSUFFICIENT


DATA


BASE


85 -


â–  118


77 -


126


THALLIUM



















EPA 200.7



INSUFFICIENT DATA BASE



90 - 110



85 - 115



10.0



.20



,05



553



Sect. 2.2
Page 8 of 9
MDHES
Rev. 7/85



Appendix B. Continued

PRECISION
RANGE LIMIT

PARAMETER (mg/1 ) (+ or -)



ACCURACY PET. LIMIT

WARNING ACCEPTANCE
LIMITS LIMITS
(% Recovery) (% Recovery) (mg/l)



TIN





1.0 - 4.0




.80


90 -


110


EPA 282.2


4.0 - 60.0




1.50






ICP


INSUFFICIENT


DATA


BASE


90 -


110


TURBIUITY














.10 - 1.0




.2


NOT


AVAILABLE


EPA 180.1


1.0 - 10.0
10.0 - 40.0




.8
2.8






VANADIUM














.5 - 10.0




.3


90 -


110


EPA 286.1


10.0 - 50.0




.6






EPA 200.7


INSUFFICIENT


DATE


BASE


90 -


110



85 - 115



85 - 115



85

8b



115
115



.80
.03

.02



.2
.01



ZINC





.005 - .030


.004


EPA 289.1


.030 - .100


.010




.100 - .500


.015




.500 - 1.00


.050


EPA 200.7


.005 - .030


.013




.030 - .100


.039


KK/war-53







94 - 113



88 - 113



89 - 118



82 - 119



,005



.005



554



Sect. 2.2
Page 9 of 9
MDHES
Rev. 7/85



Appendix B. Quality Assurance Limits for Carbon Furnace Metals Analyses Performed by
Energy Labs, Inc.

Detection Limits



Metal



Detection Limit GUg/1)



Copper
Zinc
Lead
Cadmium



1

0.05
1
0.1



Metal and Concentration
Range Qug/l)*^"



Achieved Laboratory Precision *

Precision
(+ or - /ig/1)



Copper

25-100 (3)



2.4
5.4



Zinc

<.05-20 (4)
20-100 (7)



1.1
1.9



Lead

25-100 (1)



2.5
39



Cadmium

<.l-5 (19)
5-10 (0)



0.4



Metal**



Achieved Laboratory Accuracy*

Accuracy (%)



Copper (18)

Zinc (12)

Lead (18)

Cadmium (18)



]01±16
102±13
104±17
100±28



Laboratory precision and accuracy computed for 3 standard deviations (99% confidence)
using performing laboratory duplicate and spike sample analysis data and methods given
in the Handbook for Analytical Quality Control in Water and Wastewater Laboratories ,
Chapter 6, EPA-600/4-79-019, March, 1979, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio 45268.

Value in parenthesis following each element Is the actual number of paired duplicate or
spiked sample analyses from which the corresponding precision or accuracy was computed.



555



Appendix C. Water Sample Preservation and Handling Methods

(Source: "Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes",
EPA-600/4-79-020, Revised March 1983)



SAMPLE PRESERVATION



Complete and unequivocal preservation of samples, either domestic sewage, industrial wastes, or
natural waters, is a practical impossibility. Regardless of the nature of the sample, complete stability
for every constituent can never be achieved. At best, preservation techniques can only retard the
chemical and biological changes that inevitably continue after the sample is removed from the parent
source. The changes that take place in a sample are either chemical or biological. In the former case,
certain changes occur in the chemical structure of the constituents that are a function of physical
cc editions. Metal cations may precipitate as hydroxides or form complexes with other constituents;
cations or anions may change valence states under certain reducing or oxidizing conditions; other
constituents may dissolve or volatilize with the passage of time. Metal cations may also adsorb onto
surfaces (glass, plastic, quartz, etc.), such as, iron and lead. Biological changes taking place in a
sample may change the valence of an element or a radical to a different valence. Soluble constituents
may be converted to organically bound materials in cell structures, or cell lysis may result in release
of cellular material into solution. The well known nitrogen and phosphorus cycles are examples of
biological influence on sample composition. Therefore, as a general rule, it is best to analyze the
samples as soon as possible after collection. This is especially true when the analyte concentration is
expected to be in the low ug/1 range.

Methods of preservation are relatively Umited and are intended generally to (1) retard biological
action, (2) retard hydrolysis of chemical compounds and complexes, (3) reduce volatility of
constituents, and (4) reduce absorption effects. Preservation methods are generally limited to pH
control, chemical addition, refrigeration, and freezing.

The recommended preservative for various constituents is given in Table 1 . These choices are based
on the accompanying references and on information supplied by various Quality Assurance
Coordinators. As more data become available, these recommended holding times will be adjusted to
reflect new information. Other information provided in the table is an estimation of the volume of
sample required for the analysis, the suggested type of container, and the maximum recommended
holding times for samples properly preserved.



556



Appendix C. Continued



TABLE 1

RECOMMENDATION FOR SAMPLING AND PRESERVATION
OF SAMPLES ACCORDING TO MEASUREMENT"





Vol.








Measurement


Req.
(ml)


Container^


Preservative^'^


Holding
Time^


100 Physical Properties








,


Color


50


P.G


Cool, 4°C


48 Hrs.


Conductance


100


P.G


Cool. 4°C


28 Days


Hardness


100


P.G


HNO3 to pH<2


6 Mos.


Odor


200


G only


Cool, 4°C


24 Hrs.


pH

Residue


25


P.G


None Req.


Analyze
Immediately


Filterable


100


P.G


Cool. 4'C


7 Days


Non-
Filterable


100


P.G


Cool, 4°C


7 Days


Total


100


P.G


Cool. 4°C


7 Days


Vu.atile


100


P.G


Cool. 4°C


7 Days


Settleable Matter


1000


P.G


Cool, 4°C


48 Hrs.


Temperature
Turbidity


1000
100


P.G
P.G


None Req.
Cool, 4°C


Analyze
Immediately
48 Hrs.


200 Metals










Dissolved


200


P.G


Filter on site
HNO3 to pH<2


6 Mos.


Suspended


200




Filter on site


6 Mos.<"'


Total


100


P.G

557


HNO3 to pH < 2


6 Mos.



^>



/ â– '



Appendix C. Continued



TABLE 1 (CONT)





Vol.








Measurement


Req.
(ml)


Container^


Preservative '


Holding
Tune


Chromium*'


200


P.G


Cool, 4°C


24 Hrs.


Mercury
Dissolved


100


P.G


Filter

HNO3 to pH<2


28 Days


Total


100


P.G


HNO3 to pH<2


28 Days



300 Inorganics, Non-Metallics
Acidity
Alkalinity
Bromide
Chloride
Chlorine
Cyanides

Fluoride
Iodide
Nitrogen
Ammonia



Kjeldahl, Total



100


P.G


100


P.G


100


P.G


50


P.G


200


P.G


500


P.G


300


P.G


100


P.G



400 P.G



500



P.G



Nitrate plus Nitrite 100 P.G



Nitrate
Nitrite



100
50



P.G
P.G



Cool.4°C

Cool, 4°C

None Req.

None Req.

None Req.

Cool, 4°C
NaOH topH>12
0.6g ascorbic acid*

None Req.
Cool, 4°C



Cool,4°C

H2SO4 to pH<2

Cool, 4''C
H2SO4 to pH<2

Cool, 4°C
H2SO4 to pH<2

Cool, 4°C

Cool. 4°C



14 Days
14 Days
28 Days

28 Days

Analyze
Immediately

14 Days^

28 Days
24 Hrs.

28 Days

28 Days

28 Days

48 Hrs.
48 Hrs.



558



Appendix C. Continued



TABLE 1 (CONT)



Measurement



Dissolved Oxygen

Probe

Winkler

Phosphorus
Ortho-
phosphate,
Dissolved

Hydrolyzable



Total



Total,
Dissolved



Silica

Sulfate

Sulfide

Sulfite
400 Orpmics
BOD
COD

Oil & Grease
Organic carbon
Phenolics



Vol.






Req.






(ml)


Container^


Preservative^'^


300


G bottle and top


None Req.


300


G bottle and top


Fix on site
and store
in dark


50


P.G


Filter on site
Cool, 4°C


50


P.G


Cool, 4°C
H2SO4 to pH<2


50


P.G


Cool, 4°C
H2SO4 to pH<2


50


P.G


Filter on site
Cool, 4°C
H2SO4 to pH<2


50


P only


Cool, rc


50


P.G


Cool, 4°C


500


P,G


Cool, 4°C
add 2 ml zinc
acetate plus NaOH
topH>9



50



P,G



1000


P.G


50


P.G


1000


G only


25


P.G


500


G only



None Req.



Cool, 4°C

Cool, 4°C
H2SO4 to pH<2

Cool, 4'C
H2SO4 to pH<2

Cool, 4°C

HjS04 or HCl to pH < 2

Cool, 4°C
H^O, to pH <2



Holding
Time^



Analyze
Immediately
8 Hours



48 Hrs.
28 Days
28 Days
24 Hrs.

28 Days
28 Days
7 Days

Analyze
Immediately

• 48 Hrs.
28 Days

28 Days
28 Days
28 Days



559



/ •



Appendix C. Continued



Measurement



Vol.
Req.

(ml)



TABLE 1 (CONT)



P '5 4

Container Preservative '



Holding
Time^



MBAS
NTA



250



50



P.G



P.G



Cool, 4°C



Cool. 4°C



18 Mrs.
24 Hrs.



c



1. More specific instructions for preservation and sampling are found with each procedure as
detailed in this manual. A general discussion on sampling waicr and mdustrial wastewater may
be found in ASTM, Part 31, p. 72-82 (1976) Method D-3370.

2. Plastic (?) or Glass (G). For metals, polyethylene with a polypropylene cap (no liner) is
preferred.

3. Sample preservation should be performed immediately upon simple collection. For
composite samples each aliquot should be preserved at i lie time ot collection. When use of
an automated sampler makes it impossible to preserve each aliquot, then samples may be
preserved by maintaining at 4°C until compositing and sample splitting is completed.

4. When any sample is to be shipped by common carrier or sent through the United States
Mails, it must comply with the Department of Transportation Hazardous Materials
Regulations (49 CFR Part 172). The person offering such material for transportation is
responsible for ensuring such compliance. For the preservation requirements of Fable 1 ,
the Office of Hazardous Materials, Materials Transportation Bureau, Department of
Transportation has determined that the Hazardous Materials Regulations do not apj)ly to
the following materials: Hydrochloric acid (HCl) in water solutions at concentrations of
0.04% by weight or less (pH about 1 .96 or greater); Nitric acid ( HNO3) in water solutions at
concentrations of 0. 1 5% by weight or less (pH about 1 .62 or greater); Sulfuric acid ( 1 1 2S04)
in water solutions at concentrations of 0.35% by weight or less (pH about l.l.'j or greater);
Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) in water solutions at concentrations of 0.080% by weight or
less (pH about 12.30 or less).

5. Samples should be analyzed as soon as possible after collection. The times listed are the
maximum times that samples may be held before analysis and still considered valid.
Samples may be held for longer periods only if the permittee, or monitoring laboratory,
has data on file to show that the specific types of sample under study are stable for the
longer time, and has received a variance from the Regional Administrator. Some samples
may not be stable for the maximum time period given in the table. A permittee, or
monitoring laboratory, is obligated to hold the sample for a shorter time if knowledge
exists to show this is necessary to maintain sample stability.

6. Should only be used in the presence of residual chlorine.



560



Appendix C. Continued

Using the text of ebook Lower Clark Fork River water quality monitoring, 1984-1985 : data report (Volume 1) by Gary L Ingman active link like:
read the ebook Lower Clark Fork River water quality monitoring, 1984-1985 : data report (Volume 1) is obligatory