I




'V:t. - '^.



J^



■^



(^\.iijC'#"!



1' i^



>>



1




^ifr'^



^r-m



w-



^hi^



^-^*>>;'!^',






J^^



■^ :^»;^''






7,r'



•>iv.>^



;■«??



iKs;



jSc;^,



fsi^il.



:.A><*









••>fl^^''



■^



t^u



'^\.^



m^^^' !:./?



.•^-*;:.



:i^



:^>t«^:/



John ^haniB




IN THE CUSTODY OF TME

BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY.



SHELF N?




'*K



-iV^o



/Ma




^0un



^^/*^




E P O R T S



O F



v^ A




E S



A D J U D CJ E D IN THE

Court of lyings; Bentlj

Since the Time of Lokd Mansfield's

Coming to prclide in it :

By JAMES BURROW Efq;



With TABLES,
Of the Names of the CASES,

AND

Of the Matter contained in them.



VOLUME the THIRD:

Beginning with Michaelmas Term 2 G. 3 . 1 7 6 1 ,

AND

Ending with Trinity Term 6 G. 3. 1766, (incluiive).



LONDON:

Printed by His Majefty's Law-Printers ;

For Barnes Tovey, (SuccelTor to Mr. John Work all,)

at the Dove in Bell-Yard, near Lincoln s-Inn.

MDCCLXXI.



^i?^- .J'^'V'Z,



V'



ADVERTISEMENT.

fN this Volume, n o S&ttkjnent-Cafes are inferted ;
becaufe I have already communicated to the Public,
in a feparate Colle6lion (in Quartoj All the Cafes upon
that Subjedl, which were determined within this Period,
together with many Others. However, for the Sake
of thofe Gentlemen who may not be poireffed of that
Colle6lion, I have, in the Table at the End of this
Volume, given a full Abridgement of each Settlement-
Cafe that falls within the Compafs of it.



T



AND

H E Reader is defired to add the following Words at
Pa. 1330 and 1865, refpedlively ; "jiz.

Rex verfus Inhabitants of Stockland.



See this Cafe abridged, In the Table; and at large in the
Quarto-Edition of my Settlement-Cases, N^. 163.
Pa. 508 :

AND

Rex ve?-fus Inhabitants of Staunton under Bardon.

See this Cafe abridged, in the Table; and at large, in the
Quarto-Edition of my Settlement-Cases, N''. 178,
Pa. SS^'



Lately publijhed in Quarto,



SERIES

OF THE

DECISIONS

O F

The c o u R T of iBting'0 Benc?^

UPON

SETTLEMEN T-C A S E S;

FROM

The Death of Lord RAYMOND in March 1732,

T O

The End of Trinity Tbrm 1768.

By JAMES BURROW Efq;

In Two Volumes, with proper Tables.

Sold by B A R N E S T O V E Y.



A Chronological TABLE of the Names of
the CASES contained in this Volume,
according to the Order of their Determi-
nation.



Michaelmas Te rni i 7 6 1 ,
2 Geo. 3.

SU L S T O N V. Norton, Page
1235
Stevenfon "j. Snow, 1237

Morris 1;. Pugh and Harwood, 1241
Wright, ex dimilT. William Clymer

v. Littler et al'. 1244

Rex V. James Wheeler 1256

Roe, ex dimiff. Duke of Bolton v.

Grantham 1259

Medhurft ■. Waite 1259

Rex V. George Scott and Edward

Hams 1262



Hilary Term 1672, 2 Geo. 3.

Rex V. Barker et al', ^ 1265

Rex v. Heydon and Four Others,

1270

Church-wardens of St. Saviour's

Southwark v. Smith, 1271

Stephenlbn, Gent. v. Hill, 1 273

Fenton-u. Emblers, Executor of May,

1278
Appleton 1;. Smith, 1282

Ingle ^1. Wordfworth, et al', 1284
Sone V. Afhton, 1287

Fair-ckim, ex dimiff. Fowler et al',
-u. Sham-title, 1290

Part IV. Vol. Ill,



Rex v. Heydon, Head, and Roper,

Page 1304
Reavely v. Mainwaring Efqj W"alker

et al', 1306

Rex V. Clarke et al', ^308

Rex V. Inhabitants of Minchin-

Hampton, 1308

Eajler Term 1762, 2 Geo. 3.



1314.



Rex V. SmoUet,

"v. Hamilton,

Maxwell v. Mayer,

Rex 1). Inhabitants of St. Devereux,

• V. Williams, ^S'/

V. Davis, 13 V

V. Baylis etal', Juftices of Peace

for the City of Glouceftcr,

1318

Tri?iity Term 1762, 2 G. 3.

Colebrooke "j. Dobbs, I3'9

Rex -y. Rifpal, 1320

Hart, qui tarn &c. 11. Hawkins, 1322
Rex "J. Sir Thomas Harrifon, Cham-,
berlain of London, 1322

1329

Stockland,

1330

Rex



Rex 1'. Plunket Efq;
Rex 'V. Inhabitants



Qi



Rex 1'. Harris et al',
a,



A Chronological Table, fr'r.



Rex V. Pitt, I
V. Mead, 5'



P^2'^^335



Michaelmas Term 1762,
3 ^^^- 3'

Governor and Company for fmelting
down Lead 6cc. v. Richardfon Efq;
and Others 1341

Bird 1'. Randal], 1345

Price V. Nesle, J 354

Trott, qui tarn 6cc I'. Welch 1357
Rex 1'. Heydon, 1359

Hunt T. Coxe, J 360

Willbn 1'. Ducket, 1361

Rex v. William Clarke, 1362

Filher v. Prince, 1363

Rex V, Whitear et al', 1365



Hila?y Term iy62y 3 G,



eo.



Howard, Widow, and Another, Ex-
ecutors, 1'. Jemmet, Executor,

1368

EaJIcr Term 1762, 3 Geo. 3.

Bonafous v. Rybot, 1370

Moncafter v. Watfon et al', 1375
Rex V. Barker et al', ^379

Plumer, Spr. v. William Marchant,
Adminillrator of Peter Marchant,

1380
D'Ayrolles Efq; -u. Howard, 1385
Rex V. Corporation of Weft Loe,

1386
Rex V. Thomas Haydon, ''■3^7

Palmer %'. Needham, J389

Le Breton v. Braham, 13 89

Tr'mhy Term 1763, 3 Geo. 3 .

Rex V. Showier and Atter, 1391
Bates -u. Gamble, '^l^Z



Glover "y. Black, Fage\-^^Cj'.

Mayor of Yarn.outh i). Eaton, i^o-
Stephen and Another v. Coftor anu

Another, 1408

Lade, Bart, r. Holford Efq; et Ux',

et al', 1416

Brown -o. Chapman, 1418

Woolmer and Another v. Muilman.

J4ly
Rex IT. Dr. Harris, 1420

Combe Efq; •:■. Pitt, 14? 3

Rex V. Sir Francis Blake Delaval,

William Bates and John Frain?,

1434
Rex V. Eurbage, 1440



Michaeh?:as Term
4 Geo. 3.



1763,



Right, on the Demife of Francis
Baflet, Efq; v. Thomas and Ano-
ther, 1 44 1

Rex V. Lihabitants of Titchfield,

H47
Jennings v. Martin, ^447

Rex -J. Inhabitants of St. Peter's in

Dorchefter, 1448

Pullen V. White, 1448

Hilary Term J 764, 4 Geo 3.

Harris, Executor r. Jones, i4fi
Wel> "J. Radford, 14^,

Rex V. Inhabitants of Salford, 1452
Rex V. Bankes Efq; et al', 14^2

TuUett 1;. Linfield, J4?'7

Rex 1). Juftices of Peace for the City
of London, 1456

Rex v. Inhabitants of Winterbourn,

1458

Rex V. Inhabitants of St. Andrew's

Holbourn and St. George the

Martyr, 14^8

Rex "J. Lyon, 1461

Rex r. Sir Edward Simpfon, 1463

Eajier



A Chronological Table, &c\



Eajler Term 1764, 4 Geo. 3,

The King v. Philip CarteretT

Webb Elq; M468

The Same againft the Same, J
Marder et Ux', v. Lee, 1469

Rex V. Robotham, 1472

SouKby "0. Hodglbn, 1474

Rex V. Smith, _ 1475

Hodibn V. Richardtbn, . 1477

Rex V. Inhabitants of Openfliaw,

Triquet and Others r. Bath / g

Peach and Another -u. Bath \ ^'
Cracraft 1;. Gledowe, 1482

Rex -u. Inhabitants of Leeds, 1484
Rex V. Latham et al'. Six of the In-
BurgefTes of Wigan, 14'^5

Trinity Term 1 7 6 ^ , 4 Geo. 3 .

Swift, ex dimiff. Neale et Ux', v.

Roberts, 148:^

Francis v. Wyatt, 1498

John late Bifhop of Lincoln, now

Bifliop of Saliibury v. Wolforftan,

1504
Reed v. Cole, 15 12

Rex "v. Le Chevalier D'Eon, J 5 13
Grant -u. Vaughan, 1516

Rex V. Juftices of Peace for Wilt-

fhire, ^ 1530

Baddcley 1;. Leppingwell, 1533

Bidlefon Efq; Adminiftrator 1;. Why-

tel Efq; 1545

Wilfon and Another n. Smith, 1550
Harker et al'.^i;. Birkbeck et al',

Mylock -u. Saladine, 1564

Rex V. Philipps, Lucas, and Gibfon,

1564



Michaehnas Term 1764,
t^'Geo. 3.

Trinder 1'. Watfcn and Another,

Page 1566
Walker 1;. Perkins, Adminiftrator,

1568
Rex -J, Baptift Rebord, ' 5^^9

Evans, ex dimiff. Brooke Bart. v.
AftleyElq; et al', '^Sl'^

Silk V. Rennett, Un. dV, J 58 3

Ilawes, Executrix v. Saunders, 1584
Combe Efq; ^'. Pitt, ^586

Oulton jun. v. Perry, 1592

Menetone v. Athawes, ^592

Swann "j. Broome, ^595

Hilary Term 1765, 3 Geo, 3.

Timmins v. Rowlifon, 1603

Peart and Another v. Weft^arth and
Another, i5]o

Rex -v. Sir William Trelawney, Ste-
ward and Capital Burgefs of Weft
Loe 1 6 1 5

Rex V. Granger, 1617

Frogmorton, ex dimilT. Bramftone
V. Holyday et al', 1618

Chapman, ex dimifl"". Oliver et al', 1:.
Brown et al', 1626

Rex 1'. Jokph Hall, 1636

Shubrick v. Salmond, 1637

Rex 1;. Inhabitants of Spotland, 1641
Rex •;;. Holmes, Mayor of Wigan,

Rex 1;. Felix Mac Donald, 1645

EaJIer Term 1765, 5 Geo. 3.

Rex V. Vice Chancellor <^c of Cam-
bridge, ■'647

Pillans and Rofe v. Van Mierop a id
Hopkins, '663

Lock-



A Chronological Table, &'c.



Lockwood V. Dr. Coyfgarne, Page

1676
Rex V. Ellen Taylor, late Bent, 1679
Combe Efq; 1;. Pitt, 1682

Rex V. Wroughton Efq; and Others,

J6S3
Oates, ex dimiff. Markham 'v. Cooke,

1684

Bright "J. Furrier, 1687

Kex V. Samuel Dixon, wkj-

Surman v. Shelleto, 1688

Butterworth and Barker i\ Walker

and Waterhoufe, 1689

Money, Watfon, and Blackmore r.

Dryden Leach, 1692, 1742

Rex v. Inhabitants of Burton Brad-

ftock, 1694

Rex V. Righton Efq iSiit.

Trinity Term 1765, 5 Geo. 3.

Rex 1;. Edmund Thirkell, 1696

Rex V. Ofborn, 1697

Rex V. Eundem, 1698

Rex V. John Storr, ibid.

Goodright, ex dimilT. Tyrrell, Wid.

V. Mead and Shilfon, ^7°3

Rex 1;. Atkins, J706

Rex "y. Gillet, l;07

Salvador 1;. Hopkins, 7 .,.,

Heaton v. Ruckcr, ]"

Rex v. Robert Hann and John Price,

Juftices of Peace for the Burrough

of Corfe-Caftle, 171'^, i > 86

Evelyn Bart. Executor of Sir John

Evelyn Bart. 1.'. Chichefter Efq;

1717
Rexi'. Midlam, ?
Idem V. Eundem, i '

Millar -u. Yarraway, 1723

Greetham, Widow v. The Inhabi-
tants of the Hundred of Theale,

ibid.
Rex V. Inhabitants of Uttoxeter,

1725



Wefton "c. Mafon, 7 „
Wcllon V. Chapman,! ^^^^ ^7^5
Rex -;' Inhp.bitants of White Church

Canonicorum, 1729

Biffex V. Biffex, ibid.

Fontainier 1;. Heyl, ^73^

Rex 1'. Inhabitants of St. Luke's in

Middlefex, ibid.

Rex V. Bake and Fifteen Others, ibid

Michaehnas Term 1765,
6 GeOy 1.

Ricord i\ Bettenham, '734

Money et al', *.' Leach, 1742

Bulbrook v. Sir Robert Goodere and

and Others, 1768

Fabrilius t'. Cock, 1 771

Leith r. Mac Ferlan, ^772

Johnfon v. Jebb, ibid.

Bond and his Wife 1?. Seawell and

his Wife, ^773

Lavie and Another, Aflignees of Jane

Cox, a Bankrupt 'v. Phillips and

Others, Aflignees of John Cox, a

Bankrupt, 1776

Rex 1'. Roger Aiken, ^7^5

Rex V. Hann and Price, 1786

Ruffell ^'. Stewart, '^j'^J

Gray -u. Afliton, J 78 8

Knox Efq; V. Coftello, 1789

Holcombe and Another v. Wade,

1792
Harvey v. Peake, ^793

Zouch, ex dimilT. Abbot and Hallet
•y. Parfons, 794

Peter Gander's Cafe, 1-09

Rex r. Thomas Rogers, Samuel Mat-
thews and John King, ibid.
Rex 1. Marfden et al', 18 12
Wharod ^'. Smart, 18^.3



Hilary



A Chronological Table, &c\



Hilary Term 1766, 6 Gto. 3.

Rex V. Inhabitants of Under Barrow
and Bradley Field, Pifge 1824

Wihbn V. Mackreth, //W.

R.ex V. Spencer, Common Council-
Man of Maidftone, 1827

P,.ex V. Inhabitants of Silchefter,

1840

Fotterel -u. Philby, 1841

Rex V. Crookes, i^(/.

Regula genera lis, 1842

Hernaman v. Bawden et al', Execu-
tors of Ford, 1844

Benfon v. Sir Thomas Frederick,
Bart. 1845

Hefketh v. Braddock, 1847

Rex V. Inhabitants of Dunchurch,

1859

Sir Geo, Colebrooke Bart. v. Elliott,

ibid.

Rex V. Inhabitants of Staunton under
Bardon, 1865

Eajier Term 1766, 6 Geo. 3.

Mayor and Commonalty of ColcHef-
ter V. Seaber, Executor of Wil-
liam Seaber his late Father, 1 866
Chave v. Peter Calmel Efq; 1873
Dr. Bettefworth v. Hugh Parker Bell
Efq; , 1875



Rex V. Inhabitants of Ingleton, Pao-e

1877
Rex 'V. The Redlor of St

(Soho)
Poftlethvvaite v. Parkes,
Rofe, ex dimilf. Vere et al'.



Ann



V.



t s
J 877
1878
Kii!.



1S81
1886
1 89 1



Williams v. Leper,

Butter ^'. Heathby,

Gates, ex dimiflT. Wigfall v. Brydon
et al", 1895

Armdrong, ex dimiC Tinker et al',
V. Peirfe et al', 1898

Rex V. Lookup, 1901

Rex ^'. Helling et al', ^9^4

Rex V. Inhabitants of Ecclefal Bier-
low, in Sheffield, 1905

Carter v. Boehm, ibid.



T'?'i?iity Term 1766, 6 Geo.



1



Rex V. Inhabitants of Frome Sel-
wood, 1920

Campbell v. Daley, ibid.

Rex V. Inhabitants of Ilmington,

1921

Regula generalisf ibid.

Simon 1; Motives, ibid.

Rex V. Honorable Peter Mackenzie,

1922

Catchlide, Widow and Adminiitra-
trix V. Ovington, ibid.

Walton, Affignee ^'. Bent, 1923



Part VI. Vol. IIL



AN



An Alphabetical TABLE of the Names of
the CASES comprifed in this Volume.



A.

APPLETONi;. Smith, Page
1282
Armftrong, ex dimiff. Tinker et al',
V. Peirle et al', 1898



B.



Baddeley v. LeppingwelU ^533

Bates V. Gamble, i 393

Benfon v. Sir Thomas Frederick Bart.

1845

Bettefworth (Dr.) v. Hugh Parker

Bell Efq; 1875

Bidlefon Efq; Adminiftrator -u. Why-

1545

1345
1729



te; Efq;
Bird v. Randall,
Biflex "J. Biffex,
Blackmore et al', v. Leach,



1692,

J 742

Bonafous 1;. Rybot, ^37°

Bond and his Wife 1;. Seawell and

his Wife, - 1773

Bright "-i;. Purrier, 1687

Brown v. Chapman, 141 8

Bulbrook v. Sir Robert Goodere and

and Others, 1768

Butter V. Heathby, 1891

Butterworth and Barker v. Walker

and Waterhoufe, 1689



C.



Campbell v. Daley, Page 1926

Carter -u. Boehm, 1905

Catchfide, Widow and Adminiftra-
trix V. Ovington, 1922

Chapman, ex dimiff. Oliver et al', 1;.
Brown et al', 16.^6

Chave v. Peter Calmel Efq; ^'^JZ
Church-wardens of St. Saviour's
Southwark 1;. Smith, 1271

Colchefter (Mayor and Commonalty
of) V. Seaber, Executor of Wiiiiani
Seaber his late Father, 1866

Colebrooke ^', Dobbs, I3'9

Colebrooke Bart. (Sir Geo.) v. El-
liott, 1859
Combe Efq; i'. Pitt, H^S? ^S^^'

1682
Cracraft v. Gledowe> 1482



D.



D'Ayrolles Efq; i;. Howard, 1385



E.



Evans, ex dimiff. Brooke Bart. v.

AlHey Efq; et al', 1 570

Evelyn Bart. Executor of Sir John

Evelyn Bart. i\ Chichefter Efq>

1717



F.'



An Alphabetical Table, ^c.



F.



Fabrilius v. Cock, Page 1 77 1

Fair-claim, ex dimilT. Fowler ct al',

V. Shain-tltle, 1290

Fentoni'. Emblers, Executor of May,

1278
Fiflicr V. Prince, 1363

Fontainier v. Hcyl, 173 t

Fotterel v. Philby, 1841

Francis v. Wyatt, H9S

Frogniorton, ex diiriiir. Bramftone
j_ 1'. Holyday et al', 16 18



G.

Peter Gander's Cafe, 1809

Glover V. Black, ^394

Goodright, ex dimiff. Tyrrell, Wid.
^'. Mead and Shilfon, ^7^3

Governor and Company for fmelting
down Lead &c. v. Richardfon Efq;
and Others 1341

Grant v. Vaughan, 1516

Gray 1;. Afliton, 1788

Greetham, Widow v. The Inhabi-
tants of the Hundred of Theale,

1723



H.



Harker et al', v. Birkbeck et al',

Harris, Executor i'. Jones, J45^
Hart, qui tarn &c. v. Hawkins, 1322
PTarvey v. Peake, ^793

Havvcs, Executrix v. Saunders, i c^S^
Heaton v. Rucker, ^7*^7

Hernaman v. Bawden et al'. Execu-



tors of Ford,
Hefketh 1;. Braddock,
Hodfon V. Richardfon,
Holconibe and Another v.



J 844
1847

1477
V/ade,

1792



Howard, Widow, and Another, Ex-
ecutors, V. Jemmet, Executor,

Page 136B
Hunt V. Coxe, 1360



I & ].

Ingle V. Wordfworth, et al', 1284

Jennings •-.'. Martin, I447

John hue Bifliop of Lincoln, now

BiOiop of Salilbury ■:>. Wolforrtan,

^504
Johnfon v. Jcbb, ' 1772



K.



Knox Elq; v. Coftello,



1789



Lade, Bart. v. Holford Efq; et Ux',

et al', 1416

Lavie and Another, Affignees of Jane

Cox, a Bankrupt i\ Phillips and

Others, Afllgnees of John Cox, a

Bankrupt, ^77^

Le Breton v. Braham, 1389

Leith V. Mac Ferlan, 1772

Lincoln (John late Bifhop of, now

Bifhop of Salilbury) t). Wolforftan,

1504
Lockwood V. Dr. Coyfgarne, 1676



M.

Marder et Ux', v. Lee, 1469

Maxwell 1;. Mayer, 13 H

Mayor and Commonalty of Colchef-
ter V. Seaber, Executor of William
Seaber his late Father, 1866

Mayor of Yarmouth v. Eaton, 1402
Medhurfl: r, Waite 1359

Menctone v. Athawes, 1592

Millar



An Alphabetical Table, &fr.



Millar V. Yerraway, Page 1723

Moncafter -v. Watlbn et al', 1375
Money, Watfon, and Blackmore v.
Dryden Leach, 1692, 1742

Morris v. Pugh and Harwood, 1241
Mylock V. Saladine, 15^4



O.

Gates, ex dimifT. Markham v. Cooke,

1684

. Wigfall 17. Brydon

et al', 1895

Oultonjun. v. Perry, 1592



P.



Palmer "u. Needham, '3^9

Peach and Another v. Bath, 1478
Peart and Another v. Weftgarth and

Another, 16 10

Pillans and Rofe v. Van Mierop and

Hopkins, ^6^3

Plumer, Spr. v. Willia:n Marchant,

Adminilbator of Peter Marchant,

1380
Poftlethwaite v. Parkes, j 878

Price V. Neale, ^354

Pullen V. White, 1448



R.



Reavely v. Mainwaring Efq; Walker
et al', 1306

Reed v. Cole, 15 12

Regu/ce gejierales, 1842, 1921

Rex -L'. Roger Aiken, ^7^S

V. St. Andrew's Holbourn, and

St. George the Martyr (In-
habitants of) 145^

' V. St. Anne's, Soho (Redtor of)

1877
1706

1391



— V. Atkins,

V. Atter and Another,

Part IV. Vok. III.



Rex V. Bake and Fifteen Others,

Page 173 I

V. Bankes Efq; et al', 1452

• "U. Barker et al', 1265, 1379

V. William Bates and Two

Others, 1434
v. Baylis etal', Juftices of Peace

for the City of Gloucefter,

1318

-u. Burbage, 1440

^'. Chamberlain of London (Sir

Thomas Harrifon) 1322

— - — 1;. Clarke etal', 1308

r. William Clarke, 1362

v. Corporation of Weft Loe,

1386

^'. Crookes, 1841

17. Davis, 1317

V. Sir Francis Blake Delaval,

William Bates and John Fraine,

H34
V. Le Chevalier D'Eon, 1513

— — V. Samuel Dixon, 1687

v. John Fraine and Two Others,

'434
V. Gibfon and Two Others,

1564

v. Gillet, ^7'^?

17. Grainger, ^1617

1'. Jofeph Hall, 16:56^

"u. Hamilton, I3'3

1;. Edward Hams and Another,

1262

V. Robert Hann and John Price,

Juftices of Peace for the Bur-
rough of Corfe-Caftle, 17 16,

1786

V. Harris et al', 1330

V. Dr. Harris, 1420

V. Sir Thomas Harrifon, Cham-
berlain of London, 1322

'U.Thomas Haydon, ^2^7

V. Helling et al', 1904

v. Heydon and Four Others,

1270
V. Heydon, Head, and Roper,

1304
c Rex



All Aiphabecical Table, tf'c.



:Rex V. Heydofi, Page 1359

, V. Holmes, Mayor of Wigan,

1641

-. . ZK Tnliabitants of St. Andrew's

Holbourn and St. George the

Martyr, 1458

. Burton Bradflock, 1694

Dunchurch, 1859

-., Ecclefal Bierlow, la Shef-



field.


1905


Frome Selwood,


1920


Ilniington,


1 92 1


Ingleton,


1877


Leeds,


1484


Minchin Hampton, 1308


Openfliaw,


^^77


St. Devereux,


i.V?


St. Luke's in Middlefex,




1731


St. Peter's in Dorchefter,




1448


Salford,


1452


Silchefter,


1840


Spotland,


1641


Staunton under


Bardon,




1865


Stockland,


1330


Titchfield,


H47



Under Barrow and Brad-
ley Field, 1824

Uttoxeter, ^7^5

White Church Canonico-

rum, 1729

Winterbourn, 145S

V. Juftices of Peace for the Bur-
rough of Corfe Caitle, 171 6,

1786

for the City of London,

1456

for Wiltfliire, ^SS^

-u. John King and Two Others,

1809

• V. Latham et al'. Six of the In-

Burgefles of Wigan, J485

• V. Lookup, 190!

• V. Lucas and Two Others,

1^64



Rex v. Lyon, Page 1461

V. Felix Mac Donald, 1645

— — -J. Honorable Peter Mackenzie,

1922
"J. Maidftone (Common Coun-
cil-Man of) 1827
— — r. Marfden et al', 1 8 1 2

V. Samuel Matthews and Two

Others, 1809

i;. Mayor of Wigan (Holmes)

1641

-J. Mead, J335

V. Midlam., 1720

1;. Olborn, ^^'97

V. Philipps, Lucas, and Gibfon,

1564

1;-. Pitt, 1335

V. Plunket Efq; l'^2g

V. John Price and Another,

Juftices of Peace for the Bur-
rough of Corfe Caftle, 1716,

1786

V. Baptift Rebord, ^5^9

V. Rigiiton Efq; ^694

— — f. Rifpal, J320
V. Robotham, ^472

^'. Thomas Rogers, Samuel

Matthews and John King,

1809

V. Roper and Two Others,

i3°4

V. George Scott and Edward

Hams, 1262

V. Showier and Atter, 1391

1-. Sir Edward Simpfori, 1463

v. Smith, ^475

— — V. Smollet, 1 3 r^
V. Spencer, Common Council-
Man of Maidftone, j 827
V. John Storr, 1698

-y. Ellen Taylor, late Bent,

1679

V. Edmund Thirkell, 1696

v. Sir William Trelawney, Ste-
ward and Capital Burgefs of
Weft Loe, i 6 1 5
V. Vice Chancellor ©"c of Cam-
bridge, J 647

4 Re;c



An Alphabetical Table, tfc.



•Rex V. Philip Carteret Webb Efq;

Page 1468

v. V/efl: Loe (Corporation of)

1386

(Steward and Capital Bur-

gefs of) 1615

V. James Wheeler, 1256

■:'. Whitear et al', ^I'^S

V. Wigan (Mayor of) 1641

1 V. Williams, " 3 ' 7

. -u. Wroughton Efq; and Others,

J683

■Ricord "u. Bettenham, '734

Right, ex dimiif. Francis BalTet, Efq;

V. Thomas and Another, 1441

:Roe, ex dimiff. Duke of iJolton v.

Grantham 1259

Jlofe, ex dimiff. Vera et al'. v. Hill,

i88i



S.



-Salifbury (Bifhop of, late John Bi-
Ihop of Lincoln) "U-Wolforftan,

J5°4
"Salvador v. Hopkins,

St. Saviour's, Southwark

wardens of) v. Smith,

Shubrick v. Salmond,

Silk V. Rennett, Un. &c,

Simon v. Motivos,

Sone V. Afliton,

Soulfby V. Hodgfon,



1707

(Church-

1271

16,37

1 921
1287

1474
Stephen and Another v. Coflor and

1408

1237

1235
1688

595



Another,
Stephenfon, Gent. v. Hill,^
Stevenfon v. Snow,
:SuIfton 1;. Norton,
Surman v. Shelleto,
Swann v. Broome,



Swift, ex dimiff.
Roberts,



Neale et Ux', v.
ja88



T.

Timmins v. Rowlifon, Pi^ge 160"
Trinder v. Watfon and Another,

1566
Triquet and Others v. Bath, 1478
Trott, qui tarn &c v. Welch 1,557



TuUett V. Linfield,



W.



H5S



Walker 1;. Perkins, Adminiilrator,

1568
Walton, Affignee ^'. Bent, 1923
Watfon et al', v. Leach, 1692, 1742
Weft 1;. Radford, 1452

Wefton i\ Mafon, 7
Wefton V. Chapman,) ^725

Wharod v. Smart, 1823

Williams -v. Leper, j886

Wilfon 1;. Ducket, 1361

Wilfon and Another v. Smith, 1550
Wilfon v. Mackreth, 1824

Woolmer and Another v. Muilman,

1419

Wright, ex dimiff. William Clymer

V. Littler et al'. 1244



V.

Yarmouth (Mayor of) v. Eaton,

1402

Z.

Zouch, ex dimiff. Abbot and Hallet
V. Parfoas, ^794



Michaelmas



1^35



Michaelmas Term

2 Geo. 3. B.R. 1 76 1.



Sulfton verfus Norton. Monday, 16

"' Nov. ITOl.



T



Nov. 1761.



HIS was an Aftion on the Statute of 2 G. 2. c. 24.
§ 7. " For the more efFedtual preventing Bribery and
" Corruption in the Ele<5tion of Members to ferve in
" Parliament."



The Declaration contained five Counts : Firft, That the De-
fendant corrupted one Moore to vote for Lord Villiers and Sir iJo-
bert Burdett, by giving him five Pounds five Shillings ; Secondly,
A corrupt Agreement to give Moore five Pounds five Shillings;
Thirdly, A corrupt Agreement to lend him five Pounds five Shil-
lings upon a PromilTory Note -, Fourthly, A corrupt Agreement
to deliver the Note to Moore on voting ; Fifthly, For giving the
Note and Counter-Note hereafter mentioned. A Verdidl was
found for the Plaintiff, and entered on the firft Count.

Mr. Serjeant Hewitt, on Behalf of the Plaintiff, fhewed Caufe
againft fetting afide the Verdidt ; which had been moved for, on
the Part of the Defendant.

Mr. Caldecoit, on Behalf of the Defendant, had objeded, when
he made that Motion,

Firft, Thlt the Man did not iti faB vote for the Perfons he
promifed to vote for ; but, on the contrary, voted for their Op-
ponents : And therefore the Defendant, as he did not by any cor-
rupt Agreement procure Moore to vote for them, cannot be faid
to have corrupted him to do fo.

Secondly, That the Verdidl ought not to have been taken on
the firft Count, which was for giving him the Money.

Part IV. Vol. III. B To



1236 Mich. 1 erm 1 Geo. 5. B. R.



To the firil Objedion, the Cafe oi BuJIo v. Rawlins in £. /J.
P. and Tr. 29 G. 2. was laid, by the Serjeant, tp be a full An-
fwer, being in Point.

And in Anfwcr to the fecond Ohjedlion, he alledged that the
Evidence given very fufficiently fupported the taking the Verdid:
i on the firil Count ; and for the Truth of his Allegation, appealed

to Mr. ]u\xiCQ Fojier, who tried the Caufe.

Mr. Juftice Fojler reported the Evidence to have been, " That

" the Defendant gave Moore five Guineas, to vote for Lord ViUiers

""and Sir Robert Burdett; that Moore gave him a Note for it j

" and the Defendant gave him a Counter-Note, obliging Him-

«\i.vfi: :" felf to give up the. former Note, when the Condition fliould

'■■.•■'*' be performed,"

;" Mr. Caldecott and Mr. Thurlow, for the Defendant, thereuporf
obferved, that the Adl of Parliament fays " If any Perfon, 6fr,
♦' lliall take any Money, Gff, hy way of Gift, Loan, or other
" Devife ;" And though the Plaintiff has laid this feveral Ways,
He has taken a Verdict as upon a Gift; whereas it appears in
fadi, not to have been a Gift, but a Loan or other Device.

In order to intitle them to take a Verdidl on the firft Count,
They, mutt have proved it to be a Gift : Which, it appears by
the Judge's Report, they could not prove. And We have a Ver-
^xQifor the 'Defendant, as to all the other Counts.

The Statute exprefsly diftinguiihes between Gifts, and Loans or