C. B. 84), 237.
Lazenby v. White (41 L. J. Ch.
354), 61, 128, 129.
are to pages.
Lea V. Deakin (11 Biss. 23), 65,
92, 129.
V. Miller (Seb. 513), 65, 129.
V. Wolff (15 Abb. Pr. N. S. 1),
65, 92, 100, 256.
Leahy v. Glover (10 R. P. C. 141),
257, 267.
Leather Cloth Case (11 H. L. C.
523), 2, 6, 11, 13, 18, 27, 47,
50, 100, 127, 183, 246.
Leather Cloth Co. v. Hirschfield
(1), (1 N. R. 551), S3.
v. Hirschfield (2), (1 H. & M.
295), 268.
v. Lorsont(L.R.9Eq. 345),49.
Leclancha Battery Co. v. West-
ern Electric Co. (1), (21 Fed.
Rep. 538), 260, 261, 272.
v. Western Electric Co. (2),
(23 Fed. Rep. 276), 78.
Lee V. Haley (22 L. T. N. S. 251),
23, 122, 189, 256.
V. Haley (5 Ch. App. Cas.
155), 120.
Lehigh Valley Coal Co. v. Ham-
blen (23 Fed. Rep. 225), 113.
Leidersdorf v. Flint (1), (8 Biss.
327), 211, 300.
V. Flint (2), (50 Wis. 401), 245.
Lemoine v. Cauton (2 E. D. Smith,
343), 10, 41, 128, 245.
Leonard v. Wells (L. R. 26 Ch.
D. 288), 73.
V. White's Golden Lubrica-
tor Co. (38 Fed. Rep. 922,
73), 256.
LePageCo. v. Russia Cement Co.
(51 Fed. Rep. 941), 14, 239,
244, 245.
Lever v. Goodwin (4 R. P. C. 492,
506), 88.
V. Bedingfield (80 L. T. N. S.
100), 31, 88.
Lever Bros. (Ltd.) v. Pasfield
(88 Fed. Rep. 484), 72, 199,
267.
XXVlll
TABLE OF CASES.
Lev-Man
Beferences
Levy V. Waitt (1), (56 Fed. Rep.
1016). 12, 37, 66.
V. Waitt (2), (61 Fed. Rep.
1008), 7, 12, 39.
V. Walker (L. R 10 Ch. D.
463), 14.
Lewis V. Chapman (3 Beavan,
133), 84.
V. Klapproth (11 Vict. L. R.
(E) 214), 240.
V.Lang-don (7 Sim. 421), 14, 148.
L. H. Harris Drug- Co. v. Stucky
(46 Fed. Rep. 624), 8, 59,
323, 328, 332.
Lichtenstein v. Goldsmith (37
Fed. Rep. 359), 68.
Liebig-'s Extract Co. v. Hanbury
(17 L. T. N. S. 298), 62, 129.
Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v.
Fiuzer (128 U. S. 182), 201.
V. Hynes (20 Fed. Rep. 883),
8, 72, 167, 177, 193, 209, 265,
307.
V. Sam Reid Tob. Co. (104
Mo. 53), 72, 189, 246.
Lilieuthal v. Drucklieb (84 Fed.
Rep. 918), 152.
Linde v. Bensel (22 Hun, 29 N.
Y. Sup. Ct. 601), 219.
Linoleum Mfg. Co. v. Nairn (7 Ch.
Div. 834), 52, 62, 76, 102.
Lippincott v. Hubbard (28 Pitts.
L. J. 303), 14, 16.
Listman Mill Co. v. Wm. List-
man Mill Co. (88 Wis. 334),
14, 71.
Little V. Gallus (38 N. Y. Supp.
487), 154, 155, 159.
V. Kellam(100Fed. Rep. 353),
198.
Littlejohn v. Mulligan (3 New
Zealand Rep. 446), 264.
Llewellyn v. Rutherford (L. R,
10 C. P. 456), 140.
Lockwofjd V. Bostwick (2 Daly,
521), 66, 196.
are to pages.
Longman v. Tripp (2 Bos. & P.
N. R. 67), 16.
v. Winchester (16 Ves. 269),
117.
Lord Byron v. Johnston (2 Mar.
29), 31.
Lorillard Co. v. Peper (86 Fed.
Rep. 956), 202.
Lorillard v. Pride (28 Fed. Rep.
434), 52, 167, 327, 329.
v. Wight (15 Fed. Rep. 383),
167, 171, 307.
Low V. Fels {3>5 Fed. Rep. 361),
262.
V. Hart (90 N. Y. 457), 223.
Lowell Mfg. Co. v. Larned (Cox,
Manual, No. 428), 38, 308.
Lucker v. Phoenix Assurance Co.
(67 Fed. Rep. 18), 268.
Lux v. Haggin (68 Cal. 255-269),
123.
Luyties v. HoUender (1), (21 Fed.
Rep. 281), 211, 212, 237, 249.
V. Hollender (2), (30 Fed. Rep.
632), 61, 215, 216, 339.
Lyman v. Burns (47 Off. Gaz. 660),
71.
Lysney v. Selby (2 Ld. Raym.
1118), 151.
M.
Macdonaldv. Richardson (1 GifiF.
81), 135.
Mandeville v. Harmon (42 N. J.
Eq. 185), 137.
Manhattan Med. Co. v. Wood (1),
(Fed. Cas. No. 9026; 4 Cliff.
461), 9.
V. Wood (2), (108 U. S. 218), 15,
46, 48, 73, 98, 129, 167, 209.
Manitowoc Mfg. Co. v. Dickerman
(57 Off. Gaz. 1721), 42, 335,
337.
Manitowoc Pea-Packing Co. v.
William Numsen & Sons
(93 Fed. Rep. 196), 100.
Man-Met
TABLE OF CASES.
XXIX
lieferences
Manufacturiiifi^ Co. v. Simpson (54
Conn. 527). 107.
V. Trainer (101 U. S. 51), 182.
Marcovitch v. Bramble, Wilkins
& Co. (Cox, Manual, No.
595), 270.
Marcus Ward & Co. v. Ward (1).
(15 N. Y. Supp. 913), 105.
V. Ward (2), (40 N. Y. S. Rep.
792), 144.
Market Co. v. Hoffman (101 U. S.
112). 216.
Marks v. Jaffa (26 N. Y. Supp.
908), 163.
Marsh v. Billings (7 Cush. 322),
189, 244.
V. Warren (14 Blatchf. 263),
313, 315.
Marshall v, Hawkins (4 N. Z.
L. R. Sup. Ct. 59), 181.
V. Pinkham (52 Wis. 572), 62,
129, 240.
V. Ross (L. R. 8 Eq. 651), 54,
198.
Martha Washing-ton Creamery
Buttered Flour Co. v. Mar-
tien (44 Fed. Rep. 473), 259.
Martin v. Murphy (129 Ind. 464),
137, 150.
V. Wright (6 Sim. 297), 33.
Massam v. Cattle Food Co. (L. R.
14 Ch. D. 748), 13.
Matthews v. Murchinson (17 Fed.
Rep. 760), 123.
Matsell V. Flannagan (2 Abb. Pr.
N. S. 459), 119, 121.
Mayer v. Flanagan (12 Tex. Civ.
App. 405), 14.
Maxwell v. Hogg (L. R. 2 Ch.
307), 43, 252.
McAndrews v. Bassett (4 De G. J.
& S. 380), 11, 39, 65, 273,
275.
McCall V. Theal (28 Grant Up.
Can. Ch. 48), 58.
McCann v. Anthonj-^ (21 Mo. App.
83), 171, 201, 219, 258.
are to p'ujes.
McCardel v. Peck (28 How. Pr.
120). 124.
McCord V. Williams (96 Pa. St.
78), 14n.
McElwee v. Blackwell (15 Off.
Gaz. 658). 301, 304, 311.
McGowan v. McGowan (22 Ohio
St. 370), 142, 147, 148.
McLean v. Fleming (96 U. S.
245), 2, 14, 16, 26, 31, 105,
107, 111. 122, 177, 183, 246,
249, 256, 262, 273, 277.
McVeagh V. Valencia Cigar Fac-
tory (32 Off. Gaz. 1124), 13.
McVey v. Brendel (144 Pa. St.
235), 37.
Mehichrino v. Melachrino Cigar-
ette Co. (4 R. P. C. 215),
103, 108, 130, 258.
Mellesch v. Keen (28 Beavan,
453), 150.
Mellin v. White(L. R.,1895, A. C.
154), 35.
Meneely v. Meneely (62 N. Y.427),
102, 105.
Menendez v. Holt (128 U. S. 514),
12, 14, 20, 37, 69, 70, 124, 138,
177, 256.
Meriden Britannia Co. v. Parker
(39 Conn. 454), 47. 258.
Merriam v. Famous Shoe and
Clothing Co. (47 Fed. Rep.
410), 58, 117.
V. Holloway Pub. Co. (43 Fed.
Rep. 450), 117.
V. Texas Siftings Pub. Co.
(49 Fed. Rep. 944), 65, 117.
Merry v.Hoopes(lll N.Y.420),14.
Merryweather v. Moore (L. R.
1892, 2 Ch. D. 518), 156, 157.
Messer v. The Fadettes(168 Mass.
140), 109.
Messerole v. Tynberg (36 How.
Pr. 14), 6, 66. 101.
Metropolitan Bank v. St. Louis
Dispatch Co. (1), (36 Fed.
Rep. 722-724), 133.
XXX
TABLE OF CASES.
Met-Mye
References are to pages.
Metropolitan Bank v. St. Louis
Dispatch Co. (2), (149 U. S.
436), 132, 138.
Metsler v. Wood (L. R. 8 Ch. D.
606), 259.
Meyer v. Bull Medicine Co. (58
Fed. Rep. 884), 88, 107.
Miller v. Beck (Iowa), (72 N. W.
Rep. 553), 151.
V. Keeler (9 Pa. Co. Ct. R.
274), 137.
Milling-ton v. Fox (3 My. & Cr.
338), 177, 189, 204, 274.
Milwaukee R. R. Co. v. Arms (91
U. S. 487), 243.
Mississippi & Mo. R. R. Co. v.
Ward (2 Black, 485), 216.
Missouri Pacific Railway
V. Humes (115 U. S. 512),
243.
Mitchell V. Henry (L. R. 15 Ch.
D. 181), 266.
V. Read (84 N. Y. 556), 150.
Moet V. Clybonn (Seb. 533), 204.
V. Cousten (33 Beav. 578), 189,
275.
V. Pickering (L. R. 8 Ch. D.
372), 204, 206, 224, 276.
Monroe Cattle Co. v. Becker (147
U. S. 47), 328.
Monson v. Boehm (L. R. 26 Ch. D.
398^06), 125.
Montgomerie v. Donald (Ct. Sess.
Cas. 4th Ser. 11, 506), 65.
Montgomery v. Thompson (1891,
App. Cas. 217), 102.
Moorman v. Hoge (2 Sawy. 78),
8, 167, 240, 301, 307, 328
Morgan v. McAdam (36 L. J. Ch.
228), 47, 50, 54.
V. Rogers (19 Fed. Rep. 596),
13, 14, 138.
V. Schuyler (79 N. Y. 490),
144, 148.
Morgan Envelope Co. v. Walton
(1), (82 Fed. Rep. 469), 193,
199.
Morgan Envelope Co. v. Walton
(2), (86 Fed. Rep. 605), 88,
92.
Morgan Sons Co. v. Troxell (Cox,
Manual, 674), 192.
Morison v. Moat (21 L. J. Ch. 248),
155, 157.
Morris v. Moss (25 L. J. Ch. 194),
135.
Morrison v. Case (9 Blatchf. 548),
72, 309, 332.
v. Salmon (2 Man. & G. 385),
176.
Morse v. Worrell (10 Phila. 168),
71.
Morse Machine Co. v. Morse (103
Mass. 73), 153.
Mossier v. Jacobs (65 111. App.
571), 72, 198.
Motley V. Downman (3 My. & Cr.
1), 176, 204, 221.
Moxie Nerve Food Co. v. Baum-
bach(32Fed. Rep. 205), 175,
198, 259.
v. Beach (33 Fed. Rep. 248),
179, 261, 269.
Mullins V. People (23 How. Pr.
289), 231.
Mumm V. Kirk (40 Fed. Rep. 589),
32.
Munro v. Smith (13 N. Y. Supp.
708), 182, 185, 193.
v. Tousey (129 N. Y. 38), 185.
Munsey v. Butterfield (133 Mass.
492), 134.
Murray v. Engraving Co. (28 N.
Y. Supp. 271), 163.
Musselman & Clarkson's Appeal
(62 Pa. St. 81), 135.
Myers v. Baker (3 H. & N. 802),
176.
v. Cunningham (44 Fed. Rep.
349), 234.
v. Kalamazoo Buggy Co. (54
Mich. 215), 109, 144.
V. Theller (38 Fed. Rep. 607),
171, 191.
Nat-Orr
TABLE OF CASES.
XXXI
lieferences ar
N.
National Biscuit Co. v. Baker (95
Fed. Rep. 135), 2, 73, 199,
208, 209.
National Gum & Mica Co. v.
Braendly (51 N. Y. Supp 93),
160.
Native Guano Co, v. Sewage
Manure Co. (8 P. R. 125), 62.
Neilson v. Betts (L. R. 5 H. L. R.
1), 245.
Nerve Food Co. v. Baumbach (32
Fed. Rep 205), 86.
Neva Stearine Co. v. Mow^ling (9
Vict. L. R. 98), 129.
Newark Coal Co. v. Spangler (54
N. J. Eq. 354), 106.
Newby v. Railroad Co. (Deady,
609), 110.
New Home Sewing Machine Co.
V. Bloomingdale (59 Fed.
Rep. 284), 69, 197.
Newman v. Alvord (49 Barb. 588),
10, 23, 56, 97, 99.
v. Pinto (4 R. P. C. 508), 47,
258, 275.
New York Asbestos Mfg. Co. v.
Amber Asbestos Air-cell
Covering Co. (99 Fed. Rep.
85), 260, 261, 272.
New York Cement Co. v. Coplay
Cement Co. (1), (44 Fed. Rep.
277), 63.
V. Coplay Cement Co. (2), (45
Fed. Rep. 212), 17, 63, 97,
221.
Nichols V. Kimpton (3 Times L.
R. 674), 273.
Nixey v. Roffey (W. N., 1870,
p. 227), 49, 51.
N. K. Fairbank Co. v. Central
Lard Co. (64 Fed. Rep. 133),
67, 130, 196, 256.
V. Luckel, King »& Cake Soap
Co. (1), (88 Fed. Rep. 694),
32, 69, 185, 207.
•e to pages.
N. K. Fairbank Co. v. Luckel,
King & Cake Soap Co. (2),
(102 Fed. Rep. 327), 196.
V. R. W. Bell Mfg. Co. (77
Fed. Rep. 869), 171, 186, 369.
Noel V. Ellis (89 Fed. Rep. 978),
64, 199.
Noera v. Williams Mfg. Co. (158
Mass. 110), 175.
Northcuttv. Turney (101 Ky. 314),
36, 66, 93, 97, 220.
North Eastern Awl Co. v. Marl-
borough Awl Co. (168 Mass.
147; 60 Am. St. Rep. 373), 2.
Nunn V. D 'Albuquerque (34 Beav.
595), 274.
Nuthall V. Vining (28 W. R. 330),
167, 172.
o.
Oakes v.Tonsmierre (49 Fed. Rep.
447), 13, 262.
Oakey v. Dalton (L. R. 35 Ch. D.
700), 221.
Ohio & Miss. Ry. Co. v. Press
Pub. Co. (48 Fed. Rep. 206),
34.
Oldham v. James (13 Ir. Ch. 393),
240.
Olin v. Bate (98 111. 53), 102.
Onondaga Co. Milk Association
V. Wall (17 Hun, 494), 143.
Opinion of Attorney General (47
Oflf. Gaz. 397), 380.
Oppermann v. Waterman (94
Wis. 583), 196.
O'Rourke v. Central City Soap
Co. (26 Fed. Rep. 576), 43,
66, 251.
Orrv. Diaper (L. R. 4 Ch. D. 92),
224, 268.
Orr-Ewing v. ChooneeloU Mul-
lick (Cor. 150), 42.
V. Grant, Smith & Co. (2
Hyde, 185), 42.
V. Johnson ^7 A. C. 219), 182,
194.
XXXll
TABLE OF CASES.
Orr-Pin
References are to pages.
Orr-Ewing- & Co. v. Grant (2
Hj-de, 185), 177.
Osgood V. Allen (1 Holmes, 185),
56, 91, 183.
V. Rockwood (11 Blatch. 310),
69, 255, 305, 311.
Palmer v. Harris (60 Pa. St. 156),
47, 69, 257.
Parker v. Hulme (1 Fisher, 44),
242.
Parkland Hill Blue Lick Water
Co. V. Hawkins (95 Ky.502),
66.
Partlett v. Gug-g-enlieimer (67 Md.
542), 47, 197, 257.
Parsons v. Hay ward (31 Beavan,
199), 134, 140.
Partlo V. Todd (17 Can. S. C.
. R. 196), 79.
Partridge V. Menck (2 Sandf. Ch.
R. 622), 46, 90, 257.
Paton V. Majors (46 Fed. Rep.
210), 268.
Paul V. Barrows (4 De G. J. & S.
150), 206.
V. Virginia (8 Wall. 168), 236.
Peabody V. Norfolk (98Mass. 452),
153, 155, 156.
Peltz V. Eichele (62 Mo. 171, 180),
149.
Pence v. Langdon (99 U. S. 578,
581), 123.
Pennsylvania Co. v. Railroad Co.
(118 U. S. 290), 236.
Pennsylvania Salt Mfg. Co. v.
Meyers (79 Fed. Rep. 87),
72.
People V. Fisher (57 N. Y. Sup.
Ct. 552), 37, 309.
V. Molins (10 N. Y. Supp.
130), 15.
V. Roberts (159 N. Y. 70), 138.
Pepper v. Labrot (8 Fed. Rep. 29),
13, 14, 127, 201.
Perceval v. Phipps (2 Ves. & B.
19), 157.
Perkins v. Heert (158 N. Y. 306),
230.
Perks V. Hall (W. N., 1881, p. Ill),
258.
Perry v. Truefit (6 Beav. 66), 6,
26, 46, 71.
Peterson v. Humphrey (4 Abb. Pr.
394), 14, 147.
Petrol i a Mfg. Co. v. Bell & Bo-
gart Soap Co. (97 Fed. Rep.
781), 21, 67.
Phalon V. Wriglit (5 Phila. 464),
47, 60, 258.
Phelan v. Collender (13 N. Y.
Sup. Ct. 244), 14.
Philadelphia Nov. Co. v. Blakes-
ley Nov. Co. (40 Fed. Rep.
588), 171.
Philadelphia R. R. Co. v. Quig-
ley (62 U. S. (21 How.) 213),
243.
Pickett v. Green (120 Ind. 584),
137.
Pidding v. How (8 Sim. 477), 46,
69.
Pierce v. Franks (IS L. J. Ch.
122), 273.
V. Fuller (8 Mass. 228), 134.
v. Guittard (68 Cal. 68, 71),
29.
Pike Mfg. Co. v. Cleveland Stone
Co. (35 Fed. Rep. 896), 69,
70, 130, 195, 199, 219.
Pilmore v. Hood (5 Bing. N. C.
97), 151.
Pillsbury v.Pillsbury-Washburn
Flour Mills Co., (64 Fed.
Rep. 841), 15, 49, 102, 182,
208, 209.
Pillsbury-Washburn Co. v. Eagle
(86 Fed. Rep. 608), 93, 95,
99, 220.
Pinto V. Badman (8 R. P. C. 181,
Cartmell, 270), 11, 80.
V. Trott (8 P. R. 173), 1%.
Pis- Ram
TABLE OF CASES.
XXXIU
References are to paqes.
Piso Co. V. Voight (4 Ohio N. P.
347), 47, 239.
Pittsburg- Crushed Steel Co. v.
Diamond Steel Co. (85 Fed.
Rep. 637), 131, 200, 213.
Plant Seed Co. v. Michel Plant
& SeedCo.(23Mo.App.579),
108.
P. Lorillard Co. v. Peper (86 Fed.
Rep. 956), 266.
Pollen V. LeRoy (30 N. Y. 549),
267.
Pollard V. Photographic Co. (40
C. D., Eng., 345), 157.
Pousardin v. Peto (33 Beav. 642),
224.
Popham V. Cole (66 N. Y. 69),
185.
V. Wilcox (66 N. Y. 69), 63,
183, 266, 306.
Porter v. Gorman (65 Ga. 11), 133,
142.
Portuondo v. Monne (28 Fed. Rep.
16), 181, 261.
Potter V. Commissioners of Inland
Revenue (10 Ex. 147), 135.
Potter Drug & Chem. Co. v. Mil-
ler (75 Fed. Rep. 656), 67,
195.
Powell V. Birmingham Vinegar
Brewery Co. (L. R. 1894,
3 Ch. D. 449), 88.
Pratt's Appeal (117 Pa. St. 401),
19, 92.
Pratt's Mfg. Co. v. Astral Re-
fining Co. (27 Fed. Rep.
492), 58.
Press Pub. Co. v. Monroe (73
Fed. Rep. 252), 243.
Price V. Goodall (L. R. 1891, 1
Ch. D. 35), 3.
Price Baking Powder Co. v.
Fyfe (45 Fed. Rep. 799), 67,
86, 262.
Prince's Metallic Paint Co. v.
Carbon Metallic Paint Co.
(Seb. 573), 105.
C
Prince's Metallic Paint Co. v.
Prince Mfg. Co. (1), (53
Fed. Rep. 493), 212, 215,
237, 339.
V. Prince Mfg. Co. (2), (57
Fed. Rep. 938), 124.
Prince Mfg. Co. v. Prince's Me-
tallic Paint Co. (15 N. Y.
Supp. 249), 14, 22.
Probasco v. Bou3'on (1 Mo. App.
241), 12, 145.
Proctor V. McBride (Fed. Cas.
No. 11,441), 197.
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Globe
Refining Co. (92 Fed. Rep.
357), 171, 197, 201, 202, 207.
Prudential Assurance Co. v.
Knott (L. R. 10 Ch. D. 142),
33.
Putnam Nail Co. v. Ausable
Horsenail Co. (53 Fed. Rep.
390), 32.
V. Bennett (43 Fed. Rep. 800),
177, 255, 329.
R.
Radam v. Destroyer Co. (81
Texas, 122), 266.
Radde v. Norman (L. R. 14 Eq.
348), 36 197.
Raggett V. Findlater (L. R. 17 Eq.
29), 62.
Rahtjen's American Composition
Co. V. Holzappel's Compo-
sition Co. (101 Fed. Rep.
257), 52.
Railroad Co. v. Harris (12 Wall.
65), 236.
Ralli V. Fleming (Ind. L. R. 3
Calc. 417), 203.
Ralph V. Taylor (L. R. 25 Ch. D.
194), 52.
Rammelsberg v. Mitchell (29 Ohio
St. 22), 149.
Ramsden v. D3'son (L. R. 1 H.
L. 129), 123.
XXXIV
TABLE OF CASES.
Ran-Re
References are to
Ransom v. Ball (7 N. Y. Supp.
238), 46.
V. Mayor (1 Fisher, 252), 242.
Ransome v. Bentall (3 L. J. Ch.
161), 184, 204, 206.
V. Graham (51 L. J. Ch. 897),
53, 204,
Rawlinson v. Brainard & Arm-
strong Co. (59 N. Y. Supp.
880), 69, 200.
Rawson v. Pratt (91 Ind. 9), 150.
Raymond v. Royal Baking Pow-
der Co. (85 Fed. Rep. 231),
72.
Re Adriance, Piatt & Co. (Comm.
Decis., 1881, p. 52), 329.
American Lubricating Oil
Co. (9 Off. Gaz. 687), 308.
American Sardine Co. (3 Off.
Gaz. 495) 307, 332.
American Saw Co. (58 Off.
Gaz. 521), 334.
Ames (23 Off. Gaz. 344), 332.
Arbenz (L. R. 35 Ch. D. 248),
129.
Armstrong & Co. (26 MSS.
D. 260), 330.
Atkins Filter Co. (3 P. R.
164), 63.
Barker's Trade-mark (53 L.
T. N. S. 23), 194.
Barrows (L. R. 5 Ch. D. 353),
204, 206.
Baschiera's Trade-mark (33
S. J. 469), 193.
Blakeslee & Co. (Comm. De-
cis., 1871, 284), 309.
Block & Co. (14 Off. Gaz. 235) ,
303, 309.
Boehm & Co. (8 Off. Gaz. 319),
302, 329.
Bogardus (5 MSS. D. 2), 332.
Bole Bros. (12 Off. Gaz. 939),
307.
Bovril (L. R. 1896, 2 Ch. D.
600), 66.
Bowe (50 MSS. D. 168), 332.
Re
pages.
Brandreth (Seb. 626), 63.
Brand Stove Co. (62 Off. Gaz.
588), 306.
Brigham (Comm. Decis. 1881,
p. 38), 306.
Brook (26 W. R. 791), 204.
Bush & Co. (10 Off. Gaz. 164),
67, 308.
California Fig Syrup Co. (L.
R. 40 Ch. D. 620), 375.
Chetwood (165 U. S.443), 271.
Chichester Chemical Co. (52
Off. Gaz. 1061), 332.
Christiansen (3 R. P. C. 54),
182, 266.
Coggin, Kidder & Co. (11 Off.
Gaz.), 1109, 308.
Consolidated Fruit Jar Co.
(14 Off. Gaz. 269), 306, 308.
Cornwall (1), (12 Off. Gaz.
312;, 68, 308, 334.
Cornwall (2), (12 Off. Gaz.
312), 307.
Dibble Mfg. Co. (18 MSS. D.
428), 329.
Dick & Co. (9 Off. Gaz. 538),
64, 309.
Dole Bros. (12 Off. Gaz. 939),
308.
Eagle Pencil Co. (10 Off.
Gaz. 981), 205, 307.
Edinburgh Correspondent
Newspaper (Ct. of Sess.
Cas. 1st ser. 1, new ed., 407,
n.),120.
Fairchild (21 Off. Gaz. 789),
333.
Farina (44 L. T. N. S. 99),
18, 122.
Farnum & Co. (Comm. De-
cis., 1880, p. 155), 329.
Finlayson, Bousfield & Co.
(61 Off. Gaz. 152), 331.
Fitzpatrick, Davis & Co.
(18 MSS. D. 278), 329.
Francis & Mallon (Comm.
Decis. 1871, p. 283), 307.
Re
TABLE OF CASES.
XXXV
References are to
Re Godillot (6 Off. Gaz. 641),
301.
Goodyear Rubber Co. (11 Off.
Gaz. 1062), 306.
Gorden (12 Off. Gaz. 517),
307.
Green (8 Off. Gaz. 729), 69.
Grossmith (60 L. T. N. S.
612), 68, 125.
Grove (67 Off. Gaz. 1447),
307, 332.
Hall (13 Off. Gaz. 229), 129,
306.
Hankinson (8 Off. Gaz. 89),
301, 302.
Hanson's Trade-mark (5 R.
P. C. 130), 172.
Heaton's Trade-mark (L. R.
27 Ch. D. 570), 47.
Hendley (72 Off. Gaz. 1654),
334.
Hauthaway (1), (Comm.
Decis. 1871, p. 97), 306.
Hauthaway (2), (Comm.
Decis. 1871, p. 284), 306.
Horsburg-h (53 L. J. Ch. 237),
64, 181.
Imbs (10 Off. Gaz. 463), 308.
India Rubber CombCo.(8 Off.
Gaz. 905), 306, 308, 309, 329.
Jelley, Son & Jones (51 L. J.
Ch. 639), 186, 266.
J. Marsching &. Co. (15 Off.
Gaz. 294), 334.
Johnson (2 Off. Gaz. 315), 63.
Jones (53 L. T. 1), 17.
Jordan (49 Fed. Rep. 238),
265.
Kampfe Bros. (58 MSS. D.
306), 329.
Kane & Co. (9 Off. Gaz. 105),
167, 307.
Kimball (11 Off. Gaz. 1109),
303, 330.
Knight (38 MSS. D. 341), 329.
Kuhn & Co.'s Trade-mark
(53 L. J. Ch. 238), 273.
Re
pages.
La Society Anonyme des Ver-
reries de I'Etoile (10 R. P.
C. 436), 193.
Lawrence (10 Off. Gaz. 163),
306.
Lisner (13 Off. Gaz. 455), 302,
329.
Maigen's Application (28 W.
R. 759), 69.
Manny & Co. (17 MSS. D.
155), 329.
Manske & Co. (64 Off. Gaz.
858), 326.
Maw, Son & Thompson (22
MSS. D. 403), 329.
Meyerstein (7 R. P. C. 114),
64.
Mitchell (L. R. 7 Ch. D. 36),
204.
Park (12 Off. Gaz. 2), 309.
Parker (13 Off. Gaz. 323), 300,
307.
Pierce (23 MSS. D. 16), 329.
Porter Blanchard's Sons
(Comm. Decis. 1871, p. 97),
306, 307.
Pratt & Farmer (10 Off. Gaz.
866), 309.
Proctor, Jr. (51 Off. Gaz. 1785),
333.
Rabone (Sob. 642), 186.
Rader & Co. (Comm. Decis.
1878, p. 67), 306, 309.
Railton (25 MSS. D. 321), 332.
Randell's Estate (8 N. Y.
Supp. 652), 144.
Rankinson (8 Off. Gaz. 89),
330.
Richardson (3 Off. Gaz. 120),
63, 306, 307.
Roach (10 Off. Gaz. 333), 306.
Roberts (1), (Comm. Decis.
1871, p. 113), 306.
Roberts (2), (Comm. Decis.
1871, p. 100), 306.
Roberts (3), (Comm. Decis.
1871, p. 101), 306.
XXXVl
TABLE OF CASES.
Re-Rob
Beferences ar
Re Rohland (10 Off. Gaz. 980),
68, 307.
Rothschild (7 Off. Gaz. 220),
301, 331.
Rowe & Post (9 Off. Gaz.
496), 306.
Rubber Clothing Co. (10 Off.
Gaz. Ill), 308.
Schmidt (53 MSS. D. 7), 326.
Simpson & Sons (16 Off. Gaz.
333), 301.
Snook (2 Hilt. 566), 102.
Speer's Trade-mark (4 R. P.
C. 521), 193.
Swezy (62 How. Pr. 215), 16.
Thayer (54 Off. Gaz. 957), 331.
Thewlis & Blakey's Trade-
mark (10 R. P. C. 369),
195, 199.
Thomas (14 Off. Gaz. 821),
305, 309.
Tolle (2 Off. Gaz. 415), 305,
307.
Vidvard & Sheehan (8 Off.
Gaz. 143), 301, 304.
Volta Belt Co. (8 Off. Gaz.
144), 303, 329.
Warburg & Co. (13 Off. Gaz.
44), 307.
Watson (16 MSS. D. 467),
330.
Weaver (10 Off. Gaz. 1), 309,
332.
Wellcome (L. R. 32 Ch. D.
213), 13, 21.
Whitaker(Newton'sDig.l30),
167.
Whiteley (43 L. T. N. S. 627),
186.
Worthington's Trade-mark
(L. R. 14 Ch. D. 8), 172, 194,
266.
Read v. Richardson (45 L. T. N.
S. 54), 54, 194, 267.
Reddaway & Co. v. Bentham
Hemp Spinning Co.(9R.P.
C. 503), 87, 182.
â– e to pages.
Reddaway & Co. v. Banham (L.
R. 1896, A. C. 199), 24, 88.
Redgrave v. Hurd (L. R. 20 Ch.
D. 1), 152.
Reed v. West (47 Tex. 240), 123.
Reeder v. Brodt (6 Ohio Dec. 248),
65, 218.
Reeves v. Denicke (12 Abb. Pr.
N. S. 92), 14, 141.
Regina v. Closs (D. & B. 460),
229.
V. Dundas (6 Cox, 380), 229.
V. Gray (Seb. 183), 229.
V. Smith (D. & B. 566), 229.
V. Sutter (10 Cox, 577), 229.
Reinhart v. Spaulding (49 L. J.
Ch. 57), 69.
Republic of Peru v. Reeves (40
N. Y. Sup. Ct. 316), 222.
Renter's Telegram Co. v. Byron
(43 L. J. Ch. 661), 158.
Reynolds v. Bullock (47 L. J.
Ch. 773), 139.
R. Heinisch's Sons Co. v. Boker
(86 Fed. Rep. 765), 30, 100.
Richards v. Butcher (L. R. 1891,
2 Ch. D. 522), 59.
V. Peacock (33 N. J. Eq. 606),
146.
Richardson & Boynton Co. v.
Richardson & Morgan Co.
(8 N. Y. Supp. 53), 121.
Richards v. Hunt (65 Ga. 342),
148.
Richmond Nervine Co. v. Rich-
mond (159 U. S. 293), 15.
Richter v. Anchor Remedy Co.
(52 Fed. Rep. 455), 11, 42,
213.
Richter v. Reynolds (8 C. C. A.
220), 11, 12, 131, 213, 329.
Rilletv. earlier (61 Barb.435),69,
83.
Rivero V. Norris (Seton, 4th ed.,
236), 224.
Roberts v. Sheldon (8 Biss. 398),
71, 198, 223.
Rob-Sch
TABLE OF CASES.
XXXVll
References
Robertson v. Berry (50 Md. 591),
115, 175.
V. Quidding-ton (28 Bcavan,
529), 138.
Robinson v. Finlay (L. R. 9 Ch.
D. 487), 17, 38, 129, 203.
Rodgers v. Novvill (1), (6 Hare,
325), 105, 176, 237, 273.
V. Nowill (2), (Cox, Manual,
No. 115), 270, 271.
V. Philp (1 Off. Gaz. 29), 240.
V. Rodgers (31 L. T. N. S.
285), 189.
Rogers v. Rogers (53 Conn. 121),
102, 107.
V. Taintor (97 Mass. 291), 16,
17, 105.
Rogers Co. v. Wm. Rogers Mfg.
Co. (70 Fed. Rep. 1017),
107.
Rogers Mfg. Co. v. Rogers &
Spurr Mfg. Co. (11 Fed.
Rep. 495), 107, 108, 258.
Rolt V. Bulmer (Seb. 614), 139.
Ropes V. Upton (125 Mass. 258),
150.
Rose V. Henley (47 L. J. Ch. 577),
190.
V. Henly (Seb. 551), 202.
V. Loftus (47 L. J. Ch. 576),
189, 190, 202, 219, 275.
Rosing V. Atkinson (27 Sol. J.
534), 68.
Rowland v. Mitchell (L. R. 1897,
1 Ch. D. 71), 2.
Rowley v. Houghton (2 Brewst.
303), 69.
Royal Baking Powder Co. v.
Davis (26 Fed. Rep. 293),
171, 175.
V. Raj'mond (70 Fed. Rep.
376), 2, 72, 98, 125, 126.
V. Royal Chemical Co. (Price
& Steuart, 1), 367.
Roy Watch Case Co. v. Camm-
Roy Watch Case Co. (50 N.
Y. Supp. 979), 198.
are to pages.
Ruhstrat v. People (185 111. 133),
230.
Rumford Chem. Works v. Muth
(35 Fed. Rep. 524), 58, 77.
Russia Cement Co. v. LePage
(147 Mass. 206), 15, 103, 107,
110, 138, 256.
Ryder v. Holt (128 U. S. 525), 212,
215, 237, 249, 339.
s.
Salomon v. Hertz (40 N. J. Eq.
400), 154, 155.
Sanitas Co. v. Condy (4 P. R.
195), 198.
Santa Fe Electric Co. v. Hitch-
cock (New Mex., 50 Pac.
Rep. 332), 139.
Samuel v. Berger (24 Barb. 163),
240.
Sawyer Crystal Blue Co. v. Hub-
bard (32 Fed. Rep. 388),
180, 190, 201.
Sawyer V. Horn(l Fed, Rep. 24),
26, 167, 176, 202, 263, 308.
V. Kellogg (1), (7 Fed. Rep.
721), 52, 108, 175, 198, 209,
223, 258.
V. Kellogg (2), (9 Fed. Rep.
601), 125, 223, 258, 262, 263,
273.
Sarrazin v. W. R. Irby Cigar Co.
(93 Fed. Rep. 624), 7, 9, 14,
16, 40, 70, 213, 327.
Saxby v. Easterbrook (Cox, Man-
ual, 606), 33.
Saxlehner v. Apollinaris Co. (L.