UnwerslijJ 0/
a
y
STATION BULLETIN 504 June, 1975
Chloride in Natural Waters
of
New Hampshire
by
Francis R. Hall
NEW HAMPSHIRE
AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION
UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
DURHAM, NEW HAMPSHIRE
University of New Hampshire
PREFACE
This publication is a result of the research program of the Institute of Natural
and Environmental Resources. The Institute is a multi-disciplinary group of
scientists involved in a coordinated program of research, teaching, and extension.
The research effort encompasses investigations of: problems affecting the quality
of the environment, economics of agriculture, forest and wildlife resources, the
efficient use and conservation of water and soil, and regional and community
planning and development.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I wish to thank the many students and faculty members at the University of
New Hampshire and the staff members from the various state and federal
agencies who helped make this publication possible. Particular thanks go to the
New Hampshire Water Supply and Pollution Control Commission for co-
operation in assembling much of the basic data.
The work reported herein has been accomplished as part of the research
mission of the Institute of Natural and Environmental Resources at the
University of New Hampshire. The research project has been supported by the
New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station and by the United States
Department of the Interior as authorized under the Water Resources Act of
1964, Public Law 88-379, through the New Hampshire Water Resource Research
Center.
Programs of the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Statiofi are open to
all persons without regard to race, color, national origin or sex. The University
of New Hampshire is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer.
SOURCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF CHLORIDE IN NATURAL WATERS:
NEW HAMPSHIRE AS A CASE HISTORY
by
Francis R. Hall
INTRODUCTION
Chloride is a very mobile but chemically inactive constituent in natural
waters. 2 For this reason, chloride is useful as a tracer and as an indicator of
potential problems although it is not harmful to humans except at fairly high
concentrations. The commonly accepted drinking water standard of 250
milligrams per liter (mg/£) is basically a taste threshold, people can drink up to
1000 mg/£ with little difficulty. However, other elements such as sodium and
heavy metals which may accompany chloride can be harmful at fairly low
concentrations. Also, chloride can contribute to corrosion and vegetational kills.
Particular advantages for the study of chloride are:
1. Data for many years are likely to be available in the files of various
agencies;
2. Little change in analytical techniques, so data from different times should
be comparable;
3. Natural sources can generally be identified.
Chloride in the dissolved or ionized form is of major concern herein; however,
the following conversion factors for the two major salt compounds referred to in
the text may be of interest:
sodium chloride (weight or concentration) x (0.607) =
chloride (weight or concentration)
calcium chloride (weight or concentration) x (0.639) =
chloride (weight or concentration)
The concentration unit used in this report is the milligram per liter (mg/£,)
except for solid salt where the part per million (ppm) is used. All weights are
given in terms of the short ton which is equal to 2,000 pounds.
The material on which the present paper is based has come mainly from a
research project entitled "Preliminary Investigation of Water Quality of New
Hampshire with Emphasis on Chloride and Selected Minor Constituents". The
intent herein, however, is to consider the source and significance of chloride in
natural waters in a broader sense and to treat New Hampshire as a case history.
The general method of approach is to consider regional aspects and to avoid
individual or local problems.
â– '^ Professor of Hydrology, Institute of Natural and Environmental Resources, University of
New Hampshire 03824
2j. D. HEM, STUDY AND INTERPRETATION OF THE CHEMICAL CHARACTER-
ISTICS OF NATURAL WATERS 170-175 (U. S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper
1473, 2nd ed. 1970) (hereinafter cited as HEM).
SOURCES OF CHLORIDE
In order to utilize and interpret chloride data in any meaningful way, it is
first necessary to establish what the normal values of chloride concentrations are
naturally. These values provide a baseline for evaluating changes which may be
attributed to human activity. The second thing that is needed then is to identify
the activities and assess the incremental values arising from them.
NATURAL SOURCES
Potential natural sources include atmospheric precipitation, dry fallout, rock
weathering, and saline water. Only the first two are of much importance to New
Hampshire or to most of the northeastern United States; however, the others can
be of considerable importance elsewhere.
Atmospheric Precipitation and Dry Fallout
The^ quantitative importance of chloride from atmospheric precipitation and
dry fallout varies with climate and distance from the ocean. For example,
considerable chloride in surface waters comes from the ocean in the southeastern
and northeastern parts of the United States2a, 3 whereas only a small amount
does in the southwestern U.S.'* With the ocean as a major source, lines of equal
chloride concentration (isochlors) can be expected to approximately parallel and
decrease inland from the ocean. This type of trend is shown in Figure 1 where
concentrations are about 10 mg/£ near the ocean and drop to less than one
inland. A comparable picture for Massachusetts is given in Motts and Saines^ and
for all of New England and New York in Jackson.6
A difficult question to answer is the amount of chloride which is dissolved in
atmospheric precipitation and the amount which occurs as dry fallout during
precipitation-free periods or is washed out of the atmosphere during precipita-
tion. Even if chloride in rain and snow is mainly recycled sea salt this need not
be -the case for dry fallout which can include material extracted from dust
2aA. W. GAMBELL & D. W. FISHER, CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF RAINFALL,
EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA AND SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA K9 (U.S. Geo-
logical Survey Water-Supply Paper 15 35-K, 1966).
^F. J. PEARSON, JR. & D. W. FISHER, CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF ATMOS-
PHERIC PRECIPITATION IN THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES P5-P8 (U.S.
Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1535-P, 1971).
"•"HEM 171.
^W. S. MOTTS & M. SAINES, THE OCCURRENCE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF
GROUND-WATER CONTAMINATION IN MASSACHUSETTS FIGURE 2 (University
of Massachusetts, Water Resources Research Center 7, 1969).
^D. D. JACKSON, THE NORMAL DISTRIBUTION OF CHLORINE IN THE NATURAL
WATERS OF NEW YORK AND NEW ENGLAND PLATE 10 (U.S. Geological Survey
Water-Supply Paper 144, 1905). (hereinafter cited as JACKSON).
picked up by the wind. Juang and Johnson^ present data showing that part of
the chloride leaving a small watershed in northern New England likely comes
from dr>' fallout. Based on Figure 1, Jackson^, Juang^ and Pearson and Fisher, 10
the author believes 0.5 mg/£, is a reasonable estimate for average chloride
reaching land surface in New Hampshire.
Igneous, Metamorphic and Sedimentary Rocks
Few rocks with the exception of evaporites are likely to contain much
chloride within theirstructures. ^ Evaporite deposits are derived by evaporation
of sea and lake water usually in closed basins. Marine evaporites in particular are
likely to be extensive and high in chloride. Therefore, water associated with
these rocks will also be high. For example, the Pecos River receives a
considerable increment of chloride from evaporites in southeastern New
Mexico. 12 A consideration of regional geology should show whether evaporites
are likely to be present in any particular area. For example, they are not present
in New England.
Concentrations in sedimentary, igneous and metamorphic rocks range from
15 mg/£ for sandstone up to 300 or more for shale. 13 Rock dissolution or
weathering will produce only very small concentrations in surface or ground
water although over time the accumulation may be large. Metamorphic rock
weathering is only a minor source in one small watershed in New Hampshire. 14
Chloride entrapped in sedimentary rocks leaving or entering after deposition can
be a significant item, and this will be discussed in the section on saline water.
Saline Water
Saline water may either be entrapped in sedimentary rocks during deposition
or may enter later. The former is probably most common in sandstone and shale
whereas the latter may occur in almost any rock near saline water. Two good
examples are brines found associated with petroleum deposits and sea-water
propagated inland by tides. The question of presence of brines is best answered
Juang & Johnson, Cycling of Chlorine through a Forested Watershed in New England, 72
J. Geophysical Research 5641-5647 (1967). (hereinafter cited as Juang).
^JACKSON.
9
Juang.
^°F. J. PEARSON, JR. & D. W. FISHER, CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF ATMOS-
PHERIC PRECIPITATION IN THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES (U.S.
Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 15 35-P, 1971).
Johns & Huang, Distribution of chlorine in terrestrial rocks, 31 Geochimica et
Cosmochimica Acta 35-49 (1967).
l^HEM 174.
l^Id. 171.
Juang.
V
Figure 1
/
Chloride distribution in New Hampshire, 1918-1924 /'' '*'
(•6.9
I
0.6
• Ground water
^0.4
J
i>7
1.0
05
07
7 0^ '
• • I
as
Q8
• 05
•
0.5
045
5.9
1.0
0.5
.0.7
06
0.6
/
'•7
/07
0.5
.1
1.6.
,"1.0
[?'
^Ojt'"
'I'l's 1.2 1.1
/ • • •
1.6
1.0
-2.4
10 -
1.1
,45
08
095
10
1.0 \2
•1.2
U
2.0./
1.6
0.9
40
I
tl 10
-t ^
/ 0.8°*^
/
i
>
i
1.6
0.« 08
1.1
1.5
1.0
4.0
1.2 [2 0.85
* t •
•15
1.2
i'/ 2 5'"
0.9V_10
1.3
4.0
10
2.8»
\
1.1
2.3
1.5
I 2.7
1.9
J.8'
3.8i.3-2,
r''7X)'>
1.9
27/60
,6J^ '
0.9
10
^^•' 6.5 3.0 \ ' ; 2.2 1° ; \ ?.i ' ■^^^^
/
) -^ 4*/' *' ' \] 48' '' /ifl \ /2 ^ — ^5.0*5
'U -"jV ^^ ?*^.a^°-y /:^i.2 ,'2.3 J^'Xsi/ u.^.^^r
^r^r ' -,. ^-|8,''.19 .u / \V\ '' ^ '^
V-i*' 2.5 , - - _ - ro "1 2~ ~ - -* ' / / 'c\ sjy-/ â– <r-''
by a consideration of regional geology. For example, brines are not likely to be
found in New England, but chloride from sea water is found in streams and
ground-water reservoirs or aquifers near the coast. Unless extensive intrusion is
caused by human activities such as excavations or ground-water removal, the
latter is significant only in a fairly narrow coastal strip.
Saline water in sedimentary rocks may also emerge in springs at the surface of
the earth. Depending on original depth, such water may be warm or hot. Also,
springs associated with volcanoes or recent volcanic activity may contain
chloride. It is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss whether this chloride
actually comes from the depths of the earth or is recycled sea salt. As with the
cases discussed above, the likely presence of such sources is best determined
from geological considerations.
SOURCES ASSOCIATED WITH MAN
The Minerals Yearbook for 1971 1? gives the following breakdown of salt used
in the United States in 1970: road deicing salt - 23 percent; food and
food-related uses — 17 percent; water softeners - 5.6 percent; and all other uses,
mainly industrial — 54.4 percent. A detailed source-by-source discussion would
become lengthy and confusing, so the approach will be to aggregate sources into
major categories of sewage and septic tank effluents, industrial effluents, and
road deicing salt. The sources associated with man are more homogeneous in
distribution than are the natural sources, hence they are as important in New
Hampshire as elsewhere.
Ordinary Sewage and Septic Tank Effluents
Contributions of chloride from human wastes undoubtedly vary with climatic
and other factors, but a reasonable value is that each human being contributes
about five to nine grams of chloride in excreta per day 1^17 which is equivalent
to four to seven pounds per capita per year. Kitchen and normal commercial and
manufacturing wastes contribute on the order of 14 pounds per capita per year,
and this combines with the human excreta value for a rule-of-thumb value of 20
pounds per capita per year contribution of chloride from these sources. ^^ In
general, the chloride level in effluents is raised some 40 to 80 mg/£. over the
basic value in the effluent-bearing water.
15 I. U.S. BUREAU OF MINES, MINERALS YEARBOOK, 1971, METALS, MINERALS,
AND FUELS 1031-1041 (1973).
16c. N. SAWYER & P. L. McCARTY, CHEMISTRY FOR SANITARY ENGINEERS 378
(2nd ed. 1967).
17 G. M. FAIR, J. C. GEYER, & M. C. MORRIS, WATER SUPPLY AND WASTE WATER
DISPOSAL 549 (1954).
18 O'Connor & Mueller, A water quality model of chlorides w Great Lakes, Proceedings
American Society of Civil Engineers 96, No. SA4, 955-975, 1970.
Water softeners that are charged with sodium chloride may also be a source of
chloride particularly in areas of hard water. This is not much of a problem in
New Hampshire, but in places where the water is hard a chloride increase of
perhaps 100 mg/£. has been suggested. This could be as much as 25 pounds per
capita per year in addition to the 20 pounds given above.
Industrial Effluents
The widespread variations in the location and concentration of industries
such as chemical plants or oil refineries where effluents may be high in chloride
makes difficult any form of generalizations as to assignment of rule-of-thumb
values. For example, Lakes Huron, Michigan, and Ontario receive several million
tons per year from chemical plants and similar industries. 20 New Hampshire
appears to have no area where really high concentrations of chloride can be
attributed to industries although there are individual point sources. So the
combined 20 pounds per capita per year figure is assumed adequate to include
all industries on a state-wide basis.
Road Deicing Salt
The increasing use of sodium chloride and calcium chloride as road deicing
salt has caused serious concern as evidence accumulates for its contamination of
water, corrosion of automobiles, and vegetational kills.^^^^The major usage has
been since the mid 1940's with sodium chloride being by far the more heavily
used compound. However, both chloride salts were used earlier for deicing on
roads, and calcium chloride has also been used to hold down dust. Direct
contamination of ground and surface waters has occurred due to inadequately
designed and maintained storage piles of salt.
The amount of road salt applied is a function of both climate and philosophy
on "bare" highways. State highway departments in the eastern and northeastern
United States use between 20 and 40 tons of salt per lane mile per year with
most states using 30 tons or less.^^ States in the southern and western parts of
the United States use only minor amounts or no road deicing salt. Specific data
^^E. J. STRUZESKl, JR., ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF HIGHWAY DEICING 47
(U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Water Pollution Control Research Series, 11040
GKK 06/71, 1971). (hereinafter cited as STRUZESKl).
^^O'Conner & Mueller, A water quality model of chlorides in Great Lakes, Proceeding,
American Society of Civil Engineers 96, No. SA4, 95 5-975, 1970.
21 R. FIELD, E. J. STRUZESKl, JR., H.E.M. MASTERS, & A. N. TAFURI, WATER
POLLUTION AND ASSOCIATED EFFECTS FROM STREET SALTING 34 (U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, National Environmental Research Center, EPA
R2-73-257, 1973). (hereinafter cited as FIELD).
22 R. c. TERRY, JR., ROAD SALT, DRINKING WATER, AND SAFETY - IMPROVING
PUBLIC POLICY AND PRACTICES 64-65 (1974). (hereinafter cited as TERRY).
are given for many states in sources such as Terry ,24 Struzeski 25 Field ,26 Highway
Research Board?^ Hanes?^ and Hawkins?^ Unfortunately, most of these sources
focus on state highway departments and similar large agencies while giving little,
attention to how much road deicing salt is used by county and municipal agencies.
Terry SOjoes indicate that in 1969, road salt use by 25 Greater Boston
communities was about 47,000 tons.
New Hampshire was an early user of road deicing salt, and on a highway
mileage basis it has also been a fairly heavy user. By 1966-1967 estimated
curriulated use was 2,300,000 tons.^^ In the early to mid 1960's, the annual use
on state highways was about 85,000 tons, but in the later 1960's and early
1970's the figure was 150,000 tons. Then both by decision and by benefit of a
mild winter or two the figure has dropped to 100,000 tons of salt in recent
years. Based on limited data the present author estimates that towns and cities
probably use at least 33,000 tons of sodium chloride per year.
Miscellaneous
One possible source of chloride already alluded to is saline water intrusion
due to pumpage of ground water or similar activities by man. This is most
commonly thought of as occurring near the ocean, but it can occur any place
where saline water bodies are present. High chloride values due to this are Ukely
to be fairly localized. In New Hampshire, intrusion is occurring around Great
Bay and the nearby Atlantic Ocean, and, although important locally, it is of
minor importance regionally.
The fairly common assumption that dissolved natural chlorine gas or chlorine
gas used in water treatment or other processes can be a source of chloride is not
correct. Without going into detail, the oxidation state of chlorine is so high that
dissociation to chloride is not likely under ordinary conditions at the earth's
surface ;^^ hence, chlorine is not a likely source of chloride in natural waters.
^^STRUZESKI 18-19.
2'^TERRY.
^^STRUZESKI.
^^FIELD.
2'^ ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION BY DE-ICING CHEMICAL AND EFFECTIVE
COUNTER-MEASURES (Highway Research Board Record 425, 1973).
2^R. E. HANES, L. W. ZE1.AZNY, & R. E. BLASER, EFFECTS OF DEICING SALTS ON
WATER QUALITY AND BIOTA-LITERATURE REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED
RESEARCH (Highway Research Board, National Cooperative Highway Research
Program Report 91, 1970).
^^PROCEEDINGS STREET SALTING - URBAN WATER QUALITY WORKSHOP AT
STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF FORESTRY, SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY (R. H.
Hawkins ed., 1971).
^^ TERRY 81.
^^TRUZESKI 18.
^^HEM 170-171.
CHLORIDE IN NEW HAMPSHIRE
A useful way to illustrate what can be done with chloride information is to
make approximate chloride balances for New Hampshire at two different times,
1920 and 1970, and to consider what happened during the intervening period.
Additional insights may be obtained from examples of chloride change in surface
water and ground water.
STATEWIDE BALANCE, 1920
It is assumed for purposes of this paper that Figure 1 gives a reasonable
picture of "natural" chloride distribution in New Hampshire and that 1920 is a
reasonable year for a "natural" chloride balance. True natural distribution of
chloride in the state probably can never be determined because New Hampshire
has been settled for a long time, and data are available for only a short, recent
period. Nevertheless, human activities are not likely to have had much influence
except locally before the Civil War or even later. Where the data exist, a town by
town comparison shows little or no change between data given by Jackson^^at
the turn of the century and the 1918-1924 data collected for the present study.
By 1918, however, there is definite evidence for unusually high chloride in
some drinking water, mainly from wells. The likely source of chloride is
probably a cesspool or perhaps in a few cases calcium chloride for dust control.
Such high values were not used in preparation of Figure 1, but the possibility
still exists that some of the higher values on the map particularly in the southern
part of the state reflect human influences. Where possible, data used on Figure 1
are from municipal or industrial supplies and from public institutions. To fill in
gaps, however, data from private, usually home supplies, are used. Also, only
ground-water data are used where possible. In a few cases lakes are used, but not
streams.
The approximate chloride balance for 1920 is given in Table 1. The balance is
based on the simple assumption that annual inflow equals annual outflow plus or
minus a change in storage. The implicit assumption is made that the residence
time of chloride and water is one year, and that the system is in a more or less
steady state condition so that the change in storage is negligible. These
assumptions pose few problems for 1920 except for a possible slight increase in
storage occurring due to human influence.
The precipitation and runoff figures are statewide averages given by
McGuinness.^"* The difference between precipitation and runoff of 20 inches
represents the loss of water by evaporation and use of water by vegetation. As
this is about 50 percent, chloride concentration in rainfall- can be expected to
double after reaching the earth's surface. Therefore, if average chloride in 1920
in the waters of the state was one mg/£, then chloride in precipitation should
^^JACKSON 15-18.
^"^MCGUINNESS, THE ROLE OF GROUND WATER IN THE NATIONAL WATER
SITUATION 524 (U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 1800, 1963).
have been about 0.5 mg/£. The 20 lb. per capita chloride figure for humans is
used although it may be a little large.
The outflow total of 18,900 tons or concentration of 1.2 mg/£. is the
consequence of the assumptions used in the balance. An examination of
published data up to 1920 suggests this is quite reasonable as shown by the area
weighted mean of 1.3 mg/£ in Table 2.
Table 1.
Chloride Balance for New Hampshire, 1920
Inflow Chloride, Tons
Atmospheric Precipitation and Dry Fallout!/ 14,500
Human Activity?./ 4,400
Total 18,900
Outflow
Surface water and Ground waterA^ 18,900
Change in Storagel^
1. 0.5 mg/^chloride in 43 inches of precipitation on 9,300 square miles.
2. 20 lbs. per capita per year for 443,000 people.
3. Equivalent to 1.2 mg/£^ chloride in 23 inches of runoff from 9,300 square miles.
4. Assumed zero, but human activities may actually be sufficient to cause a small increase
in storage.
Table 2.
Drainage for New Hampshire Areas, Average Runoff, Chloride Tonnage and
Concentrations for New Hampshire
Drainage Basin
Area, J.
miles2i'
743
Area
%
8.0
Annual
Runoff,
Inches
1920
Tons
Chloride
mg/^
.84/
1970
Tons
Chloride
Androscoggin
24.262/
1,050
6,540
57/
Saco
862
9.3
31.912/
1,800
.94/
7,980
46/
Connecticut
3,058
32.9
21.952/
4,380
.95/
38,900
88/
Merrimack
3,770
40.6
22.462/
9,210
1.55/
73,700
128/
Piscataqua
848
9.1
2I.OOI/
3,870
3.06/
9,040
79/
Total
9,281
99.9
20,310
136,160
Area weighted mean 23.16
1.3
8.7
1. LAND, WATER, RECREATION - THE WATER RESOURCES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
117 (New Hampshire State Planning Project Report No. 10, 1965).
2. WATER RESOURCES DATA FOR MASSACHUSETTS, NEW HAMPSHIRE, RHODE
ISLAND, AND VERMONT, 1972, (U.S. Geological Survey, 1974).
3. Estimated from data in Id.
4. F. W. CLARKE, THE COMPOSITION OF THE RIVER AND LAKE WATERS OF THE
UNITED STATES 24 (U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 135, 1924).
5. M. D. Leighton, NORMAL AND POLLUTED WATER IN NORTHEASTERN UNITED
STATES 37-38 (U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 79, 1903).
6. Estimated by author.
7. Estimated from data in WATER RESOURCES DATA FOR MAINE, 1972, (U.S.
Geological Survey, 1973) and records in UNH files.
8. Discharge weighted value approximated from data in WATER RESOURCES DATA FOR
MASSACHUSETTS, NEW HAMPSHIRE, RHODE ISLAND, AND VERMONT, 1971,
(U.S. Geological Survey, 1973).
9. Based on Lamprey River and Oyster River data in UNH files.
10
STATEWIDE BALANCE, 1970
The general chloride distribution for 1968-1970 in New Hampshire is given in
Figure 2. These data are taken where possible from municipal water supphes
utilizing ground water. However, private well supplies and in a few cases
municipal ponds or lakes are used to fill in the gaps. Except for municipal
supplies an attempt was made to avoid wells contaminated with road deicing