state mandates many programs, and asked whether they funded any of them
at present or had any plans to. rir. Bellavance stated that Gorham has
been receiving some monies for mandated programs, but very little. Any
newly mandated programs must be funded. The difficulty is that the sta*e
has been sending through new standards on older mandated programs, so
they cannot be considered "newly mandated". Donna Debliis asked what the
difference was between Shelburne and Gorham per pupil costs. r/lr.
Bellavance responded that Shelburne "s tuition was based on 89-9O
expenditures, while Gorhams per pupil costs were based on current expenses.
81
Therefore, at this time, Gorham is paying in from $500. to $700 more than
Shelburne. Lynn Newell asked how we were doing in relation to the State
average per pupil cost. fir. Bellavance responded that Gorham's average
for High School students was $400 to $450 higher than the state, but that
the Gorham average for grade scliool st idents was almost $600 less than
the state. George Hill asked what the impetus was behind the area coop-
erative study. Mr. Bellavance answered that enrollment is down t
in many mandated areas in many area schools. A situation ideal for
students and learning, but hardly cost-effective. Districts in this
area are concerned about keeping high quality programs going in a more
cost conscious way. Lynn Newell asked if the area demographics study
was still going on. It is. Looking at space needs, population projections.
The surveys have been returned, and they are in the process of correlating
and collating. Should have draft ready by late spring or early summer.
The project shows a projected 10-11% enrollment increase - higher , of
course in Shelburne and Randolph. Planning to create a Middle School
in 1992. Jackie Corrigan commented that many teachers are taking on —
extra small classes in addition to their regular class load, which
accounts for some small class numbers. She felt that because of this
the numbers reported per class might be skewed to the lower side.
Donna Deblois asked what would happen to the 6th grade tuition figure
when they are included in a middle school situation. Tte-. Bellavance
said that indications were that the 6th grade figures would rise, but
the 7th and 8th tuition figures would decrease. All in all, the average
of the three would be slightly down. Bob Corrigan asked if the per pupil
cost in Grade School would rise. Mr. Bellanance stated that it appeared
that there would be a slight impact, but a figure below the state average
would be maintained.
VOTED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE
Article #7 i To transact any other business which may legally come before
this meeting.
The question was asked as to who might serve on the School District
Planning Committee. Lynn Newell said that the Selectmen would suggest
George Hill as the Selectmen's representative. Bob Corrigan suggested
that interested persons nominate themselves to the School Moderator for
consideration.
Under this article Jo Carpenter moved thaf'the School District enter into
the record of this meeting its thanks and appreciation to Mrs. Justina
Hale for her services to the parents and children of the District."
SO DECLARED AND UNANIMOUSLY AFFIRMED.
Lynn Newell moved that the business meeting be recessed for the purpose
of counting ballots. Robin Henne seconded this motion.
Meeting recessed at 91IO pm, March 12, 1991-
Meeting reconvened for reporting of election results at 9i40 pm, March 12.
Motion by Connie Leger and seconded by Hildy Danforth to adjourn the
annual Shelburne School District meeting.
Meeting was adjourned at 9:46 pm, March 12, 199I.
Respectfully Submitted,
It/.,
^C, Ann Leger
School Clerk
82
FINANCIAL REPORT
OF THE
SHELBURNE SCHOOL DISTRICT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
JUNE 30, 1991
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the information contained in this
report was taken from the official records and is complete and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. The accounts are
kept in accordance with Section 17 of Chapter 21-J of the Revised
Statutes Annotated and regulation Chapter Rev. 1100, Financial
Accounting for Local Education Agencies on file with the
Administrative procedures Act, and upon forms prescribed by the
Department of Revenue Administration.
DEBRA B. BAKER
JO ANNE CARPENTER
Nena Onacki
School Board
ROBERT BELLAVANCE
Superintendent of Schools
August 26, 1991
83
BALANCE SHEET
June 30, 1991
ASSETS
Cash on Hand, June 30, 1991 $26,864.34
Capital Reserve Fund - Bus 13,551.94
TOTAL ASSETS $40,416.28
LIABILITIE S
Unreserved Fund Balance $26,147.19
Capital Reserve Fund - Bus 13,551.94
Other Payables (Office Furn .Ctr . ) . . . 693.00
(Town of Gorham) 24.15
TOTAL LIABILITIES $40 , 416 . 28
84
o o o o o
c;ox503o=>r-
S3e
^^
U CIS
PM
B
H
Pd
U V3
H
SS
H
O b
Q
>-] g
d
Q pa
8
^H rj n T
in \£> r^ 00 (T> o >
rn >D r^ CO
r^f^r-r- oir^r^r^r^r^r^
r^ r^ r^ c p^ r>- r* i
r^ r^ r^ (^ r^ T^ I
X 'J
05 O
< C q:
H O Q-
Z H
UJ u Q
Z o cu
bJ 3
â– -) u a
UJ u xt
Ul wJ
c u
a:
en a
T. <fl
< r H
oc < u
o a 3
o u o;
cc o E-
a cc CO
Q. 7.
a •-!
u) a
ui a
'_) Ul
U4 o I
a. O H
tn > o
41 :<:
(/I OS
O
O J
at
aw
3 o
t/l o
-. . CJ
-I Q ?;
a V. <
3 uj a
a. H •->
< 13
< O tn
O >-> J
â–ºH Q M
O 3 a
o < =
X o X
H X o a
_] O UJ UJ
< X Ul X
UJ U) Q. (-
z a. lA o
CO
l-l u.
— 1 H Q u.
iQ (O Ul <
c z r H
O >-< CO
H J
iJ u. < H
CJ O Z CO
3 O Z
U UJ h-l i-i
w > H
(0
H
c a: z
H Ui 1-1
E a. r
-o o ^ o
< X CO <
K
o; wj UJ <
COO
U O 1-1 o
(3 X u- UJ
O U< CL.
CO O to
Z Q
UJ <
'J
K O
UJ O
X X
e- CJ
O CO
â– ^.
1/1 <^ <
3 7"
m CO 1
1-1 a.
u, o
DC CO
O J «
Q. < UJ
CO z z
Z « M
< W CO
cc H ^
H Z CO
M (-• Ul
a ^ X
u UJ H
o. (J O
> H
cc z
Ul UJ
CO E
u
H J
X UJ
o
.J a. J
< a. <
M 3 H
a CO o
UJ H
O 06
<: u
z X
< H
ji o
85
Ed
Hi
o
eu
§
M
•->
(d
*».
M
S5^
s2
CO
' .
SS
O M
vo in o o
â– o oo
CO rr,
" =0030
â– * O O 3 3 3
30— .oooor^
^ f^ D a^ O > -H '
â– T in o r* X
a-. 3 ^ ri .*i -T ir. o
00 GO CO CO
S CO CO 00 30
030)23 CODXXOOCO 0X}00
» X> X> S 3>
V)
oc o s:
'^ O <
c a a
-. o a, o
u H o
^ ^ Q a:
Q o ui a.
Q 3
M U DC Q
r u <: uj
U) i-l
c u u
1-4 e> w
Oi O
'yl
<T.
Ul
-<
H
H
a
~;
CO 4-> S
>H
I-H
ULi
.H
c
X
<
UJ
Ul CO
5- fc< Iw
(J
' — 1
h- O
LLi
c
iX
X.
y.
H
<
e-
CO
CO X
PROGRAI
[NSTRUC
I Suppo
••SOCIAL
o
n
tn UJ
'T
H
Ul
H-t
»H
c
J
C£
CO
n
J J
c
^. r:
H
c
o.
"
jT*
-0
a.
o
J
CO
H -
< o
IT,
c
HH
en
o
Q
o
d
Q
^.
<
a
<
ul
c: a
O i-i
-)
H
J
<
CC
CO
<
»t
•-1
u<
i/V
X
:.i
O >-<
n Q
l-H
u
u- rr.
H
fT.
y
«1
o
y.
a:
1-1
J
a ?:
U u
c
o
o -^
t/>
— 1
o
u.
<
X
d
Ul
/T
UJ
CO
*^
^
w
o <
^
3
o
i-:
11
ffi
o
u
u>
<
o
H
d.
H
o
t-i
â– J H
O -H Q
o
J 4
a
U
UJ l-l
M
u
OC
O
c
ii
H
V.
m
EC
CO o
r.i /vr n. -i*
x
X
O X
iJ
> H
01
J
ul
<
J
H
iJ
i-i
â–º-1
Ul
H
VOC 1
OTHEI
Pui
atte:
a.
(-
X u
nc
(0
O <
a
c
o
o
a:
o
m
»r
<
J
QC
O
DC
Q
J
O It]
UJ
c
cc u
UI
u
o
CJ
to
o
3
o
>^
*-i
(-
ul
<
1— t
't
>• lAj
X
1-1
a. LJ
X
o
X
U4
UJ
X
X
i£i
to
♦ *
n.
X
X
x!
X
:d
w
i/i a.
H
T. a
H
o
u<
a.
H
u
r<H
a.
;_>
UJ
H
<
H
O X
a en
o
w UJ
o
W o
tf) O
V.
U.
O
C>
u
86
r^ O O O
in o o o o o
o o CO o o o o
O T
in «
in «
o «
CN «
.-1 .^1 ^ T
ln^.o^^a>iT^o >^Hrvjm
'J' in ^o r~ CO
J\J\3SJ\ (fl^JNCT\CT\<T^ON
^ CTN 0^ ON CT\
^ ON ON ON ON ^ ON
O U :<:
3
u
X ui a:
CO <
Ul
J
to a, o
>l
M
bu H
o
o r: tn us
(J
-1 H Q
Ul c
o
o < i: H i^
O
rt) to Ul
< H
X
C X K < U O J
J J
c z s
H e
u
a o X :3 a<
< O
en M
tn T3 a
en
rt o o X ai-i
O 1-1
a r^ J
< X
U Q x o e- 3 o
1-1 Q
1-1 *J Cu <
t- <
^
u u a X en m o
O 3
a, o o z
tn -^ o
o
3 0. z w
u
o «t
3 3 o
Z ID 10
n
u, X Q M — 1 ♦
u
vJ +
a 14 u M
l-l u
X
u < U Q H Q
vu
X
o X
4J > H
Hi ij
V) ^ ui X a>:
«t
H
X o
X m O <
X c o
c ;-> o ui 3 u]
Q
_)
u UJ
Ul C X o
UJ tj O
>^ U UJ U X C H
<
X lij
X 11 a. :li
X o X
U 0< 5 H H =1
UJ
(0 a.
H E Q
H O
K tf) > b < O X
a, ui
O M u
O <n
X Z Z
m w iH
Q* s r.
3 Q Q z
CO < < w
z
[L. < Z Q
o w u <:
X o
u < .J
o X o
HH U UJ o
Ul UJ X X
Oi Q. H O
O (0 O <A
u) o tn
4) IH >
O E-i H X
H Z < U
> < H cn
u ^ X
(U Oi O 1-3
CO a< <
Cu CO Z
0) O Z K
Ul d: cd
lU H X E-1
C Z H z
H iJ 1-1 1-1
Ul o; Kf ij
3 CJ r. M H
ffi tn -r 04 z
hH O. => UJ
a, o a< u
M J a,
6-1
tn < Oi
3 M o
ffl X en
Id
X C3 X
UJ < u
X Z X
87
o o o o o
o o
o o
in lO
o o
o o
in in
in ^o r^ 00 <T^
o o o o o
M O
tn a a a a iH
a
S ^ in
U V.7. V. X 2
X
C >^ 4)
OJ O U> 3 =>
lU
H a K CJ >0 O
M.4 U^ Ui U^ U( H
U U bl < - t H
in in
Q
M CO u >
c a: CL en K )H
z
06 H 0) 3 I-.
m en u u. cj a
=j
H Z >< W O 0)
Li
ei^
to O e-i I-" en
H O O O O H
IH CJ M ti >H
H H H E- O
z
Q J', 1-1 U u
T> H
bJ
H 3 J j; j:
c en en en (n
O
i-j i: M 4J 4)
3 n i: z is
a r o o Q
u. < < < <
H
S8S
« fiC IX IX
O
H 1- H H
1-
88
REPORT OF DISTRICT TREASURER
FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR JULY 1, 1990 TO JUNE 30, 1991
Cash on Hand, July 1, 1990 $ 545.97
Received from Selectmen:
Current Appropriation 377,460.00
Revenue from State Sources 7,324.70
Received from all Other Sources 1,740.87
TOTAL RECEIPTS $386,525.57
TOTAL AMOUNT AVAILABLE FOR FISCAL YEAR $387,071.54
LESS SCHOOL BOARD ORDERS PAID $360,207.20
BALANCE ON HAND, JUNE 30, 1991 $ 26,864.34
AUDITORS' CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that we have examined the books,
vouchers, bank statements and other financial records of the
treasurer of the school district of SHELBURNE, NEW HAMPSHIRE
of which the above is a true summary for the fiscal year ending
June 30, 1991, and find them correct in all respects.
RODNEY A. HAYES
LOUISE BEVIN
Auditors
September 12, 1991
89
Notes
Notes
Notes