United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the.

The Industrial reorganization act. Hearings, Ninety-third Congress, first session [-Ninety-fourth Congress, first session], on S. 1167 (Volume pt. 7) online

. (page 140 of 140)
Online LibraryUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on theThe Industrial reorganization act. Hearings, Ninety-third Congress, first session [-Ninety-fourth Congress, first session], on S. 1167 (Volume pt. 7) → online text (page 140 of 140)
Font size
QR-code for this ebook


13. Fraud on Patent Office

13.2.1. 35 U.S.C. § 131 : 35 U.S.C. § 122.

13 41, Kingsland v. Dorsev, 338 U.S. 318. 83 USPQ 330 (1949), Beckman
Instruments Inc. v. Chemtronics, Inc., 428 F. 2d 555. 165 USPQ 355 (5th Cir-
1970) ; Charles Pfizer & Co. v. F. T. C, 401 F. 2d 574, 579 (6th Cir. 1968), cert
denied, 394 U.S. 920 (1969).

13.4.2. King.sland v. Dorsey, 338 U.S. 318. 319, 83 USPQ 330, 331 (1M9).

13.4.3. Precision Instrument Mfg. Co. v. Automotive Maintenance Maeh. Co..
324 U.S. 806, 818, 65 I'SPQ 133. 1.30 (1945) ; Beckman Instruments, Inc. v.
Chemtronics, Inc., 428 F. 2d 555, 165 USPQ 355 (5th Cir. 1970) ; Monolith
Portland Midwest Co. v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp., 407 F. 2d 288.
160 I'SPQ .577 (9th Civ.. 1969) : Monsanto Co. v. Rohm and Haas Co.. 312
F. Supi). 778. 793; 104 I'SPQ .5.-.O. .568 (E.D. Pa. 1970).

13.4.4. Beckman Instrumeents, Inc. v. Chemtronics, Inc., 428 F.2d 555, 165
USPQ 3.55 (5th Cir. 1970).

13,12,1, 208 F.Supp. 598. 135 USPQ 254.

13.17.4, SR v. BTL, appeal dismissed as being moot, 317 F.2d 491, 137 USPQ
497 (2nd Cir. 1963).

13.17.8. See SR v. BTL, appeal dismissed as moot, 317 F.2d 491, 137 USPQ (2nd
Cir. 1963).

13.38.1, SR v. BTL. 208 F.Supp. 598, 605, 135 USPQ 254. 259.

13 39.15, Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery and Chemical
Corp., 382 U.S. 172, 148 USPQ 308 (1965) .



5909

13.39.16, Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery and Chemical
Corp., 382 U.S 172, 147 USPQ 404 (1965).

13 39.17, Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. Chemtronics, Inc., 328 F.Supp. 1132,
113S. 170 USPQ 466, 470-471 ( W.D. Tex. 1971 ) .

13 39 18, Cataphote Corp. v. De Soto Chemical Coatings, Inc., 450 F.2d 769,
772. 171 USPQ 736, 738-739 (9th Cir. 1971), cert, denied, 408 U.S. 929, 174 USPQ
li»3 (1972).

13.39.19, Waterman-Bic Pen Corp. v. W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co., 267 F.Supp. 849,
856 153 USPQ 499, 504 (D. Del. 1967). See also Beckman Instruments, Inc. v.
Chemtronics, Inc., 328 F.Supp. 1132, 1138, 170 USPQ 466, 470-471 (W.D. Tex.

13.39.20, TTnited States v. Standard Electric Time Co., 155 F.Supp. 949, 952,
116 USPq'm, 16 (D. Mass. 19-57).

13.39.21, Eli Lill.v and Co. v. Generix Drug Sales, Inc., 460 F.2d 1096, 174
USPQ 65 (5th Cir. 1972).

14. Other Patents and Patent Applications

14 14 6 Struthers Scientific and International Corp. v. General Foods Corp.,
334 F.Supp. 1329, 1331-32, 172 USPQ 426, 427-429 (D. Del. 1971).

14 14.7, United States v. Gaxo Group. Ltd., 410 U.S. 52, 176 USPQ 289
(1973) ; Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co., 405 U.S. 251 (1972).

15. SR— IBM August 21, 1856 Agreement

15.6.1, 15 U.S.C. § 1.

15.7.1, 15 U.S.C. § 2.

15 25, 15 U.S.C § 1: Standard Oil v. United States, 221 U.S. 1 (1911) ; United
States V. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co., 310 U.S. 150 (19J0) ; Times-Picayune Publish-
ing Co. V. United States; 345 U.S. 594 (1953) ; United States v. E. I. du Pont de
Nemours & Co., 351 U.S. 377 (1956) ; United States v. National Lead Co., 63 F.
Supp. 513, 66 USPQ 141 (S.D. N.Y. 1945), affd, 332 U.S. 319, 73 USPQ 498
(1947).

15.25.1, 15 U.S.C. § 1.

15 -V, 1 1 United States v. Line Material Co.. 333 U.S. 287, 76 USPQ 399 (1948) ;
Standard Oil Co. (Indiana) v. United States, 283 U.S. 163, 9 USPQ 6 (1931) ;
Report of the Attorney General's National Committee to Study the Antitrust
Laws (1955), at 242.

15 26. United States v. National Lead Co., 63 F.Supp. 513, 66 USPQ 141 (S.D.
NY 1945) ; atf'd, 332 U.S. 319, 73 USPQ 498 (1947) : United States v. Timken
Roller Bearing Co., 83 F.Supp. 284, 81 USPQ 28 (N.D. Ohio 1949) .

15.36, United States v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 351 U.S. 377 (1956) : 16
Business Organizations, Von Kalinowski, Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation,
§ 8.02.

15.40. 15 U.S.C. § 15; Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 395 U.S.
100, 161 USPQ 577' (1969) .

17. 1961 Agreement of SR and BTL

17.2.8, SR V. BTL, 208 F.Supp. 598, 135 USPQ 254 (S.D. N.Y. 1962).

17 3.4, United States v. Line Material Co., 333 U.S. 287, 76 USPQ 399 (1948) ;
Standard Oil Co. (Indians) v. United States, 383 U.S. 163, 9 USPQ 6 (1931) ;
Report of the Attorney General's National Committee to Study the Antitrust
Laws (1955), at 242.

18. 1965 Agreement of SR and IBM

18 9.2, United States v. Line Material Co., 333 U.S. 287, 76 USPQ 399 (1948) ;
Standard Oil Co. (Indiana) v. United States, 383 U.S. 163, 9 USPQ 6 (1931) ;
Report of the Attorney General's National Committee to Study the Antitrust
Laws (1955), at 242.

19. Discriminatory Licensing

19.9.2. Peelers Co. v. Wendt, 260 F.Supp. 193. 151 USPQ 378 (W.D. Wash.
1966) : Bela Seating Co. v. Poloron Products, Inc., 438 F.2d 733, 168 USPQ 548
<7th Cir.) cert, denied, 403 U.S. 922, 170 USPQ 65 (171) ; La Salle Street Press,
Inc. V. McCormick & Henderson, Inc., 445 F.2d 84, 170 USPQ 305 (7th Cir. 1971).



5910

19 9 4, Laitram Corp. v. King Crab, Inc., 244 F. Supp. 9, 17-19, 146 USPQ &40-
645-647, modified, 245 F.Supp. 1019, 1021, 147 USPQ 136, 137-138 (D. Alaska
am) ; Peelers Co. v. Wendt, 260 F. Supp. 193, 204, 151 USPQ 378, 386 (W.D.
Wash. 1966).

21. Section 7 of the Clayton Act

21.6.5, 15 U.S.C. § 18.

21.6.6, Act of October 15, 1914, ch. 823, § 7, 38 Stat. 731-32, amended 64 Stat.
1125-26, December 29, 1950; United States v. Philadelphia National Bank, 374
U.S. 321, 337-38, 340-41 fn. 18 (1963).

21.6.7, 15 U.S.C. § 18.

21.6.8, Highland Supply Corp. v. Reynolds Metals Co., 327 F.2d 725, 728 (8th
Cir. 1964).

22. Statute of Limitations

22.2.5, 15 U.S.C. § 15(b).
22.3.1, 15 U.S.C. § 15(b).
22.4.1, 15 U.S.C. § 15(b).

22.10.1, 15 U.S.C. § 15(b).

22.10.2, 15 U.S.C. § 15(b).

23. Infringement of ENIAC

23.1.44, Graver Tank and Manufacturing Co., Inc. et al. v. Linde Air Producrs
Co., 339 U.S. 605, 607, 85 USPQ 328, 330 (1950).

23.1.45, 35 U.S.C. § 283.

25. Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

25.2, 15 U.S.C. §26; United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 340 U.S. 76.
87 USPQ 276 (1950) ; United States v. National Lead Co., 63 F.Supp. 513, 66
USPQ 141 (S.D. N.Y. 1945), affd, 332 U.S. 319, 73 USPQ 498 (1947).

O



BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY







Online LibraryUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on theThe Industrial reorganization act. Hearings, Ninety-third Congress, first session [-Ninety-fourth Congress, first session], on S. 1167 (Volume pt. 7) → online text (page 140 of 140)