This is a digital copy of a book that was preserved for generations on library shelves before it was carefully scanned by Google as part of a project
to make the world's books discoverable online.
It has survived long enough for the copyright to expire and the book to enter the public domain. A public domain book is one that was never subject
to copyright or whose legal copyright term has expired. Whether a book is in the public domain may vary country to country. Public domain books
are our gateways to the past, representing a wealth of history, culture and knowledge that's often difficult to discover.
Marks, notations and other marginalia present in the original volume will appear in this file - a reminder of this book's long journey from the
publisher to a library and finally to you.
Usage guidelines
Google is proud to partner with libraries to digitize public domain materials and make them widely accessible. Public domain books belong to the
public and we are merely their custodians. Nevertheless, this work is expensive, so in order to keep providing this resource, we have taken steps to
prevent abuse by commercial parties, including placing technical restrictions on automated querying.
We also ask that you:
+ Make non-commercial use of the files We designed Google Book Search for use by individuals, and we request that you use these files for
personal, non-commercial purposes.
+ Refrain from automated querying Do not send automated queries of any sort to Google's system: If you are conducting research on machine
translation, optical character recognition or other areas where access to a large amount of text is helpful, please contact us. We encourage the
use of public domain materials for these purposes and may be able to help.
+ Maintain attribution The Google "watermark" you see on each file is essential for informing people about this project and helping them find
additional materials through Google Book Search. Please do not remove it.
+ Keep it legal Whatever your use, remember that you are responsible for ensuring that what you are doing is legal. Do not assume that just
because we believe a book is in the public domain for users in the United States, that the work is also in the public domain for users in other
countries. Whether a book is still in copyright varies from country to country, and we can't offer guidance on whether any specific use of
any specific book is allowed. Please do not assume that a book's appearance in Google Book Search means it can be used in any manner
anywhere in the world. Copyright infringement liability can be quite severe.
About Google Book Search
Google's mission is to organize the world's information and to make it universally accessible and useful. Google Book Search helps readers
discover the world's books while helping authors and publishers reach new audiences. You can search through the full text of this book on the web
at http : //books . google . com/|
^^>r
Digitized by VjOOQIC
LIBRARY
MJIVERSITY OF CAUtOWfWk
DAVIS
Digitized by
Google
Digitized by VjOOQIC
Digitized by
Google
62d CONGRESS = = 3d SESSION
DECEMBER 2, 1912-MARCH 4, 1913
HOUSE DOCUMENTS
Vol. 62.
WASHINGTON : : GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFnCE : : 1913
l.ll'.KAK\
UNlVtKSlTY OF CALIFORHIA Digitized by COOglC
nAVTR
Digitized by
Google
^^Sdsi^w^ } H0U8E OF REPRESENTATIVES { ^Na 947^
DECISIONS
OF THE
COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS
AND OF THE
UNITED STATES COURTS
IN
PATENT AND TRADE-MARK AND
COPYRIGHT CASES
COMPILED FROM VOLS. 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 18Q, 181, 1S2, 183, 18^ AND
186 OF THE OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE UNITED STATES
PATENT OFFICE DURINQ THE YEAR
1912
WA8HINQT0N
GOVEBNMSNT PBIKTINa OFFIOB
1918
Digitized by VjOOQIC
L OV THM UMrUBD flTACTB PATKNT OSV^COB
DURING TBB TSAR 1912,
WtRtrr AS8IGrZA29X OOMMZBSZOXOBR.
HON. C. O. BrLXilNG-S.
AflsxarxAirr ooboossioksr.
Digitized by VjOOQIC
INDEX OF CASES.
pecUooflofflieSapremeCkrartof thoDIfltilotofCdiimbUani^ United Statei
District Courts by the letter (b); United States Oronit ConrtB by the letter (e); Court of Appeals of tlie
District of Columbia by one star (*); United States Ciicuit Court of Appeals by the letter (if); andtlia
Supreme Court of the United States by two stan («*).]
A.
Pag«.
**A. B. Dick Company. Henry etal.v 675
A. Sila, Inc. Ex parte 230
Aerial Teleplume and Power Company. In re 24
Alexander Milling Company v. Vemiar 26
Allgoever. Ex parte 293
American Boiling Mill Company. Ex parte 343
American Sugar Refining Co. Ex parte 157
Amigo. Ex parte 21
Aahley. Nnman v 59
B.
B. Fiechor & Co. v. John BlauPs Sona Comp)any v, Columbia Rice Packiug Co.,
Ltd 280
Bach. Ex parte 33
BaetB t?. Kukkuck 14S
•Baetzv, Kukkuck 515
Baker. Ex parte 291
Bamee and Thonchmidt. Williams v 16S
*Bame6 and Thorschmidt. Williams r 550
Barthels. Ex parte 171
Base. Ex parte 294
Bayles. Ex parte 70
Beard. Ex parte 138
Bettendorf. Ex parte 363
*Bettendorf. Nash v 447
Bettendorf v. O'Connor 41
*Bettendorf . O 'Connor v : M, 446
BlankeTeaA Coffee Company v. Hirph * 243
Bliss. Dixon V 411
Bogooelavsky. Ex parte 182
♦Bolin t?. Slhagluff 570
Bolm. Slingluffi? 257
Both. Ex parte 279
Boyce 1?. Russell and RusseU. Weinberg v 374
Bradbury. Forsbeig v 89
Bradley V. Doering, jr. Moore and McEee t; 205
Bradley r. Miggett 183
♦Bradley ». Miggett 510
Brakeley v. Sears A Nichols Company 144
♦Bnkeley. Sears A Nichols Company 517
m
Digitized by
Google
Vr INDEX OF CASES.
Pafe.
Brenzinger. Ex parte 249
•Brewer v. Whitney 474
Brewer. Whitney v 127
Brunnenechenkl v. Roeanz. Christians v 235
Bryan. Ex parte 145
Burcharts v. Nolan and Wright v. Christiansen 196
Burden v. Manson 393
Burk. Ex parte 338
Barks. Seacombe v 270
Burton Medicine Co. v. United Drug Co 166
Buser. Ex parte 365
C.
*C. A. Gambrill Manufacturing Company. H . Becker & Company v 503
*C. A. Qambrill Manufoicturing Company v. Waggoner-Gates Milling Company. 543
•California Winery. Carmel Wine Company v 428
Canfield. Lewis v. Deutsch v. Lum v. Murphy v 220
•Carmel Wine Company v. Califomia Winery 428
Carrier. Cramer and Hodge v 106
Charles E . Hires Company. Ex parte 203
Chilton Printing Co. v. Ciass Journal Co 251
Christians v. Brunnenschenkl v. Rosanz 235
Christiansen. Buchartz v. Nolan and Wright r 196
♦Clark. Sunmiersv 523
Class Journal Co. Chilton Printing Co. v 251
Cleal. Hopkinsv 213
♦Cleal. Hopkinsv 545
Cleveland. Skeith and Burrows v. Trout v 37
♦Cohen. Jackson Corset Company v.. 534
♦Collisv. Quenzer 502
Collis. Quenzer v 172
.Columbia Rice Packing Co., Ltd. B. Fischer & Co. v. John Blaul's Sons
Company v 280
Compos. Ex parte 256
Consumers Company v. Hydrox Chemical Co 261
Cosper. Gold v. Gold v 370
•Courson v. O'Connor 540
Covert. Greene V 236
Cramer and Hodge v. Carrier 106
Crone v. White 242
Cross V. Rusby 'MS
** Crozier v. Fried. Krupp Aktiengesellschaft 633
D.
♦Darlington. Mills and Conn t; 460
Davison. Ex parte 94
Dean. Ex parte , 124
Deere & Mansur. In re 61
De Ferranti v. Lindmark 300
♦Deitsch Brothers v. Loonen 531
Delson v. Sampliner v. Meyers. Gardner v 367
Demmler. Ex parte 375
Digitized by
Google
IKDBX 07 OASES. V
Pate.
Deutoch V. Lum V. Muiphy V. Ganfield. Lewis t; 220
Dietrick. Ex parte 11
Dietze and Dietze v. Gassinan 139
Dixcm v. Blifis 411
Doering, jr. Moore and McKee v. Bradley v 205
Douglaas. Dunn i; 360
Duncan. Wood v., 314
Dunn V, Douglaas 360
Duriiam Duplex Razor Company. Ex parte 200
B.
E. C. Atkins & Company. J. & Riley Carr v. William Schollhom Company v.
Warren Axe & Tool Company v. Geo. H. Bishop & Co. v. Radigan, Rich & Co.
V. Graefv 222
Eagle Pencil Company. Exparte 125
*Eagle Pencil Company. In re 572
*Elliott and Darlington. Mills and Conn t; 460
Elliott Jewelry Company. Ex parte 96, 317
Emerson v, Sanders 14
*£merson. Sanders v 437
Emil Fleischl & Son. John F. Jelke Co. v 63
P.
F. R. Chamberlain Company. Ex parte 25
Fanand. Exparte 227
FoTBbeigv. Bradbury 80
Fowler v, Uptegraff 357
Franklin MacVeagh & Company. Ex parte 368
Fred. C. Mansfield Co. Ex parte 397
**Fried. Knipp Aktiengesellschaft. Crozierr 633
Friedlander. Herbert v. Payne and Simms v 122
Frisbee and Baker. Winn v. Thuillier v 210
a.
Gamewell Fire-Alann Telegraph Company. Exparte 394
Gammeterv. Thropp 140
Gardner v. Delson v. Sampliner v. Meyers 367
Geo. H. Bishop & Co. v. Radigan, Rich Sc Co. v, Graef v. E. C. Atkins & Com-
pany. J. & Riley Carr v. William Schollhom Company v. Warren Axe *
Tool Company v 222
Gibson. Rinehart v 387
*Gibson. Rinehart v 573
Girardelli. Exparte .• 239
Goebel Sc Sons Grocer Company v. Johnson 207
Gold. Exparte 162
*Gold. In re 511
Gold V. Gold V. Cosper 370
Goldbeig, Bower Sc Co. Ex parte 272
Goldsmith and Whiting. Exparte 350
Goodrich Drug Co. Ex parte 303
Graef V. E. C. Atkins & Company. J. A Riley Carrv. William Schollhom Com-
pany V. Warren Axe & Tool Company v. Geo. H. Bishop Sc Co. v. Radigan,
Rich<fcCo. V 222
Digitized by
Google
VI INDEX OF OASES.
Pace.
Graham v. Laoghaar 92
Greenaway Brewing Company. W. A. Ross & Brother, Ltd., v. Loiiis Bergdoll
Brewing Company v 180
Greene v. Covert 236
Greig. Ex parte 224
Grosse and French. Ex parte 10
Gidick. Huffi; r 102
*Gulick. Huffv 488
Gussman. Dietze aikl Dietze v 139
H.
♦H, Becker A Company v. 0. A. Gambrill Manufacturing Company 503
Hamby. Ex parte 254,308
*Hammer. McManus v 474
Hanna and Hanna. Ex part<? 279
^Hansen. Slick v 551,
Hartford. Ex parte 345
Hawkins v. Ward 50
•Hawkins v. Ward 453
Hay. Paterson V 320
*Healeyi;. Inwood and Lavenberg 448
Henri, Helbronner, and Recklinghausen. Ex parte 204
**Henryetal. v, A. B. Dick Company 575
Henry W. Peabody A Co. In re 290
Herbert r. Payne and Simms v. Friedlander 122
Herahberg & Company. Ex parte 364
Hertzberg and Wohl. Ex parte 362
Hett v. Swinnerton 231
Hewitt V. Holz v, Hewitt 69
♦Hewitt V. Weintraub 518
**Hewitt and Rogers. Weintraub v 466
Hewlett. Steinberger v 323
Hill. Smith and Larsenv 97
Hilliker. Ex parte 318
Hirah. Blanke Tea A Coffee Company t; 243
Hobbs. Ex parte 275
Hodgldnson v. Rotter 379
Hodkinson. Ex parte 201
♦Hodkinson. In re 558
Hoffman. Stollwerck Brothers, Inc., v. "Lucerna " Anglo-Swiss Milk. Choco-
late Co. v 359
Hogeand Riebe. Exparte 287
Holland Rusk Co. Michigan Tea Rusk Co. r 85
Hollenv. Kelly 329
Holt A Co. V. Kansas Milling & Export Co 333
Holz t;. Hewitt. Hewitt v 69
Hopkins v. Cleal 213
♦Hopkins V. Cleal 545
Horton and Keen. Ex parte 276
Huffv. Gulick 102
♦Huff v. Gulick 488
Hydrox Chemical Co. Consumers Company v 261"
Digitized by
Google
IKDEX OF OASES. Vn
L
Page.
^Independent Breweries Company. Inre 559
*Inwood and Lavenberg. Healeyv 448
J.
J. C. Blair Company. Exparte 244
J. A Riley Carr v, William Schollhom Company v, Warren Axe & Tool Com-
pany t;. Geo. H. Bishop & Co. v. Badigan, Rich & Co. v. Graef v, E. C.
Atkins^ Company 222
Jackflon Company v. Rogers & Thompson 22
*Jackson Corset Company v. Cohen 534
Jacobson. Inre 285
Jenksv. Pagelsen 330
Jennings. Ex parte 153
John Blanl's Sons Company v. Columbia Rice Packing Co., Ltd. B. Fischer &
Co.i? 280
♦John Braadland , Limited . I n re 432
John F. Jelke Co. v. Emil Fleischl & Son 63
Johnson. Goebel & Sons Grocer Company v 207
Johnson Educator Food Co. v. Sylvanus Smith & Co., Inc 27
♦Johnson Educator Food Company v, Sylvanus Smith & Co., Inc 440
Jones. Exparte 206
Kaisling. Kneidy v 12
Kansas Milling & Export Co. Holt & Co. v 333
Kaufman. Exparte 255
Kelley. Exparte 283
Kelly. Hollenv .^ 329
Keyes and Kraus v, Yunck 246
Keystone Paint ic Filler Co., v. National Lead & Oil Co. of Pa. v. Keystone
Varnish Co. v. Pupat v. Lines 405
Kiely. Tomlinstm v .* 305
Klenkv. Kruse 135
Kneisly V. Kaisling 12
Knox V. Pries t;. Murphy. Queneel v 372
Knox. Voegeli Brothers Drug Company i; 391
*Kruh v. TluHnas 528
Kruse. Klenkv 135
Kukkuck. Baetzv 148f
•Kukkuck. Baetzv 515
Kunmski v. Ramsey 238
L.
LaJeunesse. Exparte ! 898
Labofish. Exparte 813
Lake Region Packing Association. Exparte 413
Lang. Rogers v 382
Langhaar. Graham v 92
LeBrouv. Nix.... 110
*Le Brou v. Nix 521
♦Lederer v. Walker 560
Lederer. Walkerv 177
Digitized by
Google
vm nn)Ex of gasss.
Page.
Lennox. Schulzev ^..••.' 229
Levering Coffee Company v . Merchants Coffee Co 187
* Levering Coffee Company v. Merchants Coffee Company 547
Levin. Noble v 198
Lewis V. Deutsch v. Lum v. Murphy v. Canfield 220
Lewthwaite. Ex parte 68
Lillie. Sovereign and Lenders v 402
Lindmark. DeFerranti v 300
Lines. Keystmie Paint & Filler Co. v. National Lead & Oil Co. of Fvl. v. Key-
stone Varnish Co. v. Pupat v 405
*Loonen. Deitsch Brothers v 531
Ix)hmann. Ex parte 336
Louis BeigdoU Brewing Company v. Greenaway Brewing Company. W. A.
Ross A Brother, Ltd., v 180
''Lucema" Anglo-Swiss Milk Chocolate Co. v. Hoffman. StoUwerck Brothers,
Inc.,t; 359
Lum V. Murphy v. Canfield. Lewis v. Deutsch v 220
M.
McBerty v. Shore and Shore 45
Mcintosh v. Riley 352
McKenzie. Pope v 3
^McEenzie. Pope v 450
«McManufl v. Hammer 474
Maas. Ex parte 212
*Maa8. In re 536
Mack. Weisv 400
Madame Irene v. Schweinbuig 114
Madden. Ex parte 20
^Madden. In re 444
Manson. Burden v 393
*Marconi. In re 483
^^Marshall Engine Company. New Marshall Engine Company et al 617
♦Martin. Western Electric Co. v 567
♦MattuUath. In re 490
Merchants Coffee Co. Levering Coffee Company t; 187
♦Merchants Coffee Company. Levering Coffee Company r 547
♦Meyer Bros. Coffee and Spice Company. In re 490
Meyers. Gardner v. Delson v. Sampliner v 367
Michigan Tea Rusk Co. v. Holland Rusk Co 85
♦Midgley v. Ward 442
Miggett. Bradley v 183
♦Miggett. Bradley V 610
Miller. Ex parte 265
♦Mills and Conn v. Darlington .^ 460
♦Mills and Conn v. Elliottand Darlington 460
Mobley, jr. Ex parte 407
Moffatt. Onderdonkv. Rontke v 296
Moore. Ex parte 112
♦Moore. In re 472
*Moore, Commissioner of Patents. United States ex re). Srott and Scott,
Executors, v 513
Moore and McKee v, Bradley v. Doering, jr 205
Digitized by VjOOQIC
INDEX OF CASES. IX
Ifcvgan. Ex parte .• 65
*Moi^gan. In re 481
Mnrphy. Quensel v. Knox v. Pries 372
Murpliy V. Canfield. Lewis v. DeuUch v. Lum i; 220
Myers. Ex parte 356
Mygatt. Ex parte 81,219,354,396
N.
♦Nash V. Bettendorf 447
National Lead & Oil Go. of Pa. v. Keystone Varnish Co. v, Pupat v. Lines.
Keystone P^tint A Filler Co. V 405
Naylor. Ex parte 40
Nelson. Ex parte 340
**New Marrfiall Engine Company et al. v. Marshall Engine Company 617
Newman. In re 284
Nix. LeBrouv 110
*Nix. LeBrouv 521
Noble V. Levin 198
Nolan and Wright v. Christiansen. Buchartz v 196
Numan V. Ashley 59
O.
O'Brien. Ex parte 240
O'Connor. Bettendorfv ' 45
♦O'Connor V. Bettendorf 444,446
♦O'Connor. Courson v 540
♦Olson. Poffenbarger t; - 553
Onderdonkt?. Rontke v. Moffatt 296
Ontario-Cucamonga Fruit Exchange. Strawn v 346
P.
Pagelsen. Jenksv 330
Paine. Ex parte 322
Pahner. Ex parte 146
Palter. Ex parte 95
Partridge. Ex parte 299
Paterson v. Hay 320
Pattencm. Ex parte 142
6Patter»on. United States t; 418
Payne and Simms V. Friedlander. Herbert i; 122
Phelps. Ex parte 67
Pittiburg Brake Shoe Company. In re 78
♦Poffenbaiger v. Olson 553
Pope. Ex parte 141
Pope tJ. McKensie 3
♦Pope r. McKenzie 450
Porter. Ex parte 36
Poulson. Ex parte 38
Pries r. Murphy. Quensel v. Knox v 372
Pupat V. Lines. Keystone Paint & Filler Co. v. National Lead & Oil Co. of
Pa, V. Keystime Varnish Co. v 405
♦Putnam v, Wetmore and Niemann 537
Putnam. Wetmcwe and Niemann i; 190
Digitized by
Google
X INDEX OF CASES.
Q.
Page.
Quensel v. Enox v. Pries v. Murphy 372
Qiienzer v. GoIUb 172
*Quenzer. Gollis t; 602
B.
Radigan, Rich & Ck). t;. Graef v. E. C. Atkins & Company. J. & Riley Carr v,
William Schollhom Company v. Warren Axe & Tool Company v, Geo. H.
Bishop d; Co. v 222
Ramsey. Kurowsldv 238
Reed & Camrick v, Waterbury Chemical Company 281
ReiBch Brewing Co. Ex parte 34"
Revere Rubber Company. Ex parte 248
*Ricet;. Schutte '. 606
Riley. Mcintosh v 362
Rindiart v. Gibson 387
*Rinehart v. Gibson 573
Rogers v, Lang 382
Rogers d; Thompson. Jackson Company t; 22
Rontke v. Moffatt. Onderdonk v 296
Rosanz. Christians v. Brunnenschenkl v 236
Rose. Ex parte 194
Roeenbluth. Ex parte 63
Rosenthal Brothers. Ex parte 228
Rotter. Hodgkinson t; 379
Rotter V. Samuelson 7
a Rudolph A West Company. Twitchell r 417
Rusby. Cross V 348
Russell and Russell. Weinberg v. Boyce v 374
8.
Sampliner v. Meyers. Gardner v. Delaon v 367
Samuelson . Rotter v 7
^Sanders v. Emerson 437
Sanders. Emerson v 14
Schweinburg. Madame Irene v 114
Schulze V. Lennox 229
♦Schutte. Rice 606
♦Schweinf urter Pracisions-Eugel-Lager-Werke Fichtel & Sachs. In re 466
Scott & Scott, United States ex rel., v. Moore, Commissioner of Patents 613
Seacombe V. Burks 270
♦Sears A Nichols Company v. Brakeley 517
Sears A Nichols Company, Brakeley v 144
Sherwin-Williams Company. Exparte 226
Shinola Company. Exparte 99
Shore and Shore. McBerty t; 45
Shumate Razor Company. Exparte 295
Sims. Exparte.... 160
Skeith and Burrows v. Trout v. Cleveland 37
♦Slick t). Hansen 561
Slingluffv. Bolin 267
♦Slingluff. Bolin v 670
Smith. Exparte 49
Digitized by
Google
INDEX OF CASES. XI
Page.
Smith and Lanen V. Hill 97
**Soci^t4 Anonyme dee Anciens Etabliasements Cail. United States v 620
Soci^t6 Anonyme Des Usines Remy. Ex parte 8
Sovereign and Lenders v. Lillie 402
**Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Company et al. r . United States 652
^Standard Soap Company. Siunmit City Soap Works v 430
Stebler. In re 117
Steinbeiger r. Hewlett 323
Stickney. Ex parte... 408
StoUwerck Brothers, Inc., v. "Lucema" Anglo-Swiss Milk Chocolate Co. v.
HofiEman 359
Stniwn V. Ontario-Cucamonga Fruit Exchange 346
Strimban . Ex parte 195
Stroh. Ex parte 208
•Summers r. Clark 523
•Summit City Soap Works v. Standard Soap Company 430
S winn erton . Hettv 231
Sylvanus Smith & Co., Inc. Johnson Educator Food Co. t; 27
*Sy IvanuB Smith & Co., Inc. Johnson Educator Food Company v 440
T.
•Tallmadge. In re 434
Taylor. Ex parte 1,309
Temple and Goodrum. Ex parte 70
Thaddeiis Davids Co. Ex parte 75,152
^Thomaa. Kruhv 528
Thomas v . Weintraub 55
•Thomaa v. Weintraub 456
Thompscm . Ex parte 297
Th(»npa(m and Boss. Ex parte 363
Thropp. Gammeter v 140
Thuillier v, Frisbee and Baker. Winn v 210
Tilden. Ex parte 265
Todd and Mayr. Ex parte 376
TcHnlinson v. Eiely 305
Trout v. Cleveland. Skeith and Burrows t; 37
Turner. Ex parte 159
aTwitchell V. Rudolph <k West Company 417
TJ.
Underwood Typewriter Company v. Universal Stenotype Co 385
United Drug Co. Biurton Medicine Co. i; 166
6United States tJ. Patterson 418
••United States v, Soci^t^ Anonyme des Anciens Etablissments Cail 620
••United States. Standard Sanitary Manufacturing Co. et al. v 652
•United States ex rel. Scott and Scott, Executors v, Moore, Commissioner of
Patents 513
Universal Stenotype Co. Underwood Typewritei Company t; 385
Uptegraff. Fowler t; 357
Utrecht Export Cy. Griendt Brothers, Ltd. Exparte 304
V.
Vernier. Alexander Milling Co. i; 26
Vi-Stix IVoductB Company. Ex parte 54
Voegeli Brothefs Drug Company v, Knox 391
•Von Wetebach. In re 605
Digitized by
Google
XU INDEX OF CASES,
W.
Fftffe*
W. A. Roes & Brother, Ltd., v, Louis Bergdoll Brewing Company v. Green-
away Brewing Company 180
*Waggoner-Gatee Milling 'Company. C. A. Gambrill Manufacturing Com-
pany V 543.
**Wagner Electric and Manufacturing Company. Weetinghouse Electric and
Manu&cturing Company v 641
Walker v. Lederer 177
*Walker. Lederer t> 560
Walter Baker 4& Company, Ltd., v. Worth 109
Want . Hawkins v 50
*Waid. Hawkins V 453
♦Ward. Midgley V 442
Warner. Ex parte 181
Warren Axe & Tool Company v, Geo. H. Bishop & Co. v. Radigan, Rich drCo. v,
Graef v. E. C. Atkins & Company. J. & Riley Can* v. William Scholl-
hom Company V 222
Warren Webster & Company. Ex parte 2
Wateri)ury Chemical Company. Reed & Cariirick v 281
Weaver. Ex parte 80
Webber v. Wood 351
Webster. Ex parte 312
Weinberg v, Boyce v, Russell and Russell 374
* Weintiaub . Hewitt v 518
*Weintraub v, Hewitt and Risers 466
Weintraub. Thomas v 55
♦Weintraub. Thomas v 456
Weisv. Mack 400
Welsbach. Ex parte 154
Wenzelmann and Overholt. Ex parte 218
*Wenzelmann and Overholt. In re 535
♦Western Electric Co. V. Martin 567
**WeetinghouBe Electric and Manufacturing Company v. Wagner Electric and
Manufacturing Company 641
Wetmoreand Niemann v. Putnam 190
♦Wetmore and Niemann. Putnam v 537
White. Crone i; 242
Whitney v. Brewer 127
♦Whitney . Brewer v 474
William Peterman, Inc. Ex parte 91
William Schollhom Company v. Warren Axe & Tool Company v. Geo. H.
Bishop & Co. V, Radigan, Rich & Co. v. Graef v. E. C. Atkins & Company.
J. A Riley Can t; 222
Williams. Ex parte 288
Williams v, Barnes and Thorschmidt 168
♦Williams v, Barnes and Thorschmidt 550
Wilson. Ex parte ,... 87
Winn v. Thuillier v. Frisbee and Baker 210
Wood v. Duncan 314
Wood. Webber « 351
Worth. Walter BakerA Company, Ltd., v 109
Wynne. Ex parte 84
Y.
Yunck. Keyes and Krausv 246
Digitized by
Google
INDEX OF CASES CITED.
[The opinlcNtt of the Attemey General are indicated by a double dagger (X); of the State courts by a seetioB
mark (|); the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia by the letter (a); United States District ooorts
by the letter (6); United States Circuit Courts by the letter (e); Court of Appeals of the District of Colum-
bia by one star (*); United States Circuit Courts of Appeal by the letter (d); Supreme Court of the United
stateaby two stars (**),]
A.
Page.
c A. B. Dick Co. «. Henry et al., 149 Fed. Rep., 424 ^ 587
rf A . B . Dick CJo. v. Milwaukee Oompaiiy , 168 Fed . Rep., 930 595
*A. Lescben & Sons Rope Company v. American Steel & Wire Co. of New
Jeraey, 36 App. D. C, 456 126
*A. Lichen & Sons Rope C<nnpany v. Broderick & Bascom Rope Company, 36
App.D. C, 451 125,126
•♦Adams v. Burks, 17 Wall., 453 582,600,613
♦Adams v. Murphy, 18 App. D. C, 172 176
(/^olianCo. r. JulegOo., 155 Fed. Rep., 119 595
Agee. Ex parte, C. D., 1902, 399; 101 O. G., 1609 Ill
♦♦Albright r. Teas, 106 U. S., 613 579,608,612
JAll^;retti r. Chocolate Cream Co., 177 111., 129 534
d American Acetylene Burner v. Kirchbeiger et al., 142 Fed. Rep., 744 276
c American Cotton Tie Co. v. Bullard, 4 Ban. d Ard., 520 594
♦♦American Cotton Tie Co. v. Simmons, 106 U. S., 89 598
c American Cotton-Tie Co. v, Simmons, 3 Ban. & Ard., 320 594
c American Graphophone Co. v. Hawthorne, 92 Fed. Rep., 516 592
r American Graphophone Company v. Walcutt, 87 Fed. Rep., 556 18
d American Lava Co. v. Steward, 155 Fed Rep., 731 276
♦American Stove Company v. The Detroit Stove Works, 31 App. D. C, 304. . . 31, 443
American Tin Plate Co. v. Licking Roller Mill Co., 158 Fed. Rep., 690 318, 386
♦Ams. In re, 29 App. D. C, 91 267,270
♦Andrews V. Nilson, 27 App. D. C, 451 297
♦Anti-Cori-Zine Company, 34 App. D. C, 191 2
♦♦Armour Packing Co. v. United States, 209 U. S., 56 663
Arnold v, Vaug^en and Cabot v. Arnold and Fisher, C. D., 1904, 78; 109 0. G.,
805 363
Athert<m and Happ v. Cheney, C. D., 1904, 294; 111 O. G., 1040 330
Atkins r. Fox, 45 MS. Dec, 188 53
♦♦Ayers V. Carver, 17 How., 591 , 167
B.
Baetz V. Kukkuck, C. D., 1912, 148; 178 O. G., 887 515
♦♦Baglinetal. t>. Cusenier, 221 U. S., 580 114,116,522,549
Barnes. Ex parte, C. D., 1905, 69; 115 0. G., 247 81,142
(Barrett Chemical Co. v. Stem, 176 N. Y., 27 92
Bam. Ex parte, C. D., 1901, 177; 97 0. G., 1176 HI
Batcheller. Ex parte, C. D., 1898, 656; 86 0. G., 1583 533
♦Battle Creek Sanitarium Company, Limited, v. Fuller, 30 App. D. C. 411. . 30, 86, 253
Bauer v. Crone, C. D., 1904, 336; 111 0. G., 1939 89,91,141