|
HISTORY ^
Ancient Woodbury,
f^ \
FROM THE
>5' > ^
FIRST INDIAN DEED IN 1659 TO 1819,
INCLUDING THE
PRESENT TOWNS OF WASHINGTON, SOUTIIBUUY, BETHLEHEM,
ROXBURY, AND A PART OF OXFORD AND MIDDLEBURY,
CONTAINING THE
GENEALOGICAL STATISTICS OF THE SAME,
AND OF ANCIENT STRATFORD, FROM 1639 TO 1728.
BY WILLIAM COTHREN,
VOLUME III.
WOODBURY, CONN.:
PUBLISHED BY WILLIAM COTHREN
1879.
ri
r
/ d^
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1879,
By WILLIAM COTHREN,
In the OfBce of the Librarian of Congress.
as wBiXisteir
r^U^ 8 1915
Press op The Case, Lock-wood & Bkainaiid CosrPANT, Hartford, Conn.
INTRODUCTION.
Genealogical inquiries have become far more frequent than they
were fifty years ago. Since the publication of the first volume of
the History of Ancient Woodbury in 1854, by the compiler of
this, he has been overwhelmed by a multitude of letters, increasing
in number with the passing years, making inquiries after genea-
logical information not contamed in that book. The design of
the genealogical part of that work was the introduction of the
genealogies of such families, bearing the early names in the
ancient territory, as the living members of which would interest
themselves in furnishing him, from family Bibles and other
authentic sources, the later branches, so as to make a complete
family history. This was needful, because, from the breaking out
of the War of the Revolution, the public records were scantily
and imperfectly kept for more than fifty years. At the time of
the publication of that work, great inattention and ignorance
existed in relation to genealogical information. The writer was
often amused, in the course of his inquiries, when he found intelli-
gent and otherwise well-informed persons unable to tell the names
of their grandfathers. Perhaps the publication of the History of
Ancient Woodbury, with others of a similar nature of other locali-
ties, has had much influence in arousing and fostering an interest
in genealogical inquiries. At any rate, the pressure of these inqui-
ries upon the compiler has become so great, that he is in some
sense compelled to publish this work as a personal relief from the
labor of continual searches of the records to answer the questions
of correspondents. After this work shall have been published,
the writer can answer each inquirer by a printed circular, saying :
" Behold ! I have written it all in aybook; purchase, and search for
yourselves." '■'-'— -r'.v ^ ia
This spirit of research, — this inquiry after the history of one's
ancestors, near or remote, is commendable. The sons of New
England have an ancestry of which they may well be proud. We
4 HISTORY OF ANCIENT WO'' -: '
are far from saying that pride of birth, or arrogance of position
are to be coramepded and cultivated, or that they are to be compared
to an upright life and virtuous character. In this regard, we join
with Frederick of Prussia in the exclamation : "I love the lineage
of heroes ; but 1 love merit more. Patents of nobility are but
phantoms ; true worth is within. Kings are nothing but men, a,nd
all men are equal." While, therefore, we repudiate the idea that
there is any honor in searching for an illustrious ancestry as a
means to elevate the ignoble in the estimation of the world, and
in relying on such ancestry as a shield to cover, not only a multi-
tude of transgressions, but also great mental imbecility and mean-
ness; yet it is nevertheless true that the upright son of genius,
who can point to a long and virtuous line of ancestors, whose
fair fame has been by himself untarnished, has that whereof he
may well be proud. Not that mushroom, aristocratic pride, so
often witnessed in those whose fathers were from the lowest grade
in life, which leads its possessor to daintily spurn the air breathed
by those whom he terms the "common herd"; but that manly
pride experienced by those who are actuated by pure aspirations
and high resolves for the good of mankind ; for the advancement of
the best interests of the race. Su!'h men have a right to search
the dim and dusky records of the past, and having found an hon-
ored and virtuous line of progenitors, have a right to be recorded
as the legitimate and true descendants of an illustrious race. In
this view, the inquiries concerning this subject, made during the
last few years with so good success, are eminently pi'aiseworthy.
All such investigations should tend to rebuke false pride, and to
encourage unobtrusive merit. There is no more contemptible
spectacle in social life than the foolish and absurd airs put on by
miserable pretenders to standing and refinement, so often seen by
sensible observers. If such coxcombs and butterflies could know
and appreciate the supreme contempt bestowed upon their preten-
sions by all people of common sense, it is believed that some, even
of their number, brazen-faced and hardened as they have become,
would be shamed into propriety. Such behavior is to the last
degree vulgar and disgusting. There is no gentihty in it.
No inquiries can be more interesting to the intelligent student
of human nature, than those that relate to the generations of men.
The feelings that prompt them are just and natural. They give
birth to some of the dearest charities of life, and fortify some of
the sternest virtues. The principle that prompts them lies deep
^JB
I N T K O D I' C T I O N . O
within our n:tture. In the eloquent words of Kdward Everett,
uttered duriiis; the last years of his life, — Tie sacred tie of
family, which, reaching backward and forward. ) nd> the genera-
tions of men together, and draws out the plaintive music of our
being from the s*>lcmti alternations of cradle and grave — the black
and white keys of life'.* harjv wer of lan-
guage, which puts spirit in communion with .spirit in distant
perio Is and climes ; the syrii{u»thies of country, which \k\u] the
Greek of the prestMit day to talk of the victories < > gaine»l over
the barl>arians at Marathon; the mystic tissue of race. wove!i far
back in the dark chambers of the |^ast. and which, after the vicis-
situdes and mignitions of centuries, wraps up great nations in its
broad mantle: tht.>se signiticant expressions which carry v.'lunie.-
of meaning in a won! — Fort^father. Parent, Child. l'o.
Native Land : the.*o all teach us. not Mindly to worship. h;-.t iluiy
to honor the past, \o ."^tudy the le.-st>ns oi e.xjxrience. to scan the
counsels of man in his great associations, as those couu.sels have
develojHxi in constitutions, in laws, in maxims, in traditioris. in
great, undoubted principles of right and wrvuig; which have been
sancti-'ued by the general i-onsent of thost^ who have gon? U'fore
us: thus tracing in human institutions some faiiit rellection of tliat
di\nne wis^loni which fashioned the leaf that linfoldinl itself six
weeks ago in the forest, or the ^uitteru of the leaf wltich was
bathed in the dews of Paradise in the morning of creatie'ii."
As already stated, the two volumes of the History of W oodbuiy,
although they fill sixteen hundred and titty jviges. contain only a
small part of the genealogical matter s<.-attered tlirough :hv rtvords
of the ancient ;owi-. and '>f those of the sineral towns which have
been set off from it. The births, marriages, and deaths in the early
records aro scattered among many volumes. an*l are mixed up
with the nvor.ls of deeds, town rates, ear-marks of sheep, brand
for cattle. Lay-outs of highways, and on the t<'p. bottom, and mm
gins oi the pages devote*l to tlie several other recorvls. in inter-
minable and indescribable confusion. In all of these hidiiig-
places the writer has sought out each recorded item of birtlis. luar-
riagcs. and death.<. and collated them by years, so that any person
can take the book and trace out his own genealogy, so far as the
records show it ; and he will tind it a curious .
number of persons to whom he is related by bkxKl. or niarriage.
The compiler has also added under the several y< ai-s, with the
ivc'^rvied items, all ailditional items which have Keen furnished
^\^^
i
»> II IS TORT OF A N C I K N T W O o I. B I R Y .
him from family Bibles and other authentic documents. So that
this work contains a large nural>er of family items not found upon
the public records, and is. tht-nMore. a much more complete record
of the items of which it treats. The work also contains the early
biiptismal records of the several churches in the ancient town. The
ll earlv ministers were ver>- careful in the recording of these — baptism
1 7 being one of the •• sealing ordinances." and a record of the names of
the participants in these was h.eld to be peculiarly sacrod. and was
guarded with religious care. They seemed to feel, in all its force.
^ statement, that what is "bound on earth is bound in heaven."
' /thi- early days, almost all the children were baptized in a few
days succeeding birth, and as S' «on as the mother was able to attend
church. Some felt bound to have their children baptized on the
eighth dav, to correspond in time with the old rite of circumcision.
I the place of which thi;: ceremonial took As in those days the
\ i>eoplo believed that infants, dying without baptism, were lost to
\ all eternity, if the child showed weakness, and there were fears
that it would not live, the minister was sent lor. and the child was
baptized at the litnise of its parents. In consequence, we fre-
• juently meet with an entry like this. — such a child 'was baptized
at the house, it being in '/â– "lycr >>f noii-co)ifi>i'i
of all this was to make the early baptismal records more complete
and perfect than the town record of births; and for all genealogical
and practical purposes, it is nearly as useful as the public town
record, as when you trace the date of the baptism of a child, you
are sure that you have the date of its birth within a few daj-s.
The effect of publishing both the births and baptisms, is. that many
names will be thus repeated, but will in no wise perplex the
(^reader or investigator.
In business matters, and in the Probate and other courts, the
ites of births, marriages, and deaths are in constant demand
ley are of the utmost importance in pension cases. It has been
^\ue careful endeavor of the writer to make these records so por-
, feet that town clerks and registrars can ceitify to items from the
book, instead of being compelled to look over several volumes for
an item at every call. At least, he can, once for all. compare his
H'cords with the book, and use it over after.
It is well known that Woodbury wjis first settled, principally, bv
emigrants from Stratford. To aid, therefore, in genealogical
inquiries, it was thought desirable to insert all the recorded births,
marriages, and deaths on the Stratfi^-d recori-. from its settlement
v:
INTRODUCTION.
iu 1639, some three years after the first settlement in the colouy]
at Hartford, to 172.S. This adds very much to the value of the
work in a genealogical view.
As this work is to be used, principally, as one of reference, a
list of the public officials of the town, nieinbers of Congress, judges,
senaturs, county commissioners, town clerks, a list of governors of
the State, a list of the sovereigns of England, who ruled while we
were governed as a colony of that power, and other items, have
been inserted.
It is not generally known, that the record of births in the several
towns in this State since 1852, is utterly useless The names of
the parents, and the date of birth are given, but not the Christian
name of the child. To remedy this defect, as far as possible, the
writer sent an agent to each house in the five towns to obtain the
names. But on account of death and the removal of families,
the record contained in this book is far from perfect.
This is a work never before undertaken, so far as the author is
informed, in any town m the United States, and must be of great
interest and value to every family in the ancient territory, and to
multitudes outside of it. It is the initial work, to which similar
items may be a
remarks, the work is submitted to the judgment of a discriminat-
ing public.
In this work all dates of the month, preWoiis to the 14th of
September, 175"2, are old style, and all after are new style. The
year, between the Isl of January and the 25th of March (before
the adoption of the new style), is uniformly treated, where a double
date is not given, as new style. As a brief explanation of the
cause of the difference of style, we give the following : When
the computation by the Christian era was introduced, the com-
mencement of the year was fixed on the Day of the Annunciation,
or incarnation of Christ, which event (the Nativity being fixed
December 25th), was placed on the 25th "f March. This continued
the commencement of the year in England and her dominions till
the alteration of style in 1752. when, by an act of Parliament, it was
enacted that eleven days should be struck out of the month of Sep-
tember, that the 3d should be dated the 1 4th; that one day should
be added to the month of February every fourth ye.nr, to conform
their chronology to that of the other nations of Europe, which had
introduced a similar alteration previously, in order to correct the
error arising from the precession of the equinoxes, — and that the
N
H I S T O H T or ANCIENT W ( • O D B l" K T .
lyear should ( omineiu-e with the Ist of January, instead of the Joth
(of March. Before that time, to preserve a corrospondenoe of
datt's with those of other nations, it had l>eon usual to give a
doul.lo date from the 1st of January to the 2:>th of March: thus
February 12, 1721, was writ en " ffebruary }'' 12th. IT?^." The
omission of the lower nuraln-r would cause an error of a year ear-
lier than the true dat«\
j ^
i^iirriis !x wooniu^KY
1 i:i>M 1 1. 1 ;• i^
i-7
Awnuf vt vTioNs — In thi'S work «. will Iw u-s
b.. tioru. 1>HJ> . Itin>ti/iil: ni . n\:»rriotl; d , dit ' " " ' ' ' '
chiKlrm; ss., sou- wi»l., widow.
I
Ruth.
Tliomas. s. of KK'OZur aiul Mary Kik'wIos,
dau.
Anna, " " "
Samuel, s. (^f
Jtihn. s. I'f Jolin Tlionias.
Abi<:nul, Jan. of Win. and AMsiail Frodorick,
Isaac, s. of Eleazur and Mary Knowles.
John. s. of John Cresst-y.
1C:>7.
Elizalx't]!, dau, of John Ilutliwitt.
Kuth. dau. of Kbont'zer and Sarah ITurd,
"William, s. of William and Abigail Frederick,
Isaac, s. of Nathaniel Turtle,
^'iinotliy. s. of Hoirer Terrill.
Abraham, s. of Henjamin and Sarah Ilurd,
Martha, dau. of K»>ger Terrill.
J(.ihn. s. of Jolin, Jr . and ."^arah Minor,
11)08.
Joseph, s. of William and Abitrail Frederick,
Klizal>oth, dau. of Kleazur and Mary Knowles,
Caleb, s. of William and Abigail Martin.
Ji'sejih. s. of .^i-rg' Thoniat; Squier.
Abigail, dau. of Joseph and Abigail Waller.
Comfort, dau. of Samuel Jenners,
Jost'ph. s. of John and I>onas Roots.
Sarah, dau. (,'f Benjanuu and llanner Heicock.
June ;>0. 1'".: '
Kv •_'('.. ir.s5
March •_'•.'. IGnT
Jan. l.">. l«l>'.t
April .vO. lO'.U
Au^ ."0. 1 «■>««,■)
April J 7. itiye
Julv js. uv.m;
Feb. J. 161>G
Feb.
11
Jan.
17.
Julv
•J 4
Fel"..
3
Nov.
I'J
Jan.
1-'.
Nov.
IM
Dec.
19
March I
March ;?»•
Marcli JO
Dec J.-.
Sept. •-'."»
Apr:l 11
June ;>
July 13
Vol.. Ill —J
10
H 1 S T O K Y OF A N C I K N T W «> O P B I It V
1691).
Joseph S., s. of William and Abigail Fmlorick. March 1
Joseph, s. of Joseph IJallil.ut, April IJ
Stepheti. s. of Israel, Jr.. and Mary Curtiss.^ April JT
Isaac (aftorwanls LaptisoJ Stophon). s. of rornelius and
Abigail Urunscn. May 12
Rachael. dau. of Benjamin and Rebocca (Jalpin. Aug. ;U
Sarah, dau. of John. Jr.. and Sarah Judson, Sept. 10
Samuel, s. of Jolin Thonia."^, Sept. 10
Mary. dau. of Thoma.«> Drakeley. by lii.- lirst wife. Oct. .">
Elnathan. s. of Kbenozer and Sarah llurd. V night
y" y first snow fell. Hemomber it, Oct. 12
Harriet, dau. of Jolin and Johannah ("urtiss, Nov. 1
Henry, s. of Honry and Hannah Ca.ssell. F'eb. 12
1700.
Ichabod. s. of John and Kli/abeth SluM-inan.
I.siiac. s. of John and Mary Jud^â– on,
Kuth. dau. of Joseph and l^ith lieioock.
Haeliel, dau. of Henjaniin and Klizai'eth Hinman.
Joseph, s. of Stephen and ."^arah ('urtiss,
IVter. s. of Thomas ami Hannah Minor.
Adoniram. s. of John and Abigail 'I'readwoU,
lTt>l.
David, s. of Benjamin and Hannah HtMCOck.
Thomas, s. of John Tlioina.s
Joseph, s. of Joseph and Abigail Waller.
Timothy, s. of Cornelius Brunson.
l>avid, s. of Benjamin and ."^arah Hurd,
Rev. Mr. Stoddard, his first born, a son. born and die
the same day,
Rebeekah, dau. of Israel, Jr.. aTid Mary ('urtiss.
Euniee. dau. of Abraham I'ullford.
Daniel, s. of Jolin and Marv Judson.
Rachell. dau. of Jo.
Josiah, s. of Kt>inezer and Sarah llurd,
Nathan, s. of John and Johannah ("urtiss. Feb.
April 27
June 3
July :n
Sept. 12
IVt. 20
TVc. 10
Jan. 14
March
4.
March
5.
April
3.
June
14.
July
1
«.
Julv
8.
JulV
•»•>
A ug.
24.
Sept.
♦ >.
Sept.
2,".
N..V.
.'..
2, 1702
-i.
1702.
Zachariah, s. of Mr. Zachariah and Elizabeth Walker.
Hannah, dau. of Henry Cassell.
Mary. dau. of Rev. Anthonv and Prudence Stoddard,
Stephen, s. of Joseph Heicock, by wife Ruth.
Nathan, s. of Jonathan and .
I'rudonco, dau. of Thomas and Sarah Wheeler.
Edward, s. of Benjamin Hinman.
Timothy, s. of Ephraim and Roberk.nh Minor.
Mav
It
May
• )•>
June
ly.
June
27
Sept.
G.
Sept.
H».
Oct.
25.
Pec
l(t
B I i; 1 H S IN Win. l> II I li Y .
11
1703.
Daniel, s. of Sto|.li.'n Hn
Ebenez.T s. of Snp' Tims Iliiimiin, .Ian. 4.
Bethin, tlau. of Jilin ami I>oriMs Hoo's. Voh. 7.
Samuel s. of Josiph nii-i .\l»iirail Wallor. Man-li IS.
Samuel, s. of H.-iijamiu aiul lu>l.«'.-kah tJalpin, Ajril •'..
Marv. dau. of .lolin aii.l Mary Ju«1s<.m. April 11.
Samuel, s. of ."^amuel ami Ilaiiiiali .leniifrs. .\]>ril 20.
I).>lH>rah.
S>loinon. s. <>f liev. Anthony an«l rnnh-neo ."-^to'ldanl. (>ef. U
Marv.
RelHi-kah. dau »>f Khene/i-r an
Marv, dau. of .Jonathan and Sarah Atwootl, Met. '21.
1704
Caleb, s. of John and Kuth Whi-e'.er.
Man-li -Jl
1705.
Mary, dau. of Jonathait and ."-ar.di .\t\vootl.
Eliakun. s. of Kev Antho'iy and l'iuden«-e Stoddard.
Solomon, s. of Thomas and ilannali .^<]uier.
John. s. of Kphraini ajul Kehcekah Minor,
Sarah, dau. of Stephen and Sarah ("iirliss.
Hel»eekah, dau. of Stephen and Sarah Curtiss.
Kuth, dau. of Henry and Hannah Ca.stle,
Martha, dau. of Josepli and Ahiir.iil Waller,
Sarah, dau. of Khene/.er and Marv Hronson.
Tatifnee, dau. of John and Mary Hurlhut.
Al'ipiil. dau. of KUne/er and Sarah Hurd.
Jeremiah, s. of .lohn and Mary .Itidson.
KlK'iiezer, s. of Kl>en»>zer and Niartlia Warner.
Peter, s. of Thomas and Hannah Minor.
Samuel, s. of William and Martha Treston,
April
•JO
April
30
May
•JO
.lune
:?o
.luiv
•jv
July
•js
A UK
(i
Sept.
4
Sept.
•10
• >
."-^.•pi.
(Vt.
.")
( >ct.
;n
Nov.
l^
IVe.
1.
Feb.
'J . »
1706.
Ksther, dau. of John and Joanna ('urti>s, April ">.
Hannah, liau. of H.-njainin and Hannah Hukok. .lune ..!.
Eunice, dau. of Joseph and liuth Hiekok. .Inly 11.
Benjamin, s. of Thomas and .Sirah Wheeler, .1 :iv "Jl.
Mary, dau. of .losepli and Mary Hurlhut, .^.'pt. I'V
Wait, s. of H»m. an.i Kli/.alM-tii Hintnan, < 'et. 16.
Ann, dau. of Henj. ami Sarah Huid. Oit. JO.
Thankful, ilau. of 15enj. and Hcl>eekah t^alpin. < '
I'eter. s. of Zeehar:ah and Kliztln'th Walki-r, • Vi. '-'4.
Mary, liau. of Joseph and Amy Allis, <)et. 14.
Elisha, s. of Kov. Antlumv and rrudenee Stoddard. Nov. 24.
JJISTORY OF ANCIENT WOODBVRT.
1707.
Eli/a^Mth, (lau. of William and Martha Frost on,
H'.:!iah. daii. of Jonathan and Martha Mitchel,
Abigail, dau. of John and Abigail Bo-^tiok,
Ilannali, dau. of Ebenezer and Sarah Hard,
Mosos, s. of Ephraim and I>inah Tuttle.
Joseph, s. of Kphraim and Dinah Tuttlo,
Nathan, s. of John and Mercy Hurlbutt.
Mary. dau. of Thomas and KUzabotli Mallery,
Ruth. dau. of Stephen and Sarah (.'urtiss,
Amos. s. of Cornelius and Abigail Hnmson,
Bethiar, dau. of Elvnezer «nd Mary Hrunson,
Mary. dau. of John. Jr.. and Saraji Judson,
Abigail, dau. of John and Abigail Whet^ler,
Feb. 21.
April •_':..
Sept. 19.
Sept. 20.
Oct. 21.
Oct. 22.
C>ct.
Dec.
Jan.
Oct.
Dec.
Feb.
24.
4.
14.
20.
ItJ.
Feb. 15.
1708.
David, s. of Thomas and Mary Squier. Doc.
Mary, dau. of Robert and Mary Warner, . July 24.
Martha, dau. of Kbenezur and Martha Warner, » July 23.
Israel. <. of Rev. Anthony and Prudence Stixldard, Aug. 7.
Matthew, s. of Ephraim and ReK'ckah Minor, Sept. 2#
Joanna, dau. of John and Joanna Curtiss. Sept. 5.
Adam. s. of Benjamin and Sarah Hurd. Sept. 26.
Joseph, s. of Joseph and Mary Judson. Nov. 25;
Elizabeth, dau. of /echariah and Elizabeth Walker, T>ec. 16.
Caleb, s. of John and Jane Nichols. Dec.
Adino. s. of Adino and Eunice Strong, April 17.
1709.
Timothy, s. of Titus and Mary Hinman. March 4.
Mary. dau. of John and Sarali Baker, Jan.
Jemima, dau. of Henry and Hannah Castle. March 3.
Lois, dau. of Benjamin and Haimah Hickok, March IS.
Abel, f!. of Samuel and Abigail Munn. March 23.
Matthew, s. of Juiuithan and Hannah Mitchel, March 31.
Sarah, dau. of John and Sarah Minor. April 7.
Esther, dau. of Joseph and Jane Hurd. April i».
Margaret, dau. of Robert and Mary Warner. April 22.
Martha, dau. of William and Martha Bn-ston, April 23.
Nathan, s. of William and Joanna Gavlord. May 4.
Benjamin, s. of Kbonczer and Martha Warner, May (k
( tl«diah. s. of John and Ruth Wheeler. May 2S.
Hannah, dau. of Nathaniel and Sarah Hurlbutt, Aug. 2S.
Hannah, dau. of Ebenezer and Sarah Hurd, Oct. 31.
Mercy, dau. of Benjamin and Elisabeth Hinman, Dec. 23.
BIKTIT? IN WOODBtRY 1.1
1710.
Koh.
23
Maroli
•>
Marvh
l»
Man-h
•!••
Man-h
•23
Man-li
â– js
M.iv
u>
May
I'.'
May
•Jl
Jniu»
10
July
2:>
Sopr.
«.»
Nin-.
in
IVo.
31
Stephen, s. of Stophen and Sarah Curtu?*.
John. s. of H.*v. Anthony an. I rrilonof St^HlJani.
Thomas, s. of Thomas and Hannah Sjuut,
Clement, s. of Thoma.- and Hannah Minor,
liartlitt. s. of Thomas and KlisaUnh Mal'.ery.
Abigail, dau. of Samuol and Hannah Jenm-r. |
Nathan, s. of Samnel and Hannali Jennor. )
Salmon, s. of John and Mercy Hnrlbutt.
Bathslieba. dau. of Jo.
Josiah. s. of Josiali Chitteudt>n of liuilford. by wifo
Hannah.
Benjamin, s. of Adino and Kunioe Strong.
Francis, s. i>f Francis and Mary ,"^tilos,
Jonathan, s. of Jonathan and Santh At\vo
Kezia. dau. of Samuel and Mary Sherman.
Chapman, s. of Joseph and Mary Judsou.
1711.
John, s oi John and Joanna Curtiss. Feb. 3.
Aaron, s. of William and Joanna (.iaylord, March S.
Luke. s. of Henry and Hannah Castle. March 21.
Joseph, s. of Joseph and Susanna Minor. April lir
John, s. of John and Jane Nickols, Aj^ril 2'<.
Mary. dau. of Jonathan and Hannah Mitchell. May 17.
Sarah, dan. of Wiliiam and Martlia Vreston, Sept. ;'.
Prudence, dau. of llev. Anthony and Prudence Stoddard. Oct. 1 .'.
Ni'ah and Antia Hinman's tirst! orn son. iK-t. 14.
Sarah, dau. of Frajic-is and Mary Styles. Oct. 21.
l>onjamin. s. of Benjamin and Hannah Hiokok, Nov. 21.
Gideon, s. of Zechariah and Elisabeth Walker. iV'c. Pl.
Thomas, s. of John and Sarah Skeel. l\v. 27.
Aaron, s. of William liaylord. bajv, March.
171-J.
Relx'ckah, dau. of F.phraim and Bebockah Minor. Jan. ;>0.
Aaron, s. of Thomas and Klisabeth Mallery. Feb. Ui
Lydia. dau. of Nathaniel and Sarah H\irll'Utt, Feb. 17.
Remember, s. of Jolui and ."-^arali Baker. Feb. 22.
Sarali. d.iii. of John anil Klisal>eth llurd. April 8.
Ellen, dau. of Joseph and Mary Hnrlbutt. May 7.
F.lnathan. s. of Jonathan and Mary Judson. May S.
Esther, dau. of \alentine and Abigail Brentice. May 16.
|