Electronic library


read the book
eBooksRead.com books search new books russian e-books
Ziegler Polar Expedition (1903-1905).

Scientific results obtained under the direction of William J. Peters, representative of the National geographic society in charge of scientific work, ed

. (page 79 of 121)


In adopting a mean value from this summary it has been deemed best to reject the obser-
vations of October 12, 1903, as probably defective, owing to improper setting for the magnetic
meridian. From the remaining sixty sets of observations with two needles each the resulting
inclination at Teplitz Bay is

83 J2.'4 for epoch J904.J3.



3 I2



SCIENTIFIC RESULTS OF ZIEGLER POLAR EXPEDITION



SECULAR CHANGE IN MAGNETIC INCLINATION

Observations were made for inclination, as noted in the tabulation of dip results, at the
Italian magnetic station of 1899 and 1900. In order to have the resulting values apply to the
same mean time at both stations observations were first made at the Italian station with one
polarity of the marked end of each needle ; the instrument was then transferred to pier D in
the observing hut, where complete sets with each needle were made, and finally the comparison
was completed by observing with second polarity of the marked end of each needle at the Italian
station. Assuming a linear change in diurnal variation over the period of observation, the
mean results at the two stations are directly comparable. The mean resulting difference in
magnetic dip between the two locations is 7/3 as adopted from the following tabulation of the
comparisons :



Date


Local
mean
time


Mean dip
observed at
Italian
station


Local
mean
time


Mean dip
observed at
Ziegler
station


A I Zieg-
ler station
to Italian
station


Weight


1904
June 6


h m

15 24


/

83 02.4 N


h m
15 22


/

83 14.6 N


/

12.2


i


June 20


15 30


3-3


15 28


10.8


7-5


2


June 27 16 18 14.6
Whence weighted difference e


16 18

dooted


19-3


- 4-7


2


7-3





The comparison of June 6 is given weight of one against two for each of the other com-
parisons by reason of the observer's note regarding discovery of iron bolt at foot of pier on
June 20. There being no reason to assume any change in local magnetic conditions at so
isolated and unfrequented a locality, we may assume the same difference at the time of the
Italian Expedition.

Commander Cagni's observations resulted as follows :*

D a t e Number of de- Mean observed

terminations inclination

August 21, 22, 1899 4 83 25/0 N

July 10, 16, 17, 23, 1900 9 83 01.2

whence the mean value 83 13/1 N for the epoch 1900.09. Referred to the Ziegler Polar
Expedition station, this becomes 83 13/1 4- 7/3 = 83 20/4. The value for the epoch
1904.13, as above, is 83 12/4 N. Both of these series are uncorrected for diurnal variation.
Each, however, consists of observations made at various parts of the day, so that the means
may be assumed as applying practically to mean of day at their respective epochs. Thus in
four years the northerly magnetic inclination in the region of Teplitz Bay has decreased 8'.
Hence the rate of change in magnetic inclination due to secular variation, assuming this effect
to be a linear function during the elapsed interval, is

2' per year.

This value is, while of the same sign, considerably smaller than that taken by Professor
Palazzo as a result of his discussion of Commander Cagni's observations, viz. , 24'. He,
however, considers this determination as not very reliable, owing to the short period between
the inclination observations, and also the great variation between the individual values obtained.

* Osservazioni scientifiche esequite durante la spedizione Polare di S. A. R. Luigi Atnedeo di Savoia, Duca
degli Abruzzi, 1899-1900. Milan, 1903. Pp. 462-475. (Relazione sulle osservazioni magnetiche fatta dal Pro-
fessore Luigi Palazzo.)



MAGNETIC OBSERVATIONS 313

The annual rate above deduced is further confirmed by the fact that it is of practically the same
order as values obtained at other Arctic stations. Thus, for example, for Cape Thordsen and
Mossel Bay, Spitzbergen, Dr. Solander* has deduced the annual rates of increase in magnetic
inclination as 0/4 and o.'8 for the periods 1883.2 to 1899.7 and 1873.5 to 1899.7 respectively.

HORIZONTAL INTENSITY
INSTRUMENT, METHODS, AND RESULTS

Observations for horizontal intensity were made, as already stated, with magnetometer
No. IIII loaned by the United States Coast and Geodetic Survey. For the various standardi-
zation observations with this instrument before and after the work of the expedition, as also
for the constants and methods of reduction used, see pages 6 to n. Determinations were made
generally on Monday afternoons and Tuesday mornings, but it was not possible before the
advent of daylight to adhere strictly to this program. In these observations for intensity the
time of a set of fifty oscillations was observed in the usual manner before and after deflection
observations. Sometimes these were repeated ; at other times the final set of oscillations was
lost, owing to the failure to transit of the selected scale division.

The fortieth division, being near the middle of the scale, was the one whose transit was
chosen. The initial amplitude of the oscillation was usually made about one degree in order
to increase the probability of the transit of the fiftieth oscillation. The amplitude of swing
was noted at the beginning and end, in scale divisions, but is not published for lack of space.
The time was noted by mean time chronometer Negus No. 1809, which was carried to the
observatory for the purpose. It was always placed at the foot and touching the north side of
pier M (figure 2). This chronometer was compared daily with the sidereal chronometer Negus
No. 1769, which was used in the astronomic observations. Determinations of the torsional effect
of the four suspension fibers were made before the first and after the last oscillation sets. The
temperature was noted at the beginning, middle, and end by a Centigrade thermometer, the
bulb of which projected into the magnet-house of the magnetometer. This same thermometer
was used in the deflection observations, readings being taken before and after each set.

Magnet No. 2 was suspended during deflection observations. A solid brass bar with a
carrier supported magnet No. 4 at thirty and forty centimeters from the center. Eight
settings were made and the time and temperature noted as usual. Magnet No. 2 was kept in
magnet box No. 2 outside of the hut (shown on plat) and was brought into the observatory
immediately after preceding oscillation observations. From fifteen to thirty minutes elapsed
before it was observed upon. After deflection, and before the subsequent oscillation observa-
tions, it was returned to magnet box No. 2.

The observation specimens, pages 314 and 315, which together yield an absolute value of
the horizontal intensity, //, will serve to make clear the method of observation and computation.
In the tabulation of results given below, each value of //is deduced from two or more such sets
of oscillation and one set of deflection observations made in the order stated above.

By the aid of the specimens the accompanying tabulation of the condensed original
notes may be readily interpreted. The times given are local mean reckoned from midnight
through twenty-four hours. The mean deflection angles observed at thirty and forty centi-
meters are given in the two columns under heading u. The columns t and t' show the mean
temperature readings for the deflection and oscillation observations respectively. The mean
time of one oscillation corrected for the rate of chronometer appears under column headed T' '.
The effect of ninety degrees of torsion in the suspension is given in the column v. The column
headed /Ogives the finally reduced values for horizontal intensity expressed in gammas, one
gamma being o.ooooi C. G. S. unit. The resulting values of the magnetic moment of magnet
No. 4 at t degrees and at twenty degrees Centigrade are shown in the last two columns respect-
ively. Reference to pages 8 and 10 will serve to explain the remaining headings.



21 *See reference, page 305.



3'4



SCIENTIFIC RESULTS OF ZIEGLER POLAR EXPEDITION



Station: Teplitz Bay Dale: March 19, 1904 Observer: R. R. T.

Instrument : Magnetometer IIII Magnet : No. 4, inverted

Chronometer Negus 1809, daily rate gaining 2. '37 on mean time



Oscillation
number


Chronometer
time


Temp.
V


Extreme scale
reading


Time of
50 oscillations





h m s
7 35 49- 8




14.7


d
593


d
23.0




3


36 20.2










6


50.8










9


37 21.2










12


51-2










15
50


38 22.1

44 15-0


- 14.7


57-1
56.3


26.6
31.0


m 5

8 25.2


53


48.2








28.0


56


45 15-4








24.6


59


48.9








27.7


62


46 16.2








25.0


65


50.3


-14.7


55-3


33-2


28.2


Means


7 4i-3


14.70


57-o


28.4


8 26.45



Formulae :


T = T"(l + *) (i-(/'-/)?) (i + ,) ;W ,(H + X)t=**


Coefficient of torsion. One div. = 1/57


Time of i oscil.
Corr'n for rate*

T'
log T"

" K)

" [i_(</_/) ? ]

(i+M*\
\ m)

II f 3

" ir'K
" w(H + X)


i
10.1290

0.0003


Tors,
circle


Scale


Mean.


Diff's


L. M. L.
oscillations

h m
= u 29

((' -l) =
o.75


o

19
109
289

19


d
40.8

30.4

5-9
40.6


rf

39-8

29.6
48.7
39-2


d
40.30

30.00
49.80
39-9


d
10.30
19.80
9.90


10.1287


2.0IIII
O,OOI26
O.OOOO6
0.00037


d
Mean v = 10.00 = 15. 7


2.0I28O


Remarks :
Chr. to L.
Revolver n


M. T. -


+ 3" 48. -o
to magnet box


3-45257


mioved


1-43977



* Plus for losing rate and minus for gaining rate,
t See page 10.



MAGNETIC OBSERVATIONS



DEFLECTIONS WITH MAGNETOMETER No. mi

Station : Tepiitz Bay Date : March 19, 1904 Observer : R. R. T.

Magnet No. 4 deflecting at right angles to magnet No. 2 suspended



-*J

1
1
i


-a
a
G





X


CIRCLE READINGS


I. Distance r = 30 cm.


II. Distance r = 40 cm.


No.


A


B


Mean


No.


A


B


Mean


i

w


E
W


i
4


/

94 02.5
37 01.5


/

02.2

01.5


/
02.35
01.50


2

3


/

77 25.0
54 05.2


/

24-5
04-5


/
24-75
04.85




2 W




57 00/85




23 19/90


8



W
E


5
8


37 26.5
95 31-2


26.2
30.8


26.35
31.00


6

7


54 05.5
77 47-5


05.0
47.0


05.25
47-25




2 U




58 04/65




23 42/00



r



TT

Formulae : =
m



L'



JO



H

-+ log m (H



255



j



I II


Set


I


II


O / /

3 u (mean) 57 32.75 23 30.95
u 28 46.4 ii 45-5


logC
" Sin


5.86924
9.68246


5-49476
9.30917


A m


lo *S


6.18678


6-18559


logw*(H + X)


1.43960*
8.81319


1.43960*
8.81260


Ended at . 9 51 " *3-9


' l/H(H+X)




H


6759y


6750 r


Mean 9 18.0 ^= 13-95


Chr. to L. M. T. 4- 3 48.0
L. M. T 13 06. o


log wz,
Reduction to 20
logm M


2.64345
0.00441
2.63904


Remarks : Revolver removed to magnet box


m m


435-55



*Mean from four sets oscillations before and after deflections : 1.43977, 1.43959, 1.43974,
and 1.43930.

t See page 10.



316 SCIENTIFIC RESULTS OF ZIEGLER POLAR EXPEDITION

Tabular summary of observations of magnetic horizontal intensity at Teplilz Bay



Date


Local mean
time


H


Centigrade temperature


H

lo * ~m


r = 3ocm. r = 4ocm.


t


/'


;- = 30 cm.


r = 40 cm.


1903
October 12


h nt
17 31
14 59
15 7
ii 04

16 34
16 19
12 06
20 33

9 33
ii 37
16 28

17 48

7 3
ii 06

ii 58
14 47
ii 23

12 12
17 20
7 02

16 40
7 4

20 05

7 43
19 46

20 52

6 33
15 57
13 06
12 16
7 20

16 52
6 55
17 27
7 10

16 54
6 40

17 7
6 5i

16 32
7 oo

l6 21

6 38
16 42

7 35
17 08


/

28 65.0
13.6
29.4
26.9

28 49.0

48.4
46.7
47-8

28 46.0
50.25
34-4
63.55
48.6

45-9

28 44.9

45-7
47-7
47-3
43-o
43-3
42.0

45-9

28 48.9
54-3
53-3
45-2

28 42.7

41-3
46.4
57-0
45-8

28 29.8
50-7
31-4
52.7
44-7
34-9
27.7

45-8

28 25.9
64.9
33-66
40.2
38.2
71.4

24.7
46.2
29.1
58.5

28 45.6
53-4
30.9
44.8
12.4

13-1
28.5

28 12.85*


/

II 56.4

40.6

36.8

35-i

ii 47-3
43-5
41.6

43-2

ii 39.8

44-4
37-7
46.22

45.25
43-8

ii 44.8
42.4
46.8
42.5
42.5
41.0
40.2
45-1

ii 44-3
46.4
48.5
44-75

ii 47.9
47-o
45-5
42.0
42.7

ii 35.75
47-7
39-8
45-4
39-4
35-4
35-3
42.8

ii 34.6
43-i
39-3
38.0

39-7
51-3
35-3
41.6
36.6
47.1

ii 42.6
50.6

38.4
41.1
30.8
54-2
36-9

ii 27.3*




i. 80
+ 8.00
1-55
4-5

- 18.30
15.60

12. OO
- 4.60

-7.80
7.50
4-10
12. OO
18.50
14.25

12.15
12.70
22.40

15.25
2.4O

- 5-00
- 5-65
9.60

13-95
17-25
9-45
2.15

- 4-55
22.80

13-95
17.30

5-25

-3.85
7.00

15-50
23-55
16.25
20 So


o

0.62

+ 5.78

- 2.48
6.09

19.95
16.88

14.28

- 6.12

10-35
- 9-48
- 4.83
I3.5I
19-93
15.26

14.02
12.92

-24.48
16.82
2.23

- 6.36

6.66
12.15

15-73

21. II

- 8.78
2.46

- 5.78
-23.24
I3.6I

18.01
- 6.10

2.70
7-97
- 15-59
22.75
14.50
-19.78
12.48
17-30

11.63
- 12.60
- 4-04

6.02

- 7-32

- 7.00

- 4.40
- 4.76
+ 0.83
- 3.60

+ 6.70

t- 9-45
+ 3-52

-f 1.20
+ 10.72
+ H.I4

+ 10.86
+ 6.63*


6.18222

9387
9041
9106

6.18630
8636
8666
8622

6.18672
8574
8931
8282
8639
8691

6. 18708
8691
8669
8660
8728
8727

8759
8679

6.18621

8505
8509
8676

6. 18740
8818
8678

8443
8670

6.19038
8562
9029
8558
8724
8960
9108
8700

6.19149
8256
8948
8802

8853
8093

9'59
8658
9046
8378

6.18649
8466
8996
8680
9410
8014
9033

6.19413*


6.17872

8802

959
9171

6. 18461
8685
8791
8675

6.18891
8610
9010

8511
8585
8663

6.18596

8745
8501

8745
8713
8810
8861
8572

6.18632

8513
8367
8574

6.18390
8490

8559
8780
8707

6.19130
8408
8910
8589
8937
9'93
9180

8731

6.19222
8706
8912
8998
8898

8>93
9161
8772
9070

8439

6.18687
8198
8952
8791
9400
7978
9025

6. 19629*


22.

29

^O. .


November 9


16


20


V>. .






3. ...
4
7


25-
26


1904




14

IS. .


18. ...


19

25. .


26




2


22 . ...


29....

March I


18....
19....
24
29....

April 4....
5....
n.

12


18

TO


25 ...
26....


12.90
17.40

12.40
- 14.30

4-iS
- 6.30
- 8.25
- 8.00
- 5-25
- 4.25
0.90

- 4-95

+ 5-05
+ 6.65
+ 2.15
+ 0.25
+ 9-90
+ 8.25
+ 9-8o

+ 4-35*


3


9

10.

16
17


1\


24. ...

^o


7 oo
16 49
7 15

20 22

7 58
17 19
7 58

17 22

7 28

20 48

o 42*


^1 . .


June 6. . .
7. ...
13-
14. .
20. ...


21
27

June 28* ..



Observations at the Italian station of 1899 and 1900 ; the results



MAGNETIC OBSERVATIONS

Tabular suminciry of observations of magnetic horizontal intensity at Teplitz Bay



3'7





Effect 90


1 r.












T'


torsion

V


log
m(H-\-X)


log


H


log >,


log m M


Observer


\/H(H+X)


s


/






y








10.2304


25.72


1.43061


8.80554


6646


2.64209


2.63926


W. J. P.


1291


25-40


395


1500


6786


4067


39"


Do.


1276


22.84


3941


1496


6786


4111


3831


Do.


1148


23-77


4033


1586


6799


4106


3788


Do.


10. 1070


28.44


1.44049


8.81297


6756


2-64423


2.63925


Do.


1164


25-03


4001


1331


6761


4341


3878


Do.


1424


26.29


3762


1245


6748


4190


3774


Do.


1382


22.42


3844


1246


6748


4270


3950


Do.


10.1467


22.62 1.43756


8.81269


6752


2.64161


2.63800


Do.


1562


23-33 3677 1134


6731


4216


3857


Do.


1420


24.13 3804


1387


6769


4082


3768


Do.


1637


27-54


3582


0989


6710


4276


3852


Do.


III2


25-94


4O34


1323


6760


4383


3883


Do.


1651


25.34


3586


1132


6731


4131


3686


Do.


10.1242


17.46


1.43992


8.81322


6760


2-64343


2.63925


Do.


1544


i6-73


3755


1237


6747


4193


3768


Do.


1116


19-63


4071


1328


6760


4410


3859


Do


1176


16.42


4056


1379


6768


4344


3886


Do.


1436


12.35


3897


1309


6758


4262


3971


Do.


1333


12.62


3967


1368


6767


4272


3947


Do.


1414


11.26


3912


1361


6765


4217


3884


Do.


1417


12.26


3881


1254


6749


4298


3913


Do.


10.1391


13-29


1.43896


8.81261


6750


2.64304


2.63863


Do.


1258


16.19


3966


1237


6747


4402


39i8


Do.


1830


13-39


3548


993


6710


4234


3851


Do.


1834


13-48


3544


1085


6724


4138


3850


R. R. T.


10. 1423


13-93


1.43881


8.81223


6745


2.64333


2.64014


Do.


0776


22.88


4351


1502


6787


4514


3958


Do.


1322


15-40


396o


1289


6755


4345


3904


Do.


1245


16.96


4000


1306


6757


43 6 3


3878


Do.


1224


16.31


4034


1361


6765


4339


4011


W. J. P.


10.0851


14.78


1.44388


8.81736


6822


2.64307


2.63997


Do.


1590


21-34


3678


1082


6724


4278


3927


Do.


0809


I5-76


4391


1680


6813


4364


3902


Do.


0956


17-63


4251 1412


6773


4504


3938


Do.


1002


15-64


4243 1537


6792


4370


3899


Do.


0404


18.78


4719 1896


6846


4468


3942


Do.


0672


15.30


452i 1832


6836


4336


3908


Do.


0974


18.94


4224 1470


6782 4420


3934


Do.


IO.O53O


16.66


1.44635 8.81910


6848 2.64370


2.63949


Do.


1374 J8-34


3904 1192


6740


4385


3949


Do.


0831


16.69


4379 1655


6810


4385


4071


Do.


1126


17-49


4118 1509


6788


4274


3932


Do.


0946


17.22


4279 , 1577


6798 4362


3995


Do.


1518


17.36


3789 0966


6707 4510


4146


Do.


0506


19.27


4645 1902


6847


4390


4062


Do.


1469


18.13


3814 1264


6751


4222


3907


Do.


0855


20-33


4348 1703


6817


43 01


4029 ' Do.


1413


20.97


3857 1133


6731


4400


4076 ; Do.


10.1318


17.70


I-43976


8.81322


6760


2.64327


2.64133


Do.


2220


18.04


3216 0774


6678


4133


3959


Do.


0900


17.90


4328 , 1651


6809


4334


4102


Do.


1156


18.76


4095 1416


6774


4349


4092


Do.


0499


17.14


4683 2044


6869


4284


4 '53


Do.


1871


17.41


3521 0758


6676


4456


4303


Do.


1358


16.94


3945 1487


6784


4120


3987


Do.


10.1540*


'7-57*


'43793*


8.81657*


6810*


2.63794*


2.63591*


Do.



are for two complete sets each of deflections and oscillations.



SCIENTIFIC RESULTS OF ZIEGLER POLAR EXPEDITION



The following monthly mean values for the logarithm of the magnetic moment of magnet
No. 4 at 20 Centigrade (m m ) and for magnetic horizontal intensity (//) result from these
observations :



Epoch


Number
determi-
nations


Resulting mean values


log m K


H


1903.81


4


2.63864


7
6754


1903.88


4


3882


53


I903-95


6


3808


42


1904.04


8


3894


59


1904.12


4


3870


33


1904.21


5


3953


62


1904.29


8


3931


98


1904.37


10


4012


84


1904.46


7


4104


64



The above mean values of H, each being made up of determinations made at different
times on the days of observation, may be taken practically as applying to mean of day. As
will be noted, the difference between the extreme values is but sixty-five gammas, which, con-
sidering the frequent and rapid fluctuations of this element in high latitudes, is quite satisfac-
tory. From the fifty-six determinations as grouped together in the above tabulation the
resulting horizontal intensity at Teplitz Bay is

6768 r for epoch J904.J6.

SECULAR CHANGE IN MAGNETIC HORIZONTAL INTENSITY

Observations were made for horizontal intensity, as noted in the tabulation of results, at
the magnetic station of the Italian Expedition of 1899 and 1900. Unfortunately opportunity
was afforded only upon this one occasion for observation there. The value obtained seems
somewhat unsatisfactory in view of the unusually low value of the magnetic moment of magnet
No. 4 resulting. A close inspection of the observational data does not, however, disclose any
irregularities of greater amount than the similar work at the hut indicates should be expected
in this region. It is furthermore confirmed in that the result given is derived from two sets of
deflection as well as oscillation observations.

For the purpose of reduction to mean of day a mean curve for diurnal variation in
magnetic horizontal intensity was deduced from the International Observations of 1882 to 1883
at the stations Ssgastyr, Siberia ; Cape Thordsen, Spitzbergen ; Jan Mayen Island ; Karmakul
Bay, Novaia Zemlia, and Bossekop, Norway. Applying diurnal variation corrections so
obtained, the determination at the Italian station on June 28, 1904, becomes 6810 f + 50 f
6860 f. The nearest corresponding observation at the Ziegler Expedition station in point of
time (being but four hours before) is that of the preceding date ; reduced for diurnal variation,
the resulting value is 6784 r + 8 r 6792 r- From these two determinations it appears that
the horizontal intensity at the Ziegler Expedition station is about 68 f smaller than at the
Italian stat ion.



MAGNETIC OBSERVATIONS



Inasmuch as Commander Cagni's observations were, with but one exception, made during
afternoon hours, his values have also been reduced approximately to mean of day by the same
diurnal variation curve (the corrections given are mean values over periods of observation).
These results are as follows, the observed quantities being taken from Professor Palazzo's
discussion :*



Date


No. of
determi-
nations


Local
mean time


Mean
observed
value


Correction
diurnal
variation


Reduced
mean value


Resulting
mean
H


1899
August 29


2


h m h m

14 ^I 17 *\O


r

6842


7

41


7
6801


Y


August 30


4


14 46 - 18 02


6848


41


6807


6805


1900

Tulv 12.


i


17 O7 17 \\


68os


42


68si


1


July 13


4


15 41 - 18 35


6892


41


6851




Tulv 14..


8


Q 08 - 12 w


68 is


6


6820




July 14


i


15 37 - 16 01


6876


43


681-5


6823


July 24...


8


15 10 - 18 35


681 1


3Q


67Q2




July 2$ .


8


IS 2^ - l8 O


6881


7Q


6842




August 3


8


14 40 - 18 09


6849


4O


6809


J




















The resulting mean values of 68057 and 6823?- correspond to mean of day for the epochs
1899.66 and 1900.55 respectively. From these the magnetic horizontal intensity at the Italian
station forthe epoch 1900.10136814^. Referred to the Ziegler Expedition station, this becomes
68147 687 = 67467. At the latter location the value derived was 6768 7 for the epoch 1904.16.
Hence the horizontal intensity of the earth's magnetic field has, in the region of Teplitz Bay,
in a period of four years increased 22 7 (0.00022 C. G. S.). Hence, assuming a linear change
during the elapsed interval, the rate of change in magnetic horizontal intensity due to secular
variation is

+ 67 (0.00006 C G. S.) per year.

This rate of increase confirms that adopted by Professor Palazzo in his discussion above
referred to, namely, +97. At the stations Mossel Bay (y = 79 53' N ; A= 16 04' E) and



Cape Thordsen (<f = 78 28' N ; A = 15 42' E) for the periods 1873.5 to 1899.7
1899.7 D r - Solanderf has deduced the annual rates 10 7 and 37 respectively.



1883.2 to



*Osservazioni scieatifiche esequite durante la spedizione Polaredi S. A. R. Luigi Amedeodi Savoia, Duca
degli Abruzzi, 1899-1900. Milan, 1903. Pp. 475-500. (Relazione sulle osservazioni magnetiche fatta dal
Professore Luigi Palazzo.)

fSee reference, page 305.



320



SCIENTIFIC RESULTS OF ZIEGLER POLAR EXPEDITION



SUMMARY SHOWING VAUJBS OF THB MAGNETIC ELEMENTS AND THEIR SECULAR VARIA-
TIONS AT TEPLITZ BAY

The following summarizes the mean results obtained by the expedition at the Teplitz Bay
station. In the case of the declination the value applies to the mean of both day and year ;
this may be said to be practically the case likewise for the inclination and intensity.



A Declination



Epoch


Easterly
declination


Annual rate of
secular change
1900-1904


1904.00


/

22 38.5


/

+ 1%



B Inclination



Epoch


Northerly
inclination


Annual rate of
secular change
1900-1904


1904.13


'

83 12.4


i

2



C Intensity











Annual rate of


Epoch


Horizontal
component
H


Vertical
component
Z


Total
intensity
F


secular change
1900-1904


H


Z


P


1904.16


r

6768


r
56806


r
57208


r
+ 6


-2*38



Using the text of ebook Scientific results obtained under the direction of William J. Peters, representative of the National geographic society in charge of scientific work, ed by Ziegler Polar Expedition (1903-1905) active link like:
read the ebook Scientific results obtained under the direction of William J. Peters, representative of the National geographic society in charge of scientific work, ed is obligatory