Copyright
California. Legislature.

Appendix to the Journals of the Senate and Assembly of the ... session of the Legislature of the State of California (Volume 1885v.1) online

. (page 21 of 83)
Online LibraryCalifornia. LegislatureAppendix to the Journals of the Senate and Assembly of the ... session of the Legislature of the State of California (Volume 1885v.1) → online text (page 21 of 83)
Font size
QR-code for this ebook


117 25 Feb.
27, 1884.








Original proceedings commenced by
complaint filed December 5, 1875.
Answer filed June 14, 1878. An
amended complaint has been filed
and answer made ; cause now pend-
ing in Superior Court.


Charges and specifications filed May
10,1883. Answerfiled May31,1883.
Judgment of removal from office ren-
dered September 13, 1883.


Complaint filed April 10, 1883. Judg-
ment for plaintiffs for $19,054 60,with
25 per cent damages and 10 per cent
interest from April 9, 1883, to Octo-
ber 17, 1883. Notice of appeal served
and filed January 31, 1884.


By complaint to annul
patent to certain lands
held by defendants and
situate in said city and
county.


Complaint to remove de-
fendants from office of
State Prison Director.


Complaint to recover im-
migration money col-
lected by defendant.


o




o


Superior Court
of San Fran-
cisco.


Proceeding had
before his Ex-
cellency, Geo.
Stoneman,
Governor, etc.


Superior Court
of San Fran-
cisco.


The People, etc.,
ex rel. E. C. Mar-
shall, Attorney-
General, Plain-
tiflfs, vs. The Cen-
tral Pacific Rail-
road Company
and the Southern
Pacific Railroad
Company, Defen-
dants.


The People, etc., ex
rel. E. C. Mar-
shall, Attorney-
General, Plaint-
iffs, vs. A. H.
Chapman, et al.,
State Prison Di-
rectors, Defend-
ants.


The People, etc., ex
rel. J. P. Dunn,
Controller,Plaint-
iffs, vs. Charles
D. Bunker, De-
fendant. Lang-
horne & Mil-
ler, attorneys for
Plaintiffs.



18



CO



»•










"H











1










»










a































a










S




















•§s










^8










la











s is










•o S-










B 3





















o










S




















1












m5c c'S
^ S 2 sf 1


1 - 1


^




o

I

o


00 g


ft" §

n: >
. 1-

CO &Jz

I— I ^


*


o


■- M "O ^ C3 •


mh: 3










^ y3 r-

— ^ 5




i


•r; a >






'O








p

O




-3 p n
,2 = •

s-f Pi-


i




•^ Ci , X ' ^




•^ it -s




1




'5 P N






CO


CO -S - i;
C - c a> S


~s 00 t-


- 3 00 1>






C - 00


C r- 00






C <M ." J3 c;


<^ " ^


C — ^



















1 1 1


^ fe £ ..


t—




_


g fee







s .


^ S 5:>o


13






<U (U







_o a


> C-r!


13.2 S-^-s


X!




OS


8.S >,


■x) £ c 5
n 3 0,2 £
^ '^ —

to '-'^ >"*rri


13

C

8

13







,2—0


|i pi

^ C C e CO

OS HH S CS






-S oj OS


O'C









<5


<J




1










Si










S<:




















>


>


>




^■5








G






jj ,


-t> 1


-t> 1






2 OS









g-al


I,


K


t:




0,557:


Ofi,


Ofe


OP:l,




c ®

CE-'


•No


• « C3 -•

feces






a*«.2


C<.-.2


&-<«.2:




3 u


SCO


s






CO


CQ


OQ




£5






(U m ;:; "3


2^

OS

-T3




_r . t, . CS ^ J3 ,


0^1^ aj cs -^ 5






c

u

1^


1^1^(2 ill


G..M S S 5

seizes -
P-i a £ _- 2


2P




liiiiMi


^ — V? "3 ^ ^ O

j= Ph > p.-= P3 -^


jsPhO'S'C


ttJ




Eh


El


Eh





19



1


;-,






a>


a


p


>


cS






►-5




•CO








00


of,




oo


&,


2



S^ o



«C Pq 5 CO



2 >.3 ^






1 8 ^ o3
>-, a>

c £ ft -*■ "S

^3 . "^ tB

S^ corn fl



E S



5rY^ « Q fU






5.2o






0) a}



a 5 rt



is



^,M g



o



O I,

^" ,-

.2 rf •

D O O
CO



OPq



cO a:






_P-
2"= -^ ^ c-i .

•=«l-« £: a
-a P P o ca m-c



a t*>o a; o 'i '^ fe

-a Q 1" «^ a ^ I

oQ a >- '3 1^ "

« <^ fa a i- o M

^ - ^ . a J g g .



S 5s >^e =~ °^ S « tn



•^^ D - OJ 53 ^

-^ g-jop ^

<irO:5 tl^ta a c?

"E, . — ' " o o a



a '5



20



f^ s



'S CO

5r; ^ S '*
6 i =«-^
c g^°

S '- ° 2
-^ .o !z S

^ 1-5

■^ '^ ^'tS
.- 2 oc ^






O



> oo a
la"-

-2 rt !- c



£ °



S 00



00 fcr"




^ <




t-'-'S ""




^S'S




S- ^




c j^ 00
5 s'r^
















^.Sil^




*^ <5




laint
gmen
1884.
filed






p"c .^'^




£ 3 00 a




l-s — C5













t.-3 C li


>,











^-C c CO





•"-= g£


a


"S 5 £











com
ne r
.s to
lice


i


>,£g(2


a


w





4, 188
d Hell
Defenda
ed Deceii




















d mOO 5>




■S s^"^ ^












— i^ r*




-t^Ph S




t file
nts
May
= dem
884.














-2 £ g'Ss






C c tS m











^ "*-* ^ <3> ^^










(11.=^ oW








a


a .^o'S'S





-S I- "n 5


a



a i2 > 13 a^ W S
.2a8a,|^i



s<1






op.,



02



O L.

.2§ .



03



o '3



2 «

O u

.2 g .

s o o
m



r^J, >^,



' «.s






"&. .
1-5


>


CS










"5


Ph






TS


1


Tl


©






a


a


J3


u


M-i


05


u


eS



• !5 Ph



(U (D



;fe



£v2-






S-s^£.-^®^

s-Ph > a -a. 2

aT -^ c t. 3 S

— ; >->^ ;r <a o 5

?- c • c a O ? ■






§1-1 >f^



Si'tf a'
a "= S

a e3 0Q<





^t^^i






"— ».S<J


f^i-S-a


^ 2 cph .


•5 a> cS a


c .-a


a= fc;^


.Sgft^^





21









1


Complaint filed March 1, 1884. De-
murrers of all defendants, except
Heller, April 10, 1884. Heller's
answer filed May 8, 1884.


Complaint filed March 1, 1884. De-
murrers of all defendants, except
Hastings and Toland, filed May 27,

1884.


Action on official bond
of defendant. Knight,
to recover $51,249 90,
alleged to have been
embezzled by Clerk of
Board of Harbor Com-
missioners.


Action on official bond
of defendant, Blanding,
to recover $41,610 95,
alleged to have been
embezzled by Clerk of
Board of Harbor Com-
missioners.


3


Civil.


Superior Court
of San Fran-
cisco.


Superior Court
of San Fran-
cisco.


The People, etc.,
ex rel. J. P.
Dunn, Qontrol-
ler. Plaintiffs, vs.
Wm. H. Knight,
principal, F. S.
Wensinger, J. S.
Emery, J. N.
Knowles, J. Ber-
mingham, Alex.
Badlam, W. Wit-
zeman, and Moses
Heller, sureties,
Defendants.


The People, etc.,
ex rel. John P.
Dunn, Control-
ler, Plaintiffs, vs.
Wm. Blanding,
principal, John
Center, Wm. M.
Lent, T. M.
Quackenbush, H.
H. Toland, Albert
Dibblee, Samuel
Crim, S. C. Hast-
ings, and P. Don-
ahue, sureties. De-
fendants.



22



a








.M
















Q








9






*


a
























a








o








a .








Uj-u








11








*•-« ^








o 2








si








s is








•o 2"








B 3








gco








u








o








a .








1










•* ■^ -


O 3


i o>




00 cc S


ft"


o

1


00 00 CS


S '^


f-l (M 3


1^


00 £


■4^


■^ >.^


tJ




^ rt ^


• (B


1— cu




■^Jl —




_P


'S'^-s-;


00 a
00 ©


"d^


r*


'^ CO ^


^-13


"SQ


"m


=^■1^


>^


iC


wn




s


•« *i 2 '^'"


§^




O X - t.


3


o


_ - O 0)




"Sg


p


s o g §




o


.2 "-5 X U
•5 5 " o




"S .


t

02


g.2^
.2 goo


c 3 00

£ ;ioo

O S r-c






&H


o




-2m


•■^ 2 1 .2 «-


r^ t, lO -^ *^ 3


•3

a


o3 ►*<

"i 1


•5 „^cs2^


n 2

OS

1^


=« 2


>- c "o a.


1^-




5H -g ^za^


o"°


c§5


c .0 8 e S ■=
C^ >- c


5


"*1




.2 "S &K 5
■<


li








11

j3








:73


r72


r2


>


>


>


g-s


o


5







-IJ


_^j t„


^


>> ,


5 =3


s- O


>- C "


"St!


3


S 3




O I,


ooi


^9 '-


2s|








> * ••^


^ ^^


© ^-^ w


-S




e*- *


cu<_.2


^^


3 0'3


s oO


sou


w


02


QQ


CQ


1


J3 Cl, dn Ch .is i ^ « "S


fe^ ^'"j =-«
S § ? ^ .^f






H


Pk


Eh 1



23







This cause is
under sub-
mission and
awaiting
judgment.


This cause
was com-
menced at
the order of
the Govern-
or and no
appeal is
taken by the
people.










^00
Soo

If

00 g

3 «

1-5 g-

u^
.2 a

a, o

o <0
O


Complaint filed August 6, 1884. Mo-
tion to strike out denied September
5, 1884.




3
<

3

6

s

2

a.

3
02

a

13 .
.2 "«

"S 3

P-(


Complaint filed September 29, 1884.
Judgment for defendant, November
14, 1884. Notice of appeal by rela-
tor served and filed November 15,
1884.


Action on official bond
of defendant. Gross, to
recover $3,600 25, al-
leged to have been em-
bezzled in office of
Clerk of Supreme Court.


a
a <^

•p, CD

J5 la

° 2
t) a

pq


Application for writ of
mandate to compel de-
fendants to receive cer-
tain money due the
County of Contra Costa'
and held by relator.


By complaint to oust de-
fendant from and estab-
lish relator in the office
of Police Commissioner
of the City and County
of San Francisco.


5


3


o




Superior Court
of San Fran-
cisco.


Superior Court
of San Fran-
cisco.


Supreme Court
of State of
California.


Superior Court
of San Fran-
cisco.


The People, etc.,
ex rel. John P.
Dunn, Control-
ler, Plaintiffs, vs.
Frank W. Gross,
principal, John
Martin and John
Landers, sureties,
Defendants.


The People, etc.,
Plaintifls, vs.
Home Benefit As-
sociation, Defend-
ants.


The People, etc., ex
rel. E. C. Mar-
shall, Petitioner,
vs. A. J. Soto,
Auditor, and E.
B. Hathaway,
Treasurer, Defen-
dants.


The People, etc.,
ex rel. Hinton,
Plaintiffs, vs. R.
P. Hammond, De-
fendant.



24



1








i


a

1.

il

o

i


i

"a.

i

Eh






1


stage of Proceedings in Court below.


Complaint filed May 21, 1884. De-
murrer to coinj)laint sustained June
11, 1884. Notice of appeal served
and filed June 16, 1884.


Petition for leave to use name of The
People filed and leave granted No-
vember 22, 1884.


'


Agreed case submitted. Judgment for
plaintifl' July 30, 1884. Notice of
ajjpeal served August 27, 1884. Ap-
peal dismissed November 10, 1884.


•e
a

=8 .
a »

2 S

15

o °

■a
o


2

o
a^



;Ǥ


Action to compel defend-
ant to remove a public
nuisance.


Proceeding for the dis-
covery of escheated per-
sonal propei'ty hela by
defendant.


Application for writ of
mandate, to compel de-
fendant to draw his
warrant for amount of
a certain war bond held
by plaintiff.


II

.a





Civil.


">




Civil.


In what County
Tried and Ad-
judged.


Superior Court
of San Ber-
nardinoCoun-

ty.


Superior Court
of San Fran-
cisco.


Superior Court
of San Fran-
cisco.


Superior Court
of Sacramen-
to County.


s

o

O

a


The People, etc., ex
rel. James Betner
and Q. J. Hall,
Jr., Plaintiffs, vs.
The City of Riv-
erside, Defend-
ant.


The People, etc., ex
rel. Christopher
Ilacke, Plaintiffs,
vs. The Hibernia
Savings and Loan
Society, Defend-
ant.


The People, etc., by
E. C. Marshall,
Attorney-General,
Plaintiffs, vs. The
Hibernia Savings
and Loan Society,
Defendant.


Wilbur F. George,
Plaintiff, vs. J. P.
Dunn, Controller,
Defendant.



25









fc. "-S I— I

Eh



— T3

CO) CO

■g S§g
c-H -

ci = o
t. "-5 M

Eh



c-S S

cS 3 !5



>■ 3 o



^ QC — OC

e^ —i -

o -T .«=
3 e^ >5
3 >^x —

>-3 ~ 00 -

— t>~>5C <o



; u a)






§ = >^ O -3

^- t. r- m

T3 >>* 5 Is

to cc '^ G GC
C , S 3 O ,-



a



a



r 3 i: so 00 3



5C hTiS — «

-^ cS O o oc
g 5 i. OS o ^

5 ^ bO 3 ci o

2 ^-"-s =^ >



CS



>»b



;r (U S QC fc. ^



p5 -^






P5



o 5



oM



C5« >,



C bi



her 9



o







o '3



" c ■ 2 '^ tl

o "W o 5 c f^ ■ -
<u c 'C — a; <u C

tn O) tr >i O O e



0.2



_o






Cod S
■» 5

Oa- o
3 OO



CO



o >•« S<2 §^

-.2 ^^•:3 03 03

® fl " ■ S .2 r K •

ga S^ S ^ - ^^
g<i_ a,J g-g c

Eh



CO



5 C (-1 *^ « jT O
'o3 <p' aj



';r: >^o^



Eh



WO



26



1

i








Memorandum of .ludgmciit in
Supremo Court.


Transcript filed July 25, 1882.
Submitted on briefs Novem-
ber 20, 1882. Judgment
and order affirmed Decem-
ber 29, 1882.


Transcript filed August 4,
1882. Order affirmed Jan-
uary 9, 1883.


Transcript filed August 16,
1882. Judgment and order
affirmed February 6, 1883.


1

3
O

a

c
p

Cm

o

bo


Information filed September 12, 1881.
Plea, not guilty, September 19, 1881.
Verdict, guilty of manslaughter,
February l5, 1882. Judgment, Feb-
ruary 28, 1882, ten years. Notice of
appeal served and filed July 8, 1882.


Information filed. Demurrer filed.
Order sustaining demurrer and dis-
missing proceedings. Notice of ap-
peal filed and served.


Information filed May 1 2, 1882. Plea,
not guilty. May 15, 1882. Verdict,
June 9, 1882, guilty murder first
degree. Judgment, June 26, 1882,
death. Notice of appeal served and
filed July 15, 1882.


Mode of Prosecution and
Nature of Crime.


1'
J.

£ ■
'k


By information — Obtain-
ing money under false
jn-etenses.


o

1

a
_c



a

a
'k


Character
of Action.


a

'a

o


"3
o


Criminal,


In what County
Tried and Ad-
judged.


Superior Court
of Nevada
County.


Sujierior Court
ol San Fran-
cisco.


Superior Court
of LakeCoun-

ty.


■J

■<

O

»

.J
H


10780

The People, etc..
Respondents, vs.
Isaac M. Tamkin,
Appellant. Attor-
ney-General for
People, C. W.
Cross for Appel-
lant.


10781

The People, etc..
Appellants, vs.
George L. Jordon,
Respondent. At-
torney - General
for People, Met-
calf & Lucas for
Respondent.


10784

The People, etc.,
Respondents, vs.
William Jones,
Appellant. Attor-
ney-General for
People, Hoel <fe
Bishop for Appel-
lant.



J



27









Transcript filed September 15,
1882. Judgment affirmed
January 27,1883.


Transcript filed September 18,
1882. Judgment and order
affirmed February 14, 1883.


Transcript filed September 19,
1882. Judgment and order
reversed September 26, 1883.


Information filed April 29, 1882. Mo-
tion to dismiss. Information for
want of jurisdiction filed May 18,
1882. Motion granted May 20, 1882.
Notice of appeal filed and served
July 16, 1882. Appeal from an or-
der of dismissal.


Information filed February 9, 1882.
Plea, not guilty. Verdict, May 29,
1882, guilty murder first degree,
imprisonment for life. Judgment
June 9, 1882, life imprisonment.
(No notice of appeal in record.)


Information filed December 24, 1 881 .
Plea, not guilty, December 31, 1881.
Verdict, February 27, 1882, guilty
murder first degree. Judgment,
April 15, 1882, death. Notice of
appeal served and filed May 15, 1882.


By information — Public
nuisance, misdemeanor


<B

-s

3

1

3
_o

"cS

a
a


By information — Murder.


■3

3

a

o


3

1
O


Criminal.


.2 <u

02


Superior Court
of Santa Clara
County.


Superior Court
of San Fran-
cisco.


10787

The People, etc..
Appellants, vs.
John Hupp, Re-
spondent. Attor-
ney-General for
People, J. W.
Turner for Re-
spondent.


10788

The People, etc..
Respondents, vs.
Jose de la Cruz
Soto, Appellant.
Attorney-General
for People, Hough-
ton & Reynolds
for Appellant.


10789

The People, etc..
Respondents, vs.
Fong Ah Sing,
Appellant. Attor-
ney-General for
People, L. Quint
for Appellant.



28



S








a
a

a .

taof

sg

■a S*
o

a
13


Transcript filed October 7,
1882. Order affirmed Feb-
ruary 28, 1883.


Transcript filed November 17,
1882. Judgment and order
affirmed March 24, 1883.


Transcript filed November 17,
1882. Judgment and order
affirmed March 29, 1883.


M

3

a

a

p

&
o

1


Information filed July 15, 1882. Mo-
tion to dismiss information and set
aside information filed July 19 and
29, 1882. Order dismissing informa-
tion and proceedings August 12, 1882.
Notice of appeal from order served
and filed September 19, 1882.


Information filed February 20, 1882.
Verdict, May 7, 1882, guilty. Judg-
ment, June 5, 1882, death. Notice of
appeal served and filed June 21 , 1882.


Information filed April 13, 1882. Ver-
dict May 12, 1882, guilty murder
first degree. Judgment June 5,1882,
death. Notice of appeal filed and
served June 27, 1882.


1
•ii

s =^

o °

si

o


By information — Obtain-
ing money under false
pretenses.


By information — Murder.


1

1

a
.2


a
'k


Character
of Action.


"3
a

6


"3

a

'5
a


a

1


In wliiit County
Tried and Ad-
judged.


Superior Court
of San Fran-
cisco.


Superior Court
of Sacramen-
to County.


Superior Court
of Sacramen-
to County.


<

O


10790

The People, etc.,
Appellants, vs.
George S. Jordan,
Respondent. At-
torney - General
for People, Wm.
Gibbons, Wm. Ir-
vine, J. B. Met-
calf, and J. M.
Lucas for Re-
spondent.


10798

The People, etc..
Respondents, vs.
Joseph Hurtado,
Appellant. C. T,
Jones for Appel-
lant, G. L. John-
son and Attorney-
General for Peo-
ple.


10799

The People, etc.,
Respondents, vs.
Simon Raten, Ap-
pellant. Attor-
ney-General for
People, E. Bruner
for Appellant.



29











November
ment and
ebruary 6,


at ;=; m fl ^ oi d

c =i o P a >•


- ^5^5




a^ -►^ fl S § CO




bcpR


P S S " O CO




1l^


'— *^ ?^ > O <« ■— ' •


CD g O cdr-(




nscript fi
, 1882.
der affirm
83.


^Mm'^Sca'OO

a,00 t- .^ O -H Ph — '

'?> 2 ^ g o S '^ """


"^^ <ij'S grz:

a 00^73 "3 ^
■** S fc 5 =s




Oj -^ tH CO


«00tH(UOfl'*-?^




^^ <M O 1-1


t,iM O t.H3.S O-O


tH r-l « O ^ «




&H


H


^




6, 1882. Ver-
;uilty^f burg-
Judgment Oc-
; Prison four
sal served and
82.


^' -S "* "3 d


i-J J> C,^




OO "S 1-1 <U 00
00 S £1.00

-s ^ -


00 a C3 -^




^ fi, u




'^ a ® c




ion filed July
ober 5, 1882, g
;ond degree. ■
4, 1882, State
Notice of appi
vember 17, 18


-S ,-, "^ O (u

1, •„ o r^ f»


-2=2 - c
&SS.2

»> P 00 a
.2 5-^ >




nformat
diet Oct
lary sec
tober 1
years.
filed No


g U3 O ^ (M
fc O oS 00
t2 M TS <!) 00
q 1^ (U &,r-<




'-'


►^


'-'




bO








w
1


g
"l






1


1

a
o






_o


a




■eS


^


_o




s


i


■Is

a




=2

a .


1^


t2
a












>.i


l>..^


!^




m


W


m







^


-




"d


OS


"5




a


S3


a












1


1


1












'C


*E^


&^




o


O


o




-o


^


-t> 1




5 §


5 oj


h fi
S fi




o ti


c S


O o




opr,


Ofc


oo




fes


o S


tH a
o *-•




•-• cc -;


• — o3 •


._ IX)




fe«2 8




few




o.««.2


&.«".2


g"o>




s o o


3 O O




CQ


OQ


02




nd-
ohn
ant.
eral
race
pel-


iii4'pi^'t


_2 e?-i "rt pq i
a S-^ S .P?




g>-5= fl O G.


1-^ ^^5 St


a <v p p^




10800

eople, Resj
ents, vs.
Welch, Appe
Attorney-Ge
for People, H
Hawes for \
lant.




"a

Hi

o


1 ^


p-i


P^





30



1

1


_






Memorandum of Judgment in
Supreme Court.


Transcript filed December 14,
1882, Judgment and order
affirmed August 28, 1883.


Transcript filed December 13,
1882. Judgment and order
aflirmed December 29, 1883.


Transcript filed December 22,
1882. Judgment and order
affirmed £or want of appear-
ance April 23, 1883.


o

1

i

1

o
1


Information filed October 18, 1881.
Verdict December 8, 1881, guilty as
charged, fourteen years. Notice of
appeal served and filed December 9,
1881.


Indictment filed May 3, 1882. Ver-
dict May 31, 1882, guilty of grand
larceny. Judgment June 6, 1882,
thirty j'car.s. Notice of appeal served
and filed July 29, 1882.


Information filed February 20, 1882.
Verdict May 17, 1882, g'uilty mur-
der first degree. Judgment May 24,
1882, imprisonment for life. Notice
of appeal served and filed July 20,
1882.




Mode of Prosecution and
Nature of Crime.


By information — Assault
to rob and prior con-
viction.


By indictment — Grand
larceny and prior con-
viction.


o

-s

3
1

a

a
'k


i. o

ri


s


a

•E

O


a

•E


111 what County
Tried and Ad-
judged.


Superior Court
of San Fran-
cisco.


Superior Court
of Sonoma
County.


Superior Court
of Nevada
County. *


a.

<

o


10804

People, Respond-
ents, vs. Charles
Ward, Api)ellant.
Attorney - Gene-
ral for People,
Darwin & Mur-
phy for Appel-
lant.


10805

People, Respond-
ents, vs. 0. H.
Lewis, Appellant.
Attorney- General
for People, Hen-
ley, Whi])ple <fe
Dates, and J. F.
Campbell, for Ap-
pellant.


10807

People, Resjiond-
cnts, vs. Murico
Penelon, Appel-
lant. Attorney-
General for Peo-
ple, J. M. Wall-
ing for Appel-
lant.



3]











Transcript filed January 19,
1883. Judgment and order
affirmed July 28, 1883.


Transcript filed January 25,
1883. Judgment and order
affirmed August 29, 1883.


Transcript filed January 2(5,
1883. Api)eal dismissed
January 30, 1883.


Transcript filed February 12,
1883. Appeal dismissed
April 23, 1883.


Information filed March 23, 1882.
Verdict April 3, 1882, guilty as
charged. Judgment April 22, 1882,
ten years. Notice of appeal served
and filed January 13, 1883.


Information filed November 21, 1881.
Verdictt January 18, 1882, guilty burg-
lary first degree. Judgment .Janu-
ary 21, 1882, fifteen years. Notice of
appeal served and filed January 16,
1882.


Information filed July 7, 1880. Ver-
dict October 1, 1880, guilty murder
first degree. Judgment October 23,
1 880, death. Notice of appeal served
and filed January 17, 1883.


Information filed November 25, 1882.
Verdict December 22, 1882, guilty
of murder first degree. Judgment
January 3, 1883, death. Notice of
appeal served and filed February 3,
1883.


By information — Rob-
bery.


s

1

fS

i

■"b

^^
w


3

s

£
a
P3


S

3
1

a


£

a

3


Criminal.


•3

3
1



a
1



"3
a

1



Superior Court
of San Fran-
cisco.


Superior Court
of San Fran-
cisco.


Superior Court
of San Fran-
cisco.


Superior Court
of Contra Cos-
ta County.


10S09

People, Resjwnd-
ents, vs. John
O'Brien, Appel-
lant. Attorney-
General for Peo-
ple, Darwin &
Murphy for Ap-
pellant.


10811

People, Respond-
ents, vs. Frank
Smith, Appellant.
A ttor n ey - G e n eral
for People, Eick-
hoff <fe Strauss for
Appellant.


10812

People, Respond-
ents, vs. Sing
Lum, Appellant.
Attorney-General
for People, Dar-
win & Murphy
for Appellant.


10815

People, Respond-
ents, vs. David
Jaurez, Appel-
lant. Attorney-
General for Peo-
ple, A. II. Griffith
and J. C. B.Wyatt
for Appellant.



32



Cm



3 a>



^SE



>-x


(!)








«a


~








c,0


CO
















c


CO


CO






a


CO








rt


00 ■*
















H










e^


>.


^


o^


00


'5


:2i


12;


a)


^


t(J






-—








IM


a>


S


CO

CO


-2


CO

00


«


fi




Tr


e^




o


CO


3


>,






(M


ci




"d








CS




W


^


li;




>




n)








1


J2

53




J2


"3 CO


e






o


C-00




_^


"^


y


cj ^




^


s


sr


O !>,


2


^r-


"J





t- a; eo
e^ t3 00
. ^ 00

2-0 —
^ ■* j;

"^ C !U

«s -r; o

^ = CO

S • S
m CO •:

cs coSC

I- -H c3



CO m

<B -^ CO
pi, S (N






to CO i;

C CO ^3

ci 00 !C



;>.



S ■£ .§ 3



^ « «^* "cS •

CO r-i OJ CO

CO >, C.00

^■— t. CJ '^
t- CC r^ O £.

ca 00 p!H "3 cs

S'-^ O 3

5 — 3 !^ ^

(-5 CO a> <u



t; !- fcC ro _(

■-3 ^ "^ S c3

eS o 5 "^ -T-

r- y t. CO ^



5 2 ^

00 ^ C3 u-

- - to Sd'^ ^
n 't: =3 3<

<; CO "^ 3 u

rr> SO)



g s






O i. ^ C3 g-






i o 8 « g "*-

tS •- S CO .2 'O
flTS CO — -^ .-^



3 O



5<



"S"^

s s


3 cS









o S *


O o


oo


o 2;


t-s ^


■"^ >.


I- >-.








T g


'u a s


■= s








'^'tir"^


c-^ o


a.«« o


3 O O


3 OQ


3 OO


OQ


02


DO






a> m S Jj



"^ '^



S^ §§111=2



o . g^cC^^^^-
^^^^i O s-'^ 3
0) •^:t^ o •05

- -r; 2E-i O.

§ sS,5o p.=2

Ph



«^ > 3 *?

3 ::= . o ;£

.^ 3 -S O aT ^

PL|



33







In this, error



Online LibraryCalifornia. LegislatureAppendix to the Journals of the Senate and Assembly of the ... session of the Legislature of the State of California (Volume 1885v.1) → online text (page 21 of 83)