Copyright
Charles A. (Charles Andrew) Ray.

Negligence of imposed duties, personal online

. (page 4 of 85)
Online LibraryCharles A. (Charles Andrew) RayNegligence of imposed duties, personal → online text (page 4 of 85)
Font size
QR-code for this ebook


Coor ■». Rogers, 97 N. C. 143.... 599»

Copper V. Dolvin, 68 Iowa, 757.- 270*

Corby v. Hill, 4 C. B. N. S. 556.

16'. 203 5, 1504

V. Hill, 4 C. B. K S. 556,

567 150

Corcoran v. Nail or, 6 Mackey,

580 211'

Corfield v. Coryell, 4 Wash. C. C.

371 ..379^ 495«

Corlett V. Leavenworth, 27 Kan.

673 1295«

Corliss V. Smith, 53 Vt. 532-.586^ 625^
Cornelius «. Grant, 7 Sc. Sess.

Cas. 4 628'

Corning v. Gould, 16 Wend. 531-

5765, 5776, 578^

v. Lowerre, 6 Johns. Ch.

439, 2 N. Y. Ch. L. ed.

178.- - 4773

V. Troy Iron & N. Factory,

34 Barb. 485.. 287^

V. Troy Iron & Nail Fac-
tory, 40 N. Y. 220.... 4565
Cortelyou v. Van Brundt, 2 Johns.

357.. 188«

V. Van Brundt, 2 Johns.

362 378^ 379'

Cotes V. Davenport, 9 Iowa, 227. 305^
Cotterill v. Starkey, 8 Car. & P.

691 136*

Cotton «. Pocasset Mfg. Co. 13

Met. 429- 428''

Cottrill V. Myrick, 12 Me. 222. -

53r, 5325

Couch V. Steel, 3 El. & Bl. 402.. 662^
Coupland v. Hardingham, 3 Camp.

398 105^

Coursin's App. 79 Pa. 220 201*

Couts V. Neer. 70 Tex. 468 28*

Covert V. O'Conner, 8 Watts, 477. 404'
Covington v. Bryant, 7 Bush, 248 100^
Cowdrey v. Woburn, 136 Mass.

409 4545



Cowell V. Thayer, 5 Met. 253

.167», 419'

Cowles V. Balzer, 47 Barb. 562..

5942, 596'

V. Kidder, 24 H. H. 364...

433', 545'»

Cowley ». Sunderland, 6 Hurl. &

N. 565 583'

Cowling 'B. Higginson, 4 Mees. &

W. 245 -...243', 265*

Cox V. Burbridge, 13 C. B. N. S.

430 6O75

V. Burbridee, 13 C. B. N. S.

438, 32 L. J. N. S. C.

P. 89 588', 6O52

i\ Matthews, 1 Vent. 237.. 175'
». Murphy, 82 Ga. 623 .... 605'
V. Russell, 6 Barn. & C.

566 ...259«, 260

V. State, SBlackf. 193

3765«, 377'

Coxe V. Robbins, 9 N. J. L. *384

591', 592'', 5935

Crabtree v. Baker, 75 Ala. 91. 51

Am. Rep. 424.... 290', 3045
Crafter v. Metropolitan R. Co. L.

R. 1 C. P. 300 139

Cragin v. New York Cent. R. Co.

51 N. Y. 61. 639«

Craig V. Rochester City «fc B. R.

R. Co. 39N. Y. 404.. 93'

Grain v. Fox, 16 Barb. 184 578*

Crandall v. Goodrich Transp. Co.

16 Fed. Rep. 75. 654'

Crane v. Winsor, 2 Utah, 248 446*

Craven v. Rose, 3 Rich. L. 72... 577*^
Crawford v. Allegheny (Pa.) 23

W. N. C. 141 567'

V. Delaware, 7 Ohio St. 459 82'
1). Parsons, 63 N. H. 438.. 572'
V. Rambo, 44 Ohio St. 279,

4 West. Rep. 446. 295", 461' *
V. The Wells City, 38 Fed.

Rep. 47 .- 156'

Crawfordsville v. Bond, 96 Ind.

236.

.290^ 312', 321'. 326*, 327'^
Crawshaw «. Sumner, 56 Mo. 523 233'
Creed «. Hartmann, 29 N. Y. 591

136', 333*

Creigliton t\ Kaweah Canal & I.

Co. 67 Cal. 221. 287-

Cressey v. Northern R. Co. 59 N.

H. 564 664"

Crichton v. CoUery, Ir. R. 4 C.

L. 508 - . 498*

Crittenden v. Wilson, 5 Cow. 165

270*, 430'

Crocheron v. North Shore S. I.

F. Co. 56 N. Y. 656. 138'



TABLE OF CASES,



XXXlll



Crocker©. Knickerbocker Ice Co.

92 N. Y. ess 127-»

•Crogan v. Schiele, 53 Conn. 186,

1 New Eng. Rep. 311

....25", 26^ 73^ 118', 122' «
Crogate v. Morris, Brovvnl. 197.. 644^
Crolley v. Minneapolis & St. L.

K. Co. 30 Minn. 541. 487^
Crommelin v. Coxe, 30 Ala. 318- 79'
Cronin v. People, 82 N. Y. 318.. 152-'
Cronkhite v. Croukhite, 94 N. Y.

323 182', 184«

Crooker v. Bragg, 10 Wend. 260 441^
Cropper v. Matthews, 2 Sid. 127. 619^
Crosland v. Pottsville, 126 Pa. 511 470^
Cross V. Lewis, 2 Barn, cfe C. 586 178
T. Morristown, 18 N. J. Eq.

305... - 71'

V. Morristown, 18 IST. J. Eq.

311 71"

Orossley v. Lightowler, L. R. 2

Ch. App. 478 580^

«. Lightowler, L. R. 2 Cb.

App. 482 571'

Crouch V. Charleston & S. R. Co.

21 S. C. 495 472

V. London &N. \V. R. Co.

14 C. B. 291 133'

Crowell V. Sonoma County, 25

Cal. 315 34P

Crowhurst v. Amersham Burial

Board, L. R. 4 Exch.

Div. 5. 1235

Cubit V. O'Dett, 51 Mich. 347.... 311'*
V. O'Dett, 51 Mich. 350... 635"
Cubitt V. Porter, 8 B irn. & C. 257

209- ^ 213
Cuflf V. Newark & N. Y. R. Co. '

35 N. J. L. 17.. 1493

Culver 0. Streator, 130 111. 238, 6

L. R. A. 270 335'

Cumberland & O. C. Corp. v.

Portland, 62 Me. 505. 351^
Cumberland Valley R. Co. v.

Hughes, 11 Pa. 141... 252'
Cummings?). Barrett, 10 Cush. 186 455-
V. Riley, 52 N. H. 368.... 622^
V. St. Louis, 90 Mo. 259, 7

West. Rep. 274 78'

Cummins ti. Seymour, 79 Ind. 491,

41 Am. Rep. 618

312', 327-, 3282

Cunningham ®. Cambridge Sav.

Bank, 138 Mass. 480

413,49'

Curling v. Wood, 16 Mees. & W.

628 5663

Curran v. Boston (Mass.) 8 L. R,

A. 243 347'

». Louisville, 83 Ky. 628.. 580*



Currier «. West Side E. P. Co. 6

Blatchf. 487 76'

Curry v. Ut. Sterling, 15 111. 320. 184'

Curtis «. Angier, 4 Gray, 547 188'^

V. Eastern R. Co. 98 Mass.

428. 349'

V. Eastern R. Co. 98 Mass.

428, 431 348*

V. Francis, 9 Cush. 437... 573''
V. Keesler, 14 Barb. 511..

....1883, 405', 5503

V. La Grande Water Co.

(Or.)lOL. R. A. 484.. 445-»
V. Noonan, 10 Allen, 406..

188', 571'

V. Rochester & S. R. Co.

18 N. Y. 534 155», 612'

Curtiss V. Ayrault, 47 N. Y. 73.. 168*
V. Ayrault, 47 N. Y. 75... 187
V. Ayrault, 47 N. Y. 79...

205-, 217', 241''

«. White, Clarke, Ch. 389. 2203
Cusbing V. Adams, 18 Pick. 110. 2443
v. Bedford, 125 Mass. 526.

319', 336-3,853'

V. Bedford, 125 Mass. 528. 3343
Cusick V. Adams, 115 N. Y. 55.

23', 263, 361«

Cults V. Hussey, 15 Me. 237 378* '



D.



Dalay v. Savage, 145 Mass. 38, 4

New Eng. Rep. 863..

44', 49', 53'*, 63, 73'

Dalton V. Angus, L. R. 6 App.

Cas. 740

V. Angus, L.R. 6 App. Cas.

829

V. Bowker, 8 Nev. 190....

V. Denton, 1 C. B. N. S. 672 566*

Damp V. Dane, 29 Wis. 428 481'

Dana v. .Jackson Street Wharf

Co. 31 Cal. 120 378'2'

Dauaher ■«. Brooklyn, 51 Hun, 563,

affirmed, 119 N.Y. 241,

7L. R. A. 592.... 3083
Daniel v. Metropolitan R. Co. L.

R. 3C. P. 216.

V. Metropolitan R. Co. L.

R. 5 H. L. 45, 40 L. J.

N. S. C. P. 121

Daniel Ball, The, 77 U. S. 10

Wall. 557, 19 L.ed. 999

370^ 3773, 4033, 406

The, 77 U. S 10 Wall. 563,

19 L. ed. 1001 3703



199

232
445'



309'
1393



24*



C



XXXIV



TABLE OF CASES.



Daniels v. Citizens Sav. Inst. 127

Mass. 534.- 1673, 419^

V. Clegg, 28 Mich. 33, 42.. dP

V. Lebanon, 58 N. H. 284.127-* '

V. Potter, 4 Car. & P. 262. 61 1^

Dannaker v. Riley, 14 Pa. 436... 232'^

Dant V. Dist. of Columbia, 91 U.

S. 557, 23 L. ed. 446.. 342'
Danville, H. & W. R. Co. v.

Com. 73 Pa. 38 73^

Dargan^. Mobile, 31 Ala. 469.-335' »

Dark v. Johnston, 55 Pa. 164 182^

Darker «. Beck (Sup. Ct.) 32 N.

Y. S. R. 193 1622

Darling v. Bangor. 68 Me. 110... 329^
V. Bang.r, 68 Me. 112 .-. 330'
Darlington v. Painter, 7 Pa. 473-

2633, 425, 426', 428^

Darwin v. Upton, 2 Wm. Saund.

175 178

Dauenehauer v. Devine, 51 Tex.

480_- - ..211^ 2122

Davenport v. Lamson, 21 Pick. 72 238^
V. Ruckman, 10 Bosw. 20,

37 N. Y. 568 .. 148^

V. Ruckman, 37 N. Y. 568

441, 52^, 1102, 115', 342', 3432
Davenport & N. W. R. Co. v.
Renwick, 103 U. S.

180, 26L. ed. 51 - 386^

Davids ». Harris, 9 Pa. 503 220^ ^

Davidson v. Boston & M. R. Co.

3 Cush. 91-105 381

V. Hutchinson (N. J.) 18

Atl. Rep. 977 299-*

V. Michigan Cent. R. Co.

49 Mich. 431 636^

Davies v. 3Iarshall, 9 Week. Rep.

866.-.- 1872

V. Williams, 16 Q. B. 546. 6482
Davis V. Amer. Society for Prev.
Cruelty to Animals, 6
Daly, 85, 16 Abb. Pr.

N. 8. 78- - .. 775

V. Campbell, 23 Vt. 236... 616'
«. Central Congregational
Society, 139 Mass. 367,

371 5683

«. Fuller, 12 Vt. 178 2872

V. Getchell, 50 Me. 602.... 443«
V. Getchell, 50 Me. 602, 79
Am. Dec. 636, and

note, 638-645.. 441^

V. Jenkins, 5 Jones, L.

290 540'

1). Londgreen, 8 Neb. 43.. 299^
V. New York, 14 N. Y. 506

- 702, 72^ 2473

V. New York, 14 N. Y.

524 103, 751



! Davis V. Reamer, 104 Ind. 318, 3

West. Rep. 317 567*

V. The Seneca, Gilp. 10, 34 371*

«. The Seneca, Gilp. 28 370*

V. Winslow, 51 Me. 364, 81

Am. Dec. 573-.

70, 377*, 402', 404«, 4122, 568*
Dawson v. Manchester, S. & L.

R. Co. 7 Hurl. & N.

1037 155*

Dawtry v. Huggins, Clayt. 32, pi.

56 594*

Day V. Allender, 22 Md. 511

237«, 564' 3

V. Mt. Pleasant, 70 Iowa,

193- 119*

V. Stetson, 8 Greenl. 370- . 485*
v. Walden, 46 Mich. 575. .580-*
Dayton v. Pease, 4 Ohio St. 80.. 342'
Dean v. Chicago & N. R. Co. 43

Wis. 308 635'2

V. Clayton, 7 Taunt. 489-.

15, 543', 628'

V. McCarty, 2 U. C. Q. B.

448 645»

Deane v. Randolph, 132 Mass.

475.... 334*, 336', 3413, 351
Deansville Cemetery Asso. , Be, 66

N. Y. 569, 5 Hun, 482 89*
Dearth v. Baker, 22 Wis. 73-586«, 607*
De Bary Baya Merchants Line v,

Jacksonville, T. & K.

W. R. Co. 40 Fed.

Rep. 392 - 568^ 569'

Debolt??. Carter, 31 Ind. 355 236*

De Camp v. Sioux City, 74 Iowa,

393. - - . 6603

Decatur Gas Light & C. Co. v.

Howell, 93 111. 19.-.. 288*
Decker v. Baltimore & N. Y. R.

Co. 1 Inters. Com.

Rep. 434, 30 Fed. Rep.

733 - 466'

V. Baylor, 133 Pa. 168 357»

V. Gammon, 44 Me. 322...

-...586*, 587', 593'

Deerfield v. Arms, 17 Pick. 41, 28

Am. Dec. 276..-

360', 396', 397**

V. Conn. River R. Co. 144

Mass. 625, 4 New Eng.

Rep. 18 9762, 1768. 239*

Defer v. Detroit, 67 Mich. 346, 11

West. Rep. 530 -.-2932, 306''
Delahoussaye i). Judice, 13 La.

Ann. 587 - ..2953, 4255

Delaney v. Errickson, 11 Neb.

533 5943

Delaplaine v. Chicago & N. W.

R. Co, 43 Wis. 214.. 359*



TABLE OF CASES.



XXXV



Delaware, L. & W. R. Co. «.

Central Stock Yard &

T. Co. 43 N. J. Eq.

71, 9 Cent. Rep. 111.. 88^

V. Napheys, 90 Pa. 135.i;39\ 147'

V. Salmon, 39 N. J. L. 300

6.'54i2

V. Salmon, 39 N. J. L. 311 664'
V. Toffey, 38 N. J. L. 525. 363^
Delger v. St. Paul, 14 Fed. Rep.

567..-. -.342', 343=

Delhi V. Youmans, 45 N. Y. 362

280, 2b3^ 284

V. Youmaus, 50 Barb. 316-

320 - 123

Delory v. Canny, 144 Mass. 445,

4 New Eng. Rep. 258- 130^

De Lovio v. Bolt, 2 Gall. 398

370^ 371*

De Luze v. Bradbury, 25 N. J.

Eq. 70- 186^ 2412^

Delzell V. Indianapolis «fe C. R.

Co. 32 lud. 45 - -2.52^ 488^
Dempsey v. Kipp, 61 N. Y. 462-.

- .182', 1848

Den V. Jersey Co. 56 U. S. 15
How. 426, 14 L. ed.

757 494=

De Necochea v. Curtis, 80 Cal.

397 4488, 4492

V. Curtis, 80 Cal. 404 446''

Denning v. Roome, 6 Wend. 651. 2878
Dennis v. Huyck, 48 Mich. 620-. 635"

Denny v. Correll, 9 Ind. 72 594^'

Denton v. Leddell, 23 N. J. Eq.

64 2413

Denver v. Bayer, 7 Colo. 113 82'

V. Capeli, 4 Colo. 25, 34

Am. Rep. 63... 330'

V. Dean, 10 Colo. 375 342'

V. Dunsmore, 7 Colo. 328.

342', 343=

V. Rhodes, 9 Colo. 554..-.

-. 8046, 305«,

324', 328*. 3302, 33^1^ 3421
Denver & R. G. R. Co. v. Harris,
122 U. S. 597, 30 L. ed.

1146 6573

Dering v. Earl of Winchelsea, 1

Cox, Cas. 348 226

Dermont v. Detroit, 4 Mich. 435- 329^
Derrickson v. Springer, 5 Harr. 21 234'
Derry v. Flitner, 118 Mass. 131 -. 107^
Des Plaines v. Poyer, 123 111. 348,

12 West. Rep. 760..-. 9-*
Detroit v. Beecher, 75 Mich. 454.

122», 595«

V. Blackeby, 21 Mich. 84.- 3413
D. Corey, 9 Mich. 165.. 114", 333'
V. Corey, 9 Mich. 165, 184 338'



Detroit City R. Co. v. Mills

(Mich.) 4 Harvard Law

Rev. 260 251»

Devlin v. Wabash, St. L. & P. R.

Co. 87 Mo. 545, 4

West. Rep. 54 137*

Devonshire v. Eglin, 14 Beav.

530 183»

Dewein v. Peoria, 24 111. App.

396... 333»

Dewey v. Leonard, 14 Minn. 153

135^ 642*, 645*

Dexter v. McCready, 54 Conn.

171, 2 New Eng. Rep.

838 611

v. Providence Aqueduct

Co. 1 Story, 387 .... 280'
V. Tree, 117 111. 532, 5 West.

Rep. 897 1803, 234-*, 237*

Diamond v. Northern Pac. R.

Co. 6 Mont. 580 648*

Diamond Match Co. v. New

Haven, 55 Conn. 510,

6 New Eng. Rep. 174. 315
Diamond State Iron Co. v. Giles

(Del.) 9 Cent. Rep. 577

-..20^ 361*

Dickey v. Maine Teleg. Co. 46

Me. 483. 251'

Dickinson v. New York, 28 Hun,

256 - -.-. 333*

V. Whiting, 141 Mass. 414,

2 New Eng. Rep. 356. 242»
p. Worcester, 7 Allen, 19-.

1473, 296«, 3022, 3035

Dickson «. Burnhara, 14 U. C. Ch.

594 545-»

V. HoUister, 123 Pa. 421 .-

27*, 115', 130*

V. McCoy, 39 N. Y. 400 .. .

6076, 6103*

Diedrich v. Northwestern U. R.

Co. 43 Wis. 248. .1845, 359*

Dill V. Wareham, 7 Met. 438 495'

Dillard v. Moore, 7 Ark. 166 6343

Dilling V. Murray, 6 Ind. 324, 63

Am. Dec. 385 425*, 451*

V. Murray, 6 Ind. 326 411*

Dillman v. Hoffman, 38 Wis. 559

17P, 576^ 577*

Dillon V. Acme Oil Co. 49 Hun,

565 80*, 275

Dilworth's App. 91 Pa. 247 10*

Dimes v. Petley, 15 Q. B. 276... 469^
Dinwiddle v. State, 103 Ind. 101,

1 West. Rep. 138 62G»

Dist. of Columbia v. Armes, 107

U. S. 519, 27 L. ed. 618 342'
V. Baltimore & P. R. Co,

1 Mackey, 316, 317... 39*



XXXVl



TABLE OF CASES.



Ditchett V. Spuytea Duyvil & P.
M. R. Co. 67 N. Y.
425 521

Diveny v. Elmira, 51 N. Y. 506. 343'^

Dixon V. Baker, 65 111. 518 330^

V. Bell, 5 Maule & S. 198,

199 - 367'

^.Wilkinson,2McArth. 425 198^

Doane v. Badger, 12 Mass. 65, 70 158'

i>. Willcutt, 5 Gray. 328..- 378''

Dobiecki v. Sharp, 88 N. Y. 203.. 19^

Dockfrty v. Hutson (Ind.) 25 N.

E. Rep. 144 .616^ 632'

Dodd V. Holme. 1 Ad. & El. 493

38^ 192, 199^ 200^

Dodge «. Essex County Comrs. 3

Met. 380_.. 266'

t). McClintock,47N.H.386 181'
v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 43

N. J. Eq. 351, 10 Cent.

Rep. 655 738, jcP

V. Stacy, 39 Vt. 558 577'=

Dodson V. Mock, 4 Dev. & B. L.

146 628'

Doe V. Beebe, 54 U. S. 13 How.

25, 14L. ed. 35

372' ^ 378\ 379' » «, 396'*, 399*
Doenner v. Tynan, 38 How. Pr.

176.. 2473

Doerbaum v. Fischer, 1 Mo. App.

149.. 302'

Doggett V. Richmond & D. R.

Co. 78N. C. 305.. 6593, 666^
Doherty v. Braintree, 148 Mass.

495. 497 351

«. Waltham, 4Gray, 596.. 368'
Dolfinger v. Fishback, 12 Bush,

474 6O42, 607^

Dolliff V. Boston & M. R. Co. 68

Me. 173 172*

«. Boston & M. R. Co. 68

Me. 176 166'

Dolph V. Ferris, 7 Watts & S. 367 59P
Donahoe v. Wabash, St. L. & P.

R. Co. 83 Mo. 560.... 5^
Donaldson v. Wilson, 60 Mich.

86, 1 Am. St. Rep.

487, and note 19=*

Donohue v. New York. 3 Daly, 65 330'
Donovan v. McAlpin, 85 N. Y. 188 440^

Doody V. Vaughn, 7 Neb. 28 481'

Dooley «. Sullivan, 112 Ind. 451,

11 West. Rep. 816.310% 333^
Doolrttle ■». Broome Co. 18 N. Y.

155. 4778

Doorman v. Jenkins, 2 Ad. <& El.

256 613'

Dority v. Dunning, 78 Me. 381, 3

New Eng. Rep. 41

105* 427«, 5735



224*
480=
376=



4753

534^

47a«

68^
136^



Dorman v. Bates Mfg. Co. 82 Me.

438 .16r»

Dorrity v. Rapp, 72 N. Y. 307...

199'^*, 200% 201'

Dorsey v. St. Louis, A. & T. H.

R. Co. 58 111. 67 8212*

V. St. Louis, A. & T. H. R.

Co. 58 111. 68-. ..2045,

Doty ?j. Graham, 5 Pick. 487

V. Strong, 1 Pin. (Wis.) 316
Dougan v. Cham plain Transp.

Co. 56 N. Y. 1-..138, 138'
Dougherty v. Bunting, 1 Sandf. 1

....75*,

Doughty V. Conover, 42 N. J. L.

193

Douglass V. State, 4 Wis. 387

Dovastonv. Payne, 2 Smith, Lead.

Cas. *205, note.

Dowlingi). Allen, 74 Mo. 13

V. Hennings, 20 Md. 179..

233*, 577*

Downing v. More, 13 Colo. 316.. 448*^
Doyle V. Chicago, St. P. & K. C.

R. Co. 77 Iowa, 607,

4L. R. A. 420 143

Drake v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.

Co. 70 Iowa, 59

V. Earhart (Idaho) 23 Pac.

Rep. 541.

v. Hamilton Woolen Co.

99 Mass. 579, 581

V. Hamilton Woolen Co.

99 Mass. 580 424»

«. Hudson River R. Co. 7

Barb. 508 .728,

V. Mount, 33 N. J. L. 441.
Draper v. Mackey, 35 Ark. 497..

Drew V. Gant, 1 br. 197

V. Gaylord Coal Co. (Pa.)

3 Cent. Rep. 389-.137^

V. Hilliker, 56 Vt. 641 ....

Drewett v. Sheard, 7 Car. & P.

465 188-,

Driscoll V. Newark & R. L. »& C.

Co. 37 N. Y. 637

Drucker v. Manhattan R. Co. 106

N.Y. 157, 8 Cent. Rep.

66

Dudley v. Camden «& P. Ferry

Co. 42 N. J. L. 25...

...488•-^ 490-^3*,

«. Kennedy, 63 Me. 465 —

79=3. 1265, 4753

Duffies V. Judd, 48 Iowa, 256 595^

Duffy v. Dubuque, 63 Iowa, 171,

50 Am. Rep. 743 125=

Dufour V. Stacey (Ky.) 14 S. W.

Rep. 48 487«

Duinneen v. Rich, 22 Wis. 550, 558 181'



295'

448^
455=



935

3633

79'
484'

647'
5358

578*

235*



93'



491'



TABLE OF CASES.



XXXVll



Duke of Devonshire v. Lodge, 7

Barn. & C. 36 537

Dumont v. Kellogg, 29 Mich. 420 441^
V. Kellogg, 29 Mich. 425 .. 41 P
Dunbar v. Boston, 112 Mass. 75.. 335"
Duncomb's Case, Oro. Car. 306.. 68^
Dundas v. Lansing, 75 Mich. 499,

5L. R. A. 143. 128'

Dundy «. Chambers, 23 111. 370. . 486"
V. Chambers, 23 111. 373.. . 483^
Dunham v. Lamphere, 3 Gray,

208.271 536''

Dunklee v. Wilton R. Co. 24 N.

H.489

166', 168'*, 172^ ^, 574", 576'
Dunlap V. Snyder, 17 Barb. 561. 627^
V. Wagner. 85 Ind. 529, 44

Am. Rep. 42 656% 657^

V. Yoakum, 18 Tex. 582 .. 480'
Dunn V. Hannibal & St. J. R.

Co. 68 Mo., 268 639«

Dunning v. Bird, 24 111. App. 270 OSS'*
Durant v. Palmer, 29 N. J. L. 544

.45^ 48', 4^^ 5P \ 114', 614
Durel V. Boisblanc, 1 La. Ann.

407.... 166'

Durham ■». Musselman, 2 Blackf.

96,18 Am. Dec.133. 597', 598'

Durkin v. Troy, 61 Barb. 437 129''

Dusenbury v. Mutual Teleg. Co.

11 Abb. N. C. 440-.-. 97«
Dutton V. Strong, 66 U. S. 1
B]ack,"23, 17 L. ed. 29
..359', 478' 3, 559*, 563'^ ^4 5
Dwinel «. Barnard, 28 Me. 554..

403^ 404«

v. Veazie, 44 Me. 167

403^ 4046, 4132

V. Veazie, 44 Me. 167, 175.

...80^ 47P

V. Veazie, 50 Me. 479 413^

Dyer v. Depui, 5 Whart. 584.... 571'
V. St. Paul, 27 Minn. 457. 88'
V. Sanford, 9 Met. 395....

..187' 3 4, 201^571'^ 578"«8
Dygert v. Bradley, 8 Wend. 469. 610"^
v. Schenck, 23 Wend. 446.

110, 131'-, 247^ 250'

V. Schenck, 23 Wend. 448. 71^



E.



Eagle. The, 75 U. S. 8 Wall. 15,

19L. ed. 365 370

Eakin v. Brown, 1 E. D. Smith,

26 149^ 273^

Earhart o. Youngblood, 27 Pa. 331

006\ 617^ 6193



Earl V. Beadleston, 10 Jones & S.

294 398, 233'

V. DcHart, 12 N. -J. Eq. 280

....303', 426»

V. De Hart, 12 N. J. Eq.

2K0, 287 476*

V. VanAlstine, 8 Barb. 630.58?' *
Earl of Sandwich ». Great North-
ern R. Co. L. R. 10

Ch. Div. 707 457*

East End St. R. Co. v. Doyle, 88

Tenn. 747... 251^

Eastern R. Co. v. Allen, 135 Mass.

13.. 550«

Eastham v. Anderson, 119 Mass.

526 540»

East Hampton v. Kirk, 6 Hun, 257

378', 393'

Eastman v. Amoskeag Mfg. Co.

44 N. H. 144 55

V. Meredith, 36 N. H. 284.

31P, 830', 337'

v. Meredith, 30 N. H. 284,

297-300... 3393

V. Meredith, 36 N. H. 289-

294 340', 344'»

«. Meredith, 36 N. H. 295. 345'
V. St. Anthony Falls Water

Power Co. 43 Minn.

60-..- 395*6

V. Sanborn, 3 Allen, 594.. 636''
East Omaha Land Co. ». .Jeffries,

40 Fed. Rep. 386 395'

Easton v. Pickersgill, 55 N. Y. 315 88'
East St. Louis & C. R. Co. v. Eis-

entraut (III.) 24 N. E.

Rep. 760-.. 298"

East Tennessee, V. & G. R. Co.

V. Hull, 88 Tenn. 33.. 3633
Eaton V. Boston, C. & M. R. Co.

51 N. H. 504.29P, 432S4355
V. Boston, C. & M. R. Co.

51 N. II. 504, 510.... 4542
Eberhart ». Reister, 96 Ind. 478. 630*

Ebner v. Estichter, 19 Pa. 19 577®

Eckert v. Long Island R. Co. 43

N. Y. 503.. 5*

Eddy «. Chase, 140 Mass. 471, 1

New Eng. Rep. 573..

..550«, 578*

V. St. Mars, 53 Vt. 463.... 398"
Eddystone, Tlie, 33 Fed. Rep. 925 370»
Edgerton v. New York & H. R.

Co. 39 N. Y. 227..-. 147*
Edmondson v. Moberly, 98 Mo.

523 326S 327«

Edmund's App. (Pa.) 6 Cent. Rep.

433... - 205*

Edmundson v. Pittsburgh, M. &

T. R. Co. Ill Pa. 316 114>



XXXVlll



TABLE OF CASES.



Edson V. Weston, 7 Cow. 278 490*

Edwards v. New York & H. R.
Co. 98 N. Y. 245.-..

44, 48^, 53, 68^

«. New York & H. R. Co.

98 N. Y. 247 49'

«. New York & H. R.

Co. 98 N. Y. 248.... 113
Edwardsville R. Co. v. Sawyer,

92 111.377 943

Ehrgott V. New York, 96 N. Y.

264.

1072, 310S 342', 3432, 659'
Eichels v. Evansville St. R. Co.

78Ind. 261 ...93*, 248^

Elder v. Burrus, 6 Humph. 358..

3773, 380^

®. Burrus, 6 Humph. 358,

366-... 389^

Eldred, Re, 46 Wis. 530, 541.. 75*, 475=*
Elgin Hydraulic Co. v. Elgin, 74

111. 433 3273

V. Kimball, 90 111. 356.. - 310"^
Elias V. Sutherland, 18 Abb. N.

C. 126 247*

Elizabeth City Academy v. Lind-
say, 6 Ired. L. 476, 45

Am. Dec. 500 487^

Elizabethport & N. Y. Ferry Co.
v. United States, 5

Blatchf. 198 481^

Elizabethtown & P. R. Co. ■».

Thompson, 79 Ky. 52. 94'
Elizabethtown, L. & B. S. R. Co.
«. Combs, 10 Bush,

382 - 82' 2

Elliot V. Fitchburg R. Co. 10
Cush. 191.57Am. Dec.
85-... 3553, 357% 409', 441^5
V. Fitchburg R. Co. 10

Cush. 193 442«, 455^

». Fitchburg R. Co. 10

Cush. 194 443'

Elliotts. Fair Haven, 32 Conn. 579

93*, 2482

®. Philadelphia, 75 Pa. 347 335^
1). Pray, 10 Allen, 378, 87

Am. Dec. 653 19^, 566^

v. Rhett, 5 Rich. L. 405,

421 157»

V. Rhett, 5 Rich. L. 405,

418, 419 1872

V. Rhett, 5 Rich. L. 405, 37
Am. Dec. 750, and

note, 751-768_-. 166'

«. Stewart, 15 Or. 259.... 383^
Ellis V. American Academy of

Music, 120 Pa. 608.743, 247^

V. Carey, 30 Ala. 725

....403^ 405*, 406'



Ellis «. Duncan, 21 Barb. 230,
affd. 26 How. Pr. 601.

2802, 300^

V. Hilton, 78 Mich. 150, 6

L. R. A. 454 636'

V. Iowa City, 29 Iowa, 229

2902, 305^ 3272

v. Loftus Iron Co. L. R.
10 C. P. 10, 11 Moak,

Eng. Rep. 214

5852, 5911^ 5937

Ellsworth V. Southern Minn. R.

E. Co. 31 Minn. 543. 182'
Elwell V. Crowther, 31 Beav. 103 270*
Ely V. Campbell, 59 How. Pr. 333 99'
1). Rochester, 26 Barb. 133-

136 315

«. Rochester, 26 Barb. 133,

137 307*

Emans v. Turnbull, 2 Johns. 322 396'
Embrey v. Owen, 6 Exch, 353

..288*, 409', 4412, 4433

V. Owen, 6 Exch. 370 2872

Emerson v. Taylor, 9 Me. 44 360'

«. Wiley, 10 Pick. 310

-. 571', 5803

Emery ■». Lowell, 104 Mass. 13..

.3292, 340. 349*

V. Lowell, 104 Mass. 13. 16 350'
v. Lowell. 104 Mass. 13, 16,

17 ...- 3493

1). Lowell, 104 Mass. 13, 17

- 347*. 3495

«. Lowell, 104 Mass. 15..

..329% 3433

Emporia v. Schmidling, 33 Kan.

485 365*, 656'

V. Soden, 25 Kan. 588, 37
Am. Rep. 265, and

note 454% 456' ^4

Enfield Toll Bridge Co. v. Hart-
ford & N. H. R. Co.

17 Conn. 40, 54

89', 483', 484'

Engel V. Smith (Mich.) 46 N. W.

Rep. 21 22' 2, 128*

Eno V. Del Vecchio, 4 Duer, 53

208'. 213

V. Del Vecchio, 4 Duer, 61 209^
V. Del Vecchio, 4 Duer, 53,

6 Duer, 17... 213'

V. Del Vecchio, 6 Duer, 17 233*
Enos V. Hamilton, 27 Wis. 256

l26^ 4753

Ensminger v. People, 47 111. 384. 3892
Erb 1). Brown, 69 Pa. 216.... 5712, 5304
Erd V. Chicago & N. W. R. Co.

41 Wis. 65 6472, 6652

V. Chicago & N. W. R. Co.

41 Wis. 66 646«



TABLE OF CASES.



XXXIX



Erie v. Caulkins, So Pa. 247 323^

V. Magill, 101 Pa. 6l6.124^ 129^
V. Schwiagle, 22 Pa. 888.. 311^
Erie R. Co. v. Decker, 78 Pa.

295 669^

Ernst V. Hudson River R. Co. 24

How. Pr. 97.. 362^

Escanaba & L. M. Transp. Co. v.
Chicago, 107 U. S. 678,

27 L. ed. 442 372"

•0. Chicago, 107 U. S. 682.

27 L. ed. 444 370^

Esling V. Williams, 10 Pa. 126. . 237^
Esson V. McMaster, 1 Kerr (N.

B.)501. 3773, 405' , 416

Estes V. China, 56 Me. 407

321'^ 329^ 3525

V. China, 56 Me. 410 334^

Eubanks v. Pence, 5 Litt. (Kv.)

338- ....531', 549«

Eufaula v. Simmons, 86 Ala. 515 434-

Eustace v. Jahns, 38 Cal. 3 114'

Evans v. Dana, 7 R. I. 306 236«

v. Jayne. 23 Pa. 34...2072, 233=»
V. McDermott, 49 N. J. L.

163, 4 Cent. Rep. 559. 586"
V. Merriweather, 4 111. 492 442-*
V. Wilmington & W. R.

Co. 96 N. C. 45 154-

Evansich v. Gulf, C. & S. F. R.

Co. 57 Tex. 126 29>

Evanston v. Gunn, 99 U. S. 660,

25 L. ed. 306 342'

Evansville v. Decker, 84 Ind. 325,
43 Am. Rep. 86..290^
312', 321', 323', 325-. 326^

V. Page, 23 Ind. 525 8P

Evansville & T. H. R. Co. v. Car-
vener, 113 Ind. 51, 12

West. Rep. 204. 72''

V. Griffin, 100 Ind. 221.... 23' ■*
V. Griffin, 100 Ind. 221-225 26'^
Everett v. Edwards, 149 Mass.

588, 5L. R. A. 110... 2143
V. Hydraulic Flume Tun-
nel Co. 23 Cal. 225..
..256«, 271S 272', 432', 440'
Everson v. Syracuse, 100 N. Y.

577, 1 Cent. Rep. 756. 337^
Ewart V. Cochrane, 4 Macq.

123 IW

V. Cochrane, 7 Jur. N. S.

925 186^ 24P

Ewell v. Greenwood, 26 Iowa,

377 79', 468S 473

Exchange Fire Ins. Co. v. Dela-
ware Canal Co. 10

Bosw. 180 566^ 567^4

Explorer, The, 20 Fed. Rep.

135 370^



Fagan v. Armistead, 11 Ired. L.

433.. 5142

Fahn v. Reichart, 8 Wis. 255

135^ 6442, 6451

Fair v. Philadelphia, 88 Pa. 209,

32 Am. Rep. 455 330*

Fairbanks v. Kerr, 70 Pa. 86.. 70% 142'^

V. Kerr, 70 Pa. 89... 365

Fairchild v. Bentley, 30 Barb.

147- 617'

Fallon V. O'Brien, 12 R. I. 518..

..612', 6I32

Fall River Iron Works Co. v.

Old Colony & F. R. R.

Co. 5 Allen, 224... 75^ 474^



Online LibraryCharles A. (Charles Andrew) RayNegligence of imposed duties, personal → online text (page 4 of 85)