Horace Binney.

An inquiry into the formation of Washington's Farewell address .. online

. (page 3 of 20)
Online LibraryHorace BinneyAn inquiry into the formation of Washington's Farewell address .. → online text (page 3 of 20)
Font size
QR-code for this ebook

" Hamilton^ comprising his Gorreapofidence, and his Pditical
" and Official WritingSy exclusive of the Federalist^ Oivil and
" Military/, pMished from tlie Original Manuscripts in the
" Department of State^ hy Order of the Joint Library Com^
" mittee of Congress. Edited by John G. Hamilton^ author of
" a Life of HamiltonJ^ The letters in that work are printed
in the order of date, and the date of the particular letter
referred to in this Inquiry, wiU be a guide to the volume
and place where it may be found.

3. Hamilton's letters to Washington on the same subject.
An extract from the first of these in point of date (10th
May, 1796), is printed in the Appendix to the twelfth
volume of Washington's Writings, page 391, in the paper
of Mr. Sparks, headed ^' Washington's Farewell Address."
The originals of all the other letters of Hamilton on this
subject, as well as the first, were at one time in the posses-
sion of Mr. Sparks ; and copies of them, supplied by him
as I understand, are now in my possession. They will be
either copied at large, or quoted in every material part, if
the letter refers to other matters. The originals, it is un-
derstood, were finally deposited in the Department of State.
Whether they are all now there, is, I imderstand, uncer-

Digitized byVjOOQlC


4. Washington's original draught of an Address, sent by
him to Hamilton, on the 15th May, 1796, for the purposes
described in Washington's letter of that date. I give this
title to a paper left by Washington at his death, and which
subsequently was in Mr. Sparks's possession, for the pur^
poses of his edition of Washington's Writings. Mr. Sparks
has supplied a copy of the beginning and conclusion of this
paper to Mr. Hamilton, the author of Hamilton's life, by
whose permission I use them. The two middle parts are
printed in Mr. Sparks's "Appendix. One of them is Madi-
son's draught ; the other is the paper entitled " Hints or Heads
" of Topics." Together they constitute the entire draught,
as it appears in the Appendix to. this Inquiry. The lines
which Washington altered, by drawing a line through them,
though perfectly legible in the paper, are not material, and
are supplied by asterisks. The words he interlined, to con-
nect what is disjoined by the erasure, are printed in italics
on the body of the page in the Appendix.

5. Hamilton's " Abstract of points to form an Address ;"
printed in Hamilton's Works, vol. vii, p. 570.

6. Hamilton's original draught of the Farewell Address ;
printed in the same volume, page 575.

7. Mr. Jay's letter to Judge Peters, dated 29th March,
1811 ; in the second volume of the Life of John Jay, by his
son William Jay, at page 336.

8. The Farewell Address to the People of thd United
States, by Washington, dated 17th September, 1796; in the
twelfth volume of Washington's Writings, edited by Jared
Sparks, at page 214.

9. The reprint of the autograph copy of Washington's
Farewell Address, with certain clausfes and words which had

Digitized byVjOOQlC


been cancelled in the autograph copy, now restored and
printed at the foot of the respective pages.

These are all the authorities which are necessary to de-
termine the respective contributions of Washington and
Hamilton to the Farewell Address ; and they are all accesi-
sible, in original or copy, in their original completeness.
And it is remarkable that they are not only all that is neces-
sary to this end, but that some of them supply irresistible nega-
tive proof, that nothing occurred personally, or face to fa^ce,
between Washington and Hamilton, to affect the inferences
which the written or printed documents justify; for, except
a single personal interview between them, before the corre-
spondence began, which interview, the correspondence
shows, had no influence whatever on the subsequent work
of either of the parties, there was not a single instance of
personal intercourse, direct or indirect, from the beginning
to the end of the whole work on both sides. The whole
matter was conducted in writing, and without the interven-
tion of any common friend, instructed upon the subject, and
passing between the parties.

Washington himself prepared a draught of a valedictory
address, and showed it to Hamilton in Philadelphia, before
the 10th of May, 1796. On that day Hamilton wrote to
Washington from New York, in regard to this paper, and
Washington sent it to him, with a letter dated the 15th

A draught of such an Address, in Washington's hand-
writing, either the same which he sent to Hamilton, or
another, was found among Washington's papers, after his
death. The paper that was so found, and which I shall

Digitized byVjOOQlC


hereafter refer to as the preserved paper ^ is described by Mr.
Sparks, in the Appendix to the twelfth volume of Wash-
ington's Writings, at page 391, as follows: "It is certain,
" however, that it was Washington's original idea to embody
"in the Address the substance and the form of Mr. Madi-
" son's draught, and to make such additions as events and the
" change of circumstances seemed to require. A paper of
" this description has been preserved, in which is first in-
" serted Mr. Madison's draught, and then a series of memoran-
" da or loose hints, evidently designed to be wrought into the
" Address. These are here printed as transcribed from the
"original manuscript:" and then follows a succession of
paragraphs, with the heading Hints or Heads of Topics,
fiUing about twq, pages and a half of the Appendix.

Mr. Sparks's imperfect knowledge of some of the papers
I have referred to, which were not published until after the
completion of his edition of Washington's Writings, and
perhaps something in the very considerable dissimilitude, at
least in form, between the preserved paper and the published
Farewell Address, induced him, probably, to regard it as
tmcertain whether this paper was the same which Wash-
ington showed, and afi;erwards sent, to Hamilton, as his
draught of the Address. In this state of doubt or disbelief,
he omitted to print the entire paper in extenso. Some
remarks in the initial part of it, introductory of Madison's
draught, might have given some pain to the surviving family
of Mr. Madison ; and if the paper was in reality, what Mr.
Sparks seems to have thought it was, a speculative paper,
or a paper containing mere memoranda or hints of topics
for an address, and not a definite presentment of Wash-^
ington's thoughts and language, it may seem to have come

Digitized byVjOOQlC


within the discretion of an editor, either to select it or not,
for publication. But the publication of several papers on
the subject of the Address, since that edition of Washing-
ton's Writings, particularly Hamilton's original draught, and
Washington's letters to Hamilton, having made it not pro-
bable merely, but morally certain, that this preserved paper
is the very draught which was sent by Washington to Ham-
ilton, by a letter of the 15th May, 1796, Mr. Sparks, upon
request, immediately supplied to Mr. John C. Hamilton
copies of the beginning and conclusion of the paper, and
has always, I learn, been ready so to communicate copies of
such of these papers as were in his possession, on this sub-
ject; and by means of them the whole draught has been
completed, and appears in the Appendix to this Inquiry.
There can be no reasonable doubt that the preserved paper
at large, is the original draught of Washington, which his
letter to Hamilton refers to. It was also, in some degree, a
completed paper, as far as Washington personally meant to
go. It begins with a formal address to the people, by the
description of " Friends and Fellow-Citizens ;" and it con-
cludes with Washington's signature in the usual form, but
without date. Its identity is specially established by an
alteration on the first page of it, which is noticed in Wash-
ington's letter to Hamilton, and is made by a line drawn
through certain expressions, and through a name at the foot c
of the first page. As the whole matter is now, at least,
historical, there can be no propriety in leaving any part of a
writing incomplete, which is so manifestly a principal hinge
of the main question. The alteration in the paper has
become, also, a matter of complete insignificancy, in the
personal relation, to Mr. Madison or to any one else, even ifi

Digitized byVjOOQlC


under any circumstances, the contrary aspect of it can be
thought to justify a departure from the right line of history,
in regard to the acts of great public men, who have left the
records of them for inspection.

There are one or two particulars in which Mr. Sparks, by
his omission to print the concluding paper, and by remarks
upon a part of it which he does print, has unintentionally
done some injustice to Washington. Nothing could have
been fiirther from his intention.

From the concluding part of the preserved paper, Hamil-
ton has taken some rather touching thoughts of Washington,
in regard to his long life of service, and to the affection which
he bore to the land that had been his birthplace, and the
birthplace of his ancestors for four generations. He also has
taken from it his reference to the Proclamation of Neutrality,
and other matters. A considerable portion of the conclusion,
Hamilton, with Washington's approbation, has omitted ; be-
cause, as a public paper, looking to distant posterity, as well
as to the time present, it was thought best to turn away
from the temporary causes of irritation, which Washington,
with some animation, had referred to as a party injustice to
him. One ought not to question what two such judgments
as Washington's and Hamilton's finally approved. But the
concluding part of Washington's draught appears to be of
the greatest importance to his personal biography. It will
enable the pubUc to know him, even better than he is gene-
rally known, and neither to love nor to honor him less.
It may show us, that like Achilles, he was vulnerable in one
part, not, however, in a lower part of his nature, but in the
sensitive tegument of the higher; and that the arrows of
party had just so far raised the skin, that his arm was up,


Digitized byVjOOQlC


and had given the wave of defiance to his enemies, prepara-
tory to a blow, which his deep love of the whole country
arrested. It was magnanimous as well as wise in Hamilton,
\ who was a copartner and sufferer in the conflict, to exclude
this portion of the paper from the Farewell Address ; but it
colors Washington to the life, and with the colors of a grand
and noble nature, not the less impressive because it was
human nature.

In another particular, Mr. Sparks's remarks deserve re-
consideration. Being made, probably, under the apprehen-
sion that the preserved paper was a mere study by Washing-
ton for a larger work, Mr. Sparks has regarded the second
or principal division which he has printed in his Appendix,
as being " a series of memoranda or loose hints, evidently
" designed to be wrought into the Address :" whereas they
contain the great body of Washington's contribution to the
Farewell Address, and are the basis of Hamilton's expan-
sions, on the most important points. The thoughts, and
sometimes the language, appear in their appropriate places
in Hamilton's draught ; and with Madison's draught, or rather
Washington's letter to Madison, from which that draught
was framed, they are the entire contribution of Washington,
except as he may have added to the copy of Hamilton's
original draught, after its final revision and return to him.
I am compelled to differ from Mr. Sparks on this point as
well as on one or two others ; but nevertheless, I trust, with
all becoming deference to his opinions.*

* There is a fine tone of criticism in a most able and interesting work, now near its
completion, Rawlinson's Translation of Herodotus, with Appendices containing Essays
on important epochs and topics in Ancient History. It is not for the appropriateness

Digitized byVjOOQlC


That portion of the preserved paper to which the remarks
of Mr. Sparks are applied, and which is indicated in his

of any of these dissertations to the subject of this Inquiry, but for the author's manly
freedom of dissent from, opposite opinions, without the least bitterness, and for his dis-
criminating praise without flattery, that I extract a portion or two of his remarks upon
passages in the two best English histories of Ancient Greece. I wish them to be
regarded as exhibiting my own state of feeling in any dissent I may express from the
opinions of Mr. Sparks, or of any other writer upon the subject of tne Farewell

When speaking of the extent to which Mr. Grote supposes that the institutions of
Solon permitted all the free inhabitants of Attica except actual aliens, to vote for
Archons and Senators, and to take part in the annual decision of their accountability}
whether these inhabitants were or were not members of the four tribes, Mr. Rawlinson
says, " To me it seems that the admission of these persons to citizenship at this time,
^ is highly improbable, and that if it had been a part of the Solonian scheme, we must
" have found distinct mention of it." — " Mr. Grote, in his account of the Giisthenic
'' legislation, seems to admit all that is here contended for; but his statements in that
" place appear to me to be wholly inconsistent with those contained in his account
" of the Solonian Constitution :" and then, in a note, the author cites the inconsistent
passages. — 3 Rawlinson^t Herodotus^ 406. But soon after, in speaking of his own notes
on the modern portion of the history of Athens, the author says, " Those who require
" more, are referred to the thirtieth and thirty-first chapters of Mr. Grote's history,
" which contain the most accurate digest of the ancient authorities, and the most philo-
^ sophical comments upon them, to be found in the whole range of modern literature."
—Ibid, 412.

So also as to Bishop Thirl wall's history. " If the democratic character of the Solonian
" Constitution has been insufficiently apprehended by some of our writers, by others
" it has been undoubtedly exaggerated to a greater extent To ascribe to Solon (as
** Bishop Thirl wall does) the full organization of the HeliaDa, as it appears in the time
" of the orators, the institution of the Heliastic oath, of the Nomothets and Syndics,
" and of that bulwark of the later constitution, the graphe paranomon, is to misnnder-
^ stand altogether his position in Athenian constitutional history, and to fail in dis*
** tinguishing the spirit of his legislation from that of Clisthenes." — Ibid, 405. On the
other hand, when the author is speaking of the internal changes in the Constitution of
Sparta, which grew out of the first Messenian war and conquest, he says, ^* Perhaps
^ there are scarcely sufiScient data to reconstruct the true history of the period ; but the
" view taken by Bishop Thirlwall of the changes made, and of the circumstances
" which led to them, is at once so ingenious and so consistent with probability, that
" it well deserves at least the attention of the student." — ^" Mr. Grote, without ex-

Digitized byVjOOQlC


Appendix by a line at the head, in small capitals, as hints,
OR HEADS OP TOPICS, does not appear to warrant such a de-
scription. Properly speaking, they are certwnly not hints
and heads of topics, but decidedly much more. They are
certainly not hints or heads of topics for the fiirther use of
Washington himself; though it is not improbable that they
were written for the guidance of the person who should
follow and complete the work.

This heading is not inclosed by Mr. Sparks with marks of
quotation,, like the paper that follows, from beginning to
end, aiid therefore I suppose it to be Mr. Sparks's heading.
I have not seen the original, and it seems to be uncertain
whether the original can be found. If the heading was
Washington's, it must be admitted, that at the time of
writing it, he regarded the eleven paragraphs that follow as
hints or heads of topics ; but the paragraphs themselves,
instead of being loose hints, slight touches, allusions or sug-
gestions, by way of reminder, constitute a perfectly formal
and regular paper, in extension of Madison's draught, hav-
ing a beginning and ending, and according to Washington's
plan, sufficiently exhaustive of each of the ten subjects
which succeed the first paragraph.

Of these " Hints, or Heads of Topics," the first and the

" ami ning it formally, by implication rejects it." — ^"Bishop Thirlwall's conjectural
** restoration of the fact, is on the whole satisfactory ; and if not history, deserves to
** be regarded as the best substitute for history that is possible, considering the scan-
" tiness and contradictory character of the data." — Ih. 361-3.

This is the strain of the critic, free, candid, and explicit, without bitterness, and
without veiling either praise or dissent in generalities ; and diere are multitudes of
like examples in the work. A too common fault of some critics among us, has
been vague and personal bitterness, or lavish but indiscriminating praise, from which
it has almost come to be considered, that dissent is an imputation and a challenge.

Digitized byVjOOQlC


last of them embrace the subject of party disputes, in-
vectives, and malevolent misrepresentations, which Madison
had touched lightly, and with such apparent misapprehen-
sion of Washington's views. One of the central paragraphs,
recommending pride in the name of an American, and ex-
posing the danger of the annihilation of our national dignity
by foreign intrigue and influence, and exhibiting both the
follies and evils of foreign engagements, interferences, and
favors, is developed to the extent of twenty-nine lines of
the broad and compact page of the Appendix ; and others
to the extent of ten, eight, and six lines each. These are
not hints, or heads of topics. All the paragraphs consti-
tute definite, complete, and well-expressed sentiments,
beginning with a preamble, which sets forth, that if public
affairs had continued to bear the aspect they assimied at the
time the foregoing address was drawn (Mr. Madison's pre-
paration), he could not have taken the liberty of troubling
his feUow-citizens with any new sentiment, or with a repe-
tition more in detail of those which are therein contained ;
but considerable changes having taken place at home and
abroad, he should ask their indulgence, while he expressed
"with more lively sensibility the following most ardent
" wishes of his heart :" and in the expression of these, he
follows the formula he had used in his letter to Madison,
and which Madison had pursued in his draught, when he ex-
pressed certain of Washington's wishes, as " vows which he
" would carry with him to his retirement and to his grave."
They cannot be accurately described, as " Hints, or Heads
" of Topics ;" though a hint may be taken from anything,
and any single paragraph may be divided into heads of
several topics. They are not, in an accurate sense, "a series

Digitized byVjOOQlC


" of memoranda or loose hints ;" though by some men, who
take an artistic view of composition, and regard its struc-
ture and the combination and bearing of its parts as matter
of essential consideration, they might be so described.

Although the entire paper is now presented in the Ap-
pendix to this Inquiry, it will make some of my future
remarks more intelligible, if the substance of these nine
paragraphs intervening between the first and the last of
them, is noticed in this place, in the order in which Wash-
ington has arranged the subjects.

The leading paragraph — the second in the paper— ex-
presses the ardent wish of Washington's heart, that party
disputes among all the friends and lovers of the country
may subside ; or, as Providence has ordained that men shall
not always think alike, that charity and benevolence may so
shed their benign influence, as to banish those invectives
which proceed from illiberal prejudices and jealousy. And
then the paper goes on to express like fervent wishes,

^that as the AUwise Dispenser of hiunan blessings

has favored no nation with more abundant means of happi-
ness than United America, we may not be so imgrateful to
our Creator, or so regardless of ourselves and our posterity,
as to dash the cup of beneficence thus offered to our ac-
ceptance :

that we may fulfil all our engagements, foreign and

domestic, to the utmost of our abilities ; for, in public as
well as in private life, honesty will ever be found to be the
best policy :

that we may avoid connecting ourselves with the

politics of any nation, ftirther thati shall be found necessary
to regulate our own trade, that commerce may be placed

Digitized byVjOOQlC


upon a stable footing, our merchants know their rights, and
our government the ground on which they are to be sup-

— —that every citizen should take pride in the name of
an American, and act as if he felt the importance of the
character, by considermg that we are now a distinct nation,
the dignity of which will be annihilated, if we enlist bur-
selves, fiirther than our obligations require, under the ban-
ners of any other nation. And moreover, that we should
guard against the intrigues of every foreign nation who
shall intermingle in our concerns, or prescribe our poUcy
with other powers, if there be no infraction of our engage-
ments with themselves, as one of the greatest evils that can
befell us as a people ; for, whatever may be their professions,
the event will prove, that nations, like individuals, act for
their own benefit, and not for the benefit of others ; and
that aU their interferences are calculated to promote the
former, and in proportion as they succeed, will make us less
independent. Nothing is more certain, than that if we
receive fitvors, we must grant favors, and, in such circum-
stances as ours, we cannot tell beforehand on which side the
balance will be found ; but it is easy to prove that it may
involve us in disputes, and finally in war, to fulfil poUtical
alliances ; whereas, if there be no engagements on our part,
we shall be unembarrassed, and at Uberty at all times to act
from circumstances, and the dictates of justice, sound poUcy,
and our essential interests :

^that we may be always prepared for war, but never

unsheath the sword, except in self-defence, so long as justice
and our essential rights and national respectabihty can be
preserved without it. If this country can remain in peace

Digitized byVjOOQlC


twenty years longer, such, in all probability, will be its
population, riches, and resources, when combined with her
distance from other quarters of the globe, as to bid defiance,
in a just cause, to any earthly power whatever :

^that so long as we profess to be neutral, our public

conduct, whatever our private affections may be, may accord
with our professions, without suffering partialities or preju-
dices to control our actions. A contrary practice is incom-
patible with our declarations, pregnant with mischief,
embarrassing to the administration, tending to divide us
into parties, and ultimately productive of all those evils
which proceed from faction :

^that our Union may be as lasting as time ; for while

we are encircled in one band, we shall possess the strength
of a giant, and there will be none to make us afraid.
Divide, and we shall become a prey to foreign intrigues and
internal discord, and shall be as miserable and contemptible
as we are now en\iable and happy.

The ninth and final wish is, that the several departments
may be preserved in their constitutional purity, without any
attempt of one to encroach on the rights or privileges of
another, — that the General and State Governments may
move in their proper orbits, and the authorities of our own
Constitution may be respected by ourselves, as the most
certain means of having them respected by foreigners.

The concluding paragraph in the division corresponds
with that which I have already noticed as the fourth head
in a part of Washington's suggestions, in his letter to Mr.
Madison, in regard to the treatment of public servants ; and

1 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Online LibraryHorace BinneyAn inquiry into the formation of Washington's Farewell address .. → online text (page 3 of 20)