Irving Browne Isaac Grant Thompson.

The American reports: containing all decisions of general ..., Volume 36 online

. (page 3 of 123)
Online LibraryIrving Browne Isaac Grant ThompsonThe American reports: containing all decisions of general ..., Volume 36 → online text (page 3 of 123)
Font size
QR-code for this ebook


Grove v. City of Ft. Wayoe, 45 Ind.

4»; 15 Am. Bep. 20 176

Guernsey v. Carver, 8 Wend. 4«8 81

Quetig T. State, <M lod. 94; da Am.

Bep.99 468

Oullfordv. Love, 49 Tex. 744 781

Guntber v. Lee, 46 Md. 60-67 ; 24 Am.

Bep.504 838



Haak v. Llnderman, 64 Penn. St. 499 .

Hadley v. Baxendale, 9 Exch. 841

Hadleyv. Mayor,83N. ir.60B

Baicoodv. Swords, 2 Bail. 305

Halcorabv. State, 81 Ark. 427

Hall V. GaritU 18 Ind. 880

Hall V. Ins. Co. » 6 Gray, 186

Hall V. McLeod. 2 Mete. (Ky.) 160

Hall V. Mayo, 97 Mass. 416

Hallv. PlckerinK,40Me. 648

Hall V. Sute, 8 Ind. 488.



617
888
6(B
690
22
226
677
417
750
806
126
673
211
481
660



Hall V. Sullivan R. Co., 21 L. B. 188 . .
Halladay v. Patterson, 6 Oretr. 177 . . ..

Hallettv. Wigram, 9C. B.580

Hallowell v. Bayliss, 10 Ohio St. .537 .
Hallock V. Com. Ins. Co., 2 Dutch

288 232

Ham V. Sawyer, 38 Me 87 , 770

Hamilton V. State, 82 Md. 848 882

Hamilton v. Third Ave. B. B. Co., 68 N.

Hanover B. B. Co.v. Coyle, 66 Penn.St!

4(B .826,889

Han«on ▼. Dexter, 86 Me. 616 742

Harbor t. City of Milwaukee, 80 Wis.

365 174

Hardesty V. Smith, 8 Ind. 89 202

Hardin V. State, 22 Ind. 347 68

Hardinir v. Townshend, 48 Yt. 680; 5 Am

Kep. 801 626

Harper v. Harvey, 4 W.Va. 680 262

Harper V. B. B. Co., 47 Mo. 667; 4 Am.

Bcp. 353 244

Harrinirton v. Dorr, 3 Bob. *275, 288. 813, 335

Harris' case, 2 Fair 801 24

Harris V. Lee, 1 P. Wims. 482 86, 88

Harrison v. Allen, 11 Vroom, 666 632

Harrison v. Harrison, 8 Ves. 185 105

Harrison v. Price, 22 Ind. 166 187

Hart V. Hart, 1 Hare 1 529

Harveyv. Dakln, 12Ind.481 202

Harvey t. Bichards, 1 Mas. 881 708, 714

Harvey v.Bose,28Ark. 8 605

Baasell V. Nutt, 14 Tex. 260 755

Bastings V. Whitley, 2 Exch. 611 66

Haston v. Castner, 4 Stew. Eq, 607 668

Haven V. Emery, 33N.H. 66... 617

Hawes v. Leader. Cro. Jac. 270.. 559, 561, 565

Hawkes v. Saunders, 1 Cowp. 280 693

Hawks V. Phillips, 7 Gray, ^ 386

Hawks V. Pretzlaff, Wis. 569

Bawiey v. Mayor A City Counoli, 83 Md.

270 3T3

Hawtou V. Freeman, 8 T. B. 50 417

Hay V. Cohoes Co., 8 Barb. 42; 2 N. Y.

1^ ggg gQ^

Hayes, inre Goods of,'2 CuVtYes Eq! 838. 581

Haynes v.Birk8,3B.&P.590 506

Hazen v. Boston ft Me. B. B. Co., 2 Gray,

674 804, 806

Heartley t. Nicholson, 44 L. J. Ch. App.

(N 8.)279 641

Hebbare t. Haughlan, 70 N. T. 64 : . 6;i2

Hebberi T. Winn. 24 La. Am. 886 282

Heeney v. Sprague, 11 B. L 456; 23 Am.

Bep. GQS 229

- — ^T.£9glithAve.R.C9nl5N.Y.380. 651



Heminway V. Smit!!, 28Vt.701 682

Hemmenway v. Stone, 7 Mass, 68 270

Hendrlok v. V^htttemore, 106 Maes. 28. . . 782
Hepburn v. School Directors, 28 Wall.
480.



Heriakenden's case, 4 Co. 62. . . .

Heriihy, v. Smith, 116 Mass. 266

Heron v. Herou, 2 Atk. 160

Henick v. Woolverton, 41 N. T. 695; 1

Am. Kep. 461

Herring v. Hoppook, 15N. Y. 409

Hess V. Young, 59 lud. 879^



493
866
888

m

270
516
202
646
7&i
670

178
T56
842
174

480
770

646
218

69
617

66
763



Hetfleld v. Cent. K. Co., 6 Dutch. 671. .. .
Hewes v. McNamara, 106 Mass. 281 ...
Hibbard v. Thompson, 109 Mass. 286 ... .
Higgins V. Jeffersonville B. Co., 52 Ind.

Hi^ns v . Johnson, 20 Tex. 389 . ...!*.*.!!

Hillv. Hooper, 1 Gray, 131

Hilliard v. Blohardson, 8 Gray. 349

Hilllerv. Allegheny Co. Mut. Ins.Co.,3

Penn St. 470

Hilton V. Woods, L. B., 4 Eg. 482

Hinchmanv. Patterson H. B. B.Co.,2

C. B. Gr.75 v.... 874,

Hinds V. Hinds, 1 Iowa, 86...

Uinesborough v. Sumner, 9 Vt.28

Hirschorn v. Can ney, 96 Mass. 149

Hitchcock V. Coker, 6 Ad. A; EI. 447....

Hoaglandv. B.Co.,39Mo.451

Hobbe V. London, etc., B. Co., L. B.,

lOQ. B. Ill; 34Am. Bep.02 seas

Hoboken v. Gear, 8 Dutch. 265 602

Hobyv Hoby, 1 Hagg. 146 291

Hodgpsv. Thacher, 28 Vt. 455 744

Hodsoll V. Taylor, L. B., 9Q. B. 79. 445, 794

Hoffv. Myers, 42 Barb. 270 81

Hoffman v. Foster, 43 Penn. St. 137 336

Hoffman V. Noble, 6 Mete. 68 516

Hoffman V. (St. Louis, 15 Mo. 651 790

Hoke V. Henderson, 4 Dev. 1 103

Holcomb v.Stinipeon,8Vt. 141 60

Holden v. N. Y. & Erie Bank, 72 N. Y.

286 598

Holladay v. Davis, 6 Or. 40 216

Holladay v. Patterson, 6 Greg. 177 209

Holland v.Cruft, 20 Pick. 821 562

Holloway V. Headington, 8 Sim. 835.... 641

Holmes V. Gorinor, 2 BIng. 76 416

Holmes V. Penny, 3 K. &J.90 563

Hopkins V.Boyd, 11 Md. 107 301

Horn V. Gamble, 62 Penn. St. 843 780

Hoghall V. Hosball, 51 Md. 72; 84 Am.

Kep. 72 848

Hough V. Horsey, 86 Md. 184 357

Howard V. Ives, inill, 268 506

Howard V. State, 10 Ind. 99 780

Howard Co., Dlv. of, 16 Kans. 194 829

Howe V. Newmarsh, 12 Alien, 49 338

Howell V. Howell, 59 Ga. 145 128

Howell V. Landon Co., L. B., 10 Q. B.

62 536

Howells V. Landore Steel Co., L. B., 10

Q.H.6.3 689

Howland v. Adrain, 1 Vroom, 41 606

Hoy V.Morris, 13 Gray, 519.. 632

Hoyt V. City of Hudson, 27 Wis. 656.... 490

Hoytv. 8helden,8Bosw.8Q2. 649

Hoyt V. Thumpson,3 Sandf . 421 640

Hudson V. State, 1 Blackf. 817 56

Hughes V. Buckingham, 2 Sm. & M. 632. 77<^

776

Hughes V. Stubbs, 1 Hare, 476 640

Huldekoper v . Cotton, 8 Watts, 66 63

Hull of a New Ship, Davels, 199 802

Humes v. Mayor of Knoxville, 1

Humph. 403 791, 804

Hunnlcutt v. Peyton, IT. S. & a 1881. .. 760
HuDtv.Aldrich,27N.H.81... 812



Digitized by



Google



XXIT



TABLE OF CASES CITED.



Hunt 7. Bant, T2 N. T. 2»; 28




PAOB.

Am. Bap.



HuDt V. State, 48 Oa. 266 ; 15 Am. Bep.

art 93

Huuter v. HoLaughllo, 43 lod. 88. 199

HuDtioirtoo ic Broad Top U. Oo. t.

Decker, 84 Penn. 8t. 419 587

HuDlington t. Harvey, 4 Conn. 124 801

HurBtv.UllUb Md.3ii9 891

Uutcbinffs V. Muuger, 41 N. Y. 155 282

UutohiDS V. Sims, 8 Humph. 428 898

Hutchliia V. Bk. orTenn.,8Humph. 418. 883
HutohliiB V. Uudsou. 8 Humph. 426. ... . 893
Hutchins v. State Bk^ 12 Mete. 423. . . 338

841
Kuzzey v.Flekl,3C..M. &R. 438 402

Irvine v. Mllbaiik, 15 Abb. Pr. (F. S.) 8T8. 838

Irwin V. Spriinr, 6 Oni. 200 868

Isabel V. Han. & St. Jo. U. R., 60 Mo. 482. 460

Ives v. Medtoalf. 1 Atk. 63 721

Illidge v. Goodwin, 5 C. & P. 190 612

Illinois Cent. R. Co. v. Copelaud, 24 HI.

8:» 762

Illinois Cent. R. R. Co. v. Downey, 18.

111.259 804

Illinois Cent. R. R. Co. v. Reedy, 17 III.

580 804

Iniler v. City of Sprlnfffleld, 55 Mo. 119 ;

17 .\m. Rep. 045 490

Innian v. Tripp, 11 R. I. 590; 23 Am.

Rep 5:» 791

Insurance Co. v. Mosely, 8 Wall. 897... 886
Insurance Co. v. Norton, 96 U. S.234.. 284
Irish v. Railroad, 19 Minn. 876; 18 Am.

Uep.340 7C2

Jack v. Morrison, 48 Penn. St. 113 ... .889
Jack^oIl v. French, 8 Wend. 337; 20 Am.

Kep. 699 682

JackHon v. Russell, 4 Wend. 54.1 581

Jacksonville v. J Ry Co.. 67 111. 540... 187
Jacksonville & Chi. R. Co. v. Mathers,

71111.502; 22 Am Rep. 122 207

James v. Blddinf^ton. 6 C A P. 589 443

Jumes V . Stewart, 9 Ala. 855 765

Jane v. Lanirton, 7B. Monr. 193 220

Jane v. Matilda, The 1 Bagg. Adm. 187. 561

Janes v. Jenkins. 34 Md. 1 406, 408

Jansen v. Atchison. 16 Kans. 858 229

Jeanes v. Frldenberg, 3 Penn. L. J. R.

199 633

Jefferson Co. v. Stagle, 66 Penn. St. 202. 741
Jefferys v Jeffer)'s, 1 Craig & Phillips,

138 641

Jeffries V. Com., 12Allen,145 96

Jeiiner v. Morris, 3DeG., F. & J. 45.. 87
Jerome v. Ui^reluw, 06 III. 452; 16 Am.

Rep. 6«7 150

Jersey City V. Hudson. 2 Beas. 420 548

Jersey City & Bergen R. Co. v. Jersey

City & Hoboken R. Co., 5 C. B. Or.

61 547, 661

Jewett V.Alton, 7 N. H. 253 rd8

Jeweit V. li. & U. M. R. Co., 10 Ind.

689 209, 215

Johnson V. Dodd.56N. Y. 76 741

Johnson V. OUbert, 4 Hill. 178 616

Johnson V. Johnson, 4 Wis. 135 860

Johnson V. Moore, 1 Lltt. 871 290

Johnson v. Nat. Bk of Gloveraville, 74

N. Y. 329; 30 Am. Rep. 808 862

Johnsonv. Fhlla.,60 Peon. St.445 520

Johnson v. State, ITex. Ct. App, 146.. 15
Johnson y. Wells, 6 Nev. 224; 8 Am.

Rep.245 805,807

Johnston v.8. W. R. Co., 8 Strc*bh.268. 598

Jolcev. State, 53Ga.50 862

Jordan v. Wyatt, 4 Gratt. 151 786



Jones T. Andover, 6 Pick . 146, Iftl fM

Jones T. Jones, 48 Md. 881; 80 Am. Bep.

466 il

Jones V. Perry, 2Rsp.482 TB8

Jones V. State, 2 Blaokf. 475 .. 58

Jonesboro, etc.. Turnpike Co. T Bald-
win. 57Ind. 86 178

JudkiDSV. Hill, fiON. H. 140 .33:'

JusticMV. R., : Ga. 189 12^



Karle v. K. a, St. J.& C. B. R.R.,56Mo.

^a^

Kauffmann v. Griesemer, 26* Penn. St.

411 484,

Kay V. Duchesse, 3 Camp. 128.

Keechv State. 15 Fla. 681

Kellogg V. Barton, 94 Mass. 627

Kelley v. Hiley, 106 Mass. 889; 8 Am.

Rep. 886

Kelly V. Mayor, UN. Y. 432...

Kelly v. Miller, 89 Miss. 19

Kennedy V. Green, 8 M. &K. 689

Kenningham v. Benford, 1 B. Monr.

3S5; 81d.882

Kent V. Dawson Bk., 18 Blatchf. 287... .

Kernodle v. Hunt, 4 Blatchf. 57

Kerry. Moore, 54 Miss. 286

Ketcham y. Clark, 6 Johns. l44; 5 Am.

Dec. 197

Keys V. Masr~ * ** -^ * . 775,

Kier V. Lelin

Kilbourne V.

Kilgour v. A

Klllebrewv. 6

Kimball V. J t

Kimball v.L

Kimble V. CI

Klm>>rouirh ^ I

Klngv. Bees

King V. Forr »

King V. MorU,.., _

Klngv. Speke, The,8Salk. 358

Klngv. Woodbridge, 34 Vt. 566

Kingsbury v. School Dist., 12 Mete. 98,



460

485

766

94



443
174

289
698

871
265



891
';79

69
5(i9
412
328
517
748
164

69
787
787
629

87
761

738
563
862
580
105
747
84
758
521



101
Kingsbury v. Wild, 8 N. H. 80.

Kingsley V. Smith. 14Wls.8B0

Kingwood V. Bethlehem, 1 Green, 221.

Kinney V. Crocker, 18Wil. 74

Kinney v. Farnsworth, 17 Conn. 855 .. .

Klnslerv. Wyoming, 1 Wy. 112.

Kltteredgev. Rillott, 16N. H.77

Ktpp v. City of Paterson, 2 Dutch. 298.

622,
Klrby v. Boylston Market Co., 14 Gray,

249

Kirk V. Eddowes.8 Harl. 509

Kirk V. Hlatt, 2Cart. and.)8i8

Knickerbacker v. Caiver, 8 Cow. 11 ...

Knight y. Knlsrht, 81 Iowa, 451

Knight V. Knatts. 8 Rich. 35

Knowles V. Parker. 7Meto. 31

Koehler y . Black Riv. Falls Iron Co., 2

Black. 719

Kortrlght v Buffalo Com. Bk., 20

Wend. 93: 22 Wend. 860 474,

Krause v . Davis Co.\ 44 Iowa, 141 . . . .

Kreigh v. Chicago, 86 III. 407

Kroy v. C. R. I. & P. R. Co., 82 Iowa,

867 244,

Kuhlmanv. Hecht,77Ill. 674

Lacy V. Kynaston,2Salk. 576 838

Lady Madison's case, 1 Hale's Pleas of

Crown, 693 ...18J0, 28

Lady Thyone v. Barl of Glengall, 8 H.

L. Cas. 131 719

Laege v . Bossieux, 15 Gratt. 88 802

lAmpman v. Milks, 21 N. Y. 605 419



718
2J«
836
241
690
270

42

475
288

140

667
417



Digitized by



Google



TABLE OF CASES CITED.



XXf



PAQB.

{Ancaster Co. Nat. Bk. t. Smith, 8S

Penn.8t.47 68^ 6M

rAooe ▼. Lanoe, 5 Jonee L. 418 640

rAndT. TyngboroiWfa,9Ciiffh. 86 838

- -.SDaytttS



Lane v. Cook, i



Ianse,Bxi>arte,18 Wall. 168, 167

Laiilnir v. 7J. Y. C R. Co., 48 N. Y.



583; 10Aro.Rep.417 845, ..

r aiiniler t. Francis, 23 Mo. IBl ....487, 481
f athimore v. Simmons, 13 L. ft It. 188. 1:27
1 awrenca r. Am. Nat. Bk., 54 N. Y.

435 S64

Lawrence T. Rlmendorf, 5 Barb. 73.706, 715

Lawsony. Price, 45 Md. 134 883

Lawton ▼. Rivers, 2 McCk>rd, 5U 417

Leaoh v. Kelsey, 7 Barb. 46tf . Mi

Leavenworth Co. t. Barnes, 04 U. S.

164 647



Lee y Chadsey, 8 Abb. Ct. App. Dec.

43

Leev. Minneapolis, 22 H}nn. 13

Lee y. State, 86 Ark. 260 ; 7 Am. Rep.

611 . -

Lee y. State, 51 Miss. 5G6



247
7W

757

83

648

280

6ti0

70

40



Lee County y. Rogers, 7 Wall. 181

Leech v. Leech, 4 Am . J N. S. 179 . . . .

Leeds v. Cheetham, 1 Sim. 146

Lefebvre y. Dutruit, Wis

Leriwich*8 case, 20 Gratt 84, 37,

Lehigh Val. Coal Co. y. Jones, 86 Peon.

St. 432 ow

Lemayne v. Stanley, 8 Lev. ] 105

Lenoxv.Mcpi^U, 8 8.&H. 103 816

Leonard y. Fredenburgh, 8 Johns. 29.. 388

LewI»v.^)'Arcy. 71 III. 648 153

Lewis V. Kramer, 8 Md. 289 377

Lewis y. Lee, 8 B AC. 291 765

Liberty Hall Ass. v. Housatonlc Ins.

Co.,7Gray,261 6n

Lido V. Iladfey, :« Ala. (N. S ) 627 416

Liarhtseyv. Harris, 20 Ala. 409 733

Lime Rock Bk. y. Maoomber, :.n)Me.

565 314

Limpusy. Lond. Gen. Omnibus Co., 1

H.&Colt. 638 404

Lindsay y. Comm.. 2 Ya.Cas. 345 756

Liney.N«^Ison,88N. J. L aw 837,888

Linesay. Heslng,44 111 113 ,. 150

Linn V. Ros^, 10 Ohio, 412 660

Linton y. ^5mlth,8Gray, 147 174,330

Lionbergery. Rouse, 9 Wall. 46S 495

LIttauer V.Goldman, 73 N. Y. 506 535

Uttley. McKeon.lSandf. 607 633

Liyfogston y. McDonald. 21 Iowa, 164.. 484

488,491
Llvinffston y. RawyardsC. Co., 42 L. T.

(N. S.)881;21 Alb. L. J. 442 770

Lloyd y. West |Branch Bank, 15 Fenn.

St. 172 585

Ltynvis Co. y. Brogden, L. R., 11 Bq.

18« 770

Lockyery. Savage. 88tr. 947 721

Logan y. Gaff rey, 30 Pel in. St. 196 81

Logan v West. Union Tel. Co., 84 liL 468. 207

Logansportv. Wright, 25 Ind. 512 172

Long y.Golton,U6 Mass. 414 748

Looraisy. Terry, 17 Wend. 496 758

Lord y. Ocean Bank, 20 Penn. St. 884.. S12
Lorillard y. Town of Monroe, UN. Y.

302 843

Loeee y. Buchanan, 51 N. Y. 476; 10

Am. Rep. 623 615

Loflsee y. WilUams, 6 Lans. 228 616

Lothropy. Morris. 6 Sandt 7 818

Louden y.Birt, 4 Ind. 566. 900,202

Louisyllle, etc, R. R. Co. y. fioland, 53

Ind. 886 178

b>ai8vllle, etc., R. Co. ▼• Bowler, 9

Helsk. 886 688

Vol. XXX VI— D



piea.

Louky. Woods, 15 HI. 868 741

Lovev. Moynehan, 16 111.877 18ft

LoveJoyy.Murrav.a Wall. 1,17 888

Lowev. Comm., 8 Mete. 837 780

Lowell y. Boston R. Co., 83 Pick. 24... 880

Lowell y. Short, 4 Cush. 275 230

Lowell v. Spaulding, 4Cuah. 877 880

Lowrey v. City of Delphi, 55 Ind. 280... 178
Lpwry y. Com. A Farm. Bank, Taney's

C. C. 310 849

Lowry V. Inman, 46 N. Y. 130 653

Lozay. State, 1 Tex. Ct. App. 486... .. 16
Luby V. Hudson U. R. Co., 17 N. Y. 181. 827

829

Lucas V. Parsons. 24 Oa. 640 289

Lum y . Bryant, 9 Gray, 245 828

Lynch y. Knight, 9 H.L. 598 806,807

Lynch y. Nurdin, 4 1'. &D. 073; 1 Q. B.

20 612

Lj-noh v. State, 9 Ind. 541 93

Lynde y. McGregor, 13 Allen, 178 669

M.&A.R.Co.v.Mayes,49 0a.865 674

McAdam v. Walker, 1 Dow. 178 901

McAndrews y. Bums, 10 Vroom, 117.... 686

McAuley v. Birkhead, 18 Ged. 88. 446

MoAuley y. Birkhead, 18 Ired. 38 796

McCandless y. MoWha, 28 Penn. St.

261 670

McCarthy v. Young, 6 H. & NT. 829 603

McClenaghan y. Hines, 2 Strobh. 122. . . 688

691
MoComb y Klttrid/^, 14 Ohio, 348 ... 870
McOormick v. K. C , St. Jo. & C. B. R. R.,

70Mo..3ii9;85Am. Rep. 431 483, 490

McCrilllsy.IIawe^,38Me.568 83^ 838

McCue y. Com, 78 Penn. St. 186; 81 Am.

Rep. 7 97

McCulloch v. State of Md.. 4 Wheat. 816. 496

McDonald v. English, 85 111. 235 140

McDonaldy. Lindali,8Rawle, 498. 416

McFariand v. Farmer. 42 N. Y. 886 516

McGahey y. Alston, 2 M. & W. 206. 529, 531
McGowin v. Remington, 2 Jones, 61.... 678

McGregor y. Boyle, 84 Iowa, 268 798

McHardyv. Wardworth.8Mich.849.... 828

Mclntyrev. Bowne, 1 Johns. 229 48

McLean V. Weeks, 61 Me. 877 568

McLean Co. C. Co. y. Lennon,91 III. 661;

83 Am. Rep. 64 770

McLean Coal Co. v. Long, 81 III. 359 770

MoLeod V. Drummond, 17 Yes. 154.. 840, 841

McMahonv. Allen,35N. Y. 403 508

McMahon y. Field, Ch. Div., 44 L. T. (N.

S)175 882

McMillan y. Railroad Co., 16 Mich. 79... 762

McNamara v. Dwyer, 7 Pal. 239 . 711

McNeil y. Tenth Nat. Bk. 46N. Y. 835,

829; 7 Am. Rep. 341 475,480,688

McPherson y. Acker. D. C. S. C. 1879... 419

MoTavIsh v. Carroll, 7 Md. 858 418

Macclesfield v. Davis, 8 Ves. A B. 18. . . . 673
Mack ay v. Com. Bk. of New Brunswick,

L.R.,5Priv.Coun. App.894 607, 599

Mackie v. Calms,5Cow.547 565

Mackreth v. Simmons^ Yes. 839 488

Mad Riv. & Lake Erie R. Co. y. Barber,

60hioSt.541 666

Madden y. State, 1 Kans. 340 441

Madison y. Ross, 8 Ind. 236 TOO

Maddux y.Bevan. 39 Md. 485 268

Maenner y. Carroll, 46 Md. 212 869

Magan V. Lambert, 8 Barr. 444 660

Magruder y. Union Dank, 8 Pet. 87 698

Mahanoyy. Scholly, 84Penn.8t.186 .. 178

Maher y. A. A; P. R. B.. 64Mo. 276 468

Mahoney v Atlantic « St. Lawrence

R. Co.. 63Me. 68 874

Malders y. Culven, 1 Duy. 164 888



Digitized by



Google



XXVI



TABLE OF CASES CITED.



Xaltland t attians' Nat. Bk., 40 Md.

M0;17Am. fttop. 6S0 818,880

XaineT Blaok,dOMe. 32S im

MaltUnd y. atliens* Nat. Bk., 40 Md.

640; 17Am. Rep. 620 885

MalleD T. May, 11 M. A; W. 068 t6

Malone t. Hathaway, 04 N. Y. 6; 21 Am.

Rep. 573 245,589.579

MandeTille t. Guernsey. 38 Barb. 23».. 682
HaoyardT. Ftreinen's Fuod Ids. Co.,

840al.48 806

Mano V. Oasaidy, 1 Brewat. (PeoD.)8S. 8:)3

Mannv. Beed, 4Alleo.431 753

MaDO ▼. Weiand, 81H Penn. St. 243 . . 708
Manning V. Maooinfr, 12 Rich. Bg. 410. 720
MaiiDiiiKV. Randolph, 1 South. 144.... 204
Manufacturers* Bk. v. Cole, 39 Me. 189. 314
Mansell v. Thompson. 8 C. A P. 808. . . . 768

MarbleT. Keyes, 9 0ray.221... 85

Marbounr V. Smith, 11 Kans. 554 282

Marcardler t. Chesapeake lus. Co., 8

Cr.3» 46

Marine Bk. ▼. Fulton Bk., 2 Wall. 260. 689
Marlborouj^h t. Sisson, 81 Conn. 882. ... 80

Marlowv. Pltfleld, IP. Wms.660 87

Marsh t. Falrburg, etc. , Ry. Co., 64 111.

414: 16 Am. Rep. 664 209, 814

Marsh V.Jones, 81 Vt. 378 768

Marshall t . Harwood , 5 Md. 418-481. . . 775

Marshallv. Rutton,8T. R. 645 765

Marston v. Baldwin, 17 Maas. 606 516

Marston v. Buttenham, 76 III. 611 150

Martin. Ex parte. 27 Ar4. 467 28

Martlnv. Ash. 20Ml«h. 166 440

Martin ▼. Com ra.,1 Mass. 847, 889 782

Martin t. Funk, 75 N. Y. 134; 31 Am.

Rep. 446 641,642, 643

Martin V. Jett, 13 lA. 501 484,481

Martin V Kirk, 2 Humph. 629 801

Martin V. Lemon, ^ Conn. 19S 742

Martin v.Mathiot. 14 S. ftR. 214 517

Martin V. Porter. 5 M.&W. 852 770

Martin v. Riddle, 26 Penn. St. 415 486

Martin v. Watton, 1 I^e, 130 291

MartusY. Houck, 39 Mich. 431; 88 Am.

Rep. 409 435

Mason V. Hunt, 1 Doiii;. 296 877

Masonv. Keeling. 12 Mod. 33:S 753

Massoth V. Del. & Hud. Canal Co., 64

N. Y.524... 610

Matthews v. Chloopee Mfg. Co., 3 Robt.

713 836, 838

Maud v. Monmouthshire Canal Co., 4

M.&G. 453 804

Maurer v. Mitchell, 9 W. & S. fll^ 69

Maxham ▼. Place, 40 Vt. 434 . . . (HS

Maxwell t. Owen, 7Coldw. (Tenu ^ (.30. 262

May V. Burdett,9Q. B. 101 753

Mayev. TRppan,23Cal. 306 770

Mayer V. Blease. 4Rlch. (S. C.)10 263

Mayor, etc., of Rome t. Onberg, 28 Oa.

46 790

MeadT. Eng8,5Cow. 303 507

M. & B. R. R. Co. v. Prudden, 4 C. E.

Gr. 386; Sid. 530 546

M. & E. R. R. Co. ▼. Sussex R. Co., 5

C. E. Gr. 642 650

MeaRherv. DriscoII. 09 Mass. 281 306

Mears v. Com'rs o; Wilmington, 9 Ired.

78 792

Medical k Surfrical Inst. y. City of Hot

Sprinjw, 34 Ark.W9 29

Mehanv. Syracuse. Blng. & N. Y. R.

Co.,73P^. Y. 585 577

Melg*s Appeal, 6:2 Penn . St. 28 450

Meiswlnkel t. Jung. 80 Wis. 361... 868. 871
Merchants' Bank t. State Bank, 10

Wall. 645 504

Merrttt V.Todd, 23 N Y. 28 270, 271



] 18

1 ofL.

. 800, 798
OfL.

798

97

k>.,U

661

B.C.

650

N. 8.)

785

195

1881. 24

280

91.... 668

448

514

87... 821
488. 607

790

86

I. 841, 848

688

.. 629,688

484

682

Bush,

232

L.236. 387
.. 887.888

733

»b.Pr.

683

8 Ala.

763

821

B6... 664
560

828

626

200

211

666

iy,485. 806
Y. 41;
476,480
1 .p. (N.

:..... 642
1 ..821

1 r 765

1 770

1 .801,203

J .... 768

1 34.... 770

] .Cas.

W3

] \ 865

] L.R.,

636

1 415

] irk, 8

545

J >., 10

8a-.

] 76y

] ; Chl-

139

] 7 763

] Co., 8

009

1 . .480, 516

J ».... 620

] 2flS

] 145.. 801

1 team-

Am.

...244, 536
Mullenv.State,45Ala.43;6Am.Bep.691, 97



Digitized by



Google



TABLE OP CASES CITED.



XXVll



P.VQX.

tfonroeT. Holmes, 18 Allen, 110 840

Murphyv. Caralll, 8H. ftC. 461 32^:

Murpby, Bx parte, 7 Cow. 153 'JKi

Murpby T. Chloaco, 29 111. 879 ISO

Murphy t. Smith, 19 C. B. (N. S.)861.. 539
Murray T. Ciirrte, L.R.. 6C. P.24. .. 323
MusohampT Ry. Co .8M *W. 431.. TOi!

Muflick ▼. People, 40 III £68 58

Myers T. Bank, 75 111. :»7 871

Myers ▼. Malcolm, 6 Hill, 29S 057, 058

Nabb ▼. KooDts, 17 Md. 283 887

Nashua Lock Co. t. Railroad, 48 N. H.

33B; 3 Am. Rep. 242 702

Nashville R. Co. v. Jones, 9 Hetok. 27. 538
N. A C. R. Co. T. Sprayberry, 8 Baxt.

841: »Am. Rep. 7(» 759

Nat. Bank v. Norton, 1 Hill. 572 ...391, 393
Nat. Bk. of Commerce v. National M.

B. C . 65 N. Y. 211 ; 24 Am. Rep. 288.. 264
Nat. Bk. of Rochester ▼. Pearson, 24

Minn. 140; 31 Am. Rep. 341 369

National Ex Co. v. Drew, 8 Macq. H.

L.Cas. 108 80ft

Neal V. Patten, 47 Oa. 73 639

Nebeker ▼. Cutsinger. 48 Ind. 436 . . . 165
Nelson t. First Nat. Bank. 48 lU. 80 ... 880
Neifon V. Vt.& Canada R. Co., 26 Yt.

717 674

Nevi ns v . Townsend ,6 Conn .5 270

New Albany, etc.. R. Co. v. McCor-

mick. 10 Ind. 499 215

New Brunswick Land Co. v. Mugger-

idge, 4 Drew, 686 675

Newcombv. Andrews, 41 Mich. 518 ... 448

Newelv. Keith, 11 Yt. 214 744

New Hope & Del. Bridge Co. t. Phenix

Bank, 8 Comst. 156 599

Newman, Bx parte, 9 Cal. 502 818

New Orleans v. Wardens, etc., 11 La.

Ann. 244 817

Newton ▼. Chaplin, lOa B.856 B3i

N. Y. Ice Co. ▼. N. W. Ins. Co., 23N.

Y 357 634

N. Y. Life Ins. & T. Co. v. Staats, 2

Barb. 570 741

N. Y. L. Ins. & Trust Co. t. Wllnor, 1

Barb.Ch. 862 416

N.Y. AN. H. R.CO. t. Schuyler, 84 N.

Niagara ' Co. SaV.* * Bank* v. Biiier, is

OhioSt. 68 863

Nicholas V. Chamberlain, 8 Cro Jac.,

121 407

NIchoteT Luoe,24Plck. 108 417

Noble ▼. Sylvester, 42 Yt. 146 749

Noonan t. City of Albany, 79 N. Y. 470;

83Am.Rep. 540 788

Norcuttv. Dodd, 1 Cr. & Ph. 100 663

Norrisv. Kohler,41 N. Y. 42 612

North Hudson Ck>. By. v. Hoboken, 12

Vrooro,71 680, 5S3

Northlngton, Ex parte, 1 Shep. (Ala.)

400 220

Norton V. Wis wall, 26 Barb. 618 573

NorthowriT. Thornton, 18 Yes. 161.... 674

Norwoods case, 1 Bat(» P. C. 470 24

Nutting V. Coon. R. R. Co. , 1 Gray, 600. 759

761

Oatmao ▼• Goodrich, 15 Wis. 580, 602.. 882

855
(rOomiorT. Chi. M. A St. P. R. Co.,

Minn. 8.C.,1880 829

0*CoDiior T. Pittsburgh, 18 Penn. St.

187 T90

OdeUT.Gw, lftMo.34S 478

Qdlomey. Howard, ION. H. 848 836

OfduiT. OroTe, 88 Penn. St. 487 418



Ogden ▼. Robertson, 3 Green, 12^ 534

Ohio L. In ~



416.



. Ins. & T. Co. V. Debolt, W How.



Oliver v. Hook, 47 Md. 308 . ...405,418, 419

Oliver T. Pitman, 96 Mass 46 418

Oliver v. Worcester, 102 Mass. 480 ; 8

Am. Kep.4»5 809

O'Nearscase, 17 Gratt. 582 22

Ordemann V. Lawson, 49Md. 185 887

Oriole, The. 1 Sprague, 31 518

0*Rorke v. Smith, 11 R. I. 250 ; 28 Am.

Rep. 440 419

Ortwein v. Com., 76 Penn. St. 444; 18

Am. Rep. 420 468

Ottumwa v. Parks, 43 Iowa, 119 280

Overtou v. Sawyer, 1 Jones L. 8G8..484, 487

Packv.Mayor. 8 N. Y.223 174

Packard v. Richardson, 17 Mass. 122;

OAm.Dec. 128 888

Paige V. Smith, 99 Mass. 895 105

Paine v. Hutchinson , L. R.,8Ch.888 . 675
Painter y. Mayor, 46 Penn. St. Sia.174, 896

Palmer v. Fletcher, I Lev. 122 407, 4U

Palmer V. Thayor, 28 Conn. 287 564

Parker v. Bennett, U Allen, 888 418

Parker V. Browning, 8 Pal. 888 106

Parker v. Pittsburgh, 4 Barr.51 Z»

Parker V. State, 84 Ga. 862 124

Parking_v. Carruthers, 3 Bsp. 248 891

Parrv.^ewell, 81 E. C. L. 6S4 385

Parsons v. Harker, 16 Gratt. 64 786

Parsons v. Johnson. 68 N. Y. 62; 28

Am. Rep. 149 419

Parsons v. Livingston, 11 Iowa, 104. .. 249

Parsons V. Russell, 11 Mich. 118 108

Paterson Bk. v. Butler, 7 Halst. 268.... 60T
Paterson A Passaic Horse R. Co. v.

Pater8on,9C. B. Gr. 158 647

Patterson v. Leavltt, 4 Conn. 60 ; 10 Am.

Dec. 98 739

Patterson v. Pittsburgh ConnelisvUle

R. Co. , 76 Penn. St. 380; IS Am. R.

412 537

Pattison V. Syracuse Nat. Bk., GO

N.Y 604

Paulv.Virginia, OWall. 168 849

Paulmier v. Brie Ry Co., 5 Yroom,

161 536,540

Pearson V. Cox, 2 C. P. DIv. 369 Sa

Pearson v. Spencer, 1 B. & Smith's

Rep 421

Pearsons v.TIncker, 36 Me. 887 802

Peddicord'scase, 84Md. 479 875

Peed V. McKee, 42 Iowa, 680; 20 Am.

Rep. 681 69

Pelk V. Chic. & N. W. Ry. Co., 94 U.

S. 164 647

Pell V. Ulmar, 21 Barb. 500 741

Pennaroan V. State, 53 Ga. 336 123, 124

Penn. R. Co. v. Butler, 7 P. F. Smith,

336 668

Penn. R. Co. v. Henderson, 1 P. F.

Smith. 815 668

Penn. R. Co. v. Keller, 17 P. F. Smith,

30O 668

Penn. R. Co. v. Shay, 82 Penn. St. 196. 105

People V. Arnold, Mich. 1880 497

People V. Benson, 6 Cal. 221 860

People T. Blakely, 4 Park. Cr. 176 638

People V. Bransby, 32 N. Y. 625 862

People V. Burbank, 12 Cal. 878 775, 779

People V. Calomon,8IIII. 87 186

Peoplev. Coghlll,47Cal. 861 ...741

People v. Comptroller, 20 Wend. 696. 744

Peoplev. Cook, 8 N. Y. 67 881 » 838

Peoplev. Coutant, 11 Wend. 182 771

People V . Dohring, 60 N. Y. 874 1 17 Am.

Rep. 849 .^. !....860, 86|



Online LibraryIrving Browne Isaac Grant ThompsonThe American reports: containing all decisions of general ..., Volume 36 → online text (page 3 of 123)