J. G. (Jabez Gridley) Sutherland.

Statutes and statutory construction, including a discussion of legislative powers, constitutional regulations relative to the forms of legislation and to legislative procedure (Volume 1) online

. (page 16 of 85)
Online LibraryJ. G. (Jabez Gridley) SutherlandStatutes and statutory construction, including a discussion of legislative powers, constitutional regulations relative to the forms of legislation and to legislative procedure (Volume 1) → online text (page 16 of 85)
Font size
QR-code for this ebook


519, 522.
Parfitt v. Ferguson, 3 App. Div. 176:

234, 243. 582.
Park v. Candler, 113 Ga. 647: 135.
v. Candler, 114 Ga. 466: 954.
v. Modern Woodmen, 181 111.
214: 191, 290, 1230.
Park Bank v. Remsen, 158 U. S.

337: 791.
Parker, Ex parte, 35 Tex. Crim.

Rep. 12: 1303.
Parker v. Bogardus, 5 N. Y. 309:
1168.
v. Commonwealth, 6 Pa. St.

507: 145, 172.
v. Elmira, etc. R. R Co., 165 N.

Y. 274: 259, 528, 537.
v. Fassit, 1 Har. & J. 337: 1278.
v. Great W. Ry. Co., 7 M. & Gr.

253: 1022.
v. Hubbard, 64 Ala. 203: 462.



Parker v. Parker, 102 Iowa, 500:
980.
v. Pomeroy, 2 Wis. 112: 90^.
v. Powell, 132 Ind. 419: 136.
v. State, 133 Ind. 178: 133.
v. Taswell, 2 DeG/& J. 559: 777.
Parkhurst v. Capital City Ry. Co.,

23 Ore. 471: 1023, 1024.
Parkinson v. Brandenburg, 35
Minn. 294: 319, 321.
v. State, 14 Md. 1S4: 1S5, 190,
203, 204, 219, 308, 312, 660,
703, 747, 753.
Parkland v. Gaines, 88 Ey. 562: 268.
Parks v. Soldiers, etc. Home, 22
Colo. 86: 924.
v. State, 110 Ga. 760: 176, 306.
v. State, 159 Ind. 211: 205, 300,
427.
Parlin Orendorf Co. v. Hord, 78

Mo. App. 279: 436. 439.
Parmelee v. Lawrence, 48 111- 331.

550.
Parmenter v. New York, 135 N. Y.

154: 1283, 1287.
Parramore v. Taylor, 11 Gratt. 220:

778. 784.
Parroti v. Stevens, 37 Conn. 93: 479.
Parsons v. Bedford, 3 Pet. 433: 754.
v. Circuit Judge, 37 Mich. 287:

695.
v. Durham, 70 N. H. 44: 781.
v. McCracken, 9 Leigh, 495:

12S2.
v. McGavock, 2 Tenn. Ch. 581:

1102.
v. Paine, 26 Ark. 124: 642.
v. Thompson, 1 H. Bl. 322: 1105.
v. Tuolumne Co. W. Co., 5 Cal.
43: 1053.
Partington, Ex parte, 6 Q. B. 649:

673, 811.
1'art'ngton v. Attorney-General,
L. R. 4 H. L. 122: 961, 999.






TABLE OF OA8] 9 I'll I 0.



i ar<- to the pagea; Vol i, pp. I 808; VoL n, pp 005-1815.



m v. Bervey, i Gray, 110
Partridge v. Badger, 80 Barb 148:

v. l' irsey, 3 Bar, & J. 807: 837.
v. Ins. Co., 15 Wall. 578: 013.
v. N lylor, Cm Eliz.480: 970.

3trange, I Plow. 79: 311.
oa v. Stimson, 91 Cal. 888:
841, 872, 390.

s ower Assessment. In re,
:>1 N. J. L. 156: 871, 879, 380. 391.
Patapsoo Qaano Co. v. North Caro-
lina, 171 U. S. 315: 185.
Patchin v. Brooklyn, 2 Wend 377:

948.
Paterson v. Society, 24 N. J. L. 885:

17-:.

P.ittee v. Greely, 13 Met, 284: 93a
Patten v. Rhymer, 3 E. & E. 1: '.'1 I.

v. Smith, 4 Conn. 450: 1099.
Patterson v. Bark Eudora, 190 U.
S. 169: 651.
v. Brindie, 9 Watts, 98: 109G.
v. Caldwell, 1 Met. (Ky.) 489:

4G0.
v. I ommonwealth, 99 Ky. 610:

517, 519.
v. McClausland, 3 Bland's Ch.

71: 878L
v. Tatum,3Sawj\ 164: 522, 922.
v. Winn, 5 Pet. 233: 29.
Pattison v. Bankes, 2 Cuwper, 543:

Patty v. Colgan, 97CaL 251: 130.
Paul, In re, 94 N. Y. 497: 202, 245,

Paul v. Stone, 112 Mas*. 27: 333.
Paulk v. Sycamore, 104 Ga. 728:
1031.

Oh v. Guerrard, 67 Ga. 319:

•. '. Dana; 31 Tex 07: 011.
I'av.-y v. Utter, 132 111. 189: 462,
500.



Pawlet v. Clark, 9 Cranch, 298:

11112.

Paxton & Hershey Irr. C. & L. Co.

v. Farmers' & M. Irr. & L. Co., 45

Neb. 884: 281, 711, 798.

Payne v. Conner, 3 Bibb. 180: 100.

v. School District, 168 Pa. St.

386: 277.
v. Thompson, 44 Ohio St. 192:

1290.
v. Tread well, 16 Cal. 220: 868,
872,
Peablesv. Hannaford, 18 Mo. 106:

330.
Peabody v. School Com., 115 Mass.

383: 1029.
Peachee v. State, 63 Ind. 399: 205
Peacock v. Bawks, Minor (Ala.),
387: 012.
v. Pratt, 121 Fed. 772: 430.
v. Regina, 93 E. C. L. R, 202:
3 35, 336.
Peake v. Yeldell, 17 Ala. 630: 621,
Pearce v. Atwood. 13 Mass. 324 : 35 1.
v. Bank of Mobile, 33 Ala. 693:

671, 673.
v. Lang6t, 101 Pa. St. 507: S79.
v. Mason, 99 Ky. 357: 340, 540.
v. Vittum, 193 111. 192: 574
Pearl v. Conley, 7 Sm. & M. 358:

1015.
Pearpont v. Graham, 4 Wash. C. C.

232: 32a
Pearsall v. Supervisors, 71 Mich.

433: 1139.
Pearson v. Darrington, 32 Ala. 227:
908.
v. Flanagan, 52 Tex. 266: 1131.
v. International Distillery, 72

Iowa, 348: 459.
v. Lovejoy, 53 Barb. 407: 614,

1305.
v. Stevens, 56 Ohio St. 126: 354,
407.



TABLE OF CASES CITED.



clxix



The references are to the pages: Vol. L pp. 1-C03; Vol. n, pp. 605-1315.



Pease v. Howard, 14 John. 479:
1018.
v. L. Fish. Furn. Co., 176 111.

220: 741, 793.
v. L. Fish F. Co., 70 III App.

138: 741, 79a
v. Peck, 18 How. 595: 124, 893,
895.
. v. Ryan, 7 Ohio C. C. 44: 467.
Peate v. Dicken, 1 C. M. & R. 422:

817.
Peavy v. Goss, 90 Tex. 89: 292.
Peck v. Pease, 5 McLean, 486: 621.
v. Weddell, IT Ohio St. 271: 797.
Pecot v. Police Jury, 41 La. Ann.

706: 566, 1161.
Pecquet v. Pecquet, 17 La. Ann.

204: 86a
Peed v. McCrary, 94 Ga. 487: 449.
Peeler v. Peeler, 69 Miss. 141: 749,

761.
Peet v. Nalle, 30 La. Ann. 949: 668.
Peik v. Chicago, etc. R. R. Co., 94

U. S. 164: 614.
Peiser v. Griflfen, 125 Cal. 9: 1218,

1288.
Pelham v. Messenger, 16 La. Ann.
99: 1014.
v. Woolsey, 16 Fed. 418: 219.
Pell v. Newark, 40 N. J. L. 71:
368.
v. Ulmar, 18 N. Y. 139: 1054.
Pel lew v. Wonsford, 9 Barn. & C.

134: 329.
Pells, Ex parte, 28 Fla. 67: 468.
Peltier v. Bradley, 67 Conn. 42: 557.
Peluson v. Emmerson, 135 I1L 55:

1283.
Pemble v. Clifford, 2 McCord, 31 :

610.
Penberthy v. Lee, 51 Wis. 261: 1127.
-Pendleton v. Bank of Kentucky, 2
J. J. Marsh. 148: 1064.
v. Perkins, 40 Mo. 565: 1102.



Penfield, Matter of, 3 App. Div. 30:

1228.
Penick v. High Shoals Mfg. Co.,

113 Ga 592: 674.
Peninsular Lead & Color Works v.
Union Oil, etc. Co., 100 Wis. 488:
1208.
Penniev. State, 80 Cal. 266: 300, 462.
Penniman v. Cole, 8 Met. 496: 336.
Pennington v. Coxe, 2 Cranch, 33:
659.
v. Gibson, 16 How. 65: 41, 613,

865, 866.
v. Hare, 60 Minn. 146: 1290.
v. Townsend, 7 Wend. 276: 938.
v. Woolfolk, 79 Ky. 13: 188, 227,
250.
Pennock v. Dialogue, 2 Pet. 1: 930.
Pennoyer v. McConnaugby, 140 U.

S. 1:887,890, 1198.
Pennsylvania v. Baltimore, 1 Ves.

Sr. 454: 627.
Pennsylvania Co. v. Frana, 13 111.
App. 91: 879.
v. State, 142 Ind. 428: 140, 141,
339, 916.
Pennsylvania Hall, In re, 5 Pa. St.

204: 553.
Pennsylvania R. R. Co. v. Burling-
ton, 58 N. J. Eq. 547: 391,
397, 1236.
v. Butler, 57 Pa. St. 335: 1292.
v. Canal Com'rs, 21 Pa. St. 9:

548, 1035.
v. Keller, 67 Pa. St. 300: 1292.
v. State, 142 Ind. 42S: 413.
Penny wit v. Foote, 27 Ohio St. 600:

37.
Penobscot Lumbering Ass'n, In re,

93 Me. 391:713,721,734.
Penobscot R. R. Co. v. Bartlett. 12

Gray, 244: 620, 622.
Penrose v. Martyr, E. B. & E. 499:
1245.






I VSES I



808; VoL II. pp. ■



I'. R.
. 21 I'l.i. 192: 10m
la 187: n 10.
Pens '.cola Tel. ( 'o. v. Western U. T.

lounty Com'rs, 28 Mont.

Cases, 138 Fed. 671: 967.

. Abraham, 16 App Div.
981.
• Adiri in ,57 Barb. 656:

1141
v. Allen, 1 Lana OH: 633.
v. Allen, 00 Misc. 100: 979.

1397.
v. Allen, -10 X. Y. 404: 1-
v. Allen, 6 Wend. 486: 471, 627,

1117, HIS
v. Am.-. 07 Colo. 133: 517.
v. Arensberg, 105 X. Y. 133:

v. Atchison, etc. Ry. ( •

111.
v. Backus. 11 App. Div. 147:

v. Banks, 67 X. Y. DCS: 00S,

454.
v. Harry. 93 Mich. 540: 331.
v. Bartleson. 14 Utah, 25

iellett, 99 Mich. 151: 3G4,

419.
rberrich, 11 How. Pr. 333:

071.
v. Bigler, 5 Cal. 23: 935.
v. Blue Mt. Joe, 10;) 111. 370:

191, 030.
v. Board of Education, 1C6 III.

517, 519.
v. Board of Equalization, 00

Colo. 000: 415.
v. I:- ml of State Auditors, 9

Mich. 327: 1194.
v. Board of Suprs., 56 Barb.
1 150.



le v. i:.>ar. I of Trustees, 71 l tun,

188: 1150. 1150.
v. Bond. 10 Cal. 563: 1199.
v. Bowen, ::<> Barb. 24:'840.
\. Bowen, 01 N. V. 520: 102,

103, 340.
v. Brady, 49 App. Div. 238: 583.
v. Bray, 105 Cal. 844: 744.
v. Bremer, G9 App. Div. 11: 577,

928, 1070.
v. Bridges, 142 III. 30: 811.
v. Briggs, 17 Him. 366: 700.
v. Briggs, 50 X. V, 553: 84, 201,

003. 007. 051, 001. 0G5, 266,

581, 936, 911.
v. Brislin, 80 III. 403: 005, 201,

358, 07G.
v. Br. .a.: way Ry. Co., 106 N. Y.

29: 1033.
v. Brooklyn, 69 X. Y. 005: 51ft
v. Brooks, 101 Mich. 9S: 205.
v. Brown, 189 111. 619: 527.
v. Bull. 46 X. Y. OS: 937.
\. Burch, si Mich. 408: 70, 75,

80, 84, 85, • 87.
v. Burns, 5 Mich. 114: 167, 171,

659, 731, 914.
v. Burridge, 99 Mich. 343: 992.
v. Burt, 43 Cal. 560: 53,460, 40-1.

474, 638.
v. Burtleson, 14 Utah, 258: 468..
v. Bussell, 5!) Mich. 104: 481.
v. Butler, 3 Cow. 347: 1185.
v. Butler, 16 John. 203: 634
v. Butler, 147 X. Y. 164: 303.
v. Butler St. Foundry & Iron

Co., 001 III. 036: 416, 406,

158, 511, 950.
v. Butte, 4 Mont. 174: 164, 170.
v. Calder, 30 Midi. 87: 619,600.
v. Campbell, 59 Cal. 043: 1184.
v. Campbell, 60 Hun, 95: 885.
v. Canal Com'rs., 3 Scam. 153;

1070.



TABLE OF CASES CITED.



clxxi



The references are to the pages: Vol. I, pp. 1-603; Vol. H, pp. 605-1315.



People v. Cannon, 139 N. Y. 32: 10.
v. Canvassers, 77 Hun, 372: 436,

463.
v. Canvassers, 143 N. Y. 84:

437.
v. Carlock. 198 111. 150: 136.
v. Carr, 36 Hun, 488: 518.
v. Carson, 10 Misc. 237: 266,528.
v. Central Pacific R R Co., 43

Cal. 432: 350.
v. Central Pac. R R Co., 83

Cal. 393: 354, 413.
v. Central Pac. R R Co. 105

Cal. 576: 413.
v. Chapin, 105 N. Y. 309: 945.
v. Chase, 165 111. 527: 5, 6, 12.
v. Chee Kee, 61 Cal. 404: 876.
v. Chew, 6 Cal. 636: 946.
v. Chicago, 152111. 546: 693, 706,

717, 722, 913, 933.
v. Chicago Theological Semi-
nary, 174 111. 177: 1003, 1008,
1070.
v. Cicott, 16 Mich. 283: 899.
v. Circuit Judge, 124 Mich. 664:

427.
v. Clark, 1 Cal. 406: 308, 321.
v. Clayton, 4 Utah, 421: 579.
v. Cleary, 13 Misc. 546: 518.
v. Clute, 50 N. Y. 451 : 797.
v. Cobb, 133 Cal. 74: 300.
v. Coleman, 121 N. Y. 542: 650.
v. Coler, 173 N. Y. 103: 302.
v. Collins, 3 Mioh. 343: 145, 166.
v. Com'rs, 3 Hill, 601: 663, 70S,

944.
v. Comr's, 47 N. Y. 501: 221.
v. Com'rs, 54 N. Y. 276: 62, 96,

101, 123.
v. Com'rs, 59 N. Y. 92: 1195.
v. Conrrs of Highways, 53 Barb.

70: 208.
v. Com. Council, 13 App. Pr.
(U. S.) 121: 252.
]



People v. Common Council, 22 Barb.

404: 1137.
v. Common Council, 85 Cal.

369: 400.
v. Common Council, 140 N. Y.

300: 547, 1150, 1151, 1221.
v. Comstock, 78 N. Y. 356: 927.
v. Congdon, 77 Mich. 351: 252.
v. Cook, 14 Barb. 259: 1117, 1124,

1139.
v. Cook, 96 Mich. 368: 741. 767.
v. Cook, 8N. Y. 67: 1139.
v. Cook, 148 U. S. 397: 614, 119,>.
v. Cooper, 6 Hill, 516: 941.
v. Cooper, 83 111. 585: 356, 580.

595, 601.
v. Coyle, 55 App. Div. 223: 1170,
1225.

v. Cray croft, 111 Cal. 544: 721,

913.
v. Croton Aqueduct Board, 26

Barb. 248: 1305.
v. Cummings, 88 Mich. 249: 157.
v. Curry. 1^0 Cal. 82: HI.
v. Daiton, 158 N. Y. 175:, 533.
v. Dane, 81 Mich. 36: 1188.
v. Daniel], 50 N. Y. 274: 1051.
v. Daniels, 6 Utah, 288: 42.
v. Davenport, 91 N.Y. 574: 649,

651. 723.
v. Davis, 78 App. Div. 570: 455.
v. Davis, Gl Barb. 456: 345, 562,

633.
v. Dayton, 55 N. Y. 377: 891.
v. Deming, 1 Hilt. 271: 466, 7T8.
v. Deuahy, 20 Mich. 349: 192,

245.
v. Dettenthaler, 118 Mich. 595:

122.
v. Devlin, 33 N. Y. 269: 62, 101.
v. De Wolf, 62 111. 253: 72, 87,

98, 605, 867.
v. District Ct., 28 Colo. 161:
1225.






TABLE OF 0A8E8 01 rED.



are to tiu< pages: Vol I. pp. i 608; v.-i. n, pp, bob 1815,



i Mioh. 151: 1191.
r. Dolan.5 Wyo. 245: 815, B28,

v. D ''IT- 1 ' i v. 512: 458.

v. Draper, 15 X. Y. 583: 925,

1051.
v. Dunn, BO Cal. 811: 85, 157,

800, I
v. Dunn, 157 X. T. 528: 404.
v. Eddy, 57 Parb. 593: 943,947.
\. Edwai : . 58 Hun. 877: 52a
v. Eichelroth, 7S Cal 111: 693,

71ft
v. England, 91 I fun. 152: 358.
v. English, 139 III 622: 693, 724,

ros,

v. Fidelity & C. Co., 153 X. Y.

25: 650, 890.
v. Fir.- Ass'n, 93 X. Y r . 311: 1G9.
v. Fishbough, 134 X. Y. 393:

v. Fitch, 147 X. Y. 355: 302.

v. Flagg, 40 X. Y. 401: 133.

v. Fleming, 7 Colo. 230: 185,

188, 227, 252. 458.
v. Freeman, 80 Cal. 233: 7.
v. Frisbie, 20 Cal. 135: 643.
v. Furman, 85 Mich. 110: 533.
v. Gad way, 61 Mich. 285: 252.
v. Gardner, 59 Barb. 198: 1162.
v. Gates, 57 Barb. 291: 1141.
v. Ganlter, 149 111.39: 133, 692,
724^738, 7U7.

ill, 7 Cal. 350: 557. 078.683.
Gilroy, 82 Hun, 500: 1152.
v. (, 03 111. 353: 789.

v. I J07 111. 50: 1010.

.;nn County, 100 Cal. 419:
186.
rd, 8 Colo. 432: 221.
v. r; r .-int, 70 Hun, 233: 089.

X. Y. 295: 1102,
1191.
v. Grippen, 20 Cal. 077: 162



People v. Grover, 20°, HI. 21: 757.
v. Sadden, 3 Denio, 220: 1059.
v. Ball, 8 Cola 485: 252,577,581.
v. Hamill, 134 111. one,: 258.
v. Harnor, 1 App. Div. I~9: 419.
v. Harper, 91 111. 357: o;::.
v. Harris, 12:: X. Y. 70: 522.
v. Harrison, 191 111. 257: 700,

708, 718, 722,885, 914.
v. Harrison, 92 111. App. 643:

722.
v. Hasbrouck, 11 Utah, 291: 10,

127.
v. Hatch, 33 111. 9: 47, 110.
v. Hawker, 152 X. Y. 234: 1179.
v. Hayes, 1 L0 X. Y. 484: 1174,

1175. 1189.
v. Hayne, 83 Cal. Ill: 10.
v. Henshaw, 70 Cal. 436: 347.
v. Hess, 85 Mich. 128: 1031.
v. Hicks, 15 Barb. 100: 945.
v. Hicks, 98 Mich. 86: 981, 992.
v. Hill, 8 N. Y. 449: 345.
v. Hill, 3 Utah, 334: 793, 796.
v. Hiller, 1 13 Mich. 209: 443, 554.
v. Milliard. 85 App. Div. 507:

707, 739.
v. Hills. 35 X. Y. 449: 188, 241,

633.
v. Hillsdale, etc. T. Co., 2 John.

190: 1141.
v. Hinrichsen, 161 111. 223: 711,

729, 929.
v. Hobson.48 Mich. 27: 484.555.
v. Hoffman, 97 111. 234: 797.
v. Hoffman, 110 III. 587: 164.
v. Hoi ley, 12 Wend. 481: 1118.
v. House of Refuge, 22 App.

Div. 254: 467.
v. Hoyrn, 20 How. Pr. 76: 1071.
v. Hulse. 3 Hill. 309: 044, 755,

9^:;. 1059, 126a
v. Huntley. 112 Mich. 569: 199,

297, 469.



TABLE OF OASES CITED.



clxxiii



The references are to the pages: Vol. I, pp. 1-603; Vol. n, pp. 605-1315.



People v. Hurst, 41 Mich. 328: 265.
v. Hutchinson, 172 111. 486: 530,

745, 921, 955.
v. Illinois State Reformatory,

148 111. 413: 578.
v. Institute, 71 111. 229: 185.
v. Insurance Co., 19 Mich. 392:

190, 228.
v. Irvin, 21 Wend. 128: 784.
v. Jackson, etc. Plank Road Co.,

9 Mich. 285: 1193, 1198.
v. Japinga. 115 Mich. 222: 291;

428.
v. Jobs, 7 Colo. 475: 577.
v. Johnson, 95 Cal. 471: 409.
v. Johnson, 23 Colo. 150: 112,

644, 1304.
v. Keller, 31 App. Div. 248: 528.
v. Keller, 35 App. Div. 493: 528.
v. Kelly, 99 Mich. 82: 296.
v. Kemp, 76 Mich. 410: 760.
v. Kenney, 96 N. Y. 294: 577, 582.
v. Kent, 83 App. Div. 554: 302.
v. Ketchum, 103 Mich. 443: 771.
v. King, 28 Cal. 265: 796.
v. King, 127 CaL 570: 300, 428.
v. Kinney, 110 Mich. 97: 469.
v. Kinsman, 51 Cal. 92: 641.
v. Kipley, 171 111. 44: 10, 360.
v. Kirk, 162 111. 138: 13, 132.
v. Knight, 13 Mich. 424: 1069.
v. Knopf, 183 111. 410: 396, 446,

449, 576, 578.
v. Knopf, 186 111. 457: 538.
v. Knopf, 198 III 340: 72, 84, 92,

602.
v. Koenig, 9 App. Div. 436: 482.
v. Lake Co., 33 Cal. 487: 1119.
v. Lambert, 5 Mich. 349: 620,

622.
v. Lambier, 5 Denio, 9: 1038,

1040.
v. Lane, 53 App. Div. 531: 283.
v. Latham, 203 III 24: 757.



People v. Lawrence, 36 Barb. 177:

114, 123, 188, 202, 658, 950.

1071.
v. Lawrence, 41 N. Y. 137: 205,

224.
v. Leubischer, 34 App. Div.

577: 10.
v. Levee District, 131 CaL 30:

1237.
v. Linda Vista Irr. Dist. 128

Cal. 477: 40, 300, 616.
v. Livingston, 6 Wend. 526:

545.
v. Lodi High School Dist., 124

Cal. 694: 157, 428.
v. Loewenthal, 93 I1L 191: 84,

87, 258, 886, 893.
v. Lohnas, 54 Hun, 604: 803.
v. Long Island R. R. Co., 134

N. Y. 506: 8.
v. Lord, 9 App. Div. 458: 797,

800.
v. Lorillard, 135 N. Y.285: 454.
v. Luby, 56 Mich. 551 : 581.
v. Luby, 99 Mich. 89: 95, 100.
v. Lyman, 2 Utah, 30: 872, 881.
v. Lyons, 29 App. Div. 174: 1226.
v. Lyttle, 1 Idaho, 143: 457.
v. Mahaney, 13 Mich. 481 : 48, 72.

78, 91, 92, 184, 185, 190, 204,

431, 447, 605, 866, 867.
v. Mallary, 195 111. 582: 6, 12.
v. Manhattan Co., 9 Wend. 351.

1193.
v. Marquiss, 192 111. 377: 527,

536.
v. Martin, 178 HI. 611: 396.
v. Marx, 99 N. Y. 377: 1019.
v. Maxwell, 73 Hun, 157: 5.")?.
v. May, 3 Mich. 598: 754, 887,

889.
v. Mayor, 130 111. 406: 527.
v. Mayor, etc. of N. Y, 32 Barb.

102: 472, 474,



I



i \i;i K OF 0A8E8 I I I EDD.



ihc nt ana on in to the p«c**: Vol I, pp. 1-608; Vol u, pp. 005-1815.



: . 10 Qtah, B57:
491.

o, 51 CaL 860: 641.
v. MoCallum, \ Neb. 183: 803,

133.
v. MoCann, 10 N.Y.58: 352,846.
v. M I N. V. 88: 910.

v. McClellan, 81 CaL 101: 946.
v. McC ellan, 137 111. 852: 1158,

nea

59 N.Y.862: 1280,

v. McDonald, 5 Wya 526: 1174,

1181.
v. M -Kirov. 72 Mich. 446: 214,

925.
t. McFadden, 81 CaL 489: 171,

339.
v. Meighan, 1 Hill, 298: 1
v. Merrick, 61 Hun. 307: 914.
v. Metzk t. 17 Cal. 524: 10S I.
v. Miller, 88 Mich. 383: 230.
v. Miner, 47 III. 83:
v. Mitchell, 35 N. Y. 551: 1230,

1233.
v. Mitchell, 4 Sandf. 460: 1134.
v. Molyneux, 53 Barb. 9: 651.
v. Molyneux, 40 N. Y. 113: 601,

849.
v. Mori no, 85 CaL 515: 1139.
v. Morris, 13 Wend. 325: 708.
v. Mount. 186 111. 500: 467.
v. Mount, 87 111. App. 194: 467,

v. Mullender, 132 Cal. 217: 300,

v. Murphy, 202 111. 493: 456, 487.
v. Nelson, 133 ILL 565: 133, 135,

225.
v. Nelson, 156 111. 864: 585.
v. N m. 98: 1276.

v. Normal, 170 111. 468: 393.

. Y. 1 fentraL eta It B, Co..

156 N. Y. 570: 557.



le v. N. Y. etc. R. R. Co., 84

N. Y. 565: 828.
v. O'Brien, 88 N. Y. 1C3: 266,

8 ■ .
v. O'Brien, ill N. Y. 1: 019.
v. O'Grady, 46 App. Div. 213:

528.
v. Olseu, 201 111. 491: 602
v. Onahan, 170 111. 449: L8, 132,

898, 101. 405, 406.
v. O'Neil, 51 Cal. 91: 641.
v. O'Neil, 54 Hun, 610: 648, 651.
v. Orange Co. Road Co., 175 N.

Y. 84: 427.
v. Pacific Imp. Co., 130 Cal. 442:

4G5, 467, 527, 529.
v. Palmer, 52 N. Y. 83: 462, 5 JS.
v. Palmer, 109 N. Y. 110: 572,

862. 1060.
v. Parks, 53 Cal. 635: 1S8, 215,

251.
v. Parvin, 74 Cal. 519: 239:
v. Peacock, 98 111. 172: 641, 964,

965, 1226.
v. Peck, 11 Wend. 604: 1120.
v. People's Gas, Light & C. Co.,

205 111. 4S2: 191, 204.
v. Peralta, 3 Cal. 379: 1054.
v. Perry, 79 Cal. 105: 587.
v. Pico, 62 Cal. 50: 1006.
v. Pierson, 59 Hun, 450: 528.
v. Piatt, 17 John. 195: 640, 1192.
v. Police Com'rs, 79 App. Div.

82: 518.
v. Pond, 67 Mich. 98: 265.
v. Porter, 90 N. Y. 68: 579, 592.
v. Power, 25 111. 187: 1104.
v. Prill en, 173 N. Y. 07: 730.
v. Pugh, 57 Hun, 181 : 409.
v. Purdy, 2 Hill, 31: 62, 123,

800, 867.
v. Quigg, 59 N. Y. 83: 528.
v. Raymond, 186 I1L 407: 466,

407.



TABLE OF CASES CITED.



clxxv



The references are to the pages: Vol I, pp. 1-603; Vol. n, pp. 605-1315.



People v. Recorder, 6 Hill, 429: 645.
v. Reed, 5 Denio, 554: 1136.
v. Reis, 76 Cal. 269: 749.
v. Reynolds, 5 Gilm. 1: 164, 171.
v. Rice, 138 N. Y. 151: 757.
v. Richards, 108 N. Y. 137: 82?.
v. Richmond, 16 Colo. 274: 13,

132.
v. Rio Grande Co., 7 Colo. App.

229: 1154.
v. Ritchie. 12 Utah, 180: 784.
v. River Raisin, eta R, R. Co.,

12 Mich. 389: 867, 1033.
v. Robinson. 17 Cal. 363: 872.
v. Rochester. 5 Lans. 11: 1119.
v. Roosevelt, 24 App. Div. 17:

454.
v. Rose, 167 I1L 147: 10&
v. Rose, 174 111. 310: 703.
v. Rosenburg, 138 N. Y. 410:

813, 964.
v. Ryan, 138 III. 263: 1003.
v. Ryder, 124 N. Y. 500: 1217.
v. Salomon, 51 111. 37: 164, 170,

312.
v. Sands, 102 Cal. 12: 527, 702.
v. San Francisco, etc. R. R. Co.,

28 Cal. 254: 462.
v. San Francisco, etc. R. R. Co.,

35 CaL 606: 927.
v. Scannel, 62 App. Div. 249:

502.
v. Sehemerhorn, 19 Barb. 540:

1137, 1138.
v. Schoonmaker, 63 Barb. 44

695, 698, 704.
v. Shepard, 36 N. Y. 285: 925,
v. Sheriff, 19 Wend. 87: 332.
v. Simon, 176 III. 165: 158, 360
v. Sloan. 2 Utah, 326: 558.
v. Smith, 78 Hun, 179: 883.
v. Smith, 108 Mich. 527: 428.
v. Squire, 14 Daly, 154: 386, 399.
v. Stanley, 47 Cal. 113: 1185.



People v. Starne, 35 111. 121: 72, 73,
91.
v. Stevens, 13 Wend. 341: 708.
v. Stowl, 23 Barb. 349: 145.
v. Superior Ct., 100 Cal. 105:

300, 463.
v. Supervisor, 14 Mich. 336:

1095.
v. Supervisors, 13 Abb. N. C.

421: 698.
v. Supervisors, 3 Barb. 332: 20.
v. Supervisors, 63 Barb. 83: 1226.
v. Supervisors, 6 Hun, 304: 645,

1045.
v. Supervisors, 40 Hun, 353: 528.
v. Supervisors, 49 Hun, 32: 1150,

1151.
v. Supervisors, 185 111. 288: 428.
v. Supervisors, 16 Mich. 254:

215.
v. Supervisors, 20 Mich. 95: 1230.
v. Supervisors, 8 N. Y. 317: 60,

101, 12a
v. Supervisors, 16 N. Y. 424: 635,

G43, 683.
v. Supervisors, 34 N. Y. 268:

1129.
v. Supervisors, 43 N. Y. 10: 252,

253, 628, 633.
v. Supervisors, 67 N. Y. 109: 442,

444, 459, 511, 564.
v. Sutphin, 166 N. Y. 163: 221,

208, 290.
v. Svveetser, 1 Dak. 295: 756,

797.
v. Syracuse, 59 Hun, 258: 1154.
v. Tanner, 128 N. Y. 416: 966.
v. Taylor, 96 Mich. 576: 141, 798.
v. Terry, 108 N. Y. 1: 135.
v. Thompson, 67 CaL 627: 1124.
v. Thompson, 155 11L 451: 5, 12,

132.
v. Thornton, 186 I1L 162: 467,
517, 520.



cl.wvi



TAB! l. OF I \~i CS I l I i.i>.



tn to the paces: Vol 1. pp. 1 coa; Vol 11, pp. 605-M6.



■0 T.Tibbette,4Cow.861: 1886,

1249.
v. Tighe, 5 Hun, 26: 758, 754.
v. Tiphaine, 8 Parker, 041:458.

b lale, 57 Cai 104: 481, 488.
v. '1 llun, 488: 589.

v. Torner, 49 Hun, 460: 1030.

r. lyler, 86 CaL 500: 505.
v. Tyler, 7 Midi. 161: 658.
v. Upson, 7'.' Hun, 87: 436,518.
v. Utah (,'oni'rs, 7 Utah, 279:

. 101, 955.
v. Utioa Ins. Co., 15 John. 358:

710, 1038, 1051.
v. Van Pelt, 130 Mich. 621: 490.
v. Vosburgh, 70 Hun. 502:469.
v. Wabash Ry. Co., 138 111. 85:

100a

v. Walker, 17 N. Y. 502: 330.
v. Wallace, 70 111. 680: 94, 368,

423.
v. Warden, 6 App. Div. 520:

1170.
v. Warden. SI Hun, 434: -109.
v. Warden, 39 Misc. 113: 15S.
v. Waters, 4 Misc. 1: 6, 9.
v. Watseka Camp Sleeting

Ass'n, 160 111. 576: 1003,

1007.
v. Webster, 8 Misc. 133: 302,

v. We 52 App. Div. 583: 730.
v. Wemple, 115 N. Y. 302: 694.
v. Weston, 3 Neb. 312: 844,

v. Whipple, 17 CaL 592: 95.
v. Whitney's Point, 100 N. Y.

81: I
v. Williams, 64 CaL 87:871.
v. Wil sea, 60 131.

v. V. -. 136 N. 5

mute, 1 Dak. 63: 562.



People v. Wood, 71 N. Y. 371: 051.
v. Woods. 7 CaL 579: 1199.
v. Worden Grocery Co., 118

.Mich. 001: 298.
v. Wright, 30 Colo. 439: 221,

100.
v. Wright, 70 HI. 388: 356,446,

624, 632.
V. Yancey, 107 I1L 255: 464.
v. Young, 18 App. Div. 162: 13,
130.
Peoples' B. & L. Ass'n v. Billing, 101

Mich. 186: 410.
Peoples' G. L. & C. Co. v. Chicago,

114 Fed. 384: 1195.
Peoples' S. B. & T. Co. v. Batchel-
der Egg Case Co., 51 Fed. Lit): 700.
Peoria, etc. R. R. Co. v. Duggan, 109
III. 537: 413, 400.
v. People, 144 111. 458: 704, 730.
v. People, 198 111. 318: 1010.
Pepperell v. Burrell, 2 Dowl. P. C.

074: 330.
Perchard v. Hey wood, 8 T. R 472:

iiield v. Aumick, 116 Iowa, 383:
1158.

Lval v. Cowychee, etc. Dist, 15
Wash. 480: 268, 290.
Perdicaris v. bridge Co. 29 N. J. L.

367: 007.

Pereria v. Wallace, 129 Cal. 397: 761.

Perine v. Forbush, 97 Cal. 805: 1 1 15.

Perkins v. Heert, 158 N. Y. 300: 302.

v. Led better, 08 Miss. 307: 1153.

v. Lyons, 111 Iowa, 192: 1158.

v. Perkins, 62 Barb. 531: 845,

862,
v. Philadelphia, 156 Pa. St. 539:

306, 352, 401.
v. Philadelphia, 150 Pa. St. 554:

852, 401.
v. Bcales, Tenn. Cas. 035: 19.
ell, 1 W. Black. 059: 881.



TABLE OF CAS3S CITED.



clxxvii



The references are to the pages: VoL I, pp. 1-603; Vol. n, pp. 605-1315.



Perkins v. Smith, 116 N. Y. 441:
758.
v. St. Louis, etc. R R, Co., 103

Mo. 53: 420.
v. Thorn burgh, lOCal. 189: 638,
922.
Perrault v. Minn, etc., R R Co., 117

Wis. 520: 1312.
Perrine v. Chesapeake etc. Canal

Co., 9 How. 172: 1035.
Perry v. Commonwealth, 3 Gratt.
632: 642.
v. Denver, 27 Colo. 93: 1171.
v. Gross, 25 Neb. 826: 231.
v. Minneapolis St. Ry. Co., 69

Minn. 165: 1225.
v. Mitchell, 5 Denio. 537: 947.
v. New Orleans R. R Co., 55

Ala. 413: 627.
v. Newsom, 1 Ired. Eq. 28: 627,

634, 658.
v. State, 87 Ala. 30: 1183.
Perry County v. Jefferson Co., 94
111. 214: 929.
v. R. R. Co., 58 Ala, 546: 52, 71,
78, 83.
Perryman v. Greer, 39 Ala. 133:

1062, 1294.
Persons v. Gardner, 42 App. Div.

490: 1169, 1227.
Peterman v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.,

105 Fed. 335: 785.
Peters v. Bain, 133 U. S. 670: 613.
v. Condron, 2 S. & R. 80: 1112.
v. State, 96 Tenn. 682: 422, 1298.
v. Vawter, 10 Mont. 201: 847.
Petersburg v. Metzker, 21 111. 205:

10:J3.
Peterson v. Bingham, 13 Wash. 178:
767.
v. Currier, 62 111. App. 163: 763.
v. Gittings, 107 Iowa, 306: 861.
v. State, 104 Tenn. 127: 200, 231,
404, 406, 430.



Peto v. West Ham, 2 E. & E. 144:

809.
Petri v. Commercial Nat. Bank, 142

U. S. 644: 731, 732.
Petrie v. Columbia, etc. R R Co.,

29 S. C. 303: 1292, 1293.
Petterson v. Berry, 125 Fed. 902:

1197.
Pettit v. Fretz, 33 Pa. St. 118: 1062.
Petty, In re, 22 Kan. 477: 11S7.
Peugnet, Matter of, 67 N. Y. 444:

443, 444.
Peyton v. Mosely, 3 T. B. Mon. 77:
472, 513.
v. Smith, 4 McCord, 476: 19.
Pferrmann, Ex parte, 134 Cal. 143:

216, 249.
Phelan v. Johnson, 7 Ir. L. 535: 929,

930.
Phelps v. Hawley, 52 N. Y. 23: 1155.



Online LibraryJ. G. (Jabez Gridley) SutherlandStatutes and statutory construction, including a discussion of legislative powers, constitutional regulations relative to the forms of legislation and to legislative procedure (Volume 1) → online text (page 16 of 85)