TEE COMPLETE
OARSMAN
a
THE COMPLETE OARSMAN
UNIFORM WITH THIS VOLUME
THE COMPLETE MOTORIST
THE COMPLETE GOLFER
THE COMPLETE CRICKETER
THE COMPLETE RUGBY FOOTBALLER
THE COMPLETE LAWN TENNIS PLAYER
THE COMPLETE SHOT
THE COMPLETE MOUNTAINEER
THE COMPLETE PHOTOGRAPHER
THE COMPLETE COOK
K
.1
THE
COMPLETE OARSMAN
BY
R. C. LEHMANN
WITH CHAPTERS BY F. S. KELLY,
R. B. ETHERINGTON-SMITH, M.B., F.R.C.S.,
AND W. H. EYRE
WITH FIFTY-NINE ILLUSTRATIONS
METHUEN & CO.
36 ESSEX STREET W.C.
LONDON
First Published in 1908
PREFATORY NOTE
T WISH to express my grateful acknowledgments to the
following :
To the Editor of Fry's Outdoor Magazine for permission
to incorporate in this volume the substance of an article
contributed to his magazine ;
To the Leander Club for permission to reproduce two
');
}
else if (getClientWidth() > 430)
{
document.write('');
}
else
{
document.write('');
}
//-->
engravings belonging to the Club ;
To the First Trinity Boat Club for permission to photo-
graph the ancient rudder and sculls in the possession of the
Club;
To Messrs. Blackwood and Sons for permission to reprint
"The Perfect Oar" from "Crumbs of Pity," published by
them ; and
To the Editor of the Rowing Almanack for permission to
reproduce in the Appendix the tables of winning crews.
I have endeavoured to illustrate the various movements
and positions of the stroke by means of photographs. It was,
of course, impossible for me to obtain the services of an eight-
oared crew for this purpose, and I have had to confine myself,
therefore, chiefly : (i) to photographs of a single individual,
and (2) to photographs of a pair-oar, both at rest and in
motion.
R, C. L.
May, 1908
M7516S7
CONTENTS
PART I
HISTORICAL AND INTRODUCTORY
CHAPTER I
THE EARLY HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF
BOAT-RACING
PAGE
At Oxford At Cambridge In London Leander Club . . . . i
CHAPTER II
THE EMANCIPATION OF THE AMATEUR
Early professional assistance Tom Egan's view The two Universities
and Amateurism 10
CHAPTER III
THE EVOLUTION OF THE RACING SHIP AND ITS OARS
Paracelsus Early racing boats Outriggers Keelless boats . . .18
CHAPTER IV
THE DEVELOPMENT OF STYLE
Tristram's oarsmanship Early ideas of style Casamajor's criticisms in
1858 24
vii
a 2
viii THE COMPLETE OARSMAN
PART II
THE ART AND MYSTERY OF OARSMANSHIP
CHAPTER V
THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF OARSMANSHIP
PAGE
Elementary conditions of the problem The beginning and what follows
after 3
CHAPTER VI
THE SLIDING-SEAT STROKE
Its component parts from A to Z 36
CHAPTER VII
ELEMENTARY INSTRUCTION
Fixed seats Their importance The method of teaching beginners . . 57
CHAPTER VIII
ELEMENTARY INSTRUCTION ON SLIDES
New difficulties How to master them 64
CHAPTER IX
OARSMANSHIP IN EIGHTS
Boats and oars and the arrangement of the crew . . . . .67
CHAPTER X
OARSMANSHIP IN EIGHTS (continue^
Practice for a race Faults and how to correct them The perfect oar in
prose and verse 77
CONTENTS ix
CHAPTER XI
COXSWAINS
PAGE
Their importance, characteristics, and methods 97
CHAPTER XII
WORK AND TRAINING
General considerations A country-house boat club 103
CHAPTER XIII
TRAINING PHYSIOLOGICALLY CONSIDERED
BY R. B, ETHERINGTON-SMITH, M.B., F.R.C.S. . . 1 15
CHAPTER XIV
FOURS AND PAIRS
Measurement of a racing four Measurement of oars 134
CHAPTER XV
ROWING STYLE IN OTHER COUNTRIES
Belgium New South Wales Other Continental countries The Harvard
Crew of 1906 !40
CHAPTER XVI
SCULLING
BY F. S. KELLY 157
PART III
FAMOUS CREWS AND MEMORABLE RACES
CHAPTER XVII
THE THAMES ROWING CLUB : THEIR METHODS
OF TRAINING AND THEIR VICTORIES
FROM 1874 TO 1882
BY W. H. EYRE . . . . 179
x THE COMPLETE OARSMAN
CHAPTER XVIII
FAMOUS CREWS AND MEMORABLE RACES (continued'}
PAGE
Two great victories of the London R.C. at Henley, 1878 and 1881 The
historic victory of T. C. Edwards-Moss in the Diamonds, 1878 . . 206
CHAPTER XIX
FAMOUS CREWS AND MEMORABLE RACES (continued)
Some college victories at Henley : Trinity Hall, 1887, 1895 J Nfi w College,
1897 ; Third Trinity, 1902 212
CHAPTER XX
FAMOUS CREWS AND MEMORABLE RACES (continued)
The resurrection of Leander in 1891 The Leander victory over Pennsylvania
University, 1901 217
CHAPTER XXI
FAMOUS CREWS AND MEMORABLE RACES (continued)
The dead heat between Oxford and Cambridge in 1877 The broken oar . 223
CHAPTER XXII
FAMOUS CREWS AND MEMORABLE RACES (continued)
The three University Boat Races won after Barnes Bridge, 1886, 1896,
1901 228
CHAPTER XXIII
FAMOUS CREWS AND MEMORABLE RACES (continued)
The Cambridge victories over Oxford in 1899, and over Harvard University
in 1906 239
CONTENTS xi
PART IV
THE CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT OF
THE SPORT
CHAPTER XXIV
THE GOVERNMENT OF ROWING
PAGE
The Amateur Rowing AssociationThe definition of an amateur . . 248
CHAPTER XXV
THE A.RA. AND THE MANAGEMENT OF REGATTAS
Duties of a Regatta Committee 257
CHAPTER XXVI
THE LAWS OF BOAT-RACING
The umpire and his duties Fouls . . . . . . . .261
TABLE OF WINNERS, ETC 275
NAMES OF CREWS, ETC 277
APPENDIX I 335
APPENDIX II 345
APPENDIX III 355
APPENDIX IV 364
APPENDIX V 376
INDEX . 387
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
A START AT PUTNEY (THE UNIVERSITY BOAT RACE, 1906) Frontispiece
From a photograph by Moyse, Putney
FACING PAGE
A BUMP IN THE EIGHTS AT OXFORD 4
From a photograph by Gillman 6* Co. , Oxford
A BUMP IN THE MAY RACES AT CAMBRIDGE 5
From a photograph by Steam & Sons, Cambridge
JAMES PARISH IO
Seventeen years Coxswain to the Leander Club
From a lithograph by /. /. Martin, in the possession of the Leander Club
THE GREAT RACE II
Between Robert Coombes and Charles Campbell for the
Championship of the Thames on the I9th of August, 1846
From a lithograph in the possession of the Leander Club, after a drawing
by W. Pascoe, of Richmond
RUDDERS ANCIENT AND MODERN 22
Rudder of The Black Prince, the First Trinity Racing Eight of
1835 ; and rudder of a racing eight of the present day
From a photograph by Stearn 6* Sons, Cambridge
SCULLS ANCIENT AND MODERN 23
The square-loomed scull is one of those used by W. Maule,
First Trinity, when he won the Diamond Sculls at Henley
in 1847. The other is a scull of the present day
From a photograph by Stearn & Sons, Cambridge
SLIDING SEAT 36
No. i. Hands and wrists at the finish
SLIDING SEAT 36
No. 2. Hands dropped and wrists turned for feather
xiii
xiv THE COMPLETE OARSMAN
FACING PAGE
SLIDING SEAT 38
No. 3. Arms extended on recovery
SLIDING SEAT 38
No. 4. Body swinging forward and carrying slide
SLIDING SEAT 46
No. 5. Blade beginning to turn off feather
SLIDING SEAT 46
No. 6. Position of hands and wrists for beginning
SLIDING SEAT 48
No. 7. The beginning
SLIDING SEAT ... 48
No. 8. Just after the beginning
_/
SLIDING SEAT 5 2
No. 9. Half through stroke
SLIDING SEAT 5 2
No." 10. Position of body, hands, and legs at finish
FIXED SEAT 60
No. i. The finish
FIXED SEAT 60
No. 2. Arms extended ; body swinging forward
FIXED SEAT 62
No. 3. The beginning
FIXED SEAT . 62
No. 4. Just after the beginning
" REACH OUT AND ROW ! " 6 7
A Cambridge Eight at Putney
From a photograph by Moyse, Putney
MODERN OARS 7
1. Square blade
2. "Coffin "blade
PAIR-OAR 77
No. i. " Forward ! Are you ready ? "
PAIR-OAR 78
No. 2. The beginning
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS xv
FACING PAGE
PAIR-OAR 79
No. 3. Just after beginning
PAIR-OAR 80
No. 4. Position half-way through stroke
PAIR-OAR 8l
No. 5. Position at finish
PAIR-OAR 84
No. 6. After recovery. Bow's hands too low
PAIR-OAR 85
No. 7. Three parts forward. Blades turning off feather
A START IN THE EIGHTS AT OXFORD . . . . ... "'V " "88
From a photograph by Gillman & Co. , Oxford
PAIR-OAR 89
No. 8. Arms bending
PAIR-OAR 89
No. 9. " Easy ! Hold her, stroke "
PAIR-OAR 92
No. io. Down on stroke-side
PAIR-OAR . . . 93
No. n. Down on bow-side
THE LEANDER CLUB FOUR WINNING THE STEWARDS' CUP AT
HENLEY, 1906 134
From a photograph, by Marsh Bros., Henley-on-Thamcs
A PAIR-OAR *. . . .138
Messrs. Etherington-Smith and Goldie at Cambridge
From a photograph by Steam & Sons, Cambridge
HENLEY, 1907 140
The Belgian crew winning the Grand Challenge Cup
From a photograph by A. C. Hammersley
HENLEY, 1907 141
The Belgian crew winning the Grand Challenge Cup
From a photograph by Marsh Bros., Henley-on-Thames
SCULLING .... 158
No. i. Forward position
xvi THE COMPLETE OARSMAN
FACING PAGE
SCULLING 159
No. 2. Half through stroke (stationary photograph)
SCULLING 160
No. 3. The finish. Weak position (stationary photograph)
SCULLING 162
No. 4. A clean hard beginning
SCULLING . . 162
No. 5. The beginning ; too much back-splash
SCULLING 163
No. 6. Half-way through stroke
SCULLING 164
No. 7. The finish
SCULLING 164
No. 8. Extraction of blades
SCULLING 165
No. 9. Blades extracted ; wrists turned (front view)
SCULLING 166
No. 10. Blades extracted ; wrists turned (side view)
SCULLING . . . 168
No. n. Arms extending
SCULLING 169
No. 12. Coming forward
HENLEY, 1891 . 220
The dead heat between Leander and the Thames R.C.
From a photograph by Marsh Bros., Henley-on- Thames
HENLEY, IOX>I 221
Leander defeat Pennsylvania University
From a photograph
THE UNIVERSITY BOAT-RACE, 1896 233
Oxford beginning to lead
From a photograph by Moyse, Putney
THE UNIVERSITY BOAT-RACE, 1896 234
The rough water after Barnes
From a photograph by Steam & Sons, Cambridge
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS xvii
FACING PAGE
THE UNIVERSITY BOAT-RACE, 1896 235
The finish
From a photograph
THE UNIVERSITY BOAT-RACE, 1 90! 238
Nearing the finish
From a photograph by Stearn. & Sons, Cambridge
THE CAMBRIDGE CREW, 1899 239
From a photograph by Stearn & Sons, Cambridge
THE HARVARD AND CAMBRIDGE RACE, 1906, FROM BARNES BRIDGE 246
From a photograph by Stearn & Sons, Cambridge
The photographs not otherwise acknowledged have been specially taken for the book by
S. J. Beckett, Baker Street, W., under the supervision of the author.
THE COMPLETE OARSMAN
PART I
HISTORICAL AND INTRODUCTORY
CHAPTER I
THE EARLY HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF
BOAT-RACING
At Oxford At Cambridge In London Leander Club
MY main object in writing this book is to give such an
account of oarsmanship as will enable a reader not
only to understand how the sport is organised and pursued,
but also to obtain a grasp of the principles on which, in its
highest manifestations of skill and endurance, it is based. In
other words, I desire to make clear, even to those who may
not have been initiated in the exercise, the art and mystery
of rowing. I cannot conceal from myself the difficulty of my
task, but I do not doubt that it is worth attempting. It is
no easy thing to row skilfully or to understand how skill is
acquired ; but, on the other hand, the exercise itself is one of
the noblest in the world, both in regard to its development of
bodily strength and health, and in the lessons of self-restraint
and discipline in which its votaries are unconsciously forced
to perfect themselves. Indeed, in a college at Oxford or
Cambridge rowing does for those who practise it nearly
everything that the rules of the authorities propose to do.
It makes them live a regular and simple life ; it gets them
out of bed early in the morning, and sends them to bed again
at ten at night ; it disciplines them, it keeps them healthy,
for it makes temperance necessary, and, being essentially a
2 THE COMPLETE OARSMAN
cheap exercise, it withholds them from extravagance and all
this it does not under the stimulus of penalties framed by the
dons, but on a system established and controlled by the very
men who submit themselves to it. If I could only add that
it forced a man to his books and necessarily made him a
brilliant subject for examiners, I should have compiled a fairly
complete list of academic virtues. I must content myself
with saying that, since the actual time daily spent upon it is
short, it gives a man plenty of leisure for reading, and that
many men have proved by their subsequent careers that their
brains have taken no injury from the sport which gave them
sound bodies.
Outside the Universities it cannot be said that rowing, by
which I mean skilled rowing in racing boats, is a popular
sport in the sense in which cricket and football and even
golf are popular. Rowing has never to my knowledge been
responsible for such extras of the halfpenny evening papers
as are sold by thousands in London during the cricket and
football seasons. Every schoolboy plays cricket and football ;
only a few schools have in their neighbourhood rivers on
which rowing is possible. Moreover and this is, perhaps,
the chief reason why oarsmen are few in comparison to those
who play ball games the science of oarsmanship is a highly
technical business, and the learning of it bristles with diffi-
culties. It involves a complicated series of movements which
have to be performed not merely with accuracy, but with an
accuracy based upon that of others and depending for its due
effect upon the harmony that is attained at every recurring
stroke with the rest of the men who compose a crew. In
other words, a man who rows in a crew cannot hope to gain
applause by individualising himself. The cricketer may make
his brilliant strokes in his own way, and run up his special
century ; the footballer may tackle or kick or pass in his own
particular celebrated style ; the golfer may earn praise for his
driving or his putting ; but the oarsman who does his work
in a crew must be content to subordinate his individuality, to
lose even his name and to be converted into a number, and,
HISTORY OF BOAT-RACING 8
while working his utmost, to look for fame, not so much to
any striking eminence of his own, as to the reflected glory
that comes to him as one member of a successful crew. And
in order to reach such a standard of knowledge and dexterity
as will enable him to compete in a racing boat, he must
go through long and weary preliminary stages of drill and
instruction, while his fellows who play ball games are enjoying
themselves in fields of comparatively unrestricted freedom.
It has come about, therefore, that rowing, though at Oxford
and Cambridge it still maintains its ancient pre-eminence
among the outdoor sports suitable to healthy and vigorous
youth, is not a "popular" exercise. I must not, however,
omit to mention one great advantage conferred upon rowing
by this lack of " popularity." Of all our great sports none is,
I think, so completely free from the sordid taint of profes-
sionalism and money-making. Its amateur standard is high,
and there is no difficulty in maintaining it.
Like most other British institutions, the sport of rowing
has had a hap-hazard development. It did not spring fully
equipped with rules, and an organisation from the head of
some river-god ; it grew slowly from insignificant origins, and
fitted itself as it went along with all that was required for its
immediate purposes. Its birth is not exactly " wrapped up in
a mistry," but it is difficult to indicate with any accuracy the
date when it ceased to be merely an uncompetitive pastime,
and was converted into something like the sport that we now
possess. For a full account of the history of boat-racing at
Oxford I cannot do better than refer my readers to the
Rev. W. E. Sherwood's excellent book on " Oxford Rowing "
(Henry Frowde, 1900). I may briefly summarise the results
of his investigations. Long before races were thought of
there was plenty of boating at Oxford. The earliest record
(and this is not official) of college rowing on the Isis takes us
back to 1815, by which time, it may be supposed, college
boat clubs must have been in existence. In those days the
boats very broad craft in which the oarsmen sat, with a
gangway down the centre of the boat were penned together
4 THE COMPLETE OARSMAN
in Iffley Lock. They scrambled out as best they might.
The stroke of the head-boat stood on the gangway, shoved
his ship out with a boat-hook, and then, running along the
gang-plank, dropped into his seat and began to row. The
other boats followed in order, and so they raced away to Folly
Bridge. This system continued until 1825, when a change
was made, and the boats started, as now, above the lock, but
only fifty feet apart. From this year on there exist charts
of the races and a list of head-boats ; but it is not until
1831 that we have an official record in the Treasurer's book
of the Exeter College Boat Club. The Oxford University
Boat Club was formed in 1839, ten years after an Oxford
crew how selected it is impossible to say had raced and
beaten a Cambridge crew at Henley.
With regard to Cambridge we may also, I think, assume
that organised racing was preceded by many years of casual
boating. Mr. Sherwood states (p. 5) that "they started in
1826 with but two eights, Lady Margaret and Trinity." It
is true that there are no records earlier than this year indeed
the earliest chart that I have been able to discover is that of
1827, hanging in the captain's room at the First Trinity
boathouse. This bears the names of six boats a ten-oar
and an eight-oar from Trinity, an eight-oar from St. John's,
and six-oars from Jesus, Caius, and Trinity (Westminster).
It is not, however, unreasonable to believe that some kind
of college racing, unrecorded, just as the earliest racing at
Oxford was, must have been in existence before this. These
were not the regular bumping races that we now have, but
were brought about in a very casual manner. Dean Merivale,
who had rowed No. 4 in the first Cambridge crew against
Oxford in 1829, in his speech at the University Boat-race
Commemoration Dinner of 1881, gave his recollections of the
early days. " Boating and boat-racing," he said, " were then
but as a thing of yesterday with us. In the summer of 1826,
just before I came into residence, there were only two eight-
oars on our water, a Trinity boat and a Johnian, and the only
idea of encounter they had was that each should go, as it were
HISTORY OF BOAT-RACING 5
casually, down stream and lie in wait, one of them, I believe,
sounding a bugle to intimate its whereabouts, when the other
coming up would give chase with as much animation as might
be expected when there were no patrons of the sport or
spectators of the race. In the year 1827 this flotilla was
increased by the accession of a Trinity ten-oar, a stately
vessel which had been already known at Eton as the Britannia,
and of two or three six-oars from other colleges, and then the
regular racing began, to be continued ever after. In the
third year, 1828, most of the colleges manned their eights,
and we warmed to our work. Rapit ardor eundi. In 1829 we
aspired to compete with Oxford."
The earliest college book I have seen is one belonging to
the First Trinity Boat Club. At one end of it are inscribed
" The Laws of the Monarch Boat Club/' with a list of members
from 1826 to 1829. At the other end is a list of members
of the Trinity Boat Club, with minutes of meetings and
descriptions of races, from 1829 to 1834. The earlier boat
club was by its laws limited to members of Trinity College,
and I am entitled to assume that from it the First Trinity Boat
Club originated. The first minute-book of the Cambridge
University Boat Club bears date 1828, eleven years anterior
to the foundation of the Oxford Club. By that year, therefore,
the college boat clubs must have become sufficiently important
to require the establishment of a University club which should
combine them all for the purpose of regulating their races
with one another. It was the University Boat Club Committee
which, at a meeting held on February 20, 1829, first proposed
a race against Oxford ; and it was at a general meeting of the
club on March 12 of the same year that the terms of the
challenge which was to be sent to Oxford, and posted in Mr.
Stephen Davis's barge, were decided on. Whatever may have
been the character of the earliest boat-racing at Cambridge, I
believe that from 1827, at any rate, it was carried on in much
the same way as at present. Differences, of course, there
were. It appears that about nine races were rowed in the
course of one month of the term on certain days which had
6 THE COMPLETE OARSMAN
been previously fixed. The course, too, was different. Crews
started from the Chesterton Locks, which were situated a
little below the place where we now have Charon's Ferry.
They did not begin racing] until they had passed a bumping-
post fixed a little above the corner where the big horse-grind
plies, and they continued on until they finished at the Jesus
Locks, which then stood where the Caius boathouse now
stands. When the Chesterton Locks were abolished in 1837,
in spite of the strenuous opposition of rowing men, the present
course from Baitsbite was adopted for the races.
If we now turn to the tideway of the Thames, and make
our investigations there, I fear they will not carry us any
further back beyond the point we have already reached at
Oxford. We know, indeed, that for nearly two hundred
years the jolly young watermen have been sculling their
races, for Mr. Thomas Doggett, who is described as a famous
comedian, in 1715 gave a livery and a badge to be raced for
by these gentlemen. The race for Doggett's coat and badge
is still an annual event, and from 1716 onwards the names of
the winners are on record. With regard to amateurs, we
may assume, too, as we have already assumed in the case of
Oxford and Cambridge, that they must have been organised
into clubs and have rowed races against one another for some
years though not, perhaps, for very many before the actual
records begin. In the early years of the last century the
minds of men were occupied with sterner things than boat-
clubs and boat-races. After the battle of Waterloo they
began to have more leisure.
The oldest existing society devoted to aquatics is the
Leander Club. Strange, however, as it may appear, there is
no record of the foundation of this great rowing club, and the
exact date of that event must for ever remain unknown.
No club-books relating to that early period are in the posses-
sion of the secretary, and, though endeavours were made from
time to time to tap the memory of veterans, they were
uniformly unsuccessful, except in so far as they tended to
establish, as an approximate date, some year in the period
HISTORY OF BOAT-RACING 7
between 1815 and 1820. Let me put together as briefly as
possible all the available evidence bearing on this point.
Some fifty years ago silver challenge cups for a pair-
oared race and a sculling race were presented to the club by
Mr. C. Goolden and Mr. (afterwards Sir Patrick) Colquhoun,
the donor of the sculling prize that still bears his name at
Cambridge. On these cups are engraved the arms of the
club, on which are quartered a star and an arrow. Now, it is
confidently believed, and tradition has always declared, that
there existed early in the century two clubs of repute, named
"The Star" and "The Arrow," and it has been inferred that
the Leander Club arose from the ashes of these two, or
embodied their members when it was established. Mr. H.
T. Steward, the President of Leander, tells me, however, that
he himself (and on matters of rowing history he is un-
questionably the greatest living authority) has never been able
to prove this inference, and that he could never get either Sir
Patrick or Mr. Goolden, though he often questioned them, to
state what was their authority for the coat of arms. From
this it might appear possible, therefore, that the two clubs,
" The Star " and " The Arrow," never had any real existence,
but were invented by some mythopoeic Leander man in
order to give substance to his account of Leander' s origin.
I am assured, however, by Mr. H. T. Steward, who had the
statement from his father, that two clubs of these names did
actually exist early in the last century.
Let us come to something more solid. It is quite certain
that at the time when rowing began to be an important
matter at the Universities Leander had already become
prominent. In 1828 a Leander eight beat a Christ Church,
Oxford, eight in a match for ^200 from Westminster to
Putney, and in 1831 an eight of the same club defeated
Oxford in a match for 200 a side from Hambledon Lock
to Henley Bridge. In 1837, Cambridge, having failed to
arrange a race with Oxford, challenged Leander, and beat
them in a race from Westminster to Putney. In the account